Videos dealing with Corona Virus

[spacemaverick]

Try this gentleman, he is more credible than Alex Jones.  Don't put him down until you listen to him.  (my suggestion)

James Corbett at Corbett Report





Each week he will put out a new video on Bill Gates and he allows for Bill gates excerpts where Bill Gates tells what he and his wife are doing.  This deals with vaccinations for coronavirus and just about everything else.

[ArMaP]

Try this gentleman, he is more credible than Alex Jones.  Don't put him down until you listen to him.  (my suggestion)

It's easy to be more credible than Alex Jones.

I wont put him down because I don't know him, but I wont watch the videos either, they are too long for me.

[spacemaverick]

It's easy to be more credible than Alex Jones.

I wont put him down because I don't know him, but I wont watch the videos either, they are too long for me.

Your choice....it's hard to judge a video if you don't watch it.

[ArMaP]

Your choice....it's hard to judge a video if you don't watch it.

That's why I didn't judge it.

[Ellirium113]

I think if we should point out the timestamps of particular areas of LONG videos to check out that would help.  Some of us don't have the time to watch very long vids.

[spacemaverick]

I think if we should point out the timestamps of particular areas of LONG videos to check out that would help.  Some of us don't have the time to watch very long vids.

Actually a good idea!  James Corbett reports are about 30 minutes long.

[kevin]

Roll up, roll up for the wonderful vaccine ......
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/salud/salud_vacunas26.htm?fbclid=IwAR0uqc2PWZoZS2-bnu5bFvevBTZfhWUbRkU-vMy2XjeDgB4TySa9rL_Fqng

Afterall Mr gates says that without it there will be no return to normal.


He does want to de populate You know, doesn't hide it, grins when talking about it


Kevin

[ArMaP]

Afterall Mr gates says that without it there will be no return to normal.

I wonder why some people give him so much importance (specially those that are against him).

He does want to de populate You know, doesn't hide it, grins when talking about it

His idea is to create the conditions for people to have less children.

In some societies having many children is the only way of having a relatively comfortable old age (I put old age in italics because in those countries the life expectancy is low when compared with the richer countries, with, for example, Portugal having a life expectancy of 82 and Nigeria only 58). As infant mortality is very high in those countries (around 7% for Nigeria and 0.4% for Portugal) people know they have to have many children. Also, having many children means having many working hands in the family.

By reducing infant mortality people do not need to have as many children, and by creating better conditions people can live longer, again reducing the need to have many children.
That's what happened in Europe and in the US, as people up to the industrial revolution needed to have many children so they could have a good chance of their children reaching adulthood (my maternal grandmother had 4 siblings, of which only one (besides her) got to be old enough to marry and have children). Also, having many children meant having many working hands to work the land or for the factories, so while the rich provided the land and factories the poor provided the hands at a cheap price.

That's why they call the workers proletariat, a word that comes from the Latin word proletarius, which means having children (that's why we use the word "prole" in Portuguese to mean "offspring"), as the only thing they could provide was their work and children.
The invention of vaccines created a huge reduction in deaths from smallpox, allowing a higher number of people to reach adulthood in Europe, which in turn allowed for longer working lives and gave people time to teach their children and grandchildren.
With the rise in industrialisation being also applied to agriculture brought cheaper food, which, along with higher wages given to the workers, a result of a rise of demand for workers for the rising number of factories, resulted in a better average life for the workers, so at the middle of the 20th century, European families had less children that those 50 years before them. With electricity becoming widespread, resulting in new developments in industry and creating the bases for the IT society, the situation kept on the same direction, with people having less and lees children, resulting in an old population in Western countries, with the mean age in Europe being 43.1 years while in Africa its 19.7.

So, the idea is that vaccinating people will lead to longer lives and lower infant mortality, which leads to people having less children. Increasing quality of life also increases life expectancy and, again, reduces the number of children people feel is the ideal, resulting in a slowing of the increase of population in the world.

That's how Bill Gates (and others) say they want to reduce the world population: creating better conditions for people to live, so they do not need to have as many children as they do now, reducing the growth of the population, not the population.

[Shasta56]

I'm from a Catholic/Mormon family.  My mother was one of four children, and my father was one of either 12 or 13.  Some of my father's siblings died in infancy.  I know both churches still encourage having "as many children as God gives you," but I don't know that either one has offered any actual advice regarding the economics of large families.  It might be better to have negative population growth for a time, to allow our Mother Earth to heal.

[astr0144]

In ref to can we prove if Bill Gates is legit or NOT...

IF he does have the intentions that Alex Jones suggests.. and intends to vaccine all of us or chip us all...
in a way that would be very negitive to us all...

