The Upcoming Global Technocratic Dictatorship.

[kevin]

Eric Clapton talking from his heart, listening to his heart.

Kevin

[Ellirium113]

[Ellirium113]

[karl 12]

That's a great video mate and did make a thread on another forum about it (sorry I didn't quote you as source but had about 20 tabs open and thought it was a Youtube suggestion).

Truly disturbing stuff and here's the report about it:


PDF File - U.S. Congressional Report



Also telling that Walmart, Campbells and Sprout Organic refused to cooperate with the investigation.

Then there's this: three other companies – Walmart, which sells baby food through its brand Parent's Choice; Campbell, which owned Plum Organic at the time of the investigation; and Sprout Organic Food – "refused to cooperate" with the investigation. The House subcommittee on economic and consumer policy, which released its findings in February, said it was "greatly concerned" that those companies' "lack of cooperation might be obscuring the presence of even higher levels of toxic heavy metals in their baby food products than their competitors' products".

Why are there dangerous levels of arsenic and lead in American baby food?

Also wasn't surprised to see Novartis, Nestle and Walmart on the WEF partner list.

Johnson and Johnson are also on there and was reminded of this related story from a while back.

Johnson & Johnson knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its Baby Powder

Facing thousands of lawsuits alleging that its talc caused cancer, J&J insists on the safety and purity of its iconic product.

But internal documents examined by Reuters show that the company's powder was sometimes tainted with carcinogenic asbestos and that J&J kept that information from regulators and the public.

link 1 / 2

Cheers.

[Ellirium113]

Think Politics Is Corrupt? WATCH THIS!!!


Glenn Greenwald: Nancy Pelosi Making Millions Trading Stocks of Companies She Regulates

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is the sixth-richest member of Congress, according to the most recent financial disclosure statements filed in 2019. As the California Democrat has risen through party ranks and obtained more and more political power, her personal wealth has risen right along with it. Pelosi "has seen her wealth increase to nearly $115 million from $41 million in 2004," reports the transparency non-profit group Open Secrets. Even by the standards of wealth that define that legislative body — "more than half of those in Congress are millionaires" — the wealth and lifestyle of the long-time liberal politician and most powerful lawmaker in Washington are lavish.

And ever since ascending to the top spot in the House, Pelosi and her husband, Paul, keep getting richer and richer. Much of their added wealth is due to extremely lucrative and "lucky" decisions about when to buy and sell stocks and options in the very industries and companies over which Pelosi, as House Speaker, exercises enormous and direct influence.

The sector in which the Pelosis most frequently buy and sell stocks is, by far, the Silicon Valley tech industry. Close to 75% of the Pelosis' stock trading over the last two years has been in Big Tech: more than $33 million worth of trading. That has happened as major legislation is pending before the House, controlled by the Committees Pelosi oversees, which could radically reshape the industry and laws that govern the very companies in which she and her husband most aggressively trade.

https://www.dollarcollapse.com/greenwald-pelosi-stocks/

[ArMaP]

If the US political system is supposed to be for the people then it's in need of a big change...

[Ellirium113]

DR DAVID MARTIN – THE ILLUSION OF KNOWLEDGE

Dr David E Martin begins by saying, "I think every conversation about COVID and every conversation about SARS-Coronavirus is the wrong conversation for humanity to be having. And I think that we have been seduced into a distraction of epic proportions while a greater evil is being done.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9kNy6AOyeKie/

[ArMaP]

That makes me think he is trying to divert the attentions to the life insurance companies...

[Ellirium113]

TUCKER AND GLENN GREENWALD ON BIDEN ADMIN TEAMING UP WITH BIG TECH TO CENSOR "MISINFORMATION"

Glenn Greenwald Discusses Admission of White House Directing Opposition Censorship Through Big Tech

https://www.bitchute.com/video/YzoUkA1EkAjx/

[Ellirium113]

That makes me think he is trying to divert the attentions to the life insurance companies...

I think he's telling you there are other players at work on another level. The corruption is spread through various levels of various institutions this he is suggesting is the top layer of the funding for the eugenics agenda.

[ArMaP]

I think he's telling you there are other players at work on another level. The corruption is spread through various levels of various institutions this he is suggesting is the top layer of the funding for the eugenics agenda.

It's obvious there are other players, but I find his focus on life insurance companies almost like an obsession, making his intentions suspicious.

Another thing, I never trust people that appear to have something to gain with their opinions against someone/something.
Edited to add that the above also applies to organisations, mostly media organisations.

[Ellirium113]

It's obvious there are other players, but I find his focus on life insurance companies almost like an obsession, making his intentions suspicious.

Another thing, I never trust people that appear to have something to gain with their opinions against someone/something.
Edited to add that the above also applies to organisations, mostly media organisations.

Have you checked into it?

[ArMaP]

Have you checked into it?

Into what?

[Ellirium113]

Into what he said about the insurance companies?

[ArMaP]

Into what he said about the insurance companies?

No, and I only read the text on that page, I didn't watch the video.

That's another reason I prefer to read instead of listening, that way I am not following the speech clues the person may give to help us think what they want us to think, I can focus only on the message and on it's tone, not on the "theatre" presented to the viewers by the person in the video.

Obviously, I missed a lot of what was said on that long video, but at least I could get an idea of what it was about.

PS: if the text on that page does not represent what he said in the video then I am obviously wrong.