The Truth About 5G

[WhatTheHey]

How can a radio frequency be used on sonic equipment? We can only ear frequencies below 20 KHz (for an average young adult) and we do not ear electromagnetic radiation.

    Sorry, I was looking at military energy weapons and my mind was still on the sonic while I did that post and I didn't catch my slip.  I should have said millimeter wave or short wave energy.    There is a lot of good info in the above post from Thor you should read.

   Yes most all these devises use mmw.   Devises of different types use varying levels of intensity that cause different things to happen per applied level.  "(note, however, that energy and intensity are not the same thing!)."  That quote is from ( https://www.physicscentral.com/experiment/askaphysicist/physics-answer.cfm?uid=20110119110703 ).  Many machines used to do these tasks work in the short wave range, but differ in intensity.  I hope this helps you understand.   Even X-Ray scanners are a short wave with higher intensity.  I use science based sites for most of my info and even then you must be watchful.
   Here's something to help, it shows how low intensity is what makes the difference in a tissue penetrating medical use.  Same range of short wave but low intensity.    http://alexoratech.com/devices/millimeter-wave/  .

  A variety of MMW frequencies and intensities are in use for a good number of applications. ("The millimeter-wave region of the electromagnetic spectrum is usually considered to be the range of wavelengths from 10 millimeters (0.4 inches) to 1 millimeter (0.04 inches). This means millimeter waves are longer than infrared waves or x-rays, for example, but shorter than radio waves or microwaves. The millimeter-wave region of the electromagnetic spectrum corresponds to radio band frequencies of 30 GHz to 300 GHz and is sometimes called the Extremely High Frequency (EHF) range. The high frequency of millimeters waves as well as their propagation characteristics (that is, the ways they change or interact with the atmosphere as they travel) make them useful for a variety of applications including transmitting large amounts of computer data, cellular communications, and radar.") Quote from https://ethw.org/Millimeter_Waves .

[thorfourwinds]

Forecasters may no longer be able to warn of storms such as 2018's 'beast from the east',
which dumped heavy snow on cities including Newcastle. Photograph: Owen Humphreys/PA

5G signal could jam satellites that help with weather forecasting

New mobile system to be launched this year 'will put lives at risk'

Robin McKie
Sat 4 May 2019 09.59 EDT
      
The introduction of 5G mobile phone networks could seriously affect weather forecasters' ability to predict major storms.

That is the stark warning of meteorologists around the world, who say the next-generation wireless system now being rolled out across the globe is likely to disrupt the delicate satellite instruments they use to monitor changes in the atmosphere.

The result will be impaired forecasts, poorer warnings about major storms, and loss of life, they say.

"The way 5G is being introduced could seriously compromise our ability to forecast major storms," said Tony McNally of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts in Reading. "In the end it could make the difference between life and death. We are very concerned about this."

The crisis facing the world's meteorologists stems from the fact that the radio frequencies the new 5G networks will use could contaminate critical Earth observations made by weather satellites.

Instruments on board the satellites peer down into the atmosphere and study variables such as water vapour, rain, snow, cloud cover and ice content – all crucial factors that influence our weather.

One example is the 23.8 gigahertz (GHz) frequency. Water vapour emits a faint signal at this specific natural wavelength, and this data is monitored and measured by weather satellites. Forecasters then use this information to work out how a storm or weather system is likely to develop.

"Such data is critical to our ability to make forecasts," said Niels Bormann, also of the Reading weather centre. "They are a unique natural resource, and if we lose this capability, weather forecasts will get significantly worse."

The problem is that some 5G phone networks may transmit near a frequency similar to that emitted by water vapour, and so would produce a signal that looks very like its presence in the atmosphere.

"We would not be able to tell the difference and so would have to discard that data," added Bormann. "That would compromise our ability to make accurate forecasts."

