Obama Institutes Slavery In US By Executive Order: A Plea To Law Enforcement

[Bob Powell]

Slavery is once more legal in the United States thanks to language buried deep inside Executive Order 13603, which Barack Obama signed into law on March 16th 2012. According to this Executive Order, the President - or those he designates - can conscript "persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation," in "peacetime and times of national emergency." In a nutshell, that means that Barack Obama, and those he designates, can seize any resource, property, or person at any time for any reason, forcing that person with labor without being paid. Even in peacetime.

There is only ONE definition for forced, "uncompensated employment." That definition is slavery.

This episode also includes an appeal to Federal, State, County, and Local law enforcement officers to uphold the oath they took to "Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States," by defending the citizens they have sworn to protect, even when the aggressor is a Federal Government that has devolved into nothing more than a Tyranny where one man (or those he designates) can order the enslavement of its citizens, their detention in labor and re-education camps - even their deaths - simply by signing a piece of paper.

PART ONE:


PART TWO:


Executive Order 13603:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-22/pdf/2012-7019.pdf

Internment and Resettlement Field Manual:
http://publicintelligence.net/restricted-u-s-army-internment-and-resettlement-operations-manual/

Well, I'm going to be standing tall in front of "The Man" in about three hours to see how much more this suspended license BS is going to cost me. I've already had to sell my car in order to raise the $$$ to get my license back; EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS to the South Carolina Secretary of State just to get the suspension lifted! It's just as well I suppose, because the thing was a big green crap magnet anyway. I haven't been driving or course, but my son has. He's been stopped FOUR TIMES in the past week and a half, and each time they find some nit picky excuse to issue him a fine. My insurance is going to go through the roof. 

There is a big problem with Bath Salts and fake pot even here is the backwoods of Northern Michigan. I wish these cops would park outside of THOSE businesses, and harass THEIR customers, instead of parking down the block waiting for us to leave the house to harass us. One of these days they are going to realize that I'm on their side, that I have ALWAYS been on the side of local law enforcement, and if they have any morsel of a conscience they're gonna feel like real pricks; and I'm going to enjoy rubbing it in.

LMAO!!!

[Pimander]

Slavery is already in operation in the US.

Prison's ARE being used to generate profit using labour.  Work-fare or whatever you guys call it is also enforced lawfully.  If the system cannot provide you with a job, you are asked to work for what someone else determines (OR YOU STARVE).  That is clearly slavery as the labour is not given in the form of a contract AGREED BY THE LABOURER.

The USA is and has been for most of it's history a state that favours slavery.

[Lady Jae]

Isn't that Executive Order a violation of the 13th amendment?

AMENDMENT XIII

Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Passed by Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865.

http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=40&page=transcript

J

[Amaterasu]

I'm trying to figure out how and why "executive orders" became constitutional...  I don't think they were written into the Constitution.  If they were, please, someOne point Me in the right direction.

Having one Human able to create "laws" on Her/His say-so...is so counter to what I learned growing up while studying the Constitution.  It is, in fact, dictatorial.

So...  Why do We take these "executive orders" seriously?  Why do We call them "laws?"  (There are really only three Laws...  All else is an edict, a mandate, a statute, a code, a rule, a mandate, a constitution, a declaration, and so forth.)

[Littleenki]

This pathetic crap is where our tax dollars go, so basically we are enslaving ourselves by paying those taxes, although we have to, and have no choice in the matter.

And what was that CI? Civilian internee? Our gubmint sure does sugarcoat everything they do, and anyone who reads that army paper will see what is coming, if we dont recognize the signs and stop it now!

Of course, what can we do against the PTB?

Not a darned thing, as we are already enslaved, and our slave quarters are just much larger now, than they will be when we get piled up in those fema camps, where they can excercise Naziesque tactics and population control.

Be prepared folks, its just a matter of time, and if you are in the thick of things, instead of a safe place where the military doesnt tread, youre toast!

To the hills, Jethro!!!

Of Antarctica that is!

It seems to be becoming a mantra these days...." will you aliens come down and help us ...please?!?!?"

Le

[Lady Jae]

I'm trying to figure out how and why "executive orders" became constitutional...  I don't think they were written into the Constitution.  If they were, please, someOne point Me in the right direction.

Having one Human able to create "laws" on Her/His say-so...is so counter to what I learned growing up while studying the Constitution.  It is, in fact, dictatorial.

So...  Why do We take these "executive orders" seriously?  Why do We call them "laws?"  (There are really only three Laws...  All else is an edict, a mandate, a statute, a code, a rule, a mandate, a constitution, a declaration, and so forth.)

You raised a good question and sent me searching.

President George Washington issued the first executive order in 1789. Since then, all U.S. presidents have issued executive orders, ranging from Presidents Adams, Madison and Monroe, who issued only one each, to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who issued 3,522 executive orders.

And then there is this:

While they do bypass the U.S. Congress and the standard legislative law making process, no part of an executive order may direct the agencies to conduct illegal or unconstitutional activities.

I added the bold for emphasis.

