Project Spacejumper

[1967sander]

The fully detailed images reveal what I believe to be plasma detonation propulsion technology.
Speed? No, indications. You can see them only once and that is the exact moment they iginite.
I was so very lucky to capture two of the same "species or types". One top view and the other
sideways. When you compare both, you see the same internal flash at the exact same locations.
Here is the preview of my work.

[ArMaP]

Sorry for being sceptical, but I don't see how anyone can seriously go from one image to the other.

And I think it looks more like a moray eel. 

[deuem]

Deuem

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

There are many plans for fusion powered craft, going back to the 60's

Here's a 'peggyleak' for you;







Looks kind of familiar...

But why would it be (or seem to be) transparent?.
I think there are several options, (1) it's made of titanium reinforced glass because there's tons of silicon & titanium out there, and it's 10 times stronger than steel.

(2) what we are seeing is a translucent effect from the intense field around the craft, we know that a strong field resonating at the correct frequency gives rise to optical effects (cloaking device?)

(3) It's some kind of E.T. tech we haven't seen yet.

(4) It's a space-going Moray Eel

[ArMaP]

(1) it's made of titanium reinforced glass because there's tons of silicon & titanium out there, and it's 10 times stronger than steel.

(2) what we are seeing is a translucent effect from the intense field around the craft, we know that a strong field resonating at the correct frequency gives rise to optical effects (cloaking device?)

(3) It's some kind of E.T. tech we haven't seen yet.

(4) It's a space-going Moray Eel

I would add a
(5) It's a result of the way the image was created.

[1967sander]

Or it is something real which you do not comprehend as you still think too much that every anomaly might be an image artifact.

[ArMaP]

Or it is something real which you do not comprehend as you still think too much that every anomaly might be an image artifact.

That's because I have worked with digital images for many years and I am used to see image artefacts and because you haven't shown where did you get the original image.

For example, the fact that the image looks broken in equally sized pieces makes me think that this may have come from a video. Different sources result in different images, as a photo is "frozen" in time (even if blurred) but a video may give you several images from different points in time and space that, when joined, look like the ones you posted.

So, could you start by telling us where did you get those images?

PS: you don't know what I comprehend or not, don't try to guess.

[deuem]

absolutely.



I will give you all full
access to my research. As I said I work totally unconventional.

Now, I am looking for people interested in investigating this together. Bundle our knowledge, try to explain what we see, find samples, basically build my theory that we are dealing with a lifeform.

Waiting for more clues on where your originals came from. Playing this game with the internet in China is not fun. What ever you posted so far seems to be very flat. A 2d object that is not glowing from its own power source but another one. Shall we play the game or can you fill us in a bit more.

If you quote NASA as the originator, then please post a link so we can search it on our own. Finding Waldo in a sea of NASA photos is not an easy game to play. I have many things to do and time is moving on for us.

This object so far looks very flat and is reflecting a light or glowing in a light. I do not see it producing its own light or any rings. It is like a piece of refective tape in a black light enviroment. And with nothing else to go on what else am I going to say? Oh, it is not 100% transparent.

Waiting, Deuem

[1967sander]

There are NO url. These are not NASA photos but my own research into Martyn Stubbs 3rd phenomena. I have continued his research. The original still frames come from HD NASA TV and they have been optimized with super resolution technology.

Here is the whole story:

part 1:



part 2:



part 3:

[deuem]

3 Video on UT, thanks, UT is blocked for me. Will need to get them and get back to this thread.

I hope in the videos that there is a section of the NASA HD you are talking about.

Please explain in your own words what super resolution technology. Is this you or NASA?

Deuem

[Sinny]

This thread gives me a weird feeling.

[ArMaP]

3 Video on UT, thanks, UT is blocked for me. Will need to get them and get back to this thread.

Here are the links for those 3 videos, along with link for the download.

Part 1



Part 2



Part 3

[Elvis Hendrix]

This thread gives me a weird feeling.

Why?

[ArMaP]

part 1:

I only had time to see the first 5 minutes of Part 1, but it was enough to see some things that I think I should point.

1 - The fact that the object changes size from frame to frame may be a result of a conversion from an alternate field video (I think that's how it's called, like on a TV screen, when the odd lines are sent first, then the even lines) to a full frame video like Flash video or other common computer formats.
2 - The "cork-screw" look is natural if you zoom until you see the individual pixels, as that's the only way of drawing a diagonal line with pixels without any interpolation or if you sharpen the image (sharpen removes partially the blurring effect of the interpolation).

I will see the rest when I get home at the end of the day.

[deuem]

Before I sink any teeth into this Sander, I think you should take a step back and produce some standards on what is going on. Do some known objects. To start out with a Space Jumper is a home run and we seem to need a few walks and 1st base hits.

I can only suggest this to you and I hope you can take the time to provide some back ground for the ones that don't know what you are doing yet. Including myself. If you wish to take a minute and breeze through the first few pages of my standards thread you will see what I mean. It is first, in Deuems area.

Many of us here work in the pixel world and I am not sure how you are achiving such results out of the given RGB pixels. Many of us enjoy the fact of another processor joining the group but are a little worried of results based on others attempting to do so. The once bitten twice shy rule. I am hoping you will shine and teach us somethings along the way.

Deuem