The urgency of the problem is underlined by the fact that US Federal Communications Commission and similar agencies in other countries have already started to auction off frequencies close to the 23.8 GHz frequency to future 5G network providers. In addition, other bands that are used to probe our weather include the 36-37 GHz band, which is used to study rain and snow; the 50 GHz band, which is used to measure atmospheric temperature; and the 86-92 Ghz band, which helps to analyse cloud and ice.

All these contain sections of waveband that are being auctioned off in the US. It remains to be seen if other nations will follow suit and sell these frequencies in their own countries over coming months. The issue is set to be debated at a global conference in Egypt later this year.

Forecasters say the US move has already compromised their ability to collect data, and promise to lobby other nations to limit use of crucial frequencies to preserve their ability to provide accurate forecasts. They accuse phone operators of ransacking the radio spectrum for wavelengths to exploit, and regulators of failing to protect the natural frequencies vital for Earth observation from space. "The more we lose, the greater the impact will be," states meteorologist Jordan Gerth, of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in the current issue of Nature. "This is a global problem."

[From "Comments" on this story.]

Dan H.

I have my degree in computer robotics, and have a full understanding what 5G is, and how dangerous it is.

Here is a simple explanation, and I hope people will read it all.

Most people have a Microwave in their kitchen, the home microwave uses high frequency radio wave energy to heat food by exciting the water molecules. The standard cell phone also uses microwave energy to communicate with cell towers. 4G is low power microwave energy & has a greater range of contact with towers. 5G is high power Nano wave energy, and has less range of contact with towers. 5G needs more, and closer towers to work effectively. If it takes your common microwave oven kitchen five minutes to cook something, it would take a nano wave oven less than 30 seconds to cook the same food.

If you stand in front of an open microwave oven for 30 seconds you WILL suffer severe tissue damage. Being close to a 5G transmitter is like standing in front of an open microwave oven for ten minutes or more. Demand the FCC and Cell companies stop this deadly technology.

[Ellirium113]

I've had a DLINK router pushing 5G WI-FI by me at my desk for over 2+ years. I've yet to be microwaved it seems...what am I doing wrong? 

[ArMaP]

Thanks for that information but it only supports what I said before, that millimetre waves are reflected by the body, not absorbed. It also confirms that intensity of the signal is what matters most (obviously), so an emitter working at the same frequency but a lower intensity has a much weaker effect than another one with the same frequency but higher intensity.

In case of the frequencies used on 5G, the highest it 86 GHz, well below the upper 300 GHz limit of millimetre waves. Also, being a lower frequency it's a lower energy radiation.

X-Ray is a short wave radiation but with a higher frequency and energy than the frequencies used by 5G.

The direct energy crowd control systems use a slightly higher frequency (96 GHz) but a much stronger intensity, but even then they only affect the upper 1/64 of an inch of skin, as they do not have enough energy to penetrate the body.

Q9. Does this system work like a microwave oven?
A9.  No. The ADS, a non-lethal directed-energy weapon, projects a very short duration (on the order of a few seconds) focused beam of millimeter waves at a frequency of 95 gigahertz (GHz). A microwave oven operates at 2.45 GHz. At the much higher frequency of 95 GHz, the associated directed energy wavelength is very short and only physically capable of reaching a skin depth of about 1/64 of an inch. A microwave oven operating at 2.45 GHz has a much longer associated wave length, on the order of several inches, which allows for greater penetration of material and efficiency in heating food. The ADS provides a quick and reversible skin surface heating sensation that does not penetrate into the target.

(Source)

[WhatTheHey]

Thanks for that information but it only supports what I said before, that millimetre waves are reflected by the body, not absorbed. It also confirms that intensity of the signal is what matters most (obviously), so an emitter working at the same frequency but a lower intensity has a much weaker effect than another one with the same frequency but higher intensity.

In case of the frequencies used on 5G, the highest it 86 GHz, well below the upper 300 GHz limit of millimetre waves. Also, being a lower frequency it's a lower energy radiation.

X-Ray is a short wave radiation but with a higher frequency and energy than the frequencies used by 5G.

