Machine Parts? - AS16-116-18603Quote from: Pimander on August 01, 2012, 04:29:55 AM
I can see why I wasn't selected for photo intel lol. I can barely see the words rocket and trailer.
That was my point :D At least you don't keep telling me that all that is there is blurry rocks :P
So how about this one? Its not in Allan's set but one of ArMaP's favorite
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon9/AS16_116_18603/AS16-116-18603HR_sm.jpg) (http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/AS16-116-18603HR.jpg)
AS16-116-18603HR click for full size NASA originalAs for 'enhancements' I usually show the simple crop of the area of interest enlarged then add some color for comparison, but when you have the original you can make your own clips
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon9/AS16_116_18603/Gears001a.png)
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon9/AS16_116_18603/Gears001b.png)
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon9/AS16_116_18603/Gears001c.png)
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon9/AS16_116_18603/Gears001label.png)
Now I can see those parts clearly... and my experience in geology tells me that ain't no rock :P
I have found odd bits and pieces in many moon images that indicate pieces of non natural debris strewn around.
Problem is now NASA is smashing spacecrafts all over Mars and the Moon so its going to be hard to tell the old stuff from our litter :P
The other thing that REALLY bothers me about these pictures is the LIGHTING, not to mention the goop on the lens and the really surreal horizon :D
here is the next image in the role... same odd lighting
(http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/AS16-116-18604HR.jpg) (http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/AS16-116-18604HR.jpg)
Quote from: zorgon on August 01, 2012, 07:47:55 PM
The other thing that REALLY bothers me about these pictures is the LIGHTING, not to mention the goop on the lens and the really surreal horizon :D
What's the problem with the light?
Quote from: ArMaP on August 02, 2012, 08:56:13 AM
What's the problem with the light?
Atmospheric Scatter :P
And I think I will prepare for that thread on the hills :D
This is one of my favourites too. 8)
If we could find any high resolution pictures of the area taken by LRO or Clementine that would be a big bonus. Hint hint. :D
Quote from: zorgon on August 02, 2012, 09:48:57 AM
Atmospheric Scatter :P
What, is the grey colour above the ground likely to indicate a gaseous atmosphere?
Does that make the halo around my avatar atmospheric scatter? :P
Quote from: zorgon on August 01, 2012, 07:47:55 PM
The other thing that REALLY bothers me about these pictures is the LIGHTING, not to mention the goop on the lens and the really surreal horizon :D
here is the next image in the role... same odd lighting
(http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/AS16-116-18604HR.jpg) (http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/AS16-116-18604HR.jpg)
There's a whole lot of stuff in that pics that looks manufactured.
(http://i1254.photobucket.com/albums/hh605/subatomic_dude/AS16-3.jpg)
I even see something that looks like a cone head skull. And the big block that is obscured by the smear has some interesting features too.
Now that this thread is called Machine parts...has anyone besides me given it any thought that the apparent ring and pinion gears could be part of one of John Searl's lost flying generators, or from some sort of device left there by another country's secret moon mission?
Personally, I dont think alien technology would use ring and pinion gears, unless they are flying 57 chevy spaceships.
Also, the drum shape of the larger part appears to be more hollow, resembling a core drill.
If I had to lay my money down, and with that bet assume that these images arent faked, then my best and final decision would be that they are discarded mining equipment, like some sort of core drill and drive gears, left there after they broke free from their housing.
Ive never really posted much about these anomalous finds, so forgive me if it sounds a bit far fetched...its just what I see.
Cheers!
Dave
I like your idea of discarded mining parts that seems logical to as I think there is mining all over the moon.
57 chevy ring and pinion gears from ET craft now that's funny ;D
personally I like 59's bubble tops myself...... love the cat eye tail lights. ;D
Hoss58
Quote from: hoss58 on August 02, 2012, 04:33:09 PM
I like your idea of discarded mining parts that seems logical to as I think there is mining all over the moon.
57 chevy ring and pinion gears from ET craft now that's funny ;D
personally I like 59's bubble tops myself...... love the cat eye tail lights. ;D
Hoss58
Gotta agree with ya there, Hoss! I loved the horizontal fins and those cool taillights too!
Heck, aliens would probably drive a 59 as well, they have class!
Yes, though, mining parts is probably right on...sloppy engineers!
Cheers!
