Hello,
Project Space Jumper is an ongoing investigation into extraterrestrial phenomena just outside our atmosphere.
Have you ever wondered what these weird flashes of light are? They are visible in many of NASA TV live transmissions and they are a very colorful display, almost like fireworks. Many people believe that these flashes are cosmic rays. That is very interesting as cosmic rays are invisible. In order to make cosmic rays visible you need super sensitive equipment or have to use a so-called spark chamber. Just google for a detailed explanation. What about CCD cameras? Sure cosmic rays can affect CCD cameras but cosmic rays are only visible as a bright or dark spot or streak and they are not colorful.
So what are they and does NASA know what these flashes are?
I believe they do and that there is a fundamental coincendence between these flashes of light and recent developments and innovations in new and more advanced rocket propulsion systems.
Below you see three examples of what NASA calls "cosmic rays".
As you can see there is a system like an ignitor and we can even see the flash.
Now, I am looking for people interested in investigating this together. Bundle our knowledge, try to explain what we see, find samples, basically build my theory that we are dealing with a lifeform.
As they leap through space, I call them Spacejumpers.
Anyone interested?
(http://s3d1.turboimagehost.com/t1/17609184_9581604.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17609184/9581604.jpg.html) (http://s3d1.turboimagehost.com/t1/17609185_9115732.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17609185/9115732.jpg.html) (http://s3d1.turboimagehost.com/t1/17609186_7421692.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17609186/7421692.jpg.html)
Made you curious?
Greetz,
Sander
Hello Sander, great opening post my freind :)
This may surprise you, but we are somewhat aware of this phenomenon,
we calls them Critters! (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?board=84.0)
Enjoy!
(This is your thread, so go with it where you will ;) )
-PWM-
Hey Sander
What PWM said :)
I am sure you will find a lot of help on this topic
Bless
Back
Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on January 27, 2014, 09:26:04 PM
This may surprise you, but we are somewhat aware of this phenomenon,
we calls them Critters! (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?board=84.0)
I don't, I think those are different things. :)
Yes they are totally different. They look like machines. Here is one "Top view". The inner part looks like a blue print .
(http://s3d1.turboimagehost.com/t1/17609786_Project_Spacejumper_Top_View_flat.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17609786/Project_Spacejumper_Top_View_flat.jpg.html).
Yes they are transparant.
Regards,
Sander
Aah, cigar shaped ufo's?
Maybe we should find some hi-res originals for deuem to process.....
Definitely not critters, then?
:D
ETA; looking closely at that picture, i see a highly organised geometric structure like that of a 'modern' spaceship or interplanetry transport.
How was the image processed, if i may?
Super resolution technology, 3d imager, forensic apps for sharpening edges and details, scientific micro contrast enhancement, etcetera.
Quote from: 1967sander on January 27, 2014, 11:56:19 PM
Super resolution technology, 3d imager, forensic apps for sharpening edges and details, scientific micro contrast enhancement, etcetera.
That sounds like too many things, are you sure the image got better?
absolutely.
8)
I will give you all full
access to my research. As I said I work totally unconventional.
Very impressed with the pictures so far....
Carry on, that man 8) ???
Armap; Don't expect to understand us all at once, ;)
Quote from: 1967sander on January 28, 2014, 12:28:46 AM
absolutely.
8)
I will give you all full
access to my research. As I said I work totally unconventional.
Thanks, the more tools we have the better. :)
Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on January 28, 2014, 12:58:10 AM
Armap; Don't expect to understand us all at once, ;)
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that. :(
Quote from: 1967sander on January 27, 2014, 09:03:48 PM
Anyone interested?
(http://s3d1.turboimagehost.com/t1/17609184_9581604.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17609184/9581604.jpg.html) (http://s3d1.turboimagehost.com/t1/17609185_9115732.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17609185/9115732.jpg.html) (http://s3d1.turboimagehost.com/t1/17609186_7421692.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17609186/7421692.jpg.html)
Made you curious?
Greetz,
Sander
Nope, but thanks anyway, pretty colors though. :)
Welcome new member.
Looks kinda like a pulse plasma rocket.any idea of speed?
The fully detailed images reveal what I believe to be plasma detonation propulsion technology.
