ok I don't know what is going on around here but wow
this morning I was in the driveway blowing pine leaves so I didn't hear it but something made me look up.. there coming over the barn and looking like it was heading for the house was a plane barely over the tree tops....the closest on line picture that I can fine picture is a boeing C17...
short and broad... very very low..
just now I was getting some granola and hubby is on the porch with a beer.. we have been monitoring the bat population
he yells come out here fast!....I thought bats
S H I T !!!!!!..no bats..but over the barn is a triangle of lights and following it was a line of lights .. it was not silent..it was loud but moving fast
same course as this morning ..higher but not plane height
the three lights in front was slightly to the left of the longer line of lights and I thought towing it.. they were low and LARGE
as they passed the first one sort of disappeared..but it was only the lights weren't visible from that vantage point
but the line of lights..9 ore 11 in a row different colors was a distinct triangle from the rear..with lights on the three points as it was moving away...
it had to be military they came from north west and flew south making a slight turn right over us.
so into the what the hell was that goes this sighting
and of course the camera is on another floor.. figures, huh....I think it will be attacked to me from now on
sky,
Good work on sitting down and getting it all down while it is fresh!
Very interesting sighting! I wish you had your camera with ya,
may I suggest when you have time, make a drawing of it, the
both of you, from my experience you will be glad you did.
8)
this mornings very low fly over
(http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/13/55/53/83/images15.jpg)
this one appeared to be towing
it was three points of light with the center a large red and two smaller white lights slightly behind it as it came towards us but distinctly this as it left
(http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/13/55/53/83/untitl13.png)
this one..was being towed...lights were three colors but I can't tell you the sequence
.. no question there was some kind of line between them
it look similar to when planes are refueling in the air
(http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/13/55/53/83/images16.jpg)
edit to add
we have several military bases here and these were probably from one of them
edit again .. found the link and yep this is the plane
hubby was in the engineers and build air strips and he said he thought it was a c 130
http://www.pittsburgh.afrc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123422981
News > Soaring into enlistment
(http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/13/55/53/83/14080310.jpg)
Photos
Soaring into enlistment
Col. Craig C. Peters reenlists eight Airmen of the 911th Airlift Wing along with nine members of the Development and Training Flight in front of a C-130 Hercules, Aug. 2, 2014 at the Pittsburgh International Airport Air Reserve Station. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Justyne Obeldobel)
Download HiRes
Soaring into enlistment
Posted 8/30/2014 Updated 8/28/2014 Email story Print story
Share
by Senior Airman Justyne Obeldobel
911th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
8/30/2014 - PITTSBURGH IAP ARS -- Col. Craig C. Peters reenlists eight Airmen of the 911th Airlift Wing along with nine members of the Development and Training Flight in front of a C-130 Hercules, Aug. 2, 2014, at the Pittsburgh International Airport Air Reserve Station. The reenlistment ceremony was held after a brief commander's call and in conjunction with the wing's annual Family Day festivities.
Thanks for sharing.
So the triangle appeared to be on a tow line? Any chance it was refueling?
This reminds me of the low observable UAV purposes for refueling. :-)
LSWONE.
Quote from: LSWONE on September 10, 2014, 05:48:22 AM
Thanks for sharing.
So the triangle appeared to be on a tow line? Any chance it was refueling?
This reminds me of the low observable UAV purposes for refueling. :-)
LSWONE.
LSWone, I believe if you re-read that, the triangle was towing/re-fueling the boomerang, unless I am mis-reading it...
carry that camera, sky; pics would be awesome 8)
seeker
yes it could very well have been refueling... the 911 is a refueling wing and we have seen them practice more than once overhead
what was interesting is that the evening planes took the same route as the morning one.. so the speculation is the morning one was a recon
you don't know how I am kicking myself for not having the camera with me...I had taken some pics earlier and it was beside the computer on the other floor, of course...sigh
after it was gone hubby who doesn't believe in ufo's actually said
when it came over the tree line he thought he was seeing a ufo...lol
if we hadn't been outside on those two occasions we would have never know they went over.. ::)
(http://i1284.photobucket.com/albums/a572/paparumbo/47B_zpsa5d74ec4.jpg)
Could it have been an X47B ?
(http://i1284.photobucket.com/albums/a572/paparumbo/untitled_zps31b99250.png)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e8Gmbk2_rQ
Just a thought.
Elvis.
Quote from: sky otter on September 10, 2014, 01:54:14 PM
after it was gone hubby who doesn't believe in ufo's actually said
when it came over the tree line he thought he was seeing a ufo...lol
if we hadn't been outside on those two occasions we would have never know they went over.. ::)
Funny!
Sky, you say you would have never known they went over; were they that quiet?
