Videos dealing with Corona Virus

[Ellirium113]

Did it ever occur to anyone our common RADAR has been using these frequencies for years... NO ONE HAS DIED FROM IT!

The frequencies of radar sets today range from about 5 megahertz to about 130 gigahertz (130,000,000,000 oscillations per second!). However, certain frequencies are also preferred for certain radar applications. Very long-range radar systems usually operate at lower frequencies below and including the D-band. 3 GHz (ASR)

https://www.radartutorial.eu/07.waves/Waves%20and%20Frequency%20Ranges.en.html

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Did it ever occur to anyone our common RADAR has been using these frequencies for years... NO ONE HAS DIED FROM IT!
https://www.radartutorial.eu/07.waves/Waves%20and%20Frequency%20Ranges.en.html

Nice one.....BUT.....(they will say)....lol...such gooblygook... 

[astr0144]

Seems a valid point...and certainly of interest.

I know very little in ref to Radar...only what Ive seen / experienced in films on TV or on some ships or at an airport.

fansongecho may know more as I think he worked with Radar !

If anything I thought that it maybe with the Radio Frequency area while the Mobile networks or system was to do with Microwave part of the spectrum. Did not think that they may overlap.

I dont think I have ever seen it referred to or spelt out in a EMF chart where usually you see eg from Radio, micowave, Light (IR / UV  ), X Ray and Gamma.



but it seems Radar is on this chart and comes towards the Radio / Microwave area



http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UvCLgmB_H-E/TVXyPAnD9xI/AAAAAAAAAus/IQ21G_cjcsg/s1600/Electromagnetic_Spectrum_Full_Chart.jpg

In the chart it shows mobile phones ranging on the other or old system I assume between 900mhz and 2.4 ghz

and radar at 1 to 100 / 130 Ghz.

For Telecom companies that use either other signals or 5 G . does radar not effect them in some way would you think ?
or could they have some way to block it ?

On one of the later videos that was being discussed about magnetbiology... it referred to certain things that can effect it.. like trees and other types of objects...

If Radar is similar to Microwave 5g in wave type... As radar waves hits objects and  bounces off and returns...or thats the impression I think I presently visualise...

Then im not sure how it compares. or maybe affected.
I wonder if they use something like this ! may interfere with the Mobile masts or dishes or what ever.
or is this just for effecting the return signal to the radar and not the output signal that may interfere with Mobile masts.

It will probably be the transmitter that sends the signals out.

The radar transmitter produces the short duration high-power rf pulses of energy that are radiated into space by the antenna.

https://www.radartutorial.eu/08.transmitters/Radar%20Transmitter.en.html

Radar jamming and deception is a form of electronic countermeasures that intentionally sends out radio frequency signals to interfere with the operation of radar by saturating its receiver with noise or false information. Concepts that blanket the radar with signals so its display cannot be read are normally known as jamming, while systems that produce confusing or contradictory signals are known as deception, but it is also common for all such systems to be referred to as jamming.

There are two general classes of radar jamming, mechanical and electronic. Mechanical jamming entails reflecting enemy radio signals in various ways to provide false or misleading target signals to the radar operator. Electronic jamming works by transmitting additional radio signals towards enemy receivers, making it difficult to detect real target signals, or take advantage of known behaviors of automated systems like radar lock-on to confuse the system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_jamming_and_deception


another radar link that gives some brief descriptions.

https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs226/en/

Elirium113 link=topic=11476.msg150775#msg150775 date=1589195523]
Did it ever occur to anyone our common RADAR has been using these frequencies for years... NO ONE HAS DIED FROM IT!
https://www.radartutorial.eu/07.waves/Waves%20and%20Frequency%20Ranges.en.html
[/quote]

[ArMaP]

you mentioned that your stopped watching when he talked about Mic Ovens.
but on your later reply post other things that are effect us / our biology  by Mic Waves.. ie cell phones toothbrush.
That I assume are not shielded in the same way as you describe a mic oven maybe...
or are they designed in a similar so that radiation does not get out ?

Other things do not emit electromagnetic radiation with that power level, so they are not dangerous. Also, lower frequencies are less dangerous, and a toothbrush probably only emits at 50 or 60 Hz, the frequency of the socket to which they may be connected or the frequency related to the rotation speed of the motor or other actuator (like in the case of ultrasound).