Speed? No, indications. You can see them only once and that is the exact moment they iginite.
I was so very lucky to capture two of the same "species or types". One top view and the other
sideways. When you compare both, you see the same internal flash at the exact same locations.
Here is the preview of my work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e0XO-rdWwU
Sorry for being sceptical, but I don't see how anyone can seriously go from one image to the other. ???
And I think it looks more like a moray eel. :)
(http://i1198.photobucket.com/albums/aa458/deuem/17609184_9581604dt.jpg) (http://s1198.photobucket.com/user/deuem/media/17609184_9581604dt.jpg.html)
(http://i1198.photobucket.com/albums/aa458/deuem/17609185_9115732dt.jpg) (http://s1198.photobucket.com/user/deuem/media/17609185_9115732dt.jpg.html)
Deuem
There are many plans for fusion powered craft, going back to the 60's ;)
Here's a 'peggyleak' for you;
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/images/ODD/prop3.JPG)
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/images/ODD/prop4.JPG)
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/images/ODD/prop5.JPG)
Looks kind of familiar... ;)
But why would it be (or seem to be) transparent?.
I think there are several options, (1) it's made of titanium reinforced glass because there's tons of silicon & titanium out there, and it's 10 times stronger than steel.
(2) what we are seeing is a translucent effect from the intense field around the craft, we know that a strong field resonating at the correct frequency gives rise to optical effects (cloaking device?)
(3) It's some kind of E.T. tech we haven't seen yet.
(4) It's a space-going Moray Eel :P
Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on January 28, 2014, 03:12:50 PM
(1) it's made of titanium reinforced glass because there's tons of silicon & titanium out there, and it's 10 times stronger than steel.
(2) what we are seeing is a translucent effect from the intense field around the craft, we know that a strong field resonating at the correct frequency gives rise to optical effects (cloaking device?)
(3) It's some kind of E.T. tech we haven't seen yet.
(4) It's a space-going Moray Eel :P
I would add a
(5) It's a result of the way the image was created.
Or it is something real which you do not comprehend as you still think too much that every anomaly might be an image artifact.
Quote from: 1967sander on January 28, 2014, 11:40:27 PM
Or it is something real which you do not comprehend as you still think too much that every anomaly might be an image artifact.
That's because I have worked with digital images for many years and I am used to see image artefacts and because you haven't shown where did you get the original image.
For example, the fact that the image looks broken in equally sized pieces makes me think that this may have come from a video. Different sources result in different images, as a photo is "frozen" in time (even if blurred) but a video may give you several images from different points in time and space that, when joined, look like the ones you posted.
So, could you start by telling us where did you get those images? :)
PS: you don't know what I comprehend or not, don't try to guess.
Quote from: 1967sander on January 28, 2014, 12:28:46 AM
absolutely.
8)
I will give you all full
access to my research. As I said I work totally unconventional.
QuoteNow, I am looking for people interested in investigating this together. Bundle our knowledge, try to explain what we see, find samples, basically build my theory that we are dealing with a lifeform.
Waiting for more clues on where your originals came from. Playing this game with the internet in China is not fun. What ever you posted so far seems to be very flat. A 2d object that is not glowing from its own power source but another one. Shall we play the game or can you fill us in a bit more.
If you quote NASA as the originator, then please post a link so we can search it on our own. Finding Waldo in a sea of NASA photos is not an easy game to play. I have many things to do and time is moving on for us.
This object so far looks very flat and is reflecting a light or glowing in a light. I do not see it producing its own light or any rings. It is like a piece of refective tape in a black light enviroment. And with nothing else to go on what else am I going to say? Oh, it is not 100% transparent.
Waiting, Deuem
There are NO url. These are not NASA photos but my own research into Martyn Stubbs 3rd phenomena. I have continued his research. The original still frames come from HD NASA TV and they have been optimized with super resolution technology.
Here is the whole story:
part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJacu0Rxc9I
part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xsue1uuXtFM
part 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4ppSHsnDv4
3 Video on UT, thanks, UT is blocked for me. Will need to get them and get back to this thread.
I hope in the videos that there is a section of the NASA HD you are talking about.
Please explain in your own words what super resolution technology. Is this you or NASA?
