CERN Accident? Can't get any reports...Internet buzzing with rumors about a MAJOR accident at CERNS
This video is out there and it appears its direct from the CERN webcam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTOfviCSc6w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTOfviCSc6w
The only news article I see so far is THIS one
CERN Had An Accident: It "Created" A Rainbow (Universe)(http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Screen-Shot-2015-08-27-at-9.06.50-PM-800x350.png)
Posted on August 28, 2015 by Royce Christyn
QuoteSomething very interesting happened at CERN recently – they had an accident. The accident created a "rainbow" universe. What does this mean, exactly? CERN actually created a universe for 2.6 seconds. The implications of this are both puzzling and astounding. CERN'S "accident" all ties back to the question: what is the age of the universe?
From The-NewsHub.com:
The most widely accepted theory is that in the beginning there was a singularity and that at some point, according to modern mathematics, around 13.7 billion years ago, an event now known as The Big Bang occurred.
Space and time were created in this moment along with a finite amount of energy and matter in a very dense state.
But what if the math is wrong and the universe is older than we think?
QuotePhysicists and scientists using the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) Detector at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland, apparently stumbled upon evidence that this might be true in a recent accident during the Large Hadron Collider's warm-up on March 21.
According to Jessica Czerniski, a CERN physicist, the CMS – a general purpose detector, picked up irregular data and determined that they had 'created' a rainbow universe. She added that rainbow universes such as the one accidentally created in their tests had only been speculated to exist in the past.
There is solid mathematics to back it up however.
Rainbow universes are thought to be a natural result of gravity affected by different wavelengths of light and the theory behind it, while unproven at this point, attempts to fill the gap between quantum mechanics and relativity.
Einstein's theory [of relativity] posits that objects, including light, warp space-time along a curving path and while standard physics does not depend on particle energy for this to be true, rainbow gravity does.
In an article that was published in the October 2014 edition of the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, the colour of light is determined by its frequency and according to Adel Awad from the Centre for Theoretical Physics in Egypt, the author of the article, light particles of different colours travel along slightly different paths through space-time in relation to their energies.
The theory of rainbow gravity suggests that there was no Big Bang event at all and that the universe reaches backwards in time indefinitely.
One of the more startling points of interest found in the data from the accident at CERN, when compiled into three dimensions, was the outline of a ghostly dolphin-like creature. While it was originally thought to have been residual bleed from a nearby computer screen, analyzation of the data revealed that it is apparently real.
The next step of the CERN team responsible for these findings will be recreating the conditions that spawned this event and to collect more proof that rainbow gravity, and by extension, rainbow universes, are an actuality.
It will force the scientific community to rethink its current positions on the origins of the universe as we know it, more than likely causing the idea of a singularity-based Big Bang to be thrown out.
http://yournewswire.com/cern-had-an-accident-it-created-a-rainbow-universe/
The CERN Webcam just has a History of CERN running
Live webcam only has a meeting scheduled for Nov 25th
https://webcast.web.cern.ch/webcast/index.php
Not seeing anything on the Cern Homepage
http://home.cern/
Source of the current fuss...
Whistleblower Reveals CERN Suffered Major Disaster On Friday 13th
Posted on November 23, 2015 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in Bizarre(http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/CERN-disaster-727x350.png)
Quoteccording to a CERN whistleblower, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) had a major nuclear disaster on Friday 13th November, but scientists managed to contain it and stop reports leaking to the media amid the frenzy of the Paris attacks.
According to the videos below a significant accident occurred throughout the Collider systems that resulted in a very large and brightly lit UFO hovering above the CERN facilities.
Some believe the UFO appeared to assess the extent of the damage caused by the accident, which has been likened to the type of devastation you would see after a nuclear explosion.
There is a video but it is marked PRIVATE
http://yournewswire.com/whistleblower-reveals-cern-suffered-major-disaster-on-friday-13th/
Apparently that first video is from 2008.
You had me on the edge of my seat for a minute there.
Quote from: Sinny on November 25, 2015, 03:29:26 AM
Apparently that first video is from 2008.
My bad :P Actually missed that
What about the Rainbow bridge? I mean universe :Dis that real?
QuoteThe accident created a "rainbow" universe. What does this mean, exactly? CERN actually created a universe for 2.6 seconds.
Ah poo not yet!
QuoteDespite an April Fool joke released by CERN in relation to the creation of a rainbow universe during warm-up procedures at the Large Hadron Collider in March, which was covered by a variety of media outlets and resulted in heated debate, the truth is that such a thing is actually possible and the theory behind it, rainbow gravity theory, is one of the experiments slated for exploration.
https://www.the-newshub.com/technology/full-spectrum-universe-cern-accident-creates-rainbow
Is it not interesting that such a long while back the Gods of the 9 realms came across the rainbow bridge.