The direct energy crowd control systems use a slightly higher frequency (96 GHz) but a much stronger intensity, but even then they only affect the upper 1/64 of an inch of skin, as they do not have enough energy to penetrate the body.
(Source)

    Well thanks for the agreement that it is indeed intensity that causes change in affect.  I'm glad you know what the affects are from long term exposure to as you put it "weaker effect" when no one else seems too.  According to the data its still under study.  And that is what is not cool about this whole 5G thing.  Not enough is known about the long term exposure to these fields.  Not to mention there is an issue with proximity do to the fact that a cell-tower is slightly larger then the hand held scanners and backscanners you talk about.  Like you said your self "The direct energy crowd control systems use a slightly higher frequency" and that has an acute reaction in seconds.  But I'm glad you think you know!  Maybe you should live right next to one and be an experiment.  Of course there are people winning suits against Co.s using towers already, as the towers and tech are now.   
                               http://emfsafetynetwork.org/jury-awards-vermont-couple-1million-in-cell-tower-lawsuit/

So it seems we will see what happens in time.

   Have a wonderful day!   

[ArMaP]

According to the data its still under study.  And that is what is not cool about this whole 5G thing.  Not enough is known about the long term exposure to these fields.

I agree completely, there aren't (apparently) enough studies for this new use of those frequencies, but that's no reason to present them as being as dangerous as most sites against it appear to do.

Like you said your self "The direct energy crowd control systems use a slightly higher frequency" and that has an acute reaction in seconds.

Besides using the wrong URL for the source I forgot to point on my previous post that that higher frequency means higher energy for the same intensity (I was almost asleep when I wrote that). Also, those crowd control systems waves have a power of 30 kw, much higher than any cell phone tower (I think the maximum allowed is 500 w, while a phone has a power of 1 or 2 w), resulting in a much higher energy emitted and much stronger effects.

But I'm glad you think you know!

I think I know what? I don't remember saying anything like that.

Maybe you should live right next to one and be an experiment.  Of course there are people winning suits against Co.s using towers already, as the towers and tech are now.   
                               http://emfsafetynetwork.org/jury-awards-vermont-couple-1million-in-cell-tower-lawsuit/

First of all I don't have any trust on the US justice system, so any court decision in the US means nothing to me, and that case was not just about possible health effects of the cell tower, it was about the couple having to move from their home because of being frightened for the security of their children during the construction, frightened for the health from the radio tower (I couldn't find any place that said what kind of frequencies were to be used on that tower) and because the company had full access to their property whenever they wanted.

So it seems we will see what happens in time.

I'm sure we will, unless it makes us blind.

Have a wonderful day!   

The same to you.

[thorfourwinds]

ΕX DΗS ΕMPLΟΥEE REVEALS ALL IN THIS ΙNTERVΙEW ON THIS CΟMΙNG TECHNOLOGY

Dana Ashlie
Published on Jan 25, 2019

ΑNΟNΥMOUS lNSIDΕR shares what we all may face...AND HOW to PRΕPARΕ. ΕX-DΕPΑRTMENT of HΟMΕLΑND SΕC. ΕMPLOYΕΕ TΕLLS ΑLL she experienced with HΕR DΕCLINING health working next to FIVΕ GEE TΕCH! Shocking INTΕRVIΕW on RΕAL WORLD lMPACTS of ΤΗIS CΟMNG TΕCΗNΟLΟGΥ.

Wireless Warfare Exposed. Includes ways to protect your family

Dana Ashlie
Published on Oct 28, 2018
Sometimes what you don't know CAN HURT YOU. Ignorance around this subject matter is almost guaranteed to do so. I'm still shocked that with all the research I do, I had NO IDEA this was going on and I'm thankful I've since learned how to stop it. Pleased to be sharing this life preserving information here...

Find a LONG LIST of studies with RF effects on biology along with the exact frequency type and power of each RF signal used as well as who performed the studies here:  https://www.rfsafe.com/reported-healt...