Source for quotes: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/a/Presidential-Executive-Orders.htm

A more studious explanation: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Executive+Order

Now if the Constitution forbids slavery (Article XIII) and this Executive Order is an attempt to legalize it, which takes precedence?

J

[Amaterasu]

I'm guessing We can all point and laugh at the puppet trying to pull a fast one.  Thanks for the research!

[Lady Jae]

I'm guessing We can all point and laugh at the puppet trying to pull a fast one.  Thanks for the research!

Unfortunately for us, its a done deal:

Slavery is once more legal in the United States thanks to language buried deep inside Executive Order 13603, which Barack Obama signed into law on March 16th 2012.

(bold added for clarity)

The question that comes to mind is: "Can we undo this and how?"  Does anyone have any ideas?

J

[hobbit]

We are all slaves.
You are sold to the state when Your birth certificate is registered, and a DEBT is raised against that name.
You promise to repay that debt throughout your life.
This is a usary debt based slave system, where the slaves don't realise they are slaves, they think they live in the land of the free.
The invasions recently have been to install this debt based system into those countries.
To enslave the population in debt.

Here in the UK they have recentlt rolled out ...workfare, an obnoxious worded scheme where the unemployed must work for nothing, or loose their benefits.
It's basically the corperate slave drivers cracking their whips.

hobbit

[Lady Jae]

We are all slaves.
You are sold to the state when Your birth certificate is registered, and a DEBT is raised against that name.
You promise to repay that debt throughout your life.
This is a usary debt based slave system, where the slaves don't realise they are slaves, they think they live in the land of the free.
The invasions recently have been to install this debt based system into those countries.
To enslave the population in debt.

Here in the UK they have recentlt rolled out ...workfare, an obnoxious worded scheme where the unemployed must work for nothing, or loose their benefits.
It's basically the corperate slave drivers cracking their whips.

hobbit

If I'm not mistaken, Hobbit, the US has begun to implement the same program for the unemployed. 

I'm stunned that I didn't know about this Executive Order until now.  I truly must have my head in the sand.

Sadly, I've posted this information several times.  I have not had even one response. 

J

[hobbit]

If I'm not mistaken, Hobbit, the US has begun to implement the same program for the unemployed. 

I'm stunned that I didn't know about this Executive Order until now.  I truly must have my head in the sand.

Sadly, I've posted this information several times.  I have not had even one response. 

J

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ULopfMGpr4&feature=fvwrel

It's a very long term agenda.
I have stood in the cells under Liverpool where the slaves were held ...OUT OF SIGHT...until bought and shipped on, bizzarely the CAVERN where the beatles played is right beside these.
If Lennon only had known??
hobbit

[Lady Jae]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ULopfMGpr4&feature=fvwrel

It's a very long term agenda.
I have stood in the cells under Liverpool where the slaves were held ...OUT OF SIGHT...until bought and shipped on, bizzarely the CAVERN where the beatles played is right beside these.
If Lennon only had known??
hobbit

A most eye-opening video, Hobbit. Thank you for sharing that.

Yes, if Lennon had only known.

J

[rdunk]

This Executive Order was first discussed here at the below link, starting at reply #9. If more has developed since then, on this, from the administration, I am not aware of it.

For the most part, there is not much new, other than department titles, when compared to similar prior Presidential Executive orders, by Bush, Clinton, and etc.. "Supposedly", this is simply an update to those prior EO's, to reflect latest titles, and etc.

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=731.0

I am posting a link to the EO for anyone who is actually interested in what it says. And below, I will post here a reply I made in the above forum thread, that was someone else's thoughts on just what this EO really amounts to - which was "not much to be concerned about.

EO link:  http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness

It is my hope that this information can give us all a little clearer understanding of where this Executive came from, at the least!! Do I trust President Obama? Absolutely not, because he has demonstrated openly that he doesn't speak the truth - rather he speaks what is profitable politically, to his agenda.

My 3/23/2012 reply post, from the above OP thread:

When I first saw this Executuve order, I too was very concerned, because of what I thought I was seeing in what Obama was trying to do. Well, fortunately, for me, that is now not a problem, because of a report I found on the internet. Assuming that it is accurate, I don't think that this doc gives us any more to worry about than what is already "on our political plates".

I am posting this report below for all of you, and hopefully it will help you as it has me.

"What me worry??

rdunk
*****************************************************

Obama executive order nothing to storm the castle over

Published: 5:55 PM 03/18/2012
By David Martosko

Executive Editor
Bio | Archive | Email David Martosko  Follow David Martosko

Get David Martosko Feed

David Martosko is The Daily Caller's executive editor. He is the father of two, a frequent public speaker, and a graduate of Dartmouth College and the Johns Hopkins University.

On Friday President Obama signed an executive order titled "National Defense Resources Preparedness," and by Saturday the conservative Twitterverse had erupted into righteous indignation, organized under the ExecOrder. But the 140-character expressions of outrage and the anti-Obama tea party angst masked the fact that very little in the presidential proclamation is new.