QuoteIn Norse mythology, Bifröst (Listeni/?b?vr?st/[1] or sometimes Bilröst or Bivrost) is a burning rainbow bridge that reaches between Midgard (the world) and Asgard, the realm of the gods.
And now we have this possibility. I have never believed in the Big Bang so this seems very likely to me light color= frequency and reaching other realms.
QuoteIn an article that was published in the October 2014 edition of the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, the colour of light is determined by its frequency and according to Adel Awad from the Centre for Theoretical Physics in Egypt, the author of the article, light particles of different colours travel along slightly different paths through space-time in relation to their energies.
The theory of rainbow gravity suggests that there was no Big Bang event at all and that the universe reaches backwards in time indefinitely.
https://www.the-newshub.com/technology/full-spectrum-universe-cern-accident-creates-rainbow
One has to wonder when top scientists make April Fool jokes of such a detailed serious nature...
surely they must know that the 'joke' will dominate all future reality?
Quote from: zorgon on November 25, 2015, 10:20:37 PM
One has to wonder when top scientists make April Fool jokes of such a detailed serious nature...
They are human...
Did you see Decay (http://www.decayfilm.com/), the zombie movie they made?
Quote from: ArMaP on November 26, 2015, 12:33:17 AM
They are human...
Did you see Decay (http://www.decayfilm.com/), the zombie movie they made?
Yes they are human, and yet if it were any of us making up such stories we would be called fear mongers or some such. Clearly their experiments are edgy and many people fear what they are doing and many believe the false stories.
Quote from: Dyna on November 26, 2015, 02:01:26 AM
Yes they are human, and yet if it were any of us making up such stories we would be called fear mongers or some such.
Why? There's nothing to induce fear on their April fools' stories.
QuoteClearly their experiments are edgy and many people fear what they are doing and many believe the false stories.
They are not responsible for other people's ignorance.
Quote from: ArMaP on November 26, 2015, 12:33:17 AM
They are human...
Yes but had they posted that on ATS they would be BANNED :P
::P
QuoteDid you see Decay (http://www.decayfilm.com/), the zombie movie they made?
No I have no interest in zombies There are too many of them already on the internet :P I fail to understand man kinds fascination with zombies :P
The problem is that NASA CERN and other such agencies already have bad press with all the distrust in popular opinion. The last thing they need to do is FEED this distrust with jokes that you KNOW will be taken out of context and shared fro years as REAL
Perhaps they don't care LOL They have so lost touch with reality and how the public sees them they no longer care
Quote from: ArMaP on November 26, 2015, 10:02:45 PM
They are not responsible for other people's ignorance.
Actually yes they are. THEY are the ones making project that could LITERALLY effect all life on earth..
It is most certainly up to them to make sure the public is educated and assured that all is going well...
..especially when they keep having serious accidents they can't explain.
When you are messing with the forces of the universe that have the potential to cause serious side effects to the planet... they most assuredly have a responsibility to the public
Quote from: ArMaP on November 26, 2015, 10:02:45 PM
Why? There's nothing to induce fear on their April fools' stories.
Problem is they only say "April Fool's" a few days later by then the story has already gone viral and few people check the dates on an article a few weeks after April 1 I myself sometimes miss an old date on an article that is rehashed as "new"
If NASA makes an April Fools' report claiming the Sun will explode next week... is that not the same as screaming FIRE in a crowded theater?
MOSt people will follow instincts before applying rational thought... by then the damage is done
And You can bet ATS would ban them for it as HOAXTERS :P
Remember when I posted that April Fool's flying saucer by Richard Branson? I got my thread deleted and called a hoaxter for that and banned
THIS ONE
(https://zowienews.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/richard-branson-ufo.jpg)
I posted that and said I was buying the autographed copy...
I was told by the skeptic hoard it was photoshopped and fake and I should save my money... It was tossed into the HOAX bin then later deleted. Then when people asked WHY it was deleted that too was deleted and the person who made the "Why" thread was also bannen. Seems I was sanctioned for tricking the stupid morons :P because yes I DO have the signed copy of that REAL photo of a REAL flying object a lit up flying saucer balloon made by Richard Branson and flown over London as an April Fools joke
The April Fool's UFO Landing That Terrified London
http://zowienews.com/2011/04/01/the-april-fools-ufo-landing-that-terrified-london/
I did however lie :P I did not pay for it LOL Richard signed it for me (and his book) when he was in Vegas :P
Quote from: zorgon on November 26, 2015, 11:05:23 PM
Yes but had they posted that on ATS they would be BANNED :P
That depends on how they would present it.
