A Reason I Received Why Electrogravitics is "Dangerous"

Started by Amaterasu, April 25, 2012, 10:11:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Amaterasu

Quote from: SarK0Y on July 10, 2012, 01:02:19 PM
Amaterasu, i damned don't understand how Neutron got zero mass the EVERYTHING means that all stuff about Atomic Masses, Relativistic speeds & so forth is Just B$ $tory. + mass of Proton is Just slightly greater than of Electron, right?  ::)

Who said anything about MASS?  The neutron has no CHARGE.  And it is charge that is linked to gravity.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

SarK0Y

Quote from: PLAYSWITHMACHINES on July 10, 2012, 02:35:10 PM
From what i remember from high school, the proton has about 1,870 times the mass of an electron, yet they carry equal amounts of charge.

The question is: How much energy can you put into an electron, and how much can you remove?........
PLAYSWITHMACHINES, SQK says ye did waste Time in the high school ;) it really amuses me how well-known effects can be misinterpreted & shall transform to basis 4 severe assaults onto Science :o to float in the ionized gases or into magnetic field Just're old good School, but to realize these thinges needs deal with High - Power stuff. 
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

SarK0Y

Quote from: Amaterasu on July 10, 2012, 07:49:02 PM
Who said anything about MASS?  The neutron has no CHARGE.  And it is charge that is linked to gravity.
Amaterasu, so mass doesn't correlate with gravity, right?  ::)
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Amaterasu

Not directly, no.  Enjoy the eye-rolling.  [smile]
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

SarK0Y

Quote from: Amaterasu on July 10, 2012, 08:55:28 PM
Not directly, no.  Enjoy the eye-rolling.  [smile]

Amaterasu, in short, experimental data was classified by evil govt's ;)
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Amaterasu

Quote from: SarK0Y on July 10, 2012, 09:05:05 PM
Amaterasu, in short, experimental data was classified by evil govt's ;)

Or misinterpreted...  If the "laws" are incorrect, the whole interpretation will be off.  Just sayin'.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

PLAYSWITHMACHINES

#382
Quote from: SarK0Y on July 10, 2012, 07:52:53 PM
PLAYSWITHMACHINES, SQK says ye did waste Time in the high school ;) it really amuses me how well-known effects can be misinterpreted & shall transform to basis 4 severe assaults onto Science :o to float in the ionized gases or into magnetic field Just're old good School, but to realize these thinges needs deal with High - Power stuff.

You ain't seen nothin' yet..........

QuoteWho said anything about MASS?  The neutron has no CHARGE.  And it is charge that is linked to gravity.

Listen to Amy, she knows.....

Linda: for the last time, back off...

SarK0Y

Quote from: Amaterasu on July 10, 2012, 09:20:17 PM
Or misinterpreted...  If the "laws" are incorrect, the whole interpretation will be off.  Just sayin'.
Amaterasu, all theories of Physics are wrong because no one can be completed to 100%. in short, 'tis only approximation, goes on & on ad infinitum, but one question needs precision about .01 & another of 10^-37.  :) 
QuoteListen to Amy, she knows.....

PLAYSWITHMACHINES, Practice always has the last Word, but no one of us  ;)
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

PLAYSWITHMACHINES

I can work to 0.001 if you want, (1 Micron, by hand) wait for the 'gravity' thread.....

SarK0Y

Quote from: PLAYSWITHMACHINES on July 11, 2012, 12:05:13 AM
I can work to 0.001 if you want, (1 Micron, by hand)

i said about detailization: the same object can be described with different accuracy. 
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)


Mikado

Am I to understand from the above that the conclusion is that mass is not linked to gravity?

Mikado

Amaterasu

Quote from: SarK0Y on July 10, 2012, 11:59:51 PM
Amaterasu, all theories of Physics are wrong because no one can be completed to 100%. in short, 'tis only approximation, goes on & on ad infinitum, but one question needs precision about .01 & another of 10^-37.  :) 

Yes, but when One has a theory that explains, predicts and is far more testable than a previous theory, what are the odds that it is a BETTER theory than the previous one?

In the case of SQK, it explains EVERYTHING that relativity does - PLUS the BBE, plus other things, predicts more and has been tested.  So...

Go ahead and hang on to Einstein if You wish.  I'm backing SQK.  [shrug]
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

SarK0Y

Quote from: Amaterasu on July 11, 2012, 05:42:26 AM
Yes, but when One has a theory that explains, predicts and is far more testable than a previous theory, what are the odds that it is a BETTER theory than the previous one?

In the case of SQK, it explains EVERYTHING that relativity does - PLUS the BBE, plus other things, predicts more and has been tested.  So...

Go ahead and hang on to Einstein if You wish.  I'm backing SQK.  [shrug]

well, Amy, i give up. i don't like any theory before it no's shown the least real thinge... Just sayin'

I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)