--
Where you can get RF Meters to check your own microwave/RF/EMF levels at home:
https://tinyurl.com/yaxgfg8q  - RF Meters

--
Where you can get shielded clothing to protect from RF:
https://tinyurl.com/ycz9g3lc

--
Where to get Shielding Bedding to block RF:
(also paint, curtains, fabrics, phone cases)   
https://tinyurl.com/y8pe5r75

--
Gear to Protect Mama and Baby from RF
Belly Band (Baby Protection) Page - https://bellyarmor.com/products/belly...

Belly Blanket Collection -  https://bellyarmor.com/collections/be...

Maternity Apparel Collection -  https://bellyarmor.com/collections/ap...


As for those who feel moved to financially support this YouTube video work via your donations, HALLELUJAH!
To donate via PayPal, put the following into your browser bar:
paypal.me/DanaAshlie

or reach me old school:
Dana A
PO Box 3324
Blue Jay, CA 92317

Email: danaashlie@yahoo.com

My WebSite will be located at : www.DefeatTheBeast.com
Will be carrying Heavy Metal and Ge0Engin33ring Detox Tools as well as RF Shielding Products for your families health.

Southern California based Building Biologist
http://www.hollandelectricalemf.com
William Holland  @ My Quiet Home
Electrician and RF Mediation Expert
818-292-1271

Router with EXTERNAL WiFi "OFF" button:
N600 Netgear Dual Band Router WNDR3400v3

May Peace be with you and May the Truth set you FREE!

Dana Ashlie

[thorfourwinds]

Max Igan "5G, SmartGrid & Depopulation Program"

TradCatKnight
Published on Feb 7, 2018
SUBSCRIBE 150K
TradcatKnight Radio, Max Igan "5G, SmartGrid & Depopulation Program"
Talk given 2-7-18   (aprx 35 minutes)

I apologize for the bad skype connection as Max is in the heart of the Amazon at the moment.  As always please turn up the volumes on your computer and youtube video...

Special guest Max Igan joins me to discuss:  The USA and Trump, Greater Israel Project, Jerusalem, global depopulation program, social contract/credit, 5G, crypto currency, latest geopolitics, zionism, role of false flags/war on terror and MUCH more!

Website: thecrowhouse.com
Youtube: youtube.com/user/thecrowhouse

[thorfourwinds]

Smartphone with highest radiation: Here are most dangerous phones

By Tarun Bhardwaj - 7th March 2019

In the ranking of the smartphones that emit more radiation we find different models of the iPhone but above all the Chinese devices.


Punctual like a Swiss watch, the smartphone-radiation topic is back in vogue.

Nowadays, in fact, we are more and more smartphone- dependent: our phone is at our fingertips 24 hours a day, in our pocket while we go to work or on the bedside table when we go to sleep. This is now the normality. But what we keep asking ourselves is whether the radiation emitted by smartphones is really harmful to our health and which models are more or less safe.

At the moment research has not produced concrete and univocal results: we still do not know how much and if the radiations emitted by smartphones are actually harmful. You may also be interested in Wi-Fi, 3G, 4G, 5G: dangerous radiation, yes or no? We make clarity.

From the list, however, emerged a fact: Chinese devices appear in greater quantities among smartphones that emit higher levels of radiation, followed by the iPhone.

The Statist website has compiled and published the list of smartphone models that emit more radiation (which you find below) on the basis of data collected by the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz). The institution has in fact a complete and updated database of mobile devices, new and old, and the level of radiation they emit, both in standby and when you place them on the ear to call.

Smartphones that emit more radiation: the ranking:


According to the list above, the most dangerous radiation-level phones are the Chinese. In fact, the Xiaomi Mi A1 is in the first place, followed by OnePlus 5T. In fact, the two companies are widely represented in this ranking, with as many as 8 models among the top 16 most risky smartphones.

In any case, we also find the iPhone 7 and iPhone 8, respectively in the 9th and 14th place, as well as the Google Pixels, HTC and Sony.

