News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Turning Back the Human Clock (C-14 and the reconfiguration)

Started by 1Worldwatcher, December 13, 2012, 08:46:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

1Worldwatcher

I have read an interesting story of how geneticists and Archaeologists are coming together too see why there are so many inconclusive results from one too another as far evidence presented for a specific era or Civilization, usually they would vow one against the other for understanding and accurately dating, which is usually a gap of 10K years to 82K years, which is not that accurate for such theoretical estimations of the Ancient Civilizations and the true secrets they had left behind.

I have personally had hard time accepting anything like C-14 dating with in it's math and very prevalent inconsistencies from one genre too another when using both Archaeological finding's with Genetics dating scheme. Seems as if they have found this out too, "Finally!!" that there are some very staggering changes too make with in such judgments of dating processes.

QuoteNow, new work, based on observation of the genetic differences between present-day parents and children, suggests that the genetic clock may actually run about twice as slowly as previously believed, at least for the last million years or so of primate history. In their review paper in the journal Nature Reviews Genetics, Aylwyn Scally and Richard Durbin of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Hinxton, England, propose much earlier dates for watershed events in human evolution, which could help bring the genetic and archaeological records in line. For instance, a slower clock places the migration of modern humans out of Africa at around 120,000 years ago, which is more consistent with archaeological evidence.

http://www.archaeology.org/1301/trenches/dna_clock_human_genome_mutation.html

The way thing's are coming about, and with greater understanding with in the fields of archeology and genetics, it is looking more and more like Sitchin was closer than skeptics would want to admit. This new dating processes would for sure put the ancient civilizations at a much more earlier time line than once accepted as the correct aging investigative methods.

Fascinating stuff, we should all pay attention, "Look, Listen & Learn" comes too mind.

With Great Respect,
1Worldwatcher
"To know men is too have knowledge, to know self is to have insight."