Pegasus Research Consortium

I agree with your post.

Nicely worded.

Suppression of energy sources is the key.

Once the truth is out it changes everything!

I have been publishing articles around the web on sites that make adding images to the posts easy - not like the confusing way to get them on here...  LOL!

Anyway, I thought I would start a thread and post links.  This is My most recent post just today:

Solving for Psychopaths in Control  (article):  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/Solving-for-Psychopaths-in-Control:6

Quotewithout bias or opinion

there is nothing written without bias or opinion..it's a human trait and unavoidable

but i am curious about this latest cycle (as you called it).. what group is pushing this agenda at this point ?

i feel a bit of new money in this latest push and ask what "they" have to gain

QuoteI don't think he is a shill. He is a promoter,

yeah  that's what i said

Quote from: RUSSO on December 18, 2023, 07:10:24 AM
Funny enough, they act like they are the gods with omniscient power

Unfortunately, that applies to many people, even those that are completely ignorant but have a strong belief in something.
Facebook is full of people like that, that think that any idea they have is the absolute truth and anyone that says the opposite (or what they think is the opposite) is wrong.

QuoteA couple of centuries ago, science would have been calling nonsense to human flight, space travel, telecommunication, antibiotics, electric lighting, and so on.

There's a difference between "science" and the "scientists". Science says nothing, some scientists talk as if they are representing science, when they are only talking for themselves.

QuoteImagine what they would call you if you were a scientist and wrote a piece about AI. 

That would be interesting to see.

PS: electrice light was demonstrated at the start of the 19th century, more than 200 years ago.

Quote from: RUSSO on December 18, 2023, 05:54:30 AM
Of course that would be a need to know about your believes a little more as you can be a strong atheist or a weak atheist. When someone identifies as an atheist, it may not necessarily mean they actively believe that gods do not exist (strong atheism); rather, they might simply lack a belief in gods (weak atheism).

In my case I believe that god(s) are not needed and just a human creation.

Asking questions that no one seems to want to answer (or hear), and that includes the general population, is deemed too disruptive. It would be so much better if it conformed to their previous beliefs. 'Ignorance is a blessing,' as they say.

And there goes another cycle. Clap.

No schadenfreude if you are wondering.

Quote from: space otter on December 17, 2023, 06:46:16 AM

i'm not sure about thier line without bias or opinion.

Now do it with your local paper. Now do your phone. Go in the google search (just see the news it returns to you) and see what kind of bias google think you have.

Are you serioulsy waiting for the CNN or NYT bring you anything about crash/retrieval programs? Laundry money? Bribes? Corruption? SAPs? 10k for a nail in a classified rocket? Thats another beer i own btw, to news nation(even knowing they are doing it for money because that is what tv is all about). Ty for doin what no other major network is doing.

Funny enough, they act like they are the gods with omniscient power

A couple of centuries ago, science would have been calling nonsense to human flight, space travel, telecommunication, antibiotics, electric lighting, and so on.

Imagine what they would call you if you were a scientist and wrote a piece about AI. 

Fixed the cover image.