Although there is no universal guideline for a "safe" level of phone radiation, German ecology certification Der Blaue Engel (Blue Angel) certifies only phones that have a specific absorption rate of less than 0.60 watts per kilogram. All the phones present here are more than double this benchmark.

Smartphone and radiation: where is Huawei?
In today's ranking we note the absence of Huawei: in the list does not appear even a smartphone model of the Chinese company. The data amazes if we consider that in the 2018 ranking Huawei smartphones were present and also in large numbers.

At the top of the list there were still Xiaomi Mi A1 and OnePlus 5T, followed by Huawei starting from Mate 9 up to the P9 Lite.

There were six Huawei smartphones on the list and, in general, the devices to emit more radiation are all of Chinese manufacturers except for the fourth position where we find Nokia.

It should also be noted that the second-ranked attendance level was Apple: there were in fact three iPhone on the list that, despite occupying lower positions, still remained among the smartphones to emit the highest number of radiation.

Instead, the absence of Samsung is surprising: the South Korean house had accumulated many accusations over its devices over the years. In any case, even if it is not yet clear what the damage that radiation can cause to our health, it is always good to try to avoid keeping your mobile device too close to head, heart and private parts.

[ArMaP]

Although there is no universal guideline for a "safe" level of phone radiation, German ecology certification Der Blaue Engel (Blue Angel) certifies only phones that have a specific absorption rate of less than 0.60 watts per kilogram. All the phones present here are more than double this benchmark.

There's no universal guideline for a "safe" level of phone radiation but the recommendation is that it shouldn't be higher than 2.0 Watts per kilogram, so all the phones on those charts are below the "official" safe level.

For those interest, here is the full list, with 3,430 different models.

The one I am using has a value (close to the ear) of 1.39. Luckily, I rarely have to use it as a phone.

[space otter]

i don't have a cell phone..
call me wierd but getting one made me think of it as having a leash around my neck that anyone could pull on at any time

a friend sent me this.. i think it fits here

http://fortune.com/2019/06/20/horns-growing-human-skulls-cell-phones/

HEALTH CELL PHONES
Cell Phones Might Be Causing Horns to Grow on Young People's Skulls: Study
By CHRIS MORRIS Updated: June 20, 2019 4:47 PM ET

Well, this is terrifying.

Researchers at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Queensland, Australia have found evidence that our frequent use of mobile devices could be fundamentally altering our physiology. Specifically, they're seeing horn-like bone spurs appear on younger adults (the most frequent users of those devices).

The good news, if there is any here, is that you're not going to see a generation of kids looking like triceratops wannabes, with horns poking out of their foreheads. The bad news is, the spurs are growing at the back of the skull.

Here's what the researchers say is happening: Frequent users of mobile devices regularly tilt their heads forward to view them. That shifts the weight of the head from the spine to muscles in the back of the head, which causes bones to grow in the tendons and ligaments. That results in a horn-like spur that grows from the base of the skull.

Courtesy of Scientific Report
"Our findings raise a concern about the future musculoskeletal health of the young adult population and reinforce the need for prevention intervention through posture improvement education," the scientists noted in the report, which was originally published a year ago, but has come to more prominent attention recently.

The study looked at 1,200 X-rays taken in Queensland covering a wide variety of age ranges. One-third of those showed the bone spur, with the frequency decreasing with age. Larger spurs were much more prominent in younger people.

Cell phones have been criticized for their impact on human health before, but researchers say this is the first time the body has shown an adaptation to technology used in everyday life.

"An important question is what the future holds for the young adult populations in our study, when development of a degenerative process is evident in such an early stage of their lives?," they wrote.

Worried about the effect of phones on your own body? The study's lead author suggests you run your hand over the lower rear part of your skull, telling the Washington Post that if you've got a horn growing there, you can probably feel it.
[/size]

[Irene]

I'm sorry, I think this is hilarious. I already consider today's youth to be the spawn of Satan, so this is a promising development.

