A Reason I Received Why Electrogravitics is "Dangerous"

[Littleenki]

Mornin' Linda!

I have found a new understanding of EG recently as you know, and whether it is real or not we may never know. When these devices switch between dimensions at superluminal speed, I wonder how safe it is to be within the device or craft, or even in it's path, as it must have a pre effect.

For instance, when the twin disc apparatus is spinning around the pylon, it already knows where it will be as it has to plot it's path before it switches through dimensions, as if it didnt, it couldnt achieve superluminal velocity. If one stands in that path-to-be, do they actually become affected by it even though the device isnt appearing in that spot yet?

Like the Millenium Falcon mapping out the path before switching to hyperspace?

I picture a true EG device in action, where we decide it's time to hop in one and actually fly it, and as soon as we do so, we become part of the device, like Scotty's transporter.

Is it possible, that as Hobbit poses, everthing is constantly switching, and to balance that switching at the right resonant frequency would cause matter to combine, like in the Philadelphia Experiment, or Teslas mechanical resonator?

Sure it could be dangerous, but so is a chain saw, if you hold it by the wrong end!

Cheers!
Littleenki

[Linda Brown]

I hope that you are keeping a notebook...<g>

it already knows where it will be as it has to plot it's path before it switches through dimensions, as if it didnt, it couldnt achieve superluminal velocity. If one stands in that path-to-be, do they actually become affected by it even though the device isnt appearing in that spot yet?

Morgans words on explaining something to me keep coming around again...." It puts a whole new meaning to " Pull up, pull up!" or..... Blink out! Blink OUT!"

  Linda

[Littleenki]

Im on my third comp book, and counting...LOL!
Morgan is a wise fellow, and it's taken me some time to see the reality of all of this, and i sure have a long way to go, but it is getting clearer by the day, almost as if I ignore it, and then it comes to me...very strange, but very pleasing, too!

Le

[hobbit]

Interesting take Littleenki.

I know that this might be tough but I would like to pull the topic here back a little closer to the opening statement. We have strayed a bit and all of those really great conversations are just enough off topic to be difficult to find.... Back please to

" Why Electrogravitics might be dangerous" Or some discussion even close to that?

Hobbit would talk about memory fields.
And if something can act upon those " memory fields" for transportantion between dimensions.... then possibly if it uses that... could it encourage other things to " forget" what they are? If an atom " forgets" its bonds to make it what it is.... what happens?

All important since there are many now wanting to see the Electrogravitic technology released to the public.
It would be important then I think to really understand it first.?   Linda

I would encourage the viewing of Walter Russells periodic tables, and think of how matter is created in the geometry of opposing spiral fields.
Sulpher on the normal periodic table is number 16, and it will be, as all is...a consequence of transmutation.

It may be that such a strong smell would be noticable when a local transmutation occurs??
http://www.flickr.com/photos/esaruoho/sets/72157604222958040/
hobbit

[Littleenki]

Thats a great point, Hobbit!
Any transmutation will share similarities with others regardless of the event or the result.
Is sulfur odor a common effect of transmutation?

Could be.....

Le

[hobbit]

Thats a great point, Hobbit!
Any transmutation will share similarities with others regardless of the event or the result.
Is sulfur odor a common effect of transmutation?

Could be.....

Le

Look where sulpher is in Russells table of octaves...in the sixth.
Imagine having a device that could play the sound of music??
hobbit

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

I would think the visitors dont need to use a simple thing like sulfur if they possessed such high technology. They would have something way more sophistcated and subtle.

Chanel no.9 perhaps?     

But then again, they could use it for impact, as we recognize the smell as being somthing negative, and to keep us in fear with negativity would be an effective weapon.

Right on, and throw a nice 3D laser show in there & some fireworks, and you will have the whole village on it's knees, wanting you to marry their daughters LOL

Now where's that silver motorcycle outfit..........

OK back on topic, fascinating info there I would have thought the smell would be Ozone, it is around here.......And the spirals, resonance, all in the right direction IMO

Linda made a good point about the dangers, and i appreciate it when people like Raymond take lots of safety measures.

Normally i just hide round the corner & switch it on with a broomhandle, but that may not be enough if you start getting into the Kw range and if my gravitors start moving THAT fast, i will have to move to the 'external testing facility'...

[Mikado]

I see there are 10 pages posted as to EG being dangerous. Well, so is EM.

I worked on RADAR system employed by helicopters in the military, TACAN for one. We used to cook hotdogs on a stick by simply keying up. What about microwave ovens? They can be dangerous as well and they are probably in a good percentage of homes and they should be checked periodically for leaky gaskets around the doors.

How about electrocution? The electricity being generated is a result of a generator which is EM. That is why children are taught not to lick the wall sockets.

If EG is developed into a commercially viable alternative to EM, it will have it's drawbacks as well. EM relies heavily on a current/magnetic relationship whereas EG is a voltage/gravity relationship.

The greatest danger lies elsewhere.