Deuem
This thread gives me a weird feeling.
Quote from: deuem on January 29, 2014, 07:12:11 AM
3 Video on UT, thanks, UT is blocked for me. Will need to get them and get back to this thread.
Here are the links for those 3 videos, along with link for the download.
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJacu0Rxc9I
http://ssyoutube.com/watch?v=yJacu0Rxc9I
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xsue1uuXtFM
http://ssyoutube.com/watch?v=Xsue1uuXtFM
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4ppSHsnDv4
http://ssyoutube.com/watch?v=D4ppSHsnDv4
Quote from: 1967sander on January 29, 2014, 06:26:02 AM
part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJacu0Rxc9I
I only had time to see the first 5 minutes of Part 1, but it was enough to see some things that I think I should point.
1 - The fact that the object changes size from frame to frame may be a result of a conversion from an alternate field video (I think that's how it's called, like on a TV screen, when the odd lines are sent first, then the even lines) to a full frame video like Flash video or other common computer formats.
2 - The "cork-screw" look is natural if you zoom until you see the individual pixels, as that's the only way of drawing a diagonal line with pixels without any interpolation or if you sharpen the image (sharpen removes partially the blurring effect of the interpolation).
I will see the rest when I get home at the end of the day. :)
Before I sink any teeth into this Sander, I think you should take a step back and produce some standards on what is going on. Do some known objects. To start out with a Space Jumper is a home run and we seem to need a few walks and 1st base hits.
I can only suggest this to you and I hope you can take the time to provide some back ground for the ones that don't know what you are doing yet. Including myself. If you wish to take a minute and breeze through the first few pages of my standards thread you will see what I mean. It is first, in Deuems area.
Many of us here work in the pixel world and I am not sure how you are achiving such results out of the given RGB pixels. Many of us enjoy the fact of another processor joining the group but are a little worried of results based on others attempting to do so. The once bitten twice shy rule. I am hoping you will shine and teach us somethings along the way.
Deuem
Okay is not exactly what I expected but I will take a huge step back.
Perhaps it is indeed better to start with something less unknown. The super resolution technology is mine and not NASA's. The NASA HD channel is a direct link to ESA, which I monitor 24/7. ALL spacewalks are streamed live and I record them. Also ESA uploads all EVA in full as well as HD video of other missions. That is my source.
I will try to show some less revealing material and explain exactly what I did. I know that some you are experts in the pixel world and no one has to tell me that software creates artifacts. I also know that some strange anomalies are not the result of pixel behaviour and I will, when the forum is ready, show these.
My background is: Radar, chemistry, informatics, heavy industry, mining, medical (brain disorders), law enforcement technology (image forensics), heavy industry.
Dont freak out 1967.we love heated debates.stand your ground for now.deuem is a determined fellow.the truth will come out.lol.and thankyou for the hard work.your among friends.
Well I'm interested in this thread and Robo is right there are a lot of times when subjects in threads can get a bit heated but thats a part of investigating a subject :)
Well done on the hard work. I'm also looking over your other thread about Mosting Crater 8)
Quote from: Elvis Hendrix on January 29, 2014, 01:19:55 PM
Why?
As has since been pointed out, the OP's lacking basic info and details from the start..
I feel weird when when I can predict the joutcome of a discussion....
Bar humbug.
Quote from: 1967sander on January 29, 2014, 06:06:38 PM
Okay is not exactly what I expected but I will take a huge step back.
Expect the unexpected. ;)
QuotePerhaps it is indeed better to start with something less unknown.
Known or unknown doesn't matter, as long as you explain how you did it and what you used.
QuoteThe super resolution technology is mine and not NASA's.
I supposed that, although yours, it works in the same way as other super resolution methods, using several images to try to create a new one with higher resolution.
QuoteThe NASA HD channel is a direct link to ESA, which I monitor 24/7.
Thanks for that information, I din't know that ESA transmits the NASA channel with the spacewalks. :)
QuoteI also know that some strange anomalies are not the result of pixel behaviour and I will, when the forum is ready, show these.
I can wait. :)
QuoteMy background is: Radar, chemistry, informatics, heavy industry, mining, medical (brain disorders), law enforcement technology (image forensics), heavy industry.