[thorfourwinds]

The Truth About 5G | FACTS, DANGERS and MYTHS EXPLAINED

Vtudio
Published on Apr 29, 2019

In this report we head to Australia's first 5G cell tower to study the real effects of 5G. Are the birds falling out from the sky? Is it running at real 5G speeds?

COMPANION VIDEOS
Is Huawei Spying:
S9 Tech Reviews are Wrong:

WHY 5G
It'll speed up your internet by 100x, it'll allow you to perform surgery with a robot, it'll let thousands of drones fly through the sky. It'll allow clinics to show patient data.

While these use cases sound great and futuristic, for 5G, they're a bit dumb.

Showing a patient's medical data when they're at the clinic can already be done with WIFI.
Performing remote surgery at a hospital can already be done with WIFI.

Drones which require fast 5G signals to operate, is a DANGER HAZARD.

Does your reception ever break up? What happens when they're flying over areas which aren't covered.

More importantly, fast 5G only actually works at short range. By short, fast 5G requires 10 times more antennas than 4G, because the signal operates at a higher frequency they don't travel as far. So drones flying here there and everywhere aren't really going to be in those fast 5G areas now are they?

MEDICAL
The 5G being used currently operates at the 3GHz spectrum, but the problem is that 5G can go up to 100GHz. When you start going above 29GHz you hit the realm of extremely high frequency. This frequency is the same as those hated TSA scanners use, which by the way you only have to traverse sometimes if you're travelling internationally and unlucky. But more importantly, it's been used in the medical field to change cell growth[1].

Now doctors and scientists usually say, but hey, if phones were dangerous, there would be more cases of brain cancer, and yes, that's right, brain cancer rates haven't gone up, they've just steadily dropped slightly. HOWEVER, I don't know about you, but I don't constantly keep my phone on my head. Where I do keep it however, is near my balls.... Did you know since 2002, sperm counts have fallen by 50% over the past few decades[2].

Also, did you know that Apple recommend you use your smartphone on hands free. And Samsung recommend you place your phone 1.5cm away from your body. I don't know what kind of trousers you wear, but if your mates acting a bit weird, tell them to lay off the skinny jeans.

What's scary about 5G is its mission statement. 4G only supported 4000 devices per square km. But, 5G aims to support 1 million[3]. And considering that the different cells support from only 8 to 200 users, then you're looking at 5000 cells per km at the best case.

The one saving grace at the moment with 5G is that, currently it's all hype. The 5G that's being installed at the moment here in Australia operates at 3GHz[4], so, it's just ever so slightly faster than 4G, but these units are designed to operate at higher frequencies, and with a switch of a button, you might start needing some tin foil.

CREDITS

CNBC - Is 5G Safe:

Collective Evolution - Veteran MD Drops Bombshell About 5G Technology Dangers At 5G Hearing:

Talks at Google - Frank Abagnale - Catch Me If You Can:

RT America - How To Survive Dangers of 5G:

TEDx Talks - Wireless wake-up call - Jeromy Johnson:

The Conscious Resistance - Derrick Broze Educates Houston City Council on 5G Tech:

Tesla - Tesla Autonomy Day:

Otiah - Winter Conspiracy:

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme...
[2] https://www.webmd.com/men/news/201707...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G#Over...
[4] https://www.telstra.com.au/aboutus/me...

[thorfourwinds]

5G Technology and Artificial Intelligence-
Warning from Extraterrestrial Pleiadian (Taygeta)

The 5G Dragnet

corbettreport
Published on Jun 21, 2019
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: https://www.corbettreport.com/5g/

Tommy Bryan
5G is not about high speed internet. That is the cloak it is wrapped in. It is about total saturation of surveillance capability with every human being haveing a footprint that will be recorded. They will know even when you are in bed and who you are in bed with. Don't believe it, then please watch this:

[Irene]

When I updated my phone this past spring I asked about the dangers of 5G. The guy laughed at me like I was crazy.

I'd say that last video pretty much makes him the fool and not me.