Most of it combines existing executive orders from Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. Those earlier orders refined similar statements from Presidents Harry Truman and Richard Nixon.

And Truman and Nixon, it turns out, were both updating language from President Roosevelt after the passage of the Defense Production Act in 1950.

While Obama's executive order is written in sophisticated legislative verbiage, its aim should be clear to anyone who reads it from front to back as I did. (You're welcome.)

And Microsoft Word has a nifty "compare" feature that combines two documents into a single version with every single difference, no matter how small, spelled out in red. It's a huge time-saver.

So what's new since 1994?

When Bill Clinton issued his version of the plan to prepare the country for some unstated national military emergency, most disaster response functions were assigned to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

Today, those functions belong to the Department of Homeland Security, whose sub-agencies include FEMA. Most of the significant changes from Clinton's order to Obama's involve reassigning FEMA's old duties to DHS — which didn't exist when Clinton was president. Obama did this in 10 separate places.

But in large part, the function of this executive order — in all its historical incarnations — is to clearly delineate what each cabinet secretary is responsible for if the country should go kablooey.

Obama also axed the FEMA director's prior role as a tie-breaking vote whenever two cabinet secretaries might disagree about allocating resources in a time of emergency. From now on that decision will land on the president's desk.

After the black eye FEMA got — deserved or not — following Hurricane Katrina, this is at minimum a smart PR move.

Obama also red-lined the Export-Import Bank of the United States from Clinton's order completely. But even that is probably meaningless: The Ex-Im Bank's charter is set to expire this year, but Obama is strongly in favor of its renewal.

Another curious change involves the Department of Agriculture's mandate. New language from Obama includes, for the first time, "livestock resources, veterinary resources, [and] plant health resources."

It also expands the definition of "food resources" to include "potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers." On the other hand, Obama has curiously eliminated tobacco form the list of things the government can — and has been able to since before any of us were born — control if an unfriendly power should ever drop the big one on New York City. 

All of this seems completely sensible.

Still, breathless statements flooded Twitter over the weekend, by Sunday reaching a pace of about 20 per minute.

"To Obamabots and other asleep #Americans: Wake the hell up! New Executive Order dated March 16th. Prepare yourselves!" read one.

"Obama's 'Dictator' executive order. Read it & tell me if you REALLY believe Hitler comparisons are legit," said another.

Other tweets warned that Obama aims to "make it easier to push America N2 totalitarianism like China" and had seized "the power to STOP ALL ELECTIONS." One Twitter user said that in the wake of the executive order, "I've decided to buy stock in Guillotine companies."

The most common tweeted phrase about the executive order, by far, was "peacetime martial law."

The narrow span of initial reactions from conservative websites ranged from "stunning" and "harassing"  to "totalitarian" and "the blueprint for Peacetime Martial Law." One typical thread simply declared that the president had "gone too far."

What's maddening about this, aside from the fact that so few commentators, clearly, had actually read the order, is the knee-jerk assumption that Barack Obama is somehow less trustworthy — at the molecular level — with his constitutional powers than was Bill Clinton.

Yes, the Internet has turned political events into tinder with a ferocity Clinton never faced. And yes, the political right harbors an intense distrust of the Oval Office's current occupant.

But the idea that he would, in an election year, suddenly declare himself the singular steward and controller of all private property, or put himself in solitary control of the water supply or reinstitute the draft — all accusations I've read online in the past day — is ludicrous.

If you want to see what any legislative or regulatory language really means, skip over all the nouns (like food, water, fertilizer and fuel) and look at the verbs.

Columnist Ed Morrissey spotted a few in Obama's executive order: "identify," "assess," "prepare," "improve," "foster [cooperation]," "provide." These aren't exactly words that suggest lots of action. I don't see "usurp," "hijack" or "shanghai."

I also don't see anything in the executive order that establishes a new legal authority of any kind. Not only is the language old hat, but it spells out which laws the White House is relying on for its authority.

So this is all pretty thin soup.

If we can't trust the president — any president — to look at what's going on and make his cabinet secretaries play nice, we have bigger problems than who's going to control the next corn crop if Putin starts punching in launch codes instead of his ATM password.

So everyone just chill, okay? It's time to crumple up those tinfoil hats. At least for a week or so.

[Lady Jae]

This Executive Order was first discussed here at the below link, starting at reply #9. If more has developed since then, on this, from the administration, I am not aware of it.

It's time to crumple up those tinfoil hats. At least for a week or so.

Thank you, rdunk.  Being a new member, I missed your posts.

I still do not like the wording of this EO...regardless of whose words they are.

I will put my "tin foil hat" away, but I reserve the right to cling tightly to my Constitution.

My question still stands though:  which takes precedence?

J

[hobbit]

Thank you, rdunk.  Being a new member, I missed your posts.

I still do not like the wording of this EO...regardless of whose words they are.

I will put my "tin foil hat" away, but I reserve the right to cling tightly to my Constitution.

My question still stands though:  which takes precedence?

J

Has He, has declared a national emergency because of the russian nuclear threat??
Whatever that EGO laden so called president wants.
hobbit