That MAYBE the Most impotrant issue that we have to be concerned  about at the moment..

But of the few of us who comment in this thread...

we dont really have a lot of agreement of full evidence to agree to  one way r the other as yet...

and still maore likely will be like this until a vaccine may get suggested...or that  the authorities start to insist everyone must agree to it all..

[ArMaP]

In ref to can we prove if Bill Gates is legit or NOT...

IF he does have the intentions that Alex Jones suggests.. and intends to vaccine all of us or chip us all...
in a way that would be very negitive to us all...

First question: why should we believe Alex Jones?

[Ellirium113]

In ref to can we prove if Bill Gates is legit or NOT...

IF he does have the intentions that Alex Jones suggests.. and intends to vaccine all of us or chip us all...
in a way that would be very negitive to us all...

That MAYBE the Most impotrant issue that we have to be concerned  about at the moment..

But of the few of us who comment in this thread...

we dont really have a lot of agreement of full evidence to agree to  one way r the other as yet...

and still maore likely will be like this until a vaccine may get suggested...or that  the authorities start to insist everyone must agree to it all..

Bill Gates is reportedly working on 8 different Vaccines. Other people (NOT BILL GATES) are also making vaccines. So even IF the theory of Gates wanting to reduce numbers through a vaccination program turns out to be true, that might only apply to the 8 vaccines and will be very traceable if people with THOSE specific vaccines start dropping. This will confirm the conspiracy theorist's allegations and open the floodgates for Gates to begin defending himself from the massive blowback he would get over it. In essence there is a battle over getting a vaccine to production first to be the dominant leader in sales. Already plans are in the works to prevent people from suing the vaccine companies if it doesn't work as advertised. 

[astr0144]

I have explained this on other occasions... such as some past other major things that occurred such as the death of Bin Larden as an eg where he informed his followers or suggested that his death was a 3rd time occasion..

plus other people who have been on his show and interest shown to him from Donald Trump at one time.
and some other influencial peopple of whom many may trust their judgement to some degree..

in terms of the actual virus... or Bill Gates....

I can only go off him making comments on the likes of Gerge Sorus and Bill Gates over many years.

he has claims of connections to other insiders etc who claims to be more aware of Gates agendas..



But to be  it can be seen like politics... both partys may may make out to be knowledgable / honest...as to why we should trust them.. 

We can always say how do we beleieve anything or anyone ! 

is whatever we may think only an individuals opinion ?

First question: why should we believe Alex Jones?

[astr0144]

You may make some valid worthwhile points to further consider E113.

I do just hope that any other organisations ar not totally controlled by the W.H.O of its suggested Bills Gates controls.

but as far as I am aware ,chances are ...that have to connected to it...

It would be more comforting if there were some more trusted compnaies involved in the developement or could have opposing views and control if need be ...or  say on such things if they challenged things from Gates or W.H.O..that can also offer us alternatives...

Bill Gates is reportedly working on 8 different Vaccines. Other people (NOT BILL GATES) are also making vaccines. So even IF the theory of Gates wanting to reduce numbers through a vaccination program turns out to be true, that might only apply to the 8 vaccines and will be very traceable if people with THOSE specific vaccines start dropping. This will confirm the conspiracy theorist's allegations and open the floodgates for Gates to begin defending himself from the massive blowback he would get over it. In essence there is a battle over getting a vaccine to production first to be the dominant leader in sales. Already plans are in the works to prevent people from suing the vaccine companies if it doesn't work as advertised.

[ArMaP]

I have explained this on other occasions... such as some past other major things that occurred such as the death of Bin Larden as an eg where he informed his followers or suggested that his death was a 3rd time occasion..

How can that be a reason to believe him? Did he say how and when Bin Ladden would be killed?

plus other people who have been on his show and interest shown to him from Donald Trump at one time.
and some other influencial peopple of whom many may trust their judgement to some degree..

That's no reason to believe him.

I can only go off him making comments on the likes of Gerge Sorus and Bill Gates over many years.

he has claims of connections to other insiders etc who claims to be more aware of Gates agendas..

"Claims" that are never proved are just that, so why should we believe some guy that claims many things he can't prove?

I don't.

We can always say how do we beleieve anything or anyone ! 

is whatever we may think only an individuals opinion ?

I tend to believe people that:
- are talking about things they are supposed to know;
- are proved to be right in previous occasions when talking about that subject;
- they are not talking about other people, specially people with whom they are not connected;
- they say things that can be verified as true, in which they base their opinions, and they present their opinions as being opinions instead of presenting them as facts.