Just my opinion,

Mikado

[Littleenki]

PWM asks....
Now where's that silver motorcycle outfit..........



This might be a bit more effective at spooking the local talent!LOL!

When we do address the dangers of Em and Eg(yes Mikado, I too cooked hot dogs in the military, but they were wrapped in foil and tied to a test bed turbine in the aimd shop! 8)we have to see all the dangers, and as mikado has posed they are many.

A chicken wrapped in foil and cooked on one of these is amazingly moist, and is done in about 25 minutes!

Personally, my nde involved 220 a/c and a pair of wet shoes when a boy, and it profoundly changed me, as well as peaked my interest in electricity from an early age.

What can harm us can help us, as we see, and to be aware of the many results of messin' with these fields, we can see the channel without the markers.

I have to think about my first cymatics experiement using a midbass speaker and a 500 watt fosgate amplifier(remember them anyone? Then youre dating yourself!)

My ears rang for days and were never the same, resulting in a lifetime of tinnitus.
Although I learned the essence of resonance and how certain frequencies become immensely louder when tuned in, I also learned those navy flight deck earmuffs are priceless for doing prolonged experiments with cymatics....not to mention my neighbors asking me if I had aliens landing in my shop!

As you pointed out, Mikado, there is an as of yet unknown part of EG that may be horribly dangerous, even fatal, if not addressed before working with it, and as Zorgon posted in a thread on The Aviary, we probably have lost many volunteer pilots and craft to this lack of understanding, as the military in the past, tended to just "fly it" before doing the math and engineering completely.

Of course, with the stealth tech and such, they had no choice but to let the computers do the piloting, and I have to wonder, what really powers some of those unmanned vehicles? Are they unmanned as to save lives(something the military has plenty of) or are they just so dangerous to an occupant, they cant be flown any other way?

There is something floating out there for us to find, and the first one to find it will be the first one to understand the dangers of EG and Em science beyond what we already have learned(whatever that is )

Le

[hobbit]

I see there are 10 pages posted as to EG being dangerous. Well, so is EM.

I worked on RADAR system employed by helicopters in the military, TACAN for one. We used to cook hotdogs on a stick by simply keying up. What about microwave ovens? They can be dangerous as well and they are probably in a good percentage of homes and they should be checked periodically for leaky gaskets around the doors.

How about electrocution? The electricity being generated is a result of a generator which is EM. That is why children are taught not to lick the wall sockets.

If EG is developed into a commercially viable alternative to EM, it will have it's drawbacks as well. EM relies heavily on a current/magnetic relationship whereas EG is a voltage/gravity relationship.

The greatest danger lies elsewhere.

Just my opinion,

Mikado

ANY idea what VOLTAGE is?
What GRAVITY is??
I see no point in claiming something is a consequence of something that You cannot explain.
hobbit

[Mikado]

ANY idea what VOLTAGE is?
What GRAVITY is??
I see no point in claiming something is a consequence of something that You cannot explain.
hobbit

As a matter of fact I do and thanks in part to my work. Further, for you to say that I do not is a bit presumptive.

If experiments can show a relationship between Voltage and Gravity then it might be safe to assume at the moment, that there is a definite link. Further, in keeping with what Dr. Brown expressed as areas of high/low Kmu and all points in between and if there is a relationship, as postulated to the aether than it is not too terribly difficult to at least be able to describe voltage and gravity and their relationship with certain other variables.

No use in explaining this any further for it is apparent that you are looking for an argument and I do not wish another "warning" for simply answering a question but I felt the need to at least offer a response.

Best to you,

Mikado

[hobbit]

As a matter of fact I do and thanks in part to my work. Further, for you to say that I do not is a bit presumptive.

If experiments can show a relationship between Voltage and Gravity then it might be safe to assume at the moment, that there is a definite link. Further, in keeping with what Dr. Brown expressed as areas of high/low Kmu and all points in between and if there is a relationship, as postulated to the aether than it is not too terribly difficult to at least be able to describe voltage and gravity and their relationship with certain other variables.

No use in explaining this any further for it is apparent that you are looking for an argument and I do not wish another "warning" for simply answering a question but I felt the need to at least offer a response.

Best to you,

Mikado

Usual double talk ....saying nothing.
hobbit

[hobbit]

As a matter of fact I do and thanks in part to my work. Further, for you to say that I do not is a bit presumptive.

If experiments can show a relationship between Voltage and Gravity then it might be safe to assume at the moment, that there is a definite link. Further, in keeping with what Dr. Brown expressed as areas of high/low Kmu and all points in between and if there is a relationship, as postulated to the aether than it is not too terribly difficult to at least be able to describe voltage and gravity and their relationship with certain other variables.

No use in explaining this any further for it is apparent that you are looking for an argument and I do not wish another "warning" for simply answering a question but I felt the need to at least offer a response.

Best to you,

Mikado

Please explain where I am looking for an argument, as YOU have stated here?
Any idea what voltage is?
Any idea what gravity is??

