I had a dream about the NASA space shuttle before the February 1, 2003 Columbia tragedy. I didn't recall this dream until after I saw the tragedy on CNN. In this dream I saw an archetypal image of a looming UFO behind my house in the sky above the trees. I was then turned 90 degrees to my left parallel to the back of my house and looking up I could see the NASA space shuttle in orbit as if with a telescopic view. My attention was then turned off to the right of the NASA space shuttle at the distant stars in the background of space. Some of the stars rushed forward and quickly assembled into a big cargo net and then quickly proceeded to rush through the NASA space shuttle as if carrying something away. Then at the end of the dream I was turned another 90 degrees to my left still parallel to my house pointed in the direction of the river below my house and I saw a water tower out of place standing as if magnified in the vicinity of that river.
My username UFOOWNER means UNTO FOO WINNER(s) foo = fubar! The psychic circle has been telling me to wait other and It's been telling me that since about 2003 and I have just recently figured out what it meant by other(or other terrestrial officer). I now know who he is. The lines in the palm of my right hand form a symbol that looks like a star a toy spinning top and a tornado all in one and represents a very nice Lockheed Martin toy or UFO. The tornado represents foo.
My signature is "By far, reality is the best invention yet for Lockheed Martin. What have they already thought of next? Terrestrial Officers Tyler and Denver on the Intelligent Design and the "Now!" or the eternal presence of military perfection. What an extraordinarily serious situation is that of the "Now!""
I say that reality is the best invention yet because of a quote I read by Bertrand Russell 1872-1970 which reads: "Thus 'MATTER' is not a part of the ultimate material of this world but merely a convenient way of collecting events into bundles."
When the time gets right I expect some non ordinary experiences to occur socially and out in the public involving me. You could say I've been hung out to dry while I wait.
Welcome to Pegasus.
Can you link a picture of the palm of your right hand?
Anyways... Hope you like the house.
The house is very nice. Thanks for asking. I could put up a picture of my hand If I had a better digital camera and if someone could instruct me on how to post it. Fumi gave me his old digital camera but it doesn't focus very good up close. And the camera every time I turn it on it now goes off. I am going to have to invest in a new camera. It might take a minute though as I will have to save up for it. Best regards
Quote from: UFOOWNER on October 29, 2014, 10:20:31 AM
if someone could instruct me on how to post it.
You always can use:
http://tinypic.com/
To upload pictures in the web.Its free.. no registration required.
Here you just have to click in the monalisa icon above and put the url from the image you uploaded.
Dont feel in the need to do this... just got curious about the
(http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/blogs/wiredenterprise/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Talk-to-the-hand.jpg)
;)
I see that the hand has the letter "M" in the palm.
That means you are not a descendant of the reptilian E.T. races.
Most likely you are Pleiadian.
I had a seemingly non-interesting and completely mundane dream about 5 years back. The next day my dream played out before me, down to the closest details.
Never quite happened to repeat it since.
On the rare occasion I get to sleep for long periods, I often enjoy controlling and creating my own dreams.
Unconcious/subconcious thoughts fascinate me.
Whats Deja vu all about?
A couple of years before my mother died, I dreamed that she disinterested me. I was right. It was her last ditch attempt at using money to control me. My sanity was worth more to me than any amount of money she could dangle in my face.
Shasta
Quote from: Sinny on October 30, 2014, 01:58:59 AM
Whats Deja vu all about?
(http://oi57.tinypic.com/x27atw.jpg)
In his book The Rediscovery of the Mind, published in 1992, John Searle describes a curious thought experiment, in which the brain of a person was progressively replaced by silicon chips. As if parts of that person's brain to deteriorate due to some unknown disease and the only way to get around this was to replace them gradually for chips that would perform the same brain functions.
Searle was not concerned with the technical details of a surgery of this type, but with the consequences for a person who received these chips. He wondered what would happen from the subjective point of view. How would we feel with a brain both biological and not biological? How would be our world experience with an integrated brain to a machine, or, ultimately, with the brain turned into a machine?
Searle tells us three possibilities. The first would be to the overall success of the surgery. Vital functions, consciousness and behavior would remain intact. Nothing would happen; replacement would be perfect. The second possibility is the gradual reduction of conscious experience. In so far as the neurons are replaced by chips, its field of consciousness would narrowing. In the same way that the visual field of a person suffering from glaucoma will closing. A third possibility would be that the behavior is extinguished without, however, no loss of consciousness.
