Outside my window

[ArMaP]

Obvious alien architecture.  The greys with a hint of reptoid no doubt.

In any specific place?

[Lunarstation]

In any specific place?

All overit.

If you cant see anything do not worry.  I have been doing this for a very long time so I have trained my eyes so I now know what I am looking at.  Telescopic doo dah whatsits are all over the place I could not even begin to imagine what any of it is but there are lots of telescopicly extended pipe type structures and other strange anomalies.  I will try and break down some of the images but I must admit I'm surprised you are at the level you hold on this forum but you give off the vibe you cant see anything.  No big deal I'm happy to be here showing people that I have found some interesting photos which show things I would not expect to see because they do not occur in nature and prove that we are being lied to.  There are a lot of disinfo agents around pedling pictures of rocks and calling it aliens.  A lot of the researchers you see on TV are censored so they plant the tinyest of seeds.  NASA are government stooges so they will never release anything because the vested interests of the military weaponising space etc.  We will never set foot on the moon again.

[ArMaP]

All overit.

OK, some specific cases would help.

If you cant see anything do not worry.

I'm not worried, I have been looking at photos of the Moon and Mars for the last 14 years and I only saw a few unusual things.

I have been doing this for a very long time so I have trained my eyes so I now know what I am looking at.

That may be a problem.

I will try and break down some of the images but I must admit I'm surprised you are at the level you hold on this forum but you give off the vibe you cant see anything.

That would be good. And you shouldn't be surprised, each person has their own way of seeing things that are not completely obvious, both by nature and by training.

[Lunarstation]

It's a lot of work for a zero return 

[Ellirium113]

What I might be seeing on my 28" 4K monitor might not be the same as what someone looking at it on a 17" monitor or a laptop screen. Also might look different on someone else's 50" plasma tv. Specifics are a good thing.

[ArMaP]

It's a lot of work for a zero return 

Then why do you post?

[Lunarstation]

I like sticking itvto ghe man lol....

[ArMaP]

I like sticking itvto ghe man lol....

Posting photos that nobody understands hardly do that...

[Lunarstation]

Posting photos that nobody understands hardly do that...

The structures are way beyond our understanding for sure.  I dont think it is important to know what they are.  The importance lies in recognising that they are there and the history we've been sold is all built on a deception.

There are anomalies on the moon, NASA have been keeping it a secret.  That is the story.

https://flic.kr/p/WLXxvA

This is the biggest secret in the history of mankind why is it being hidden?

[ArMaP]

The structures are way beyond our understanding for sure.

What structures?

I dont think it is important to know what they are.

That's the most important part, knowing if they are natural, artificial or just misinterpretation.

There are anomalies on the moon, NASA have been keeping it a secret.  That is the story.

That's the problem, it's only a story if you don't show proof of what you say.

[Lunarstation]

What structures?
That's the most important part, knowing if they are natural, artificial or just misinterpretation.
That's the problem, it's only a story if you don't show proof of what you say.

How do you look at an image? Try zooming to compare the back of the moon images I posted with the fake LROC ones.
You wont do that because you'll say it is JPEG artefacts :p

Look at how LROC shows craters filled in and no structures at any level.  Zoom in, can you see any perfect circles or 90 degree lines.  Are there anythings resembling pipes or boxes or sqare openings.  Are there any humanoid head structures etc.  Does it look like the  dead barren landscape that old hack Buzz Aldrin keeps banging on about., Wondered why he kept going on about Mars, to deflect attention away from the moon. 

How comes the pictures they post of the lunar landing sites are worse quality than from Apollo itself?

How long have you been working for them ?

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mare_Crisium_4191_h3.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

https://flic.kr/p/Vz34qW


https://flic.kr/p/Vz2uwj

https://flic.kr/p/WA9cs9


This looks like what you'd expect to see on the surface of the moon ?
https://flic.kr/p/WDtY7H

[ArMaP]

How do you look at an image?

With the right tool, my eyes.

Try zooming to compare the back of the moon images I posted with the fake LROC ones.

That's one problem, you start by stating that LROC images are fake. Why are they fake? Can you prove they are fake or it's just your opinion?

You wont do that because you'll say it is JPEG artefacts :p

I will look if you give me an example, I'm not going to choose a few photos from the thousands available without knowing what you want me to look at.

Look at how LROC shows craters filled in and no structures at any level.

Craters filled in? An example, please.

Zoom in, can you see any perfect circles or 90 degree lines.  Are there anythings resembling pipes or boxes or sqare openings.  Are there any humanoid head structures etc.  Does it look like the  dead barren landscape that old hack Buzz Aldrin keeps banging on about., Wondered why he kept going on about Mars, to deflect attention away from the moon. 

Sorry, I don't understand which of those are questions (if any) and which aren't. Could you be more specific?

How comes the pictures they post of the lunar landing sites are worse quality than from Apollo itself?

What pictures? LROC pictures compared with Apollo pictures? It's hard to know what you're talking about if you don't say more.

How long have you been working for them ?

Never, I work for a Portuguese software company, have been looking at Moon photos for the last 14 years and have been involved in digital imagery for around 30 years.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mare_Crisium_4191_h3.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

https://flic.kr/p/Vz34qW


https://flic.kr/p/Vz2uwj

https://flic.kr/p/WA9cs9

You talk about LROC photos and post photos from Apollo 16 and Lunar Orbiter 4? I don't understand it, just posting images meanings nothing, I don't understand what you want me to do, if anything.

This looks like what you'd expect to see on the surface of the moon ?
https://flic.kr/p/WDtY7H

That highly altered image, making it useless? No.

[Lunarstation]

Only contrast and brightness change does not make billions of years old alien artefacts materialise?
https://www.flickr.com/gp/150974590@N04/DVdPV7

Uncovring that which does not want to be uncovered is not easy.

https://www.flickr.com/gp/150974590@N04/DVdPV7

This video might help.

[Lunarstation]

Lroc lo4 same sort of fakes anyway.

The aliens are so powerful they even frightened the Ruskies off of the moon.  I know what  my eyes see and I am stiking with it so does every one else I know youd have to be a mental case to deny it.  Any way time to move on. 

It's all swamp gas and wether ballons.  Crash test dummies and want to believery.

Nothing to see here.

As you weren't

[The Seeker]

Obviously you cannot see past your passion 

The Living Moon website and a good part of Pegasus is devoted to Lunar Anomalies, hence the name "Living Moon" and has roughly 10 years worth of research, several thousand web pages, devoted to the moon, Apollo, et al

perhaps you would be better served in your research if you took time to read a bit

Seeker