Next thing YOU will be saying that this is evidence of an argument, and YOU will be stating as fact that I have started an argument, which is clear for all to see is NOTHING but a figmant of YOUR imagination.

Hobbit

[Linda Brown]

Maybe we are all figments of other peoples imagination Hobbit!

I just found this. From Paul Schatzkins old Forum and you had just been as active here... talking this time rather boldly about the FTM remember? ( Nick Cook had dubbed it the Fu#@king Time Machine and Paul picked up those initials.... so that were he got it and what it refers to.

And then langley had quite a moment and sent this message.... Please note the time and the people posting here and especially the thought that hits Langley out of the blue and his reaction ( I need a smoke!)

by Langley on Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:25 am

James Barrett wrote:
Langley,

I think all of us will contribute to a boom in sales of " The Hunt for Zero Point". Nick Cook will never understand ( at least right now) that his little book is being used as a sort of text. Mine is in tatters.
How bout page 31 where AGAIN he sees without seeing......... JDB


Hi James, goody theres new chapters up, but before I go to them, I need to report a hair raising collision I had on page 221 of Cooks Book.

Now, as part of my thing, for a number of years, Ive been in the habit of going to Lanl website (Los Alamos website) and doing searches (as part of my digging stuff up re atomic testing) and one of the terms I had cause to search for starting about 5 years ago was "spin vectors". And dang it, though there was heaps of stuff openly available on the topic at lanl, there was enough stuff back then pulled by the lanl search engine which were classified and not available to the global general public. What I had been after was a clear explanation of Annihilation reactions (for some reason I was trying to figure what made the atom normally robust, and what made it go wonky. A question I had related to the relationship of the electron to the proton. What would happen when they met - what ordinarily kept them from meeting. (Which reveals the general state of my ignorance more than anything else. though I knew that Annihilation reactions occured and that the particles involved disappeared in puff of gamma. )(I have registered this in the forums a while back) And so remembering my confusion when hits where labelled "restricted" not for public release popped up at lanl, I spun out when I read the following on page 221 of Cooks Book:
"A point is reached where a large number of electrons and protons with opposite charges and (OPPOSITE-emphasis added) directions of spin are into collision and annihilate with one another" Coats wrote. "

And I saw, as I read this 5 minutes ago, the utter relational conformity with Brown's understandings (or what I understand of those). Schauberger created something in which ionisation occurred, but in which the ions (ie charged particles including separated electrons, protons and also including atoms which have had some of their electrons removed) (ion is a long word) both positive and negative were free. So upon meeting, the plus value (proton) and negative value (electron) summed to zero - and anhiliation reactions took place. With Brown's work the ozone problem is testament to the fact that Oxygen ions (O3 - ozone a + free radical) did not recombine as a result of Brown's machinery. But in the application of this basic fact (valence, recombination, annhilation and the circumstances of the occurences) does the B2 emit gamma from its trailing edges? If so there is perhaps evidence of a Schauberger as well as a Brown effect. (Brown methology to produce the ions, Schauberger effect (possibly engineered via the flow dynamics of the boundary layer over the wings) to produce "annhilation" thrust enhancement at the trailing edges. This sounds nuts, but IF the Schauberger effect is real, then why not.

Bear with me. For five years Ive been wondering whats so secret about "spin vectors" and then on P221 Cook explains it, not knowing that he has.

I need another smoke.

Someone once wrote about the radioactive properties of the B2. I think now the story might be true, but if so it is not strontium 90 paint. It is gamma from mutual annhilation of protons and electrons on the trailing edges of the wings.Langley
Senior Officer
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:31 am
Location: AUSTRALIA Top----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.ttbrown.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=495&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&hilit=thumpstick&sid=8af79947f3c0ea38bb5ab97a5091d353&start=165


Just picking up messages that have been seen and lost in the past.    Linda

[hobbit]

Linda Brown,
Where is Langley these days?
I went off in a spin there didn't I??

Every living entity is a FTM.
The Earth is a living entity.

Every living entity is enabled to operate as a seperate FTM within it's own electrogravitic bubble of torus shaped electrogravitic flows.

Every seperate torus bubble is vectored to, and supplied from the dominant bubble it is within.

To utilise the Earths life enabling bubble of electrogravitic content may endanger all the seperate similer bubbles reliant on a constant input from the dominant bubble they exist within.

Extreme caution until a full comprehension of how this all operates will have been required before the moronic military minded ones weaponised a system that in all probability would kill the planet and all upon it.
Here's a link to everythingiselectric where electrobleme is pondering about fossils.
I consider that fossilization occurs instantly when a huge spike occurs that momentarrilly removes the electrogravitic field from around the Earth, either locally , or wholly.


In an instant all will forget, but the individual bubble about living entities will enable them to remember for a fractionally longer time, and as everything resets they become captured within the new memory condition.
The ASSUMED millions of years is just that....assumed.
The actuality may be over much shorter cyclic time loops of tens of thousands of years.
hobbit