Elvis
I'm sorry but I can't identify the triangle as more than that...
a triangle
but I have to ask..
what kind of triangle would be refueling (or even towing) the second one that
LSWONE called a boomerang (which is what it looked like) ?
there was a visible tether between them
BTS
no it was loud..but if you were inside with a tv or something on you wouldn't have heard it..
our discussion today has been on the type of sound..besides loud
and hubby says almost helicopter/huey loud
I'm still going with roaring..
lugging the camera around is getting tiresome..lol ;)
Quote from: sky otter on September 10, 2014, 05:29:32 PM
Elvis
I'm sorry but I can't identify the triangle as more than that...
a triangle
but I have to ask..
what kind of triangle would be refueling (or even towing) the second one that
LSWONE called a boomerang (which is what it looked like) ?
there was a visible tether between them
BTS
no it was loud..but if you were inside with a tv or something on you wouldn't have heard it..
our discussion today has been on the type of sound..besides loud
and hubby says almost helicopter/huey loud
I'm still going with roaring..
lugging the camera around is getting tiresome..lol ;)
Anything like this?
(http://i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b596/LSWONE/Wing_zps6483b127.png)
(http://i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b596/LSWONE/triangle_zps036d859d.jpg)
LSWONE.
LSWONE
it was already dark when they came over.....
there was a full moon last night but it was clouded over..
so what we saw were lights comeing towards us
the tree line is about 450 feet from the porch and the horizon further out
(there are maybe 3 to 4 thousand acres back that way without humans)
we saw lights coming towards us
by the time I got out there were two sets of lights about half of that distance
the first set was a larger red light with small white lights out from it
hubby says that he thinks that was the C130 cause he says he could see the tail
I just saw the lights
the second set of lights that were further back from the first ones and to the right of them
I don't know if they were higher or on the same level
but it was a row of lights..there was color but I can't tell you where the color was in the line of white lights
as they sort of turned you could see the line between them
it was a loud roar and almost over the house they made a slight adjustment to a
more southerly direction as they were going away from us
I saw a dark triangle against a dark sky...after thinking about it I can't tell you which set of lights it was..but as they were going away from us there weren't any visible lights in the rear or under them...just that triangle shape
..if the moon had been out it would have been easier to see
they were lower than normal airplane flight.. but higher than the treetop flight of the c130 that flew over in the morning
you figure we viewed them for maybe a 1000 ft total so it was brief and speed would be a guess...they weren't slow or fast but steady
I don't know if they were both making a sound or if only one was ..which one is another guess..
it's raingin now so I came in but I have been hearing jets most of the day..just can't see anything with the clouds
we see all kinds of things in the sky here and one day I will get some good pics...
I don't think we are dealing with ET's but who the heck knows...it's very busy out there
sky otter, as you don't have a photo of the event could you take a photo from the place(s) where you saw them and draw them on the photo? That would help get an idea of what you saw. :)
oh armap.. you make it sound like I would know how to do that..lol
I did take a pic earlier tonight of the sight line from the porch to the tree line..
but drawing anything is beyond my skill level...
give me a minute to get it here
(http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/13/55/53/83/00411.jpg)
if you do one finger on the photo right at the middle area of the tree line it will give you an approximate height
and dead center in the pic for placement
from the tree line to the house is a slight sloop up..
is that helpful?
sky, the one i saw so long ago resembled this:
(http://media.moddb.com/cache/images/mods/1/19/18461/thumb_620x2000/Secutor4.jpg)
but was i estimate 200 yards long...
seeker
seeker.. 200 yards. ??? that's huge...
the one I saw years ago was huge also but it wasn't that shape...I still wonder about
who's it was
Looks like you just joined the triangle club, Sky.
Is it just me, or does anyone else not think that it is odd how these things have lights on them?
Obviously they need to train at in flight refueling and perhaps the lights make it safer but it is almost like they want us to see them. Lets face it, there are plenty of places that are not populated (e.g. over sea).
HYPOTHESIS: The triangles are not the best top secret technology available. If triangle craft were the most secret technology then they would not have Christmas lights and refuel over populated areas.
Anyone agree?
Pimander
that wasn't the first one..i have said many times about how populated the sky is here
last year I got a pic and ask if anyone wanted to waste some time trying to figure out what it was
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=5769.msg79842#msg79842
the pictures that were checked out turned out to be a triangle but I only saw the lights moving quickly across the sky..
thinking about it .. same flight path..
hummmmmmmmmmmm
wonder if there is a base near here where they could be coming from
lots of limestone mines...iron mountain is about an hour by car
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2521390/data-center/22-stories-underground--iron-mountain-s-experimental-room-48.html
edit to remove incorrect iron mountain info..sorry..it's correct now
side note..can be ignored ;D
I worked in the mushrooms so I can tell you it is huge underground.. out of bus. now but still there
http://agmap.psu.edu/Businesses/index.cfm?fid=3718
when they closed this person did a video.. you can see they are in the middle of nowhere
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEHZhLvZhOU
continuing
wampum , pa. limestone mines (sorry can't remember the business name) is where they did the lens for a well known space telescope..YEAH THAT ONE
IF you look at a map we aren't that far from the ohio military bases..
and I have to say the most folks don't sit out much anymore but we do and we are at the edge of a small boro and we see all kinds of things
this was a first for this one though...