QuoteThe problem is that NASA CERN and other such agencies already have bad press with all the distrust in popular opinion. The last thing they need to do is FEED this distrust with jokes that you KNOW will be taken out of context and shared fro years as REAL
I know that it will be taken out of context because I am part (although from the less common section) of the "conspiracy theories" world, people that have not been part of it do not know (or even understand) how something said as a joke can turn into a completely out of context version.
QuotePerhaps they don't care LOL They have so lost touch with reality and how the public sees them they no longer care
I think they never really understood how that part of the public sees them.
Quote from: zorgon on November 26, 2015, 11:08:31 PM
When you are messing with the forces of the universe that have the potential to cause serious side effects to the planet... they most assuredly have a responsibility to the public
They have, but not the responsibility to educate them, nobody has, only people that want to be educated can be educated, you cannot force it.
Quote from: zorgon on November 26, 2015, 11:12:58 PM
Problem is they only say "April Fool's" a few days later by then the story has already gone viral and few people check the dates on an article a few weeks after April 1 I myself sometimes miss an old date on an article that is rehashed as "new"
They usually say it on April 2.
QuoteIf NASA makes an April Fools' report claiming the Sun will explode next week... is that not the same as screaming FIRE in a crowded theater?
Yes, but that's not what CERN did.
QuoteAnd You can bet ATS would ban them for it as HOAXTERS :P
See my previous post.
QuoteRemember when I posted that April Fool's flying saucer by Richard Branson? I got my thread deleted and called a hoaxter for that and banned
Only post banned, not really banned.
Quote from: zorgon on November 26, 2015, 11:17:22 PM
Then when people asked WHY it was deleted that too was deleted and the person who made the "Why" thread was also bannen.
The person that made that thread (at least the one I saw) was banned two years latter, for an unrelated reason, nobody was banned for asking.
Quote from: ArMaP on November 27, 2015, 09:00:18 AM
They have, but not the responsibility to educate them, nobody has, only people that want to be educated can be educated, you cannot force it.
I am actually surprised at some of the things you say in this thread. I thought you held authoritative groups and people to a more professional level of responsibility. I have seen this in your responses in the past.
Personally I can see releasing true information you must release but don't wasn't known, on April 1st would be a great way to bury the dirt.
Quote from: Dyna on November 27, 2015, 07:36:27 PM
I thought you held authoritative groups and people to a more professional level of responsibility.
First, I don't know what you mean by "authoritative groups", it's the first time I see that expression. Second, I don't understand what's the connection with "professionalism". ???
QuotePersonally I can see releasing true information you must release but don't wasn't known, on April 1st would be a great way to bury the dirt.
Third, I don't understand the first part of the above sentence. ???
Quote from: zorgon on November 24, 2015, 10:25:23 PM
The only news article I see so far is THIS one
CERN Had An Accident: It "Created" A Rainbow (Universe)
(http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Screen-Shot-2015-08-27-at-9.06.50-PM-800x350.png)
Posted on August 28, 2015 by Royce Christyn
http://yournewswire.com/cern-had-an-accident-it-created-a-rainbow-universe/
I forgot to say that you posted this on April. :)
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=8139.msg111974#msg111974
QuoteI forgot to say that you posted this on April. :)
On April who?I don't understand this sentence? :P
Quote from: Dyna on November 27, 2015, 11:31:13 PM
On April who?I don't understand this sentence? :P
Should it be "in April"? Sometimes I get them mixed.
Quote from: ArMaP on November 27, 2015, 11:43:45 PM
Should it be "in April"? Sometimes I get them mixed.
Yes "in April" is better :P unless April is a person then it would be weird :P
But yeah I forgot that one LOL
As for professionalism... an agency like Cern or NASA should not be doing April Fools posts using material that is already causing fear and distrust in the public sector. Everyone knows that most people don't always read the dates and will take is seriously. Just causes more fear and distrust.
It is hard enough these days to sort the truth from the BS... they do no one a service by adding to it deliberately
Quote from: zorgon on November 29, 2015, 06:49:08 PM
Yes "in April" is better :P unless April is a person then it would be weird :P
Thanks. :)
QuoteAs for professionalism... an agency like Cern or NASA should not be doing April Fools posts using material that is already causing fear and distrust in the public sector. Everyone knows that most people don't always read the dates and will take is seriously. Just causes more fear and distrust.
In situations like this there are three main types of people: the ones that ignore CERN's or NASA's work, those that, in doubt, fear it, and those that are interested in it from a technical point of view. I doubt the people that work at CERN or NASA are even aware of what those that fear their work think, as they move in different circles, each one distrusting the other.
Any updates on this? Even that first video has been made private and can't find any new info at all.
Not Yet