Are you by any chance comparing a Mobile Phone with a Micowave being sealed to stop radiation..
or is the effect on the mobile phone different and justs recieves the signal..

No, I just mentioned that I stopped watching because the man was saying that microwave ovens affect our magnetic fields. If they are shielded to stop radiation from getting out then their radiation doesn't affect us.

Why did you not keep watching whe you was aware that a Moble Phone was also mentioned in the sceneio that you seemed to descibe. ? ie the sheilding and that the radiation does not get out..

Because the way he said it made me think he was not being honest.

Does radiation get sealed or out of a Mobile phone  ? in a similar comparision ?

No, if the radiation from a mobile phone was blocked they wouldn't be able to work.

It was often suggested that Mobile Phones were a danger to us.. so I assume there is some radiation that comes from
the mobile phone.. and its not sealed in the same ways as a mic oven..

or does the radiation come with the microwaves and just surround us  when  we use a mobile phone..

If so or not whats the difference ?

The frequencies cell phones use can be dangerous, but not with the amount of power used by cell phones. Older phones worked with higher power transmissions, but when studies started appearing showing that they could be harmful the makers reduced the power to reduce the probability of negative effects on the users, as they weren't interested in being sued.

or have you now considered anything different since reading my prior post.. which so far I am not sure if my made you consider anything differently..

although I can see that from your other points / comments it has not changed your view or maybe made you consider some other things differently.. I dont think !

I didn't change my mind.

From what I read you seem to have a fair understanding in this topic now...
but you dont see enough to still fully convince you...

so you seem to have done some quite indepth detective research...

I haven't made much research, but I studied electricity in high school (3 years), and although I didn't have any classes about radio I have read about in books and magazines about electronics (I have two courses on electronics, those paid by the EU many years ago to help develop the technological side of countries just after joining the EU).

Not sure which telecom companies are using or plan to use (If some may alter to 60 Ghz) but I also thought that one concern was the China telecom Co Huawei that planned to use it and thats maybe the main thing that raised this concern.

Huawei is a equipment maker, not a telecoms company. They make the equipment and IT related companies use. At work, our telecom and Internet provider is Vodafone, and the equipment they installed was from Huawei.

maybe : The angular momentum or spin speed of the electron probably alters and this may effect the binding...[/b]

Maybe, but I doubt it, as if that happens it would have been noticed a long time ago, as that frequency has been in use for many years.

In ref to my last prior comment above .. that the atoms spin effect may stop it binding with the hemoglobin..
could be the issue... BUT just HOW severe it can effect  the binding... Maybe it just has some medium effect rather than a full effect.. and thats why those people did not turn fully Blue...

If they do not turn blue then they do not need to have a tube inserted in their trachea to help them breath, I have lived many years with difficulty breathing and only needed to go to the hospital 5 or 6 times in the last 52 years.

NOW its interesting that you seem to  agree with that ...BUT you may question other things we had discussed of other Drs / scientists companies etc where you dont seem to accept for certain cases that could do similar..ie take bribes and pay offs to go along with either big biz or Govts for corrupt purposes  etc..

I do not agree with that because they would need to bribe many thousands of people, and we would only need one that speaks about it (with evidences) to bring it all down.

so why agree with that and not some of the other simialar things that we discussed or that A.J has suggested on numerous occasions... in which often say that you dont believe him on many a similar thing hes referred to.

I agree that 60GHz was not tested on the conditions they are going to be used by cell phones, so I think testing it first is better than reaching the conclusion that it is dangerous after some years of use. But that doesn't mean I have to believe unrelated things.

Maybe only mainly the larger main Countries .. not all !

Well, the largest countries are China and India.

[ArMaP]

Did it ever occur to anyone our common RADAR has been using these frequencies for years... NO ONE HAS DIED FROM IT!
https://www.radartutorial.eu/07.waves/Waves%20and%20Frequency%20Ranges.en.html

It was mentioned on the The Truth About 5G thread but not on this one.

[ArMaP]

For Telecom companies that use either other signals or 5 G . does radar not effect them in some way would you think ?
or could they have some way to block it ?

The atmosphere does the blocking. The 60 GHz frequency radio can only go a short distance (a couple of km at most, but usually less than that), so while it's used on radar it's not used on long distance radar, so, unless they put 5G antennas working at 60 GHz close to a 60 GHz radar I don't think they will have problems.

