News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Sex With Non-Humans

Started by Eighthman, July 25, 2017, 04:16:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ellirium113

Quote from: space otter on July 25, 2017, 11:03:58 PM
how do you know that ?

Murphy's law... Necessity makes strange bedfellows.

I need not go through the entire historical archive of sexual encounters with non-humans. Just search it you will find it.

The Seeker

Quote from: space otter on July 25, 2017, 11:42:07 PM


ah seeker I know you have come thur a lot of the literature I have
and the old fairy tales(?) say that mars was just one of the races that  came here

the last one I remember reading about was the russian boy who remembers being from mars

the natives of most countries have stories of being from elsewhere originally
all the old mythology..before tv and comics rewrote them
Quite true, otterus  8) and let us not forget Robert Morningsky and the terra papers; the Hopi are waiting to return to the sky, the aussie abos point up towards home...

Seeker
Look closely: See clearly: Think deeply; and Choose wisely...
Trolls are crunchy and good with ketchup...
Seekers Domain

Shasta56

Quote from: biggles on July 26, 2017, 12:07:02 AM
Sex with non-humans, the ex-husband.

Been there, done that.
Daughter of Sekhmet

ArMaP

I have one doubt about the title: were some already human and the others were not, or were non of them human yet? Or were all humans? The research doesn't appear to make that distinction.

Irene

Biggles and Shasta, looks like we have a trifecta. That last one of mine put me off my feed permanently.

Irene
Shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods.....

biggles

Quote from: Irene on July 26, 2017, 01:47:30 AM
Biggles and Shasta, looks like we have a trifecta. That last one of mine put me off my feed permanently.

Irene

yep hon, I know how you feel. xo
I know that I know nothing - thanks Capricorn.

The Seeker

Quote from: ArMaP on July 26, 2017, 12:53:05 AM
I have one doubt about the title: were some already human and the others were not, or were non of them human yet? Or were all humans? The research doesn't appear to make that distinction.
I noticed that, ArMap; the line of distinction appears to be a group of "homonids"- using that as a search term, this group is pre-human, before homo-sapien came into being;

So my take is that none of the test group were human; yet. My issue with this research is the way they worded the discourse; "ghost species" of "proto-humans" means, to me, that something changed and they don't have a clue what, they just want to talk about the fact that they think they found where something changed, but really don't know what, or why.
Look closely: See clearly: Think deeply; and Choose wisely...
Trolls are crunchy and good with ketchup...
Seekers Domain

thorfourwinds

Quote from: Irene on July 26, 2017, 01:47:30 AM
Biggles and Shasta, looks like we have a trifecta. That last one of mine put me off my feed permanently.

Irene

YIKES!
And we thought the only thing to worry about was dykes on bikes!

Irene, Biggles and Shasta - The Three Moosketeers...LOVE YA for the laughs!

And good to know that we boys are safe here... :P
EARTH AID is dedicated to the creation of an interactive multimedia worldwide event to raise awareness about the challenges and solutions of nuclear energy.

biggles

I know that I know nothing - thanks Capricorn.