new sandyhook info

[ArMaP]

That "pastor" sure sounds and looks like Matthew Broderick - and if *I* was trying to manipulate the "plebes," if *I* had all this money, if *I* controlled the media and Hollywood...  If *I* was psychopathic.....

This is EXACTLY the sort of thing I would pull.  Make up "news" to play on People's heartstrings.  To instill fear so as to promote Self-disarming.

Would you make this with known people that could be easily recognised by any person in the world?

[Amaterasu]

Youre not insane Amy, but did you look at the whole site www.wellaware1.com?

It rolls from the top into a quagmire of reaching comparisons..he might be right about 1 or 2 of them, but not most.

And yes, the dude is clearly not all there...not that some of the best minds are any more "there" but his site shows a serious paranoid tendency to construct things where they are not.

Im no Squirrel, but I knows a nut when I see one!

Oh, I don't think He is spot on in every connection He makes - just enough of them, and especially in the "Family exposed" ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=js9cvBOUms4&list=PL44EA00FAAA799428 ) piece - for Me to see patterns and motives and logic behind the "drills," hoaxes, psyops.

[Amaterasu]

Would you make this with known people that could be easily recognised by any person in the world?

ArMaP, They laugh at us.  When an actor is presented as, say, a doctor or a policeperson, or whatever, on the news, MOST of Us - whether We know the actor in other roles or not - WILL NOT SEE anyOne We know.  We see the doctor or policeperson or whatever and never think twice.  Especially with makeup, prosthetics, costumes, lighting and camera lenses/angles creating a different "look" for Them.

They RELY on this for Their ruses.  And They laugh, They laugh HARD at how "stupid" We are.

[Amaterasu]

Oh and HERE's an interesting post over at Conspiracy.Co:

http://www.conspiracy.co/forums/main-wall/13071-sandy-hook-victim-allison-wyatt-really-girl-named-lily.html




BUT... I'm sure the taking of a child's pic from the web and posting it as one of the dead kids isn't a clue here.....

[Littleenki]

Well Amy, I agree theres something rotten in Connecticut, perhaps the time will tell.

Personally, I belive the shooting was not as it is presented, but Im still not sure in what way...just that it is possible whether it happened or not, it was a false flag.

People will reach and look for every possible clue or bit of evidence, and thats real good, to out the evil running our country we need every tidbit and fact we can find.

The FB post above is very disturbing...Ill read more about that today! Hope you had a peaceful holiday!

Cheers!

[ArMaP]

ArMaP, They laugh at us.  When an actor is presented as, say, a doctor or a policeperson, or whatever, on the news, MOST of Us - whether We know the actor in other roles or not - WILL NOT SEE anyOne We know.  We see the doctor or policeperson or whatever and never think twice.

Then things are worse than I thought, as those people have lost one of the characteristics that all human beings have, the capacity of recognising faces.

They RELY on this for Their ruses.  And They laugh, They laugh HARD at how "stupid" We are.

If people react like you said then they are right. 

[Amaterasu]

Well Amy, I agree theres something rotten in Connecticut, perhaps the time will tell.

Personally, I belive the shooting was not as it is presented, but Im still not sure in what way...just that it is possible whether it happened or not, it was a false flag.

People will reach and look for every possible clue or bit of evidence, and thats real good, to out the evil running our country we need every tidbit and fact we can find.

The FB post above is very disturbing...Ill read more about that today! Hope you had a peaceful holiday!

Cheers!

Let's look at The Dark Night film and the fact that both the words "Aurora" and "Sandy Hook" are in the film, and the fact that the Aurora "shooting" took place at a showing of TDN.  What are the probabilities?

If no conspiracy, if it was all "just coincidence," I would guess about 1 in 1,000,000,000 or maybe a few more zeroes at the end there.  If conspiracy, about 1 to 1.

So....  Let's work out the most probable path here.

[Amaterasu]

Then things are worse than I thought, as those people have lost one of the characteristics that all human beings have, the capacity of recognising faces.

ArMaP, really?  I did not recognized a close friend after not seeing Him in a few years because He grew a beard.  I listed all the tricks They use.  And if One is not EXPECTING the possibility of a known actor playing a PART on the NEWS...and there's makeup, prosthetics, lighting, costumes, camera lens and camera angle...the BEST One is likely to get is, "Gee, S/He kinda looks like [fill in the name]."  Many People look like somebody...

Without any connection, and with trust that the news is TRUTH, when Robin Williams is introduced on the news as Joe Expert, People will not even go there.  They will see Joe Expert.  Have You studied psychology at all...?

If people react like you said then they are right. 