If Radar is similar to Microwave 5g in wave type... As radar waves hits objects and  bounces off and returns...or thats the impression I think I presently visualise...

Then im not sure how it compares. or maybe affected.
I wonder if they use something like this ! may interfere with the Mobile masts or dishes or what ever.
or is this just for effecting the return signal to the radar and not the output signal that may interfere with Mobile masts.

I don't understand what you mean by thins.

It will probably be the transmitter that sends the signals out.

Cell phones are transmitters and receivers, as are the antennas, otherwise the communication would be in one direction only.

[ArMaP]

I found an interesting study on the effects of microwaves on human biology, here.

[Ellirium113]

Seems a valid point...and certainly of interest.

I know very little in ref to Radar...only what Ive seen / experienced in films on TV or on some ships or at an airport.

fansongecho may know more as I think he worked with Radar !

If anything I thought that it maybe with the Radio Frequency area while the Mobile networks or system was to do with Microwave part of the spectrum. Did not think that they may overlap.

I dont think I have ever seen it referred to or spelt out in a EMF chart where usually you see eg from Radio, micowave, Light (IR / UV  ), X Ray and Gamma.



but it seems Radar is on this chart and comes towards the Radio / Microwave area



http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UvCLgmB_H-E/TVXyPAnD9xI/AAAAAAAAAus/IQ21G_cjcsg/s1600/Electromagnetic_Spectrum_Full_Chart.jpg

In the chart it shows mobile phones ranging on the other or old system I assume between 900mhz and 2.4 ghz

and radar at 1 to 100 / 130 Ghz.

For Telecom companies that use either other signals or 5 G . does radar not effect them in some way would you think ?
or could they have some way to block it ?

Telecom channels are encrypted that is why you can't simply use internet with any device that does not get the encryption key through the ISP. They only look at the encrypted packets on that wave not the others this is how multiple devices work off the same frequencies. They use a sort of pulse width modulation between different encrypted packets.

On one of the later videos that was being discussed about magnetbiology... it referred to certain things that can effect it.. like trees and other types of objects...

If Radar is similar to Microwave 5g in wave type... As radar waves hits objects and  bounces off and returns...or thats the impression I think I presently visualise...

Then im not sure how it compares. or maybe affected.
I wonder if they use something like this ! may interfere with the Mobile masts or dishes or what ever.
or is this just for effecting the return signal to the radar and not the output signal that may interfere with Mobile masts.

It will probably be the transmitter that sends the signals out.
https://www.radartutorial.eu/08.transmitters/Radar%20Transmitter.en.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_jamming_and_deception

another radar link that gives some brief descriptions.

https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs226/en/

Radar waves will have no effect on the other forms of communication as it is all on separate channels. If you used a general receiver of some sort that listens to everything it would be quite a mess of distorted signals. This is the same reason you can not listen to regular a regular CB radio and pick up channels running on private crystals with the same sort of radios. The private crystal radios will use a specific frequency that other devices are not using. The 60 Ghz will use digital signal in encrypted. The video below can explain FAR better than I can.

Incidentally The 5G Routers will put out FAR more power than the 5G phones. I have had one beside me for years now and I have yet to drop dead or get COVID, or any other sickness from it. My skin is not burnt. I like to think my mind works perfectly fine (but some days I have my doubts...LOL). Ideally the service providers want to use the lower end of the spectrum as they travel further.

[ArMaP]

An article from 2001 that explains how the oxygen attenuation of the 60 GHz frequency helps reduce interference between different sources.

Fixed Wireless Communications at 60GHz Unique Oxygen Absorption Properties

[astr0144]

After doing a certain ammount of attempted research and quesioning on this topic ,I m not sure if I am much wiser..

I am still not sure what to make of everything researched or discussed so far with the 5g / 60 Ghz / Corona Virus threat concerning theory...it maybe we are not really greatly wiser or convinced one way or another.

from various videos from suggested experts who I assume some of the speakers are Scientists or Engineers or have high knowledge of the things that they discuss in the video.

and then we have our reseach and discussions of members which some have certain more knowledge in some of the related areas / topics. and then we have the Conspiracists with the likes of Alex Jones and his associates theories and suggestions. and finally the TV media and Politictionns

Other things do not emit electromagnetic radiation with that power level, so they are not dangerous. Also, lower frequencies are less dangerous, and a toothbrush probably only emits at 50 or 60 Hz, the frequency of the socket to which they may be connected or the frequency related to the rotation speed of the motor or other actuator (like in the case of ultrasound).

