Coast to Coast Tonight Physicist Dr. John Brandenburg Unites Gravity and EM

[COSMO]

Continuing Einstein's quest for a Unified Field Theory, plasma physicist Dr. John Brandenburg and his theory which connects gravity and electromagnetism.



Veteran plasma physicist John Brandenburg reveals the new theory that finally accomplishes what Einstein failed to do: the GEM Unification Theory proves the mathematical and physical interrelation of the forces of gravity and electromagnetism! This theory vindicates Einstein's dedication to unifying the fields in the final labor of his life. His quest became legendary, then mythic, until the whole idea was dismissed as myth by other physicists; the gravity-electromagnetism problem pursued by Einstein until his death became regarded like the ancient Greek problem of squaring the circle-an epic puzzle with no solution. But the other physicists were wrong, as Brandenburg shows. It turns out the fields can be unified-the circle can be squared-and this has vast implications for the future of humankind. Brandenburg starts out by tracing the evolution of thought on the two long-term forces of nature, gravity and electromagnetism, from ancient times to the modern day. He shows the intricate interweaving of Einstein's work with that of other physicists, including Sarkharov and his "zero point" theory of gravity and the hidden fifth dimension of Kaluza and Klein. He also traces the surprising, hidden influence of Nikola Tesla on Einstein's life. This book shows how, despite Einstein's errors in the details, the successful GEM Unification Theory is built on his basic hypothesis that gravity and electromagnetic forces could be unified, and that both controlled gravity and a new view of the cosmos follow: hydrogen, the basic building block of the universe, can be unified with the vacuum itself! The universe is self-renewing, a sort of "evergreen cosmos." Brandenburg describes control of space-time geometry through electromagnetism, and states that faster-than-light travel will be possible in the future. Anti-gravity through electromagnetism is possible, which upholds the basic "flying saucer" design utilizing "The Tesla Vortex." A must read for any person interested in UFOs and leading-edge physics. See the physics used at Area 51 explained!

http://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Einsteins-Unified-Field-Electro-Magnetism/dp/1935487426/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1344218913&sr=8-2&keywords=john+brandenburg

Former space science museum curator and former NASA consultant, Richard C. Hoagland, will discuss the history and expectations of the Mars Rover which is scheduled to land on Mars sometime around show time. Over the course of the program, he'll be joined by plasma physicist Dr. John Brandenburg, aerospace engineer Dr. Robert Zubrin, and space expert Dr. David Livingston. Hosted by George Noory.

[Pimander]

Continuing Einstein's quest for a Unified Field Theory, plasma physicist Dr. John Brandenburg and his theory which connects gravity and electromagnetism.

Wouldn't that be the Higgs field?

[COSMO]

Wouldn't that be the Higgs field?

He says that gravity can be manipulated using a highly charged plasma vortex.  He is more credible than some with good credentials:

Dr. John Brandenburg, a plasma physicist, has used mathematical calculations to predict the Higgs Boson particle mass at 128GeV. The prediction is based on The GEM Theory, unifies the four fundamental forces of nature, and is turning out be very close to the reported experimental Higgs mass of roughly 125GeV. He announced his new findings at the Space Technologies and Applications International Forum 2 conference in Albuquerque N.M. In the new theory, the Higgs is merely a quantum "mirage" of a more fundamental massless field called the Radion field - which creates mass by reflecting off a hidden 5th dimension.
http://www.pacificflyer.com/2012/04/news-briefs/

John Brandenburg, PhD is a plasma physicist. He did his graduate work in California at Lawrence Livermore National Lab in controlled plasmas for fusion power, and has worked in defense, energy, and space research. Dr. Brandenburg was also part of the Clementine Mission to the Moon which discovered water at the Moon's poles. However, the focus of Brandenburg's scientific career has been to complete the great effort of Einstein to unify the two long range forces of nature, gravity and electromagnetism.

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guest/brandenburg-dr-john/53388

good interview video:

[Pimander]

I'm aware of his ideas.  I don't see it as a new idea that the Higgs "particle" is a mirage.  All particles are effectively mirages caused by a field effect (or can be at least be viewed that way).

If mass is caused by inertia in the Higgs field (which I have claimed here before and been obsessively argued with by a certain member so I gave up wasting my time lol) then anything that alters or modulates the properties of the Higgs field might cause gravity amplification or negative gravitational effects.  A plasma vortex spinning at extremely high frequency looks like a good candidate to modulate the Higgs field to me.  Perhaps a better one than electrogravitic candidates, but what would I know? 

[COSMO]

I'm aware of his ideas.  I don't see it as a new idea that the Higgs "particle" is a mirage.  All particles are effectively mirages caused by a field effect (or can be at least be viewed that way).

If mass is caused by inertia in the Higgs field (which I have claimed here before and been obsessively argued with by a certain member so I gave up wasting my time lol) then anything that alters or modulates the properties of the Higgs field might cause gravity amplification or negative gravitational effects.  A plasma vortex spinning at extremely high frequency looks like a good candidate to modulate the Higgs field to me.  Perhaps a better one than electrogravitic candidates, but what would I know? 

Yeah, Higgs field sounds like an ether theory to me anyway.  What was old is new again.  I like Brandenburg because of his credentials.  He is a senior propulsion scientist at Orbital Technologies Corp and has worked on NASA projects plus he is building on standard physics and has the fortitude to look beyond into some areas that others seem to fear to address.  He is a plasma physicist and has experimental results to bear out his theory, not just a garage tinkerer.  I think electrogravitics is kind of a proof of concept, that em can impact gravity, or what we perceive as gravity, and I see it as verification of the ether and it's relationship to em.  There is a primary medium that creates gravity, conveys mass, inertia and is the medium that em propagates in.  Check out that video interview in the link I posted above.  It's pretty good.  I think a vortex is the way to produce a STEADY effect, not just a pulse.  The thing I really like about the vortex is that it is natures way.  Nature already has the answers, it shows the way, it's all around us.

[Fruitbat]

Hey less of the disparaging reference to "garage tinkerers" will ya?

If you work to a consistent method and keep enough notes that other people can duplicate your effort, does it matter whether you have a "proper" lab or whether you work in your garage with whatever you have?

or am I missing the point?

FB.

[COSMO]

Hey less of the disparaging reference to "garage tinkerers" will ya?

If you work to a consistent method and keep enough notes that other people can duplicate your effort, does it matter whether you have a "proper" lab or whether you work in your garage with whatever you have?

or am I missing the point?

FB.

Disparaging? 

John  is a plasma physicist and has built plasma thrusters for NASA...so I do not consider him a garage tinkerer.  I did not say that being a garage tinkerer is a bad thing, but a garage tinkerer may not have a solid technical background or the resouces to do things with the proper materials, energy levels or safety equipment.  I think there is a clear distinction between a plasma physicist that has built plasma thrusters for NASA and a garage tinkerer.  That's not saying that a garage tinkerer will not come up with the technology to take us to the stars, but given the same intentions, my money would be on someone with a good technical/scientific/engineering background, substantial resources, the best materials and facilities money could buy and researchers that could focus on the technology instead of scrounging for parts and worrying about going to work and paying their bills.  No matter how hard you try, without proper resources, your efforts may not be enough to acheive the results you are looking for.  Resources are key...Tesla would agree I think.  But hey...if a person working in their garage can come up with a proof of concept for field propulsion, I am all for that too. 

Cosmo