For philosophers of the mind is the second possibility that interest. After all, which means a gradual reduction of consciousness?
We may transmit data to the chips implanted in the brain. Have you ever thought to transfer content from one library to the brain of someone? What would happen to this person to invoke the memory of something that was implanted in his memory without having gone through your consciousness? How to mentaly classify a memory of a thing of which we are unaware? Will invoke it would tend to put it in the field of memory or imagination?
I think the memory of something of which we were not aware will have a distinctive feature. It will be accompanied by a feeling of deja vu, an unexpected reminder of something that was never realized and intruded in our memory. This is the origin of the sense of strangeness that accompanies déjà vu. This may be a psychic discomfort for some, not for others.
I like this explanation too :P
Michio Kaku: What Is Déjà Vu?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ks_UHmaZcSg
PS...
OR maybe this is just glitches in the matrix ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_KmNZNT5xw
A person who has brain cancer may opt to have most of the brain replaced with silicon chips and feel no worse for the wear after surgery but how would he convince others that he is still a sentient person and not some mindless automaton? Then again there is no way to prove that a automaton doesn't have consciousness if it behaves just like a real person. This issue may prevent us from creating human like androids for slave labor and other purposes if there is a moral and ethical concern that the android might be sentient. What a complicated world we live in...LOL.
Quote from: Sinny on October 30, 2014, 01:58:59 AM
Whats Deja vu all about?
Tuning in to the Akashic Record 8)
Quote from: Sinny on October 30, 2014, 01:58:59 AM
I had a seemingly non-interesting and completely mundane dream about 5 years back. The next day my dream played out before me, down to the closest details.
Never quite happened to repeat it since.
On the rare occasion I get to sleep for long periods, I often enjoy controlling and creating my own dreams.
Unconcious/subconcious thoughts fascinate me. Subconscious ("recordings" not memories or thoughts) can be refiled as experience in the standard banks with all recalls present. There is a method of thinking which Man did not know he had and by some strange oversight he has hitherto never before discovered. The process uses the pre conscious in psychiatry or the file clerk in Dianetics.
Whats Deja vu all about? Deja vu for all I know will have to be accepted as something meaningfully connected to whatever or just a non ordinary experience about your own experience of existence. Very difficult to make a linear connection there where there is definitely a timeline line.
Quote from: onetruekeeper on October 30, 2014, 03:43:00 AM
A person who has brain cancer may opt to have most of the brain replaced with silicon chips and feel no worse for the wear after surgery but how would he convince others that he is still a sentient person and not some mindless automaton? Then again there is no way to prove that a automaton doesn't have consciousness if it behaves just like a real person. This issue may prevent us from creating human like androids for slave labor and other purposes if there is a moral and ethical concern that the android might be sentient. What a complicated world we live in...LOL.
You know that advanced technology has control of both universes the thought and MEST universes. "I am frightened and astonished to see myself here instead of there now instead of then." Blaise Pascal from the book infinity and the mind
Quote from: Sinny on October 30, 2014, 01:58:59 AM
I had a seemingly non-interesting and completely mundane dream about 5 years back. The next day my dream played out before me, down to the closest details.
That also happened to me, some 20 years ago. :)
QuoteWhats Deja vu all about?
I used to have some deja vus, but some years ago I noticed a slight difference between what was happening (or just happened) and what had happened on first time I saw that happening. Since then I have never had a deja vu in which I couldn't find one or more small differences to the original, meaning that I have never had a real deja vu since then, only similar events.
Quote from: ArMaP on October 30, 2014, 12:20:04 PM
That also happened to me, some 20 years ago. :)
I used to have some deja vus, but some years ago I noticed a slight difference between what was happening (or just happened) and what had happened on first time I saw that happening. Since then I have never had a deja vu in which I couldn't find one or more small differences to the original, meaning that I have never had a real deja vu since then, only similar events.
It is possible that our lives play out like a movie on a videotape and that our so called free will is only an illusion. All of our decisions that we are making now and will make in the future have already been predetermined. Now and then we play mind games with ourselves to reassure that we still have free will. But ironically that too was already predetermined. Sometimes a glitch occurs where a future scenario we are supposed to experience gets placed in the wrong time slot, just like a case of bad insert editing of a video clip so we end up experiencing that scenario twice, thus the feeling of Deja Vu.