So How would the EMF Radiation vary between a Cell Phone and Microwave oven ?  / and in ref to Power levels ?

I can visulise a toothbrush having to have less power and radiations threat effect... A Microwave oven is larger item and maybe seen to require more power and its radiation effect could seem more of  a threat if not sealed as such....  BUT I am NOT sure how a Cell / Mobile Phone may compare... as small as they maybe in size.... I am not really sure how much power their batteries produce or what radiation effect that they maybe having... or exactly how the radiation effect relates to the phone... if it recieves a microwave signal and emits one when in use to the same or different degree...
or if radition signal is just all around if its sent to the phone..

No, I just mentioned that I stopped watching because the man was saying that microwave ovens affect our magnetic fields. If they are shielded to stop radiation from getting out then their radiation doesn't affect us.

Ok he may had made a mistake in ref to the Mic Oven... but was his other items not worth being considered to continue to watch further as later the speakers go into the more indepth detail.
Im not sure if you later have rewatched the rest of it...and if so... did any of it add any further interest or concerns to what they were explaining ? or if you did watch has not altered your view ?

Because the way he said it made me think he was not being honest.

As said before (above)...  Maybe he made a mistake on that item... but he continues to refer to Mobile Phone which is what we are researching..

No, if the radiation from a mobile phone was blocked they wouldn't be able to work.

From what you say...I assume that  a Mobile Phone is NOT sealed in the same way as a Microwave oven... and as it both receives and sends out signals...and it relates to radiation which I assume is the Microwave EMF.. How Much concern or difference would you say could the radiation be and is it varying in relation to both receiving the Mic EMF and transmitting it  in any way or would that be about the same level either way ?

As I note you mentioned Older Mobiles V newer ones and how they have reduced the threat of radiation...

The frequencies cell phones use can be dangerous, but not with the amount of power used by cell phones. Older phones worked with higher power transmissions, but when studies started appearing showing that they could be harmful the makers reduced the power to reduce the probability of negative effects on the users, as they weren't interested in being sued.

I think that explain my prior question

I didn't change my mind.

I haven't made much research, but I studied electricity in high school (3 years), and although I didn't have any classes about radio I have read about in books and magazines about electronics (I have two courses on electronics, those paid by the EU many years ago to help develop the technological side of countries just after joining the EU).

Interesting that you studied it in how you describe and have some fair knowledge of it..or it seems maybe more than
many..inc me.. I have had some education in the past on it but parts hard to understand or follow to be confident with it.

if I take time and work on it and get an interest in it enough.. while I am on top of it I can sort of follow some of it..
but once I stop doing so... weeks or months later.... Ive forgot it to some degree and would struggle recalling it of hand.
but parts I get reminded about and can recall parts at times.. that applies to a lot of things with me.

Some people just have very recall memory and seem to learn it once and can then understand or apply it much better.
they are the lucky or gifted ones who who dont seem to struggle as much..

Huawei is a equipment maker, not a telecoms company. They make the equipment and IT related companies use. At work, our telecom and Internet provider is Vodafone, and the equipment they installed was from Huawei.

I was not sure prior to this exactly sure what Huawei did... However as they are Chinese.. and may not provide a telecom network service.. could they join up with one say major related Chinese
one..or would that even matter...if other main networks were convinced of any agenda thru what ever means to consider dealing with them. ...other than just offering its product to the world or  whoever and having other telecom networks connect to use their equipment..

such was what was indicated here ..
With the development of 5G wireless networks, there have been calls from the U.S. to prevent the use of products by Huawei or fellow Chinese telecommunications company ZTE by the U.S.

Maybe, but I doubt it, as if that happens it would have been noticed a long time ago, as that frequency has been in use for many years.

But could the 5 G / 60 Ghz have some slight variation that makes the valid difference along what the Conspiricists are suggesting.

If they do not turn blue then they do not need to have a tube inserted in their trachea to help them breath, I have lived many years with difficulty breathing and only needed to go to the hospital 5 or 6 times in the last 52 years.