In this case only the image forensics is relevant, could you be more specific? Thanks in advance. :)
For myself, I am not freaking out. I would like to be shown some known objects and what happens to them. Say an ant to start with. Something that all readers can relate to and work up to the jumpers. You have a nice resume and I hope you can understand why I am asking this. I feel like I started at the end of the book and my stupidity is filling in the missing links. I am very glad that another processor has joind the ranks and wish you well.
Deuem
Quote from: 1967sander on January 29, 2014, 06:06:38 PM
Okay is not exactly what I expected but I will take a huge step back.
DAMN THE SKEPTICS FULL SPEED AHEAD :DIf we had listened to the skeptics way back when we started John's Moon Thread at ATS we would never have created Pegasus
Stick to your guns, state your case and don't worry about the experts :P They all think they know :P but no one is really sure or they would't be here Well almost :D
Take ArMaP for instance... uber skeptic but nice guy... Why is he here? Because we have found at LEAST 4 images that have him stumped :D In fact I am thinking of making a feature thread on that :D
Quote from: zorgon on February 01, 2014, 11:11:15 AM
If we had listened to the skeptics way back when we started John's Moon Thread at ATS we would never have created Pegasus
I think we should listen to everybody but not shape our actions because of what other people say. :)
QuoteTake ArMaP for instance... uber skeptic but nice guy... Why is he here? Because we have found at LEAST 4 images that have him stumped :D
Not just that, one of the reasons I am here (and everywhere I can ;D ) is because I want to know about things (many things), and if we look in just one direction we are most likely to miss the truth. :)
QuoteIn fact I am thinking of making a feature thread on that :D
That's an idea. :)
I have now watched the 4 vids you posted and I like this one. In the side by side comparision it shows a much larger field than shown. Maybe the dirrectional field you're talking about.
It is very difficult to get good clean stills from the video, you place the cursor over the objects all the time. If you can place some more photos with your before and after I would like to take a go at a couple of them to see what I can get.
I like critters.
(http://i1198.photobucket.com/albums/aa458/deuem/Fromyourvideo.jpg) (http://s1198.photobucket.com/user/deuem/media/Fromyourvideo.jpg.html)
Quote from: deuem on February 01, 2014, 02:32:07 PM
I have now watched the 4 vids you posted and I like this one. In the side by side comparision it shows a much larger field than shown. Maybe the dirrectional field you're talking about.
It is very difficult to get good clean stills from the video, you place the cursor over the objects all the time. If you can place some more photos with your before and after I would like to take a go at a couple of them to see what I can get.
I like critters.
(http://i1198.photobucket.com/albums/aa458/deuem/Fromyourvideo.jpg) (http://s1198.photobucket.com/user/deuem/media/Fromyourvideo.jpg.html)
Send me a PM with a mail address and I will send you the videos and a couple of the originals I started with by WEtransfer . Here is the BLUE JUMPER to start with. The Blue Jumper is visible as a blue flash top right corner. The second enhancement increased resolution and micro-contrast - 1 setting only - no other enhancements. Third is a part cut from image 2. The rest made with Lucis Pro. 3 settings resulting in 3 different levels of contrast. Have fun ... and please let some explain how this possible ... because I cannot explain this with artifact, interpolation, pixelshift, or whatever other explanation. This totally impossible but it there.
The big blue "boxes" are amplified Moire lines which resulted color artifacts crated by the software (Lucis) but what is between these boxes is something else. I tried to remove them all with fourier but to no avail.
(http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661431_164_-_xUFO3rd-interior_0_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661431/164_-_xUFO3rd-interior_0_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661434_165_-_xUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661434/165_-_xUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661436_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661436/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661440_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661440/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661443_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661443/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661446_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661446/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661455_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR11111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661455/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR11111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661464_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661464/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111111.jpg.html)
Here is the "trunk". I use other type of software so I guess my results will be different from yours.