Quote from: onetruekeeper on October 30, 2014, 04:00:30 PM
It is possible that our lives play out like a movie on a videotape and that our so called free will is only an illusion.
I suppose it's possible. :)
QuoteSometimes a glitch occurs where a future scenario we are supposed to experience gets placed in the wrong time slot, just like a case of bad insert editing of a video clip so we end up experiencing that scenario twice, thus the feeling of Deja Vu.
That doesn't explain why I stopped having deja vus and started seeing them as slightly different from the original.
Obviously, I'm not talking about a deja vu like those in Matrix, as I never had one of those and I don't know any case of a deja vu like that.
Quote from: ArMaP on October 30, 2014, 04:33:09 PM
I suppose it's possible. :)
That doesn't explain why I stopped having deja vus and started seeing them as slightly different from the original.
Obviously, I'm not talking about a deja vu like those in Matrix, as I never had one of those and I don't know any case of a deja vu like that.
Perhaps it's a case of slipping into a parallel universe where events that are almost identical to ours takes place.
Quote from: onetruekeeper on October 30, 2014, 04:54:45 PM
Perhaps it's a case of slipping into a parallel universe where events that are almost identical to ours takes place.
Sorry, I don't understand what part of my post the above sentence applies, could you please tell me? Thanks. :)
Quote from: ArMaP on October 30, 2014, 05:01:35 PM
Sorry, I don't understand what part of my post the above sentence applies, could you please tell me? Thanks. :)
Please disregard it then. I may have misread your post.
Quote from: onetruekeeper on October 30, 2014, 04:00:30 PM
It is possible that our lives play out like a movie on a videotape and that our so called free will is only an illusion. All of our decisions that we are making now and will make in the future have already been predetermined. Now and then we play mind games with ourselves to reassure that we still have free will. But ironically that too was already predetermined.
BINGO . Right on the nail. :)
Quote from: The Matrix Traveller on October 30, 2014, 08:06:49 PM
BINGO . Right on the nail. :)
Predetermined before the big bang even. they let some of it out and there is an infinte supply left.
"Thus 'MATTER' is not a part of the ultimate material of this world but merely a convenient way of collecting events into bundles." Bertrand Russell 1872-1970
When I used the word "predetermined" I am not suggesting that someone or something is deciding to create us or what future events we will experience. Deciding and creating obviously takes place only in space and time. Since everything emerges from infinity which is outside of space and time then how we come into existence and how events unfold will remain a total mystery. In this case even asking how is meaningless.
QuoteDeciding and creating obviously takes place only in space and time. Since everything emerges from infinity which is outside of space and time then how we come into existence and how events unfold will remain a total mystery.
Why do you
believe this ?
All comes
through 'Communication' or you would
NOT know you exist
or even that this
little Universe exists. :)
I say
Little .... because your experience is
within the 'Processing System' of your brain,
involving the '
Visual Cortex' and other Processes
LINKED to this.
You
assume the same exists outside this Processing environment re. the brain.
But either way it can't be proven !
The Communication involves Processing. Any function at all involves a Process which can't be denied ...
Can you name
one thing or 'happening', that does
NOT involve some 'Process' or 'Communication' ?
QuoteIn this case even asking how is meaningless.
This statement is
belief based
ONLY ..... and has nothing to do with '
Intelligence'. :)
Not suggesting you Lack 'Intelligence' or anything, but
instead Intelligence per say.
When we learn
HOW to drive a car then we can drive it .... :)
The same applies with Quote;
QuoteDeciding and creating obviously takes place only in space and time. Since everything emerges from infinity which is outside of space and time then how we come into existence and how events unfold will remain a total mystery.
When you learn the 'Processing Language', then you can use this for
practical every day use.
Such as allowing you to build Transport, which will allow you to experience crossing Galaxies in minutes ...
LOL.
So
NO it is
NOT as you put it;
QuoteIn this case even asking how is meaningless.
Sleepwalking studies have shown that the human body is capable of functioning quite well without conscious direction and is also able to perform very complex tasks on it's own ( driving a vehicle, engaging in conversation, household chores, eating and going to the toilet..etc ) all without the person being aware of what's going on.
This begs the question as to what purpose does consciousness serve in relation to the body?
Why does consciousness find itself trapped in the body when the body shows that it does not require it?
