A Reason I Received Why Electrogravitics is "Dangerous"

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Ah, but that 'tunnel effect' is a dead giveaway, isn't it?

The motion of charge is a truly remarkable thing, even our electronics are capable of 'overunity' but we don't even know it....

[Linda Brown]

Amy you said

"Dr. LaViolette would agree with You, Mikado.  Yes, like fire and electricity, EG has its dangers.  The reasons given in the OP are absurd, and I had concluded that upon reading  the letter.  Dr. LaViolette, too, says they are absurd.[/color

]I would like to counter that statement. Why don't you ask Dr. Violette a very simple question. Which of the two is the most potentially dangerous.... EM or EG.
Lets see what he personally will say.

This is the statement that Mikado made. We are sticking with that  "ElectroGravitics is no more dangerous than ElectroMagnetism"I really do want to see what Dr. Violette has to say regarding THAT statement.

We are sticking to the topic here of the statement that Mikado chose to make.... and only that.... no other absurd discussions please. That one is plenty enough!!!

Linda

[Mikado]

Gabriel Kron - Tensor Analysis of Networks

[Linda Brown]

Off topic? How Mikado

"Practice what you preach this is..

OFF TOPIC!

We are in the electrogravitics section talking about how dangerous it is. One member mentioned that the alphabet agencies would most likely be beating down any developers door ( because it is dangerous) and I mentioned the fact that you have previously skoffed at such an idea.  THAT is not off topic.

Maybe the Chuck Norris Joke strayed a bit but you always mention him for some reason so I thought it was appropriate as well as funny.

So this is not off topic and since I seem to be the moderator here I think that I have the ability to call that? Anybody disagree? Lets talk about it.

So, isn't it true Mikado that you have really made quite a joke about anyone coming to your door. Is that because you have no development to be worried about and there for can afford that kind of strange attitude?

You keep saying you have something.... so .... more power to you. I should think that you might be concerned that someone WILL someday come down your lane....

Or perhaps they have already?  Its a valid question.  Linda

[Amaterasu]

Amy you said

"Dr. LaViolette would agree with You, Mikado.  Yes, like fire and electricity, EG has its dangers.  The reasons given in the OP are absurd, and I had concluded that upon reading  the letter.  Dr. LaViolette, too, says they are absurd.[/color

]I would like to counter that statement. Why don't you ask Dr. Violette a very simple question. Which of the two is the most potentially dangerous.... EM or EG.
Lets see what he personally will say.

This is the statement that Mikado made. We are sticking with that  "ElectroGravitics is no more dangerous than ElectroMagnetism"I really do want to see what Dr. Violette has to say regarding THAT statement.

We are sticking to the topic here of the statement that Mikado chose to make.... and only that.... no other absurd discussions please. That one is plenty enough!!!

Linda

Well...  I suppose it depends on the scale...  Taking the initial post in consideration, I have to guess EM and EG are in the same ballpark relative to the dire statements made.

[dcooper]

You might be right Linda EM is not as dangerous as EG, But it could be more dangerous we just have to wait until EG is proved right, also  depends on How you use EG, plus Linda if you use EG the right way (not for evil) it can be better than EM in some cases, for example a solar wind or EMP can distroy EM communication not for EG

I think EG is WAY more cooler than EM.

[Linda Brown]

Amy,

You are asking people to sign your petition to release the electrogravitic technology and you don't understand that there is an enormous difference in the dangers presented??

Well...  I suppose it depends on the scale...  Taking the initial post in consideration, I have to guess EM and EG are in the same ballpark relative to the dire statements made.

When we first messaged about this you couldn't see it either.....your head was more wrapped in the economics of the world which is where your first passion lies. My point was..... without a world to speak of..... economics doesn't count for much. does it.

And you still are not seeing what has been said here? You are going to let someone like Mikado equate the dangers involved and call them EQUAL??

Please tell me thats not true.

Linda

[Mikado]

Off topic? How Mikado

"Practice what you preach this is..

OFF TOPIC!

We are in the electrogravitics section talking about how dangerous it is. One member mentioned that the alphabet agencies would most likely be beating down any developers door ( because it is dangerous) and I mentioned the fact that you have previously skoffed at such an idea.  THAT is not off topic.

Maybe the Chuck Norris Joke strayed a bit but you always mention him for some reason so I thought it was appropriate as well as funny.

Maybe? It was off topic. I mentioned Chuck Norris at different times due to certain facts that his biography doesn't match what YOU told everyone. In other words, deception caught. Don't believe me? How about the fact that you claimed that he went out with Tula and according to his own biography he was married. Next time, if you are going to use someone in the public eye make sure you at least have things match.

So this is not off topic and since I seem to be the moderator here I think that I have the ability to call that? Anybody disagree? Lets talk about it.

Yes, I disagree. You are show casing everything I have claimed... "do as I say and not what I do" mentality.

So, isn't it true Mikado that you have really made quite a joke about anyone coming to your door. Is that because you have no development to be worried about and there for can afford that kind of strange attitude?

You keep saying you have something.... so .... more power to you. I should think that you might be concerned that someone WILL someday come down your lane....

Or perhaps they have already?  Its a valid question.  Linda

I make a joke...a big fat joke...out of what you claimed. NO one will come down my lane, they haven't, at least anyone connected with a fictional group perpetrated in the mind of someone.