But do they need to turn blue to actually faint ? and if it was doing this to them... and  they were taken to hospital and suggested to have the virus...if the system is or were faking it..they could still make out that the patient needed a tube inserted...

But I surpose another major point is  that it does not happen to all of them ... I assume ... and the video for some reason has just shown a couple of egs...Has there been enough ref / evidence to suggest its occurring on a larger scale   Id rather doubt it addmittedly.

I do not agree with that because they would need to bribe many thousands of people, and we would only need one that speaks about it (with evidences) to bring it all down.

They may not need to bribe thousands... just those who are in charge .for certain things....
I mean you agreed about the Health scandles referred to in the magneticbiologyvideo..  HOW many peole were involved in that as just that eg... NUMEROUS !  that mainly went along with those few that were the leaders in charge who made the decisions...  ..as the workers or who ever follow what they are told and often things can get covered up...

Hence similar things I could believe could occur in others types of various organisations...
It would be a case those at the Top who may planning what ever they have in mind if for eg to control the health system... they in turn tell the directors or managers...
and thay may only be given certain information depending whats required... and the manager setc pass down instruction to the other levels  / workers etc etc.

If One Big organisaton could do such a thing... I believe  its possible many others could as well..

I suspose its a bit like the Nasa moonlanding Conspiricy that we have discussed in the past... in how so many departments involved just do certain things in says creating various parts
or doing  various types of jobs related ot connected to it...

but only a few people would know whats really could be going on...

Im saying that I agree NASA  M.Ls was faked ...  but i think we did agree that often many things could had been possible..if operated..

it would depend on the agenda..

Its the same thing with Policticians... do they tell us the truths about many things...Not always IMO... they cover thing up..and they are the suggested leaders we are led to believe to trust..  and how many in various Countries have been found corrupt...in the past ... although some in the 1st world have been harder to fully  prove..

look at all the dirty tricks that have been suggested in the US elections... is not a potential similar thing that could go on if there is a cover up...

It may only take a certain % of various top leader type  people who may support such an agenda say from the Bilderbergers if they are able to influence such people to along with their agendas... if we are to believe that the
theories behind Bilderberg is true ?

I agree that 60GHz was not tested on the conditions they are going to be used by cell phones, so I think testing it first is better than reaching the conclusion that it is dangerous after some years of use. But that doesn't mean I have to believe unrelated things.

Well, the largest countries are China and India.

[astr0144]

In ref to you bringing up Radar E113... and you informing us how it compared...and that Radar has never killed anyone

I think from reading your comments that you gave some  explanations as to how other things may not seem effected.
to allow them to continue to work.

I think that I can understand how encryption can work...and that it maybe on seperate channels but I maybe not fully clear in considering that the effects of radar  do not cause some sort of issue with 5 G....

and the fact that you brought it up.. I was thinking that may mean that 5G should be very similar and therefore be no threat...

Im not sure if you had the answers after your initial related post that informed us or if since you have go on to research and consider some further answers to offer explanations...

Based on what you have said.. do you still think that  the threat with 5 G is unlikely to exist ?

other than that some of your points ...Would also you see maybe ArMaPs basic description below may offer another simple explanation ?

ArMaP

The atmosphere does the blocking. The 60 GHz frequency radio can only go a short distance (a couple of km at most, but usually less than that), so while it's used on radar it's not used on long distance radar, so, unless they put 5G antennas working at 60 GHz close to a 60 GHz radar I don't think they will have problems.

Ellirium113

Telecom channels are encrypted that is why you can't simply use internet with any device that does not get the encryption key through the ISP. They only look at the encrypted packets on that wave not the others this is how multiple devices work off the same frequencies. They use a sort of pulse width modulation between different encrypted packets

Radar waves will have no effect on the other forms of communication as it is all on separate channels. If you used a general receiver of some sort that listens to everything it would be quite a mess of distorted signals. This is the same reason you can not listen to regular a regular CB radio and pick up channels running on private crystals with the same sort of radios. The private crystal radios will use a specific frequency that other devices are not using. The 60 Ghz will use digital signal in encrypted. The video below can explain FAR better than I can.

Incidentally The 5G Routers will put out FAR more power than the 5G phones. I have had one beside me for years now and I have yet to drop dead or get COVID, or any other sickness from it. My skin is not burnt. I like to think my mind works perfectly fine (but some days I have my doubts...LOL). Ideally the service providers want to use the lower end of the spectrum as they travel further.