Consciousness research has also shown that the conscious mind ( not brain or sensory function ) is capable of perceiving sight, smell, taste, sound, touch of distant objects and places without the need of the body.
It seems to me that something, perhaps an amusing idea conceived of eons ago had gone terribly wrong.
Human bodily habitation was probably just an idea that was tried out for fun but somehow got out of control and now we are unable to free ourselves from it unless we physically die.
QuoteSleepwalking studies have shown that the human body is capable of functioning quite well without conscious direction and is also able to perform very complex tasks on it's own ( driving a vehicle,
engaging in conversation, household chores, eating and going to the toilet..etc ) all without the person being aware of what's going on.
That's because you are studying an '
Avatar' (Like that used in
1st person Computer games)
It's
NOT the 'flesh', which is '
AWARE' of anything, that is why we refer to the 'human Primate' as a person,
and
NOT an '
AWARENESS' ... :)
We might say "Who is that '
person' over there" ?
But we never say "Who is that '
AWARENESS' over there" ?
QuoteThis begs the question as to what purpose does consciousness serve in relation to the body?
NOT at all, it is '
AWARENESS' which experiences the 'human Primate' or '
Avatar',
NOT the flesh.
The 'flesh' doesn't even know it exists ..... let alone know
LIFE. :)
Check this out for yourself, see
IF any '
Component' of your body knows you ? :)
QuoteWhy does consciousness find itself trapped in the body when the body shows that it does not require it?
It isn't trapped at all .... because it isn't in the 'human Primate' to start with.
QuoteConsciousness research has also shown that the conscious mind ( not brain or sensory function )
is capable of perceiving sight, smell, taste, sound, touch of distant objects and places without the need
of the body.
Now that is
CORRECT !But the experience is in a different mode of experience.
QuoteIt seems to me that something, perhaps an amusing idea conceived of eons ago had gone terribly wrong.
NOT at at all ....
WHY do you
believe the above statement you've made. ?
It was meant to be or it would never have taken place.
QuoteHuman bodily habitation was probably just an idea that was tried out for fun but somehow got out of control and now we are unable to free ourselves from it unless we physically die.
Speak for yourself. Why on Earth would you draw this conclusion ? :)
There was a funny story of how Hugh Everett, the famous physicist that came up with the theory of parallel universes one day got into a conversation with a religious person who believed in GOD. It is said that Hugh Everett, who was a atheist, was able to convince this religious man by showing him a mathematical formula
that there was no GOD. The religious man became very distraught that all these years he believed in something that wasn't true. Are YOU ready to be shown the truth? Most people cannot handle the truth. The first indication of this is that there is no way to have a understandable dialog with that person because that person will use words and terms that are totally alien to the other. Asking for clarification will only bring more jargon and confusing responses. That person has built up such an elaborate paradigm system over the years that now he or she is a prisoner of that system, unable to find a way out or maybe they like it there and don't want to leave for fear of the unknown that lurks just outside their comfort zone.
I could be guilty of this myself..heck, maybe we ALL are to some degree but at least I try to explain my delusions as clearly as possible so that the other person can at least understand what I am trying to say.
Quote from: onetruekeeper on November 03, 2014, 05:24:47 PM
There was a funny story of how Hugh Everett, the famous physicist that came up with the theory of parallel universes one day got into a conversation with a religious person who believed in GOD. It is said that Hugh Everett, who was a atheist, was able to convince this religious man by showing him a mathematical formula
that there was no GOD. The religious man became very distraught that all these years he believed in something that wasn't true. Are YOU ready to be shown the truth? Most people cannot handle the truth. The first indication of this is that there is no way to have a understandable dialog with that person because that person will use words and terms that are totally alien to the other. Asking for clarification will only bring more jargon and confusing responses. That person has built up such an elaborate paradigm system over the years that now he or she is a prisoner of that system, unable to find a way out or maybe they like it there and don't want to leave for fear of the unknown that lurks just outside their comfort zone.
I could be guilty of this myself..heck, maybe we ALL are to some degree but at least I try to explain my delusions as clearly as possible so that the other person can at least understand what I am trying to say.
I remember a quote but forgot the author's name it goes "We cease to believe in the unknowable but there it sits nevertheless calmly licking its chops."
I'll give you one to think on: Monopoly World It's time to play monopoly everyone. So get ready. And watch your head. They're back!