(http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663369_073_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663369/073_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663370_074_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663370/074_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663371_075_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663371/075_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663372_076_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663372/076_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663373_077_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663373/077_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663374_078_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663374/078_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663375_078_-_UFO3rd-13.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663375/078_-_UFO3rd-13.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663376_078_-_UFO3rd-16.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663376/078_-_UFO3rd-16.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663377_079_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663377/079_-_UFO3rd-1.jpg.html)(http://s1d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663406_078_-_UFO3rd-163.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663406/078_-_UFO3rd-163.jpg.html)
(http://s1d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663481_078_-_UFO3rd-1531.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663481/078_-_UFO3rd-1531.jpg.html) (http://s1d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663483_078_-_UFO3rd-5211.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663483/078_-_UFO3rd-5211.jpg.html) (http://s1d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663484_078_-_UFO3rd-7345.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663484/078_-_UFO3rd-7345.jpg.html) (http://s1d4.turboimagehost.com/t1/17663485_078_-_UFO3rd65111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17663485/078_-_UFO3rd65111.jpg.html)
I would like to process the original you started with with no changes. Then you can see if anything I do in any way backs up your work or shows us what it might be. I go after the energy patterns that are produced by light. Reflective or internal or both or none. it is my feeling that any object that is alive must use energy to move otherwise it shows dead to me. Alive or Dead are some key words I use.
Reflective light shows up bla and produces smaller rings that seldom grow outside of the size of the object or are all bounced in one direction where as internal light produces rings many times the size of the object like a light bulb. UFOs seem to have over 90 sets of rings and lights in the 30 to 50 range. Heat produces a flame style set of rings. And the Sun produces very large ring sets that can be picked up anywhere the light hits.
Space junk produces nothing unless it is right in the sun and we gat a reflection. Your blue UFO object on the ISS photo prodused a wandering effect, like a smudge of light, while in the circled area I sent to you, there seems to be a UFO hiding in there with a field of 70 to 90 rings. UFOs in space produce less rings because there is no air, so the nobel gasses are not there to be fired up. Everything in space has to take several steps back on the light issue because of the lack of earths gasses.
Yes there seems to be many critters in space, full of them.
Deuem
I am guessing here and need you to fill in some blanks.
It seems to me so far that in your work and mine we are actually going in different directions.
If I process a photo after you are done, all of the energy seems to be removed and left with the skeleton.
That's Ok. Maybe it will help figure out what parts inside the object are producing the energy fields.
Time will tell on that one. The critters need to eat and expend energy like all of us do. Like you mentioned deep sea creatures also show signs of light to see food and others. They need to mate and find ech other at times to reproduce more critters. This would be hard to do if they had no colors or light in space.
Thinking of birds, males have all the colors while females are very plain. Why not with critters. To another female critter it might look very sexy and show good genes. So I would expect some of the same looking critters to be bland and some very colorful for that reason.
deuem
Man this is cool! 8)
Finally someone that exactly thinks as I do. I see space as an ocean. A deepsea full of living creatures, big ones and small ones, that communicate with light in total darkness. The "flash" I have been describing is what I believe to be a sort of pulse detonation engine. The critters as you call them are of bio-mechanical nature and possibly nano-technology. They have volume but hardly any mass. Perhaps the explanation that we can see right into theu innerparts as hull/skin are transparent, allowing us to see the flash. The "fish"or "eel-like" ones, all have the same structure, head, skeleton and the rear part look similar. Perhaps longer or wider but in the end the look the same. I was really lucky to catch this one blue critter in both sideview and topview. Are they intelligent? I do not know. Could be that they simply evolved outside our atmosphere but do not have ability to communicate with other species. On the other hand, what is intelligence? If it means not to destroy the environment you live in, than humans are not intelligent. I am really looking forward to your results.
Have a nice Sunday,
Sander
I agree, I think of space now just like an ocean. with many, probably endless different species.
in every conceivable form. Life will always find a way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DARcIIc4pCw
http://youtu.be/DARcIIc4pCw
Quote from: deuem on February 02, 2014, 05:32:21 AM
Like you mentioned deep sea creatures also show signs of light to see food and others.
Don't forget that many use light as a lure to catch other fishes. :)
Well, it works for hu-mons as well ;D
"oh look, stange lights, let's go take a look"
ZZZzappp!