I'm thinking I should mount the camera and set it on auto...sigh
secret in plain site..lots of weather balloons... :P
Quote from: Pimander on September 11, 2014, 11:39:38 AM
Looks like you just joined the triangle club, Sky.
Is it just me, or does anyone else not think that it is odd how these things have lights on them?
Obviously they need to train at in flight refueling and perhaps the lights make it safer but it is almost like they want us to see them. Lets face it, there are plenty of places that are not populated (e.g. over sea).
HYPOTHESIS: The triangles are not the best top secret technology available. If triangle craft were the most secret technology then they would not have Christmas lights and refuel over populated areas.
Anyone agree?
Pimander, let us consider the current state of affairs in the unidentified aerial phenomena genre'; there is so much poop and disinfo flying around these days that I am beginning to doubt whether or not Joe Sixpack actually pays attention any more...
just by the fact they do have lights on them would lead 99% to automatically discount them as military, conventional, et all...
the one I saw in the late 70's didn't have any lights, or make any sound...
perhaps Ms otter will luck out and get some pics...
seeker
the one I saw in the late 70's didn't have any lights, or make any sound
ditto for the one I saw in the 80's....
this is different and I would say it is military....whose.. on or off world may be the real question but.. if that sucker was getting refueled.. guess...
Quote from: sky otter on September 11, 2014, 10:09:07 PM
the one I saw in the late 70's didn't have any lights, or make any sound
ditto for the one I saw in the 80's....
Yes those are different propulsion the silent dark ones...
But if you have looked over UFO reports for 40 odd years you will see the silent dark ones and the triangles came in AFTER the waves of the saucer type glowing ones.
In MY opinion these are our own technology based on the research I have seen at dot mil sites and reports from certain people
Give hu-mons a little credit we can be pretty good at figuring things out if our heads are not up our ass 8)
Since the SECRET space program had astronauts long before NASA was NASA... (this is now public knowledge) does it not follow that they are WAY ahead of where most people think they are? Just common sense really...
If the secret astronaut program was in full swing back in the early 69's (the MOL was CANCELLED in 1969) and they finally released that info publicly on NOVA(PBS) Aired February 12, 2008 on PBS, then it follows that if you use the same time frame (about 50 years) it will be 50 years from now when we find out about the space fleet
::)
Since Richard Truly was THE FIRST secret astronaut, then became head of NASA for a spell, being the director that CLOSED the "No Alien Contact" rule, became Vice Admiral of the NAVY and first commander of the Naval Space Command...
What more does it take to wake people up?
Really?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/military/astrospies.html
That has always been the question,Z: what is it going to take for Joe Sixpack to get his collective head out of the sandbox[with video games, fake reality shows, and mega doom porn to keep their attention] and pay attention?
Orson Welles scared the piss out of most peeps with his war of the worlds broadcast; then by the time the movie "the day the earth stood still" came in the early 50's no one paid attention...
NASA has never been more than a dog and pony show to program the masses into complacency; i have the thought at times that one of the reasons JFK was taken down was because he knew about the Secret space program and what really goes on in the black world...
remember the pics of his visit to A51?
It appears the large, silent triangles didn't come on the scene until the mid 70's; my sighting was in '79... perhaps it is now obsolete enough for the tech behind it to start "being developed" in the public arena...
the question I have now is about the fluxliner; when did that 100 year old tech start zooming around in the public eye? late 40's?
would be interesting to get Tom Bedlam to come over for a chat or two about how he journeyed to Planet Dirt...
seeker
well what I saw back then was not a triangle....I have told a few I trust what it was
but it's not going here..lol..sorry
I know it wasn't military but I have wondered often if it was inter dimensional
sorry seeker I don't recognize that name..i have tried not to read too much sci fi..
I would really like to keep my observations as pure as I can without being influenced by what others have had to say....it's only after I see something that I go searching for info
but that's just how I do it..
The silent ones might be unmanned triangular stealth blimps and don't require jet propulsion because they are so light. I remember reading about them somewhere a few years back. The technology was supposedly shelved in favor of others but I doubt it as it sounds like a very cheap way of spying compared to some of the crazy expensive triangle projects at A51.
The UFO I saw was was well lit and definitely not conventional propulsion but it was not a triangle. I'd suggest it was deliberately visible in a populated area which I can't explain away as a normal secret technology test. Could it have been a real ET encounter? I wish I knew but it was extremely odd if it was not.