Parker Brothers should like this idea in the future.
People will be busy in the future right up to the point where we get back and then it starts all over again. A cycle of off world to on world travel bringing new materials and better advancements each time. And it only gets quicker and better each time.
Quote from: onetruekeeper on November 03, 2014, 05:24:47 PM
There was a funny story of how Hugh Everett, the famous physicist that came up with the theory of parallel universes one day got into a conversation with a religious person who believed in GOD. It is said that Hugh Everett, who was a atheist, was able to convince this religious man by showing him a mathematical formula
that there was no GOD. The religious man became very distraught that all these years he believed in something that wasn't true. Are YOU ready to be shown the truth? Most people cannot handle the truth. The first indication of this is that there is no way to have a understandable dialog with that person because that person will use words and terms that are totally alien to the other. Asking for clarification will only bring more jargon and confusing responses. That person has built up such an elaborate paradigm system over the years that now he or she is a prisoner of that system, unable to find a way out or maybe they like it there and don't want to leave for fear of the unknown that lurks just outside their comfort zone.
I could be guilty of this myself..heck, maybe we ALL are to some degree but at least I try to explain my delusions as clearly as possible so that the other person can at least understand what I am trying to say.
Awesome post, although I'm not really a fan of the 'Math proved God doesn't exist' bit.
Quote from: Sinny on November 05, 2014, 04:49:22 PM
Awesome post, although I'm not really a fan of the 'Math proved God doesn't exist' bit.
I agree with your signature. And as a result of that signature I think that the US government should be an exclamation mark rather than a question mark. I know why the government is a question mark. It all has to do with the way in which they acquired what they were given. Why do you think Area 51 is ready to shoot any one for trespassing. It all has to do with they way in which they acquired this technology. That which gave it to them is allowing them to beat around the bush.
I will give Einstein's view on God and the meaning of life: "What is the meaning of human life, or of organic life altogether? To answer this question at all implies a religion. Is there any sense then, you ask, in putting it? I answer, the man who regards his own life and that of his fellow creatures as meaningless is not merely unfortunate but almost disqualified for life." Albert Einstein The World As I See It This is how I feel about Zorgon's response that there is no disclosure and that to answer this debate at all implies a disclosure. Is there any sense then I ask in debating this question of disclosure?
Quote from: UFOOWNER on November 05, 2014, 07:57:11 PM
I agree with your signature. And as a result of that signature I think that the US government should be an exclamation mark rather than a question mark. I know why the government is a question mark. It all has to do with the way in which they acquired what they were given. Why do you think Area 51 is ready to shoot any one for trespassing. It all has to do with they way in which they acquired this technology. That which gave it to them is allowing them to beat around the bush.
I will give Einstein's view on God and the meaning of life: "What is the meaning of human life, or of organic life altogether? To answer this question at all implies a religion. Is there any sense then, you ask, in putting it? I answer, the man who regards his own life and that of his fellow creatures as meaningless is not merely unfortunate but almost disqualified for life." Albert Einstein The World As I See It This is how I feel about Zorgon's response that there is no disclosure and that to answer this debate at all implies a disclosure. Is there any sense then I ask in debating this question of disclosure?
I give up chasing the ghost of 'disclosure' early on, I realised there was only personal disclosure, a perception, an inner reality.
'I know' UFOs are real.
'I know' things go 'bump in the night'
'I know' Oswald did not kill JFK
'I know' 9/11 was an inside job
'I know' The New World order is on the verge
'I know', we all know, and we're never going to 'be told' we know.
Open secrets - the human race - a horse holdings itself on a leash, trapped by the chains of it's mind.
Quote from: Sinny on November 05, 2014, 11:07:12 PM
I give up chasing the ghost of 'disclosure' early on, I realised there was only personal disclosure, a perception, an inner reality.
'I know' UFOs are real.
'I know' things go 'bump in the night'
'I know' Oswald did not kill JFK
'I know' 9/11 was an inside job
'I know' The New World order is on the verge
'I know', we all know, and we're never going to 'be told' we know. Point taken and I appreciate your opinion. Best regards
Open secrets - the human race - a horse holdings itself on a leash, trapped by the chains of it's mind.
Quote from: Sinny on November 05, 2014, 04:49:22 PM
I'm not really a fan of the 'Math proved God doesn't exist' bit.