Quote from: zorgon on August 02, 2012, 09:48:57 AM
Atmospheric Scatter :P
It looks more like the sunlight entering the camera.
Quote from: Pimander on August 02, 2012, 01:18:09 PM
This is one of my favourites too. 8)
If we could find any high resolution pictures of the area taken by LRO or Clementine that would be a big bonus. Hint hint. :D
Here you go. :)
(click for full size)
(http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/uploads/M175179080LR_thumb.png) (http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/uploads/M175179080LR_thumb.png)
That large rock in the middle of the photo (AS16-116-18603) is "House Rock", a large (25 metres long) rock, so those "machine parts" must be very large also.
Brilliant. Thanks ArMaP.
With my fist look at the overhead shot, I don't see anything that indicates "mining operation" to me. Anyone else see anything?
Does anyone think the machine parts are due to image tampering. I'm not suggesting I know anything, but surely we should ask that question too as we are always accusing NASA of tampering. :)
Quote from: COSMO on August 02, 2012, 02:40:00 PM
There's a whole lot of stuff in that pics that looks manufactured.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. What makes "stuff" look manufactured? Do you mean the rocks look machined?
Quote from: COSMO on August 02, 2012, 02:40:00 PM
I even see something that looks like a cone head skull. And the big block that is obscured by the smear has some interesting features too.
Where is the skull?
After studying the photos, it looks like discarded parts, possibly an engine with some landing gear...But hey it could be anything.
Quote from: Littleenki on August 02, 2012, 03:28:41 PM
Personally, I dont think alien technology would use ring and pinion gears, unless they are flying 57 chevy spaceships.
Hmmm that would explain THIS image that NASA used in a scientific presentation
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Toons/NASA_Fossils_02.png)
The Garvin Trilobite(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Mars4/Fossils/Humphrey/Clip02.png)
The Garvin Artifact
NASA's Chief Scientist Reveals Artifact in Rover Images (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Mars4/Fossils/Clip01.png)
Story is here
NASA Evidence From Mars (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Mars_Images_23.html)
Hey, that's my bluetooth headset :o
I wonder where it had gotten to.......
Quote from: zorgon on August 05, 2012, 09:26:45 PM
Hmmm that would explain THIS image that NASA used in a scientific presentation
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Toons/NASA_Fossils_02.png)
The Garvin Trilobite
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Mars4/Fossils/Humphrey/Clip02.png)
The Garvin Artifact
NASA's Chief Scientist Reveals Artifact in Rover Images
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Mars4/Fossils/Clip01.png)
Story is here
NASA Evidence From Mars (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Mars_Images_23.html)
Aha, Zorgon, so it isnt a 57 chevy, its a 63 econoline truck..LOL!
Luke, you need a new bluetooth, too, that ones a bit bulky!:D
Le
Yeah, i made it myself LOL ???
Here is a pic of the 'star' in the backround, which i think may be a photoshopped anomaly in the 'wall' of the 'collapsed dome' they are standing in..... you will have to scroll right to see it
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/images/ODD/as17-136-20769-br-enl.jpg)
Zoom & enhance...
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/images/ODD/as17-136-20769-br-enl2.jpg)
Full zoom...
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/images/ODD/blob3p.PNG)
Bad paint job or what??
Still think it's a 'star' (while no other stars ever show in Nasa pics??)
Bloody links, wait 1...there, that's better :-[
Quote from: PLAYSWITHMACHINES on August 07, 2012, 09:05:10 PM
Here is a pic of the 'star' in the backround, which i think may be a photoshopped anomaly in the 'wall' of the 'collapsed dome' they are standing in..... you will have to scroll right to see it
I could try to find a better version of that photo, if I know it's ID. :)
Here it is;
as17-136-20769
Sorry, my PC has downgraded the image to Windoze Paint quality ;)
A better Version of that picture here: AS17-136-2079: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20767HR.jpg (http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20767HR.jpg)
(http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20767HR.jpg)
Wrong picture: Here is the correct one: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20769HR.jpg (http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20769HR.jpg)
(http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20769HR.jpg)
You can find them all here: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/ (http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/)
Hmm, anyone have an idea on the scale of this object?
(http://www.floridafusion.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/moon1.jpg)
Le
Ooparts all over the place, just like i said :)
If those are footprints in front of the object, then it must be pretty small, about the size of a 9v battery?
Maybe it IS a 9v battery ::)