In fact, someone did come down my lane, as a matter of fact, two different individuals and it had nothing to do with any "alphabet" agencies. It had everything to do with you posting personal information at the Cosmic Token which led to two individuals coming down the lane of the farm and my parents being hassled with phone calls. Here is a news flash for you...no utilities are in my name for just the reason explained.

That is a self fulfilled prophecy.

No light came on, there is no twigsnapper, there is no Morgan super spy. You talk of shams, most of the first hand info supplied by them to Paul Schatzkin was a sham.

Now, are you done with this stuff? I am getting weary of you persistent attempts to get me off topic.

Mikado

[Mikado]

You might be right Linda EM is not as dangerous as EG, But it could be more dangerous we just have to wait until EG is proved right, also  depends on How you use EG, plus Linda if you use EG the right way (not for evil) it can be better than EM in some cases, for example a solar wind or EMP can distroy EM communication not for EG

I think EG is WAY more cooler than EM.

EMP will disrupt EG communications as well.

Mikado

[Linda Brown]

As you know Dylan Dad said that there was a parallel relationship between EG and EM.... Everything developed in EM can be developed in EG someday.... and yes.... if we concentrate on the good I think its " way cooler too"

ASk Mikado to prove his last statement.

Linda

[Mikado]

Amy,

You are asking people to sign your petition to release the electrogravitic technology and you don't understand that there is an enormous difference in the dangers presented??

Well...  I suppose it depends on the scale...  Taking the initial post in consideration, I have to guess EM and EG are in the same ballpark relative to the dire statements made.

When we first messaged about this you couldn't see it either.....your head was more wrapped in the economics of the world which is where your first passion lies. My point was..... without a world to speak of..... economics doesn't count for much. does it.

And you still are not seeing what has been said here? You are going to let someone like Mikado equate the dangers involved and call them EQUAL??

Please tell me thats not true.

Linda

You claim that you do not have an understanding of the science and yet you are attempting to make an argument in regards to the dangers of EG.

BOTH EM and EG have dangers to them. One could just as easily claim all the dangers of EM for there is enough evidence of that.

To claim the dangers of a heretofore unexplored area as dangerous is to imply that one has knowledge for one must understand what it is to cite the dangers and frankly, you have already publicly claimed to have no scientific understanding.

Chicken Little indeed.

Mikado

[Mikado]

As you know Dylan Dad said that there was a parallel relationship between EG and EM.... Everything developed in EM can be developed in EG someday.... and yes.... if we concentrate on the good I think its " way cooler too"

ASk Mikado to prove his last statement.

Linda

Why should I answer him when he came right out and said that he wouldn't answer me in a previous post somewhere?

Oh...what the he11.

If one really understands what EG is they would understand that it is the method of propagation. However, what is being transmitted is derived from normal electronics which are susceptible to EMP.

Proof positive that those making statements don't really understand what they are talking about.

Mikado

[SarK0Y]

it vents energy from another dimension and appears to create energy.
.......
The fact that it produces a dimensionless thrust means that it produces its thrust regardless of its inertial frame of reference.

This appears to violate the conservation of energy and mass law. This law is of course in error because we can plainly see that the universe is full of energy and matter and existence implies creation.
......
The generator application has dire economic as well as other consequences, but the collision of an object travelling at near light spead with our moon, (which by the way would eventually be inevitable) would create an energy density at the collision site about equal to the energy density near a black hole.

so scared stuff  here needs Just to recall how permanent magnets interact with each other: they only tend towards stable position (South against North & North against South). in short, interaction of permanent magnetic fields can't produce continuous acceleration, so any realization of M-glider uses A/C to get stable vector of forces. & there're Nothing about extra Dimensions + to violate the conservation of energy and mass law 

[Amaterasu]

Amy,

You are asking people to sign your petition to release the electrogravitic technology and you don't understand that there is an enormous difference in the dangers presented??

Well...  I suppose it depends on the scale...  Taking the initial post in consideration, I have to guess EM and EG are in the same ballpark relative to the dire statements made.

When we first messaged about this you couldn't see it either.....your head was more wrapped in the economics of the world which is where your first passion lies. My point was..... without a world to speak of..... economics doesn't count for much. does it.

And you still are not seeing what has been said here? You are going to let someone like Mikado equate the dangers involved and call them EQUAL??

Please tell me thats not true.

Linda

No...  I'm letting Dr. LaViolette clue Me in.  According to HIM, the dire scenarios offered in the letter I received are out of the realm of the reasonable.  Mikado's view just happens (? or is similarly based) to come close to LaViolette's view.

Unless You can offer specifics of what EG has that is beyond Dr. LaViolette's, Mikado's and My understanding...I'm guessing I can't place a lot of credence in the notion that one small misstep will vanish the planet (or life thereupon).

I don't give Your insinuations zero probability, but with what I have from LaViolette, and generally agreed to by Mikado, as well as My own grasp...I have to give them low probability.  In large part because I don't know specifically what You are even talking about.

[dcooper]

Don't think EMP might disrupt EG In Townsend Brown Electrogravitic communication it Said it can penetrate throw every thing (also some articles, which is at the thomastownsendbrown website), plus he showed it can pass through EM shield. if they penetrate throw objects like a "g"wave then it should go throw EMP as well as solar wind.

I have to disagree with you Mikado, if that's not enough for you then fine, But I disagree