If God is omnipotent and all powerful...
...can God make a boulder bigger than he can lift?
8)
Quote from: UFOOWNER on November 05, 2014, 07:57:11 PM
Why do you think Area 51 is ready to shoot any one for trespassing.
Out of the thousands of people who annually mess around Area 51 how many have been shot?
How many people have been arrested for taking photos of the sign that says "no photos allowed"
::)
It's really nice out there when we get snow. At least they finally paved the road
;D
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/Vault/warningsigns.jpg)
Quote from: onetruekeeper on November 03, 2014, 05:24:47 PM
Are YOU ready to be shown the truth? Most people cannot handle the truth.
What makes YOU think YOUR version of truth it the right one?
QuoteI try to explain my delusions as clearly as possible so that the other person can at least understand what I am trying to say.
THIS is why the Hu-mon race is still at war... everyone is trying to hard to explain their particular delusion and trying to sell it as truth. When the other person does not accept this... all hell breaks lose
Tell your 'truth' IF it has merit it will bear fruit. It does not need explanation... it either IS or IS NOT truth. The Light of Day usually will show which
Quote from: zorgon on November 06, 2014, 09:35:36 AM
What makes YOU think YOUR version of truth it the right one?
Good point. The eternal problem.
My version about thruth, right and wrongk.... :P:
Even if we are on the good way, coming closer to the real truth (Whatever that is), we dont know 100% of that truth.
Since there is not an exact truth. There is only what IS. For X its not even there, for Y its all the wisdom there is.
We are not developed as a human enough to see or comprehend what IS in most cases in principle. There is always more, the "truth" is always moving and "changing".
1. Some people will never grow on most fields, and are not mend too grow on those fields at first place.
2. Some people will only grow and grow, and will never be able to explain a certain truth to the guy mentioned by 1.
Of course there are no 2 categories, but infinite categories people. Another problem ;D
Good luck with making war! ;D ;D
Well, this is my partly truthfully wrongk thingie thing. Back to work again.
cheers.
Quote from: zorgon on November 06, 2014, 09:20:29 AM
If God is omnipotent and all powerful...
...can God make a boulder bigger than he can lift? I know what you mean Zorgon. Can God make an unmade thing? This kind of argument leads down the road of contradictories which will have to be accepted and acted upon until either the arrival of further data or some sort of resolution is met(We can agree to disagree). And thus we have a paradox. I asked one of my friends at Church one night is it possible that God can make an unmade thing his reply was that God can do anything.
8)
Quote from: zorgon on November 06, 2014, 09:36:59 AM
What is a UFO? 8) The one I am talking about is Military muscle collecting its own exotic matter to become more dense and defensive and also the distribution of exotic matter that it doesn't need to the military on Earth and to the public for what they need or that which it doesn't need.
To sum it up I'll state it in another way in the form of a game with this consideration: Monopoly World It's time to play monopoly everyone. So get ready. And watch your head. They're back!
The big bang only let out a little bit of matter and thus there is an absolute infinite amount still out there that we will be collecting. The UFO I am speaking of will be after an absolute infinite amount of exotics.
"Thus 'MATTER' is not a part of the ultimate material of this world but merely a convenient way of collecting events into bundles." Bertrand Russell 1872-1970 In other words off and on world travel.
Quote from: zorgon on November 06, 2014, 09:35:36 AM
What makes YOU think YOUR version of truth it the right one? Because I think that what I say has its own reason for existing. Nothing more.
THIS is why the Hu-mon race is still at war... everyone is trying to hard to explain their particular delusion and trying to sell it as truth. When the other person does not accept this... all hell breaks lose
Tell your 'truth' IF it has merit it will bear fruit. It does not need explanation... it either IS or IS NOT truth. The Light of Day usually will show which
Quote from: zorgon on November 06, 2014, 09:20:29 AM
If God is omnipotent and all powerful...
...can God make a boulder bigger than he can lift?
8)
'God' is the thing that none of us can explain or comprehend.
A very interesting quote from Arthur Schopenhauer for Zorgon. I think you will find it interesting.
"Thus we see already that we can never arrive at the real nature of things from without. However much we investigate, we can never reach anything but images and names. We are like a man who goes round a castle seeking in vain for an entrance, and sometimes sketching the facades. And yet this is the method that has been followed by all philosophers before me." Arthur Schopenhauer