Did it ever occur to anyone our common RADAR has been using these frequencies for years... NO ONE HAS DIED FROM IT!
https://www.radartutorial.eu/07.waves/Waves%20and%20Frequency%20Ranges.en.html

[kevin]

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/navy/nrtc/14089_ch4.pdf
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/radio-frequency-radiation-may-cause-cancer-israeli-study-suggests-1.5918197
http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/yorkslincs/series3/radiation_RAF_radar_yorkshire_health_cancer_fears_risk.shtml
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/benjamin-netanyahu-suggests-to-microchip-kids-slammed-by-experts-627381

[kevin]

https://www.theportugalnews.com/news/trees-to-be-implanted-with-microchips/50951

Dogs, trees, what next?

In all places, fancy that.

Kevin

[astr0144]

Alex Joness video channel is back up..

He has another video I intend to watch where he claims chipping is coming to us all.. and that this virus is leading to it I think thru the vaccine...

This is one thing that I want to try to make a judgement on...as it could happen quite soon if they alrady have it in place ..
Theres no doubt with Alex Jones..his media channels are now high tech and his broadcasts give variable effective looking  backgound that him look like a very rich modern studio ...

and his commentry now I think is a bit over the top not to mention his advertising breaks and comments..

I am still not sure if hes legit or employed by whoever maybe planning what he claims..

but he claims to have a quite a lot of evidence that Chipping is coming...
and would not doubt its highly possible.

but hes going on about having a huge deduction in population ...of millins / billion... in ref to the Georgia guide stones
to leave 500 mill or whatever the figure was..

How are whoever remains going to deal with all that

He also makes ref to how we are being asked to to use these tracking apps for this virus...
where they are saying its to test who has the virus or who we could come in contact with..

but he reckens its part of getting us to accept chipping...which it certainly could be...
He says over 10,000 Swedes have  now agreed to this...for free bus rides..

Will other Countries ofer this to get the populace to start going along with it..?

Theres also ref to threatening people who use what they see as inappropiate speech.. to do with the virus either in China or maybe USA and other things and getting people to report each other... Similar to what the Nazis did..
and the authorities investigating...

How many would they have to employ to deal with this ?

One problem now is people can easily record things on Mobile phones..so they see this as proof.

whats it coming too..

In the Uk and maybe other Countries..

The Govt had laid down a set of rules and had asked the public to follow them..with  only suggesting we could go out for food when needed and exercise 1 hr a day..and that we could not visit anyone...or  travel very far from our homes unless itwas essental.

Then yesterday.. they tell us that they have got the virus threat down due to lockdown and have altered some of the rules.... and now will allow us to met up with an associate or other family member who lives elsewhere... but only one at a time.. and ideallly outside as they say research shows the virus less threat outside ... which I think many of us already had considered.

Then the next thing you know... the news sasy China may now have a 2nd wave or new threat..
so I wonder what may happen next... or is still part of their plan if Jones is correct...where thet may play along with us ..
It now seems they are saying that they could have a vaccine in place in a few months maybe by Sept..

The Economist - Homepage

Bjorn Cyborg
Why Swedes are inserting microchips into their bodies

No more worries about losing your wallet—but plenty about privacy
Europe
Aug 2nd 2018 edition
Aug 2nd 2018

ON SOME Swedish trains, passengers carry their e-tickets in their hands—literally. About 3,000 Swedes have opted to insert grain-of-rice-sized microchips beneath the skin between their thumbs and index fingers. The chips, which cost around $150, can hold personal details, credit-card numbers and medical records. They rely on Radio Frequency ID (RFID), a technology already used in payment cards, tickets and passports.

By one estimate there are 10,000 cyborgs with chip implants around the world. Sweden, home to several microchip companies, has the largest share. Fifty employees of Three Square Market, a Wisconsin-based firm, volunteered to receive chip implants that can be used to pay at vending machines and log in to computers. Individuals can order do-it-yourself kits, which come with sterilisation tools and a needle to inject the device, or attend "implant parties", where a professional gives chips to a group. Sometimes they get T-shirts that say "I got chipped".[/b]

https://www.economist.com/europe/2018/08/02/why-swedes-are-inserting-microchips-into-their-bodies
   

[spacemaverick]

It seems we got away from the virus again.