I can't help thinking that the triangles with lights are not cutting edge now which is why they use lights. Perhaps the stuff seen by Lazar and our very own A51Watcher is the cutting edge now? If it is then I want to know what fuel they are using.
Sky, I'd love to see some pictures. It does sound like you live in a cool place for sky watching.
So, whilst on the subject of various propulsion systems..
I have seen many a varity of UFO including Orbs, and triangles..
Zorgon has described methods for which the both may operate..
However, one thing bugging me is how my black 'saucer' might have been propelled'.
Saucer most likely isnt the best word for me to use... I'll see if I can upload a sketch.. albeit a poor one lol
Okay, my drawing was a bit whack, the arrow just indicates where the thing really was.
(http://i1309.photobucket.com/albums/s635/Sinny_Dawes/peg1_zps2bd1645e.jpg) (http://s1309.photobucket.com/user/Sinny_Dawes/media/peg1_zps2bd1645e.jpg.html)
Just for fun, he's the triangles that kept buzzing my town
(http://i1309.photobucket.com/albums/s635/Sinny_Dawes/peg2_zpsb492ee91.jpg) (http://s1309.photobucket.com/user/Sinny_Dawes/media/peg2_zpsb492ee91.jpg.html)
And here's a strange thing by 22 year old cousin saw, after his 4 years old nieice pointed it out:
(http://i1309.photobucket.com/albums/s635/Sinny_Dawes/peg3_zpsfb336176.jpg) (http://s1309.photobucket.com/user/Sinny_Dawes/media/peg3_zpsfb336176.jpg.html)
Sky, I'd love to see some pictures. It does sound like you live in a cool place for sky watching.
yeah.. that makes two of us..lol
P have you ever considered what you saw to be interdimensional?
what I saw back then does not fit with any other thing I have seen..not even close..
the stuff I am seeing now.. the triangles and things.. those are man made things..
however you figure their movements or propulsion..they aren't from somewhere else..imo
Sinny.. looks to me like you have a mix of things there..
like I said the triangle is a man made thing but the squiggly things.. hummmmmmmmm
I would check the other realms in your area and see who is playing with the elementals..
or the bugs ;)
just a guess as there are so many levels of 'beings' here and with the way the earth energy is changing more and more are visible.. in my opinion , of course
when I got my first digital camera I was taking night pics of the moon and stars and had a huge orb show up in one of the shots about 6 inches or so.. I enlarged the pic and isolated the orb and I believe I could see what looked like a porthole and a "being" inside
unfortunately I didn't know how to save both and only have the blown up pic left.. somewhere on a disc....so it's just a story now..no proof
so hang onto your drawings..somewhere down the line it will click what it is..
8)
Sinny, would you mind doing a thread on your sighting? In particular I'm interested in the first picture. A 2D image is not enough really. The more detail the better.
Quote1. Where were you and what were you doing at the time?
2. What made you first notice the object?
3. What did you think the object was when you first noticed it?
4. Describe the object and its actions and motions in detail.
5. Describe your feelings, reactions and actions, during and after sighting the object.
6. How did you lose sight of the object?
MUFON SITE
This is useful for descriptions of movement. http://mufoncms.com/cms_files/MUFON_New_Form1_Complete.pdf
Also don't forget sound, smells etc. For example I felt a highly charged atmosphere similar to being near an electrical sub station or certain physics apparatus in a University and heard a hissing sound. The air felt like it was humming or buzzing. These details are what I pay most attention to.
@Sky: I have definitely considered interdimensionality as an explanation (generally and in my case). There are interesting possible connections to other worlds that may have been passed off as superstition prematurely by scientists (even though it was probably a necessary part of the development of human thought to free science from religious dogma). I see you are familiar in what you said to Sinny. ;)
P
I wonder if those of us with the older-silent- maybe-interdimensional sightings should compare locations.. as in lat and long...plus time of day..
I think there may be something in Circadian rhythm and age of viewer....all proponets of this imo
Okay, so the description to accompany the first image can be found here:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=3137.0
Others sighting from the same location can be found on page one here:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=6257.0
Yes, I think Sky and Pi both touch upon some pertinent points.
I believe that my Home Town throughout 2010-2012 was cartainly a 'UFO Hotspot', and although it appears I have had the most frequent and most interesting sightings in the area, I also know of at least 20 other witnesses over that time period also.
It may still be a hotspot, but I have not been around to make that observation.
Another point that I would like to add is, if I seek a UFO long and hard enough, one will surely present it's self.
The work of Bruce Cornet (NIDS) and Ellen Crystal touched upon the theory of 'UFO Hotspots', and I personally believe that anything non-human is interdimentional - supported by other historical documentation including the work of Crowley :)
If any further information is required, you know where to find me ;)
Another point that I would like to add is, if I seek a UFO long and hard enough, one will surely present it's self.
you have just proven the adage that.....you get what you focus on