;D
Quote from: 1967sander on February 01, 2014, 03:43:37 PM
Send me a PM with a mail address and I will send you the videos and a couple of the originals I started with by WEtransfer . Here is the BLUE JUMPER to start with. The Blue Jumper is visible as a blue flash top right corner. The second enhancement increased resolution and micro-contrast - 1 setting only - no other enhancements. Third is a part cut from image 2. The rest made with Lucis Pro. 3 settings resulting in 3 different levels of contrast. Have fun ... and please let some explain how this possible ... because I cannot explain this with artifact, interpolation, pixelshift, or whatever other explanation. This totally impossible but it there.
The big blue "boxes" are amplified Moire lines which resulted color artifacts crated by the software (Lucis) but what is between these boxes is something else. I tried to remove them all with fourier but to no avail.
(http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661431_164_-_xUFO3rd-interior_0_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661431/164_-_xUFO3rd-interior_0_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661434_165_-_xUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661434/165_-_xUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661436_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661436/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661440_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661440/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661443_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661443/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661446_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661446/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661455_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR11111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661455/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR11111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661464_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661464/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111111.jpg.html)
that shape looks very familiar ..
*edit*
ah yes .. mr Walsons
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n1CA5L4hd0
funbox
there are many , dating back to 2008 I think ..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbsFLbuiizE
funbox
Quote from: funbox on July 10, 2016, 02:33:55 PM
there are many , dating back to 2008 I think ..
Way back in the days of ATS... we offered Bernard Walson (and gridkeeper) a spot on pegasus to present his stuff and tell us how he got his results and WHERE to look for these spacecraft ( IE coordinates) He (they) refused.
At that time I got an email from a Boeing IT executive who offered us a telescope that could check and get good photos of these Walson spacecraft...
As proof of his claim he sent this photo along of the ISS
(http://thelivingmoon.com/41pegasus/04images/Lenard/ISS/fiedler01_zoom.jpg)
There is no doubt countless secret and non secret orbiting space craft out there but Walson has no interest in actually explaining himself and is satisfied with making videos of useless blobs for his fickle audience who don't care about reality
So I gave up
This is a small part of what is out there These are older Russian ones
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/04images/Baikonur/big3324.jpe)
Quote from: zorgon on July 10, 2016, 10:51:31 PM
Way back in the days of ATS... we offered Bernard Walson (and gridkeeper) a spot on pegasus to present his stuff and tell us how he got his results and WHERE to look for these spacecraft ( IE coordinates) He (they) refused.
At that time I got an email from a Boeing IT executive who offered us a telescope that could check and get good photos of these Walson spacecraft...
As proof of his claim he sent this photo along of the ISS
(http://thelivingmoon.com/41pegasus/04images/Lenard/ISS/fiedler01_zoom.jpg)
There is no doubt countless secret and non secret orbiting space craft out there but Walson has no interest in actually explaining himself and is satisfied with making videos of useless blobs for his fickle audience who don't care about reality
So I gave up
This is a small part of what is out there These are older Russian ones
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/04images/Baikonur/big3324.jpe)
an interesting comparison nevertheless wouldn't you agree ?
as for Walson's secreative way .. yes odd , hard to reconcile deception , but ..stranger things have happened
did he give a reason of any detail, in why he wouldn't release the co-ords ?
funbox
Quote from: 1967sander on February 01, 2014, 03:43:37 PM
(http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661431_164_-_xUFO3rd-interior_0_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661431/164_-_xUFO3rd-interior_0_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661434_165_-_xUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661434/165_-_xUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661436_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661436/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661440_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661440/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661443_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661443/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661446_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661446/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR1111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661455_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR11111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661455/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR11111.jpg.html) (http://s1d2.turboimagehost.com/t1/17661464_179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111111.jpg) (http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17661464/179_-_zxUFO3rd-interior_1_SHR111111.jpg.html)
The picture looks vaguely familiar
(http://i1371.photobucket.com/albums/ag316/SerpUkhovian/Trieste_zpshnbmanmz.jpg)
Quote from: SerpUkhovian on July 11, 2016, 11:00:57 AM
The picture looks vaguely familiar
(http://i1371.photobucket.com/albums/ag316/SerpUkhovian/Trieste_zpshnbmanmz.jpg)
it would if you was including the large blue moire boxes
the structure lies in white
funbox