Aether Displacement

[mpc755]

you clearly have no idea what you are talking about

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

The ripple is a gravitational wave.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

[Somamech]

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

The ripple is a gravitational wave.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

Working model please

You would have to have tested this if you are so sure... or is this a theory ?

[mpc755]

Working model please

You would have to have tested this if you are so sure... or is this a theory ?

I figured out what relates relativity with quantum mechanics.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

Both are aether displacement waves.

[Somamech]

I figured out what relates relativity with quantum mechanics.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

Both are aether displacement waves.

So you have a working model ? or a theory ?

[hobbit]

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid. The aether is not going forward and backward at the same time.

Aether is displaced by matter.

You missed IMHO.
Unless You have some evidence to back up Your as fact statement??

IMHO( in my hoibbit opinion)
The aether is not merely a single subject, it is far more complex., and it most certainly travels in counter spin flows in precise opposite direction in layers, and the clouds of water in different conditions of state of water reveal this.

Matter doesn't exist except as a local memory , and no matter how arranged that matter is, it is always within a memory field of torus form that implodes into and out of a heart centre that maintains the memory .
The memory is fed down in scaler fashion , and in this planets condition that results in a constant growth of mass.
The net inrush is what we term gravity.

Mass is created in a fixed lattice matrix of universe, that a resonant based fluid like substance travels about in the mirror like faces of the scalar geometric substance that forms the fixed near solid universe.

If mpc would simply ponder where mass origonates, then He/She??
would instead of trying to bully this theory he has , and deem anyone who offers alternate theory as someone to be kicked out of a thread.
May instead contemplate a creation and annihilation continuum , where mass is a consequence that remains in it's state as long as the memory field that here has a net implosion ratio remains reasonably steady.

I can follow the flowing part of what is called the aether, and can also detect and plot and follow each and every memory field about that which I atune to.
I can then determine how each memory firld sym biotically interacts with the larger memory fields it exists within.
I have wandered about multiple megalithic sites made of huge blocks of mass in varios forms, and have gleaned any understanding of the consequences of their placenents  etc, no matter how much scorn is thrown my way....I ramble onwards.
hobbit

[Amaterasu]

Never heard of it before but it appears to be an ion thruster, correct?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_thruster

If so then this is different than the aether. Ions are still particles of matter which exist in and displace the aether.

No.  The effect is much stronger than ion wind - though many try to hide it under that label.  It's like 3 orders of magnitude stronger...and is predicted in LaViolette's SQK.  It is the foundational effect in electrogravitics:

PDF's Electrogravitics:

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA227121
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0211/0211001.pdf
http://www.ssrsi.org/Onsite/PDFbin/Biefeld-Brown%20Effect.pdf
http://www.rqm.ch/Central%20Oscillator%20and%20SpaceQuantaMedium.pdf
http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/files/ElectrograviticsElectrokineticsValone.pdf
http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org/Loder.PDF
http://users.teilar.gr/~a.a.nass/files/C6.pdf
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/The%20Case%20for%20AntiGravity-booklet.pdf
http://www.ostfalia.de/export/sites/default/de/pws/turtur/NeuesVerzeichnis/Film_englisch.pdf

Also:  http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE24.html

[mpc755]

So you have a working model ? or a theory ?

I'm explaining what occurs physically in nature.

[Somamech]

I'm explaining what occurs physically in nature.

Yeah so you have replicated that what you see in nature or just have a theory?

[mpc755]

You missed IMHO.
Unless You have some evidence to back up Your as fact statement??

IMHO( in my hoibbit opinion)
The aether is not merely a single subject, it is far more complex., and it most certainly travels in counter spin flows in precise opposite direction in layers, and the clouds of water in different conditions of state of water reveal this.

Matter doesn't exist except as a local memory , and no matter how arranged that matter is, it is always within a memory field of torus form that implodes into and out of a heart centre that maintains the memory .
The memory is fed down in scaler fashion , and in this planets condition that results in a constant growth of mass.
The net inrush is what we term gravity.

Mass is created in a fixed lattice matrix of universe, that a resonant based fluid like substance travels about in the mirror like faces of the scalar geometric substance that forms the fixed near solid universe.

If mpc would simply ponder where mass origonates, then He/She??
would instead of trying to bully this theory he has , and deem anyone who offers alternate theory as someone to be kicked out of a thread.
May instead contemplate a creation and annihilation continuum , where mass is a consequence that remains in it's state as long as the memory field that here has a net implosion ratio remains reasonably steady.

I can follow the flowing part of what is called the aether, and can also detect and plot and follow each and every memory field about that which I atune to.
I can then determine how each memory firld sym biotically interacts with the larger memory fields it exists within.
I have wandered about multiple megalithic sites made of huge blocks of mass in varios forms, and have gleaned any understanding of the consequences of their placenents  etc, no matter how much scorn is thrown my way....I ramble onwards.
hobbit

Einstein defined motion as applied to the aether as the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time.

I interpret this to mean, at the galactic level, it can not be known if aether flows or not.

There is directionality to galaxy clusters moving through the Universe which can not be explained by the Big Bang. This could possibly be interpreted as a flow through the Universe of the aether.

However, at this time, I think it is more important to work with what there is evidence of and that is aether is displaced by matter.

[Somamech]

Einstein defined motion as applied to the aether as the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time.

I interpret this to mean, at the galactic level, it can not be known if aether flows or not.

There is directionality to galaxy clusters moving through the Universe which can not be explained by the Big Bang. This could possibly be interpreted as a flow through the Universe of the aether.

However, at this time, I think it is more important to work with what there is evidence of and that is aether is displaced by matter.

Thanks for that

You have just proven in your weasel way that you have no working model

[Somamech]

Heres a rodin coil for you 

Its invisible

[mpc755]

No.  The effect is much stronger than ion wind - though many try to hide it under that label.  It's like 3 orders of magnitude stronger...and is predicted in LaViolette's SQK.  It is the foundational effect in electrogravitics:

PDF's Electrogravitics:

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA227121
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0211/0211001.pdf
http://www.ssrsi.org/Onsite/PDFbin/Biefeld-Brown%20Effect.pdf
http://www.rqm.ch/Central%20Oscillator%20and%20SpaceQuantaMedium.pdf
http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/files/ElectrograviticsElectrokineticsValone.pdf
http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org/Loder.PDF
http://users.teilar.gr/~a.a.nass/files/C6.pdf
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/The%20Case%20for%20AntiGravity-booklet.pdf
http://www.ostfalia.de/export/sites/default/de/pws/turtur/NeuesVerzeichnis/Film_englisch.pdf

Also:  http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE24.html

I don't know enough about it to comment.

[mpc755]

Yeah so you have replicated that what you see in nature or just have a theory?

Here is an experiment which I have not yet performed but if it behaves as predicted it would be evidence of aether displacement.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/Kim_EtAl_Quantum_Eraser.svg

If beam splitter BSb is replaced with D4 the photons traveling the blue path which are detected at D1 and D2 may correspond with the interference patterns being created at D0. If this is the case then the which-way information of the photons will be known and this is evidence nothing is delayed, nothing is erased and de Broglie was correct.

It is evidence de Broglie was correct because it is evidence the particle traveling toward D0 has associated waves traveling both the red and blue paths and that wave interference is occurring prior to the particle being detected at D0 regardless of what else happens in the experiment.

[mpc755]

Thanks for that

You have just proven in your weasel way that you have no working model

Then general relativity is not a working model.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable"

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

[Somamech]

Then general relativity is not a working model.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable"

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

So you have a working model or not ?