marcus allen and the nasa pics

[zorgon]

What is ISIS?

A really hot Egyptian babe with Wings



or

USGS Isis: Planetary Image Processing Software

http://isis.astrogeology.usgs.gov/

Isis requires Linux

[Pimander]

Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers

You need Linux to run it.

[deuem]

Since I don't run Linux, I will have to pass on it so I am left with the hot babe with wings, all in all a better deal!  Deuem

[stealthyaroura]

You say "nice example zorgon"

Okay so...

...what is wrong in my picture besides the horizon? (this is about lighting )

Sorry been away from MY laptop and busy. well the fact that you can see the astronaut
when he should be in full darkness as the sun is clearly in front of the LM and him.
where is the lighting coming from?it SHOULD be cast in a shadow? NO?

[ArMaP]

it SHOULD be cast in a shadow? NO?

It is in the shadow, as it should be.

The shadow is not completely black, as they never are when there's a reflective surface near.

[zorgon]

The shadow is not completely black, as they never are when there's a reflective surface near.

I got a reply from Ed Hengeveld.

He says that was made with Apollo 11 photos pasted in Photoshop. Then he added the Sun as Photoshop effect, so the Sun is the only thing not real in that image.

Kinda makes shadow talk a moot point

I won't say its photoshoped but it is

[ArMaP]

Kinda makes shadow talk a moot point

Why? The Sun is fake, the light is not.

[Pimander]

Does anyone know why he added the Sun "as an effect"?  Strange behaviour if you ask me.  Or am I just some crazy?

[zorgon]

Why? The Sun is fake, the light is not.

Well if the sun is fake then what is the light source and what direction is that light source coming from?

besides the point is 'NASA image tampering"

I would say adding a photoshopped sun is 100% 'NASA image tampering"

[Pimander]

Well if the sun is fake then what is the light source and what direction is that light source coming from?

besides the point is 'NASA image tampering"

I would say adding a photoshopped sun is 100% 'NASA image tampering"

One for the list.  The potential for a mega-thread is enormous. LOL

But motive.  WHY?

[ArMaP]

Does anyone know why he added the Sun "as an effect"?  Strange behaviour if you ask me.  Or am I just some crazy?

I don't know, maybe he didn't like the available photos where the Sun was visible?

On that sequence of photos there isn't any showing the Sun, maybe that's why he made a fake one.

[ArMaP]

Well if the sun is fake then what is the light source and what direction is that light source coming from?

The Sun in that mosaic is fake (probably because there's no photo with the Sun in that sequence), but all photos have, obviously, a light source.

besides the point is 'NASA image tampering"

I would say adding a photoshopped sun is 100% 'NASA image tampering"

It depends on the meaning. It's definitely "tampering of NASA images", but was not done by NASA.

[ArMaP]

But motive.  WHY?

Probably to show the whole Lunar Module with the astronaut exiting it, instead of just several photos with the several stages of the astronaut exiting the LM and only parts of the LM showing.

[deuem]

ArMap, I think you need to post the words and location of where it was said to be done and by who.

The sun in this photo would have been to the right, lower and almost cut in half. The guy moved in a new one to the photo hence all of the shadows are off. He made a publicity shot. The same story we are seeing here, also goes with all of the Pan shots. They all are manipulated. We need to get to the originals. Also forget all photos in books and posters. All of them have been worked. I strongly suggest going after the best res originals only. Every thing else has been worked on purpose and can be tracked down.

Now if this was an original then we have a great case. I could change his white space suit to green and the sun to purple. Manipulation is easy. Getting the originals is not.

The motive is easy, to make money selling posters to people that don't know any better.

Deuem

[zorgon]

ArMap, I think you need to post the words and location of where it was said to be done and by who.

Page One

I got a reply from Ed Hengeveld.

He says that was made with Apollo 11 photos pasted in Photoshop. Then he added the Sun as Photoshop effect, so the Sun is the only thing not real in that image.