No.  They take advantage of Our TRUST.  They play Us.  It's not that We're stupid.  It's that THEY hold ALL the cards.  They have build this facade of "reality," inculcating Us from birth.  We are at a HUGE disadvantage.  To assume that is "stupidity..."  Well, You know what They say about assuming...

[ArMaP]

BUT... I'm sure the taking of a child's pic from the web and posting it as one of the dead kids isn't a clue here.....

I guess that's what that guy from the police (or whatever) was talking about, people posting any photo as if it was a photo of one of the victims.

[ArMaP]

Without any connection, and with trust that the news is TRUTH, when Robin Williams is introduced on the news as Joe Expert, People will not even go there.  They will see Joe Expert.  Have You studied psychology at all...?

As I said once, as much as I studied English, by looking and listening to other people.

No.  They take advantage of Our TRUST.  They play Us.  It's not that We're stupid.  It's that THEY hold ALL the cards.

That's more than trust, that's blind faith and has nothing to do with anyone "holding all the cards", it's (probably) because the people stopped thinking a long time ago, maybe falling for all of the "dangers" that they supposedly face and from which TPTB supposedly protect them.

They have build this facade of "reality," inculcating Us from birth.  We are at a HUGE disadvantage.

I don't understand what disadvantage is that, sorry.

To assume that is "stupidity..."

If actions made by people that are supposed to know what they are doing, that are supposed to know right from wrong, that are supposed to be informed, that are supposed to know how to get informed, that are supposed to know that we do not live in an ideal world result in making their life's worse and they keep on doing it (or not changing the things they do) and repeating the same mistakes without learning a thing from those mistakes, what would you call it?

Well, You know what They say about assuming...

Yes, I know, and I think it's a stupid saying that only works in English, so I can say it in Portuguese.

[petrus4]

Well Amy, I agree theres something rotten in Connecticut, perhaps the time will tell.

I think the Batman shooting was false flag, 100%.  This one I'm not sure about, because I haven't really looked into it.  I'm also trying to be a little more open minded to the idea that maybe it was just a disturbed kid who did "go off," if only for the sake of objectivity, this time around.  I still don't really believe that, though; because to me, that is no explanation at all.  It's a non-explanation.

The main thing that is bothering me about these incidents, is that while there are nearly always elements that don't add up, the majority don't want to know about those.  They want to believe the government's story, to ignore anything about the events which don't make sense, and will even actively tell those who are thinking about it more deeply, to shut up and stop doing so.

[Littleenki]

Adam Lanza's doctor..thanks lady!



Another suspicious piece of the puzzle.

[sky otter]

ok..i've really had enough of this stupidity...really

does anyone realize that they are quoting REPORTERS
reporters are not all paid by the gov..and none i have met are infallible
that's why the reports have mistakes in them..not because the gov slipped up
in issuing the info
reporters have egos and want to be the first with ""info''?
so that they look like THE one to listen too


has anyone actually talked to some one who was there instead of just regurgitating BULLS HIT
has anyone qualified their sources ..
sure doesn't look like it

here's your psycho with insider info in another you t
the title should be enough



wow..now here are some ideas i haven't seen yet..
maybe old  elizabeth and her croonies have found a way to tune into the loonies
and prod them into action
maybe the gun makers are paying them to do it
i mean ..look at how the gun sales have jumped since

maybe the real eye opener here is that
  the gov and press or whomever wants-to are proving
that anyone who buys into this tripe has no cognitive powers and are truly
easier to control than they thought
a real bait and switch..get them scrambling to prove what doesn't exist while
the real story is happening in front of their blinders

a lot of this drivel going in circles is why the real conspiracies are discounted
what a fuXXing shame
and waste of intellect

[micjer]

I really don't know what to believe.

All I know is that things don't add up the way the official story is told.

http://www.conspiracy-cafe.com/apps/blog/show/21414148-baby-you-can-drive-my-car

The notorious car photographed leaving the scene of the Sandy Hook school shooting does NOT belong to Adam Lanza or his mother. HUH? That's right. The audio from the police radio contains the vehicle registration request and reply. The car is registered to Christopher Rodia on charges for larceny and narcotics.

[sky otter]

All I know is that things don't add up the way the official story is told.


ok Mic
that is my point..
you are realaying on info that is printed..one piece of printed info contradicting a different piece of info

how do you know that picture is from the crime scene and not just a random shot of a car being towed?

how do you know ANY of the stuff is the real info and not put there to play with your brain..
or just mistakes
or just a reporter wanting credit..

you are questioning what happened not who is reporting it or how they got their "STORY"
or even if their story is correct

look at where this pic was found....do you actually think the police let their broadcasts be made public?
who posted this pic originally and how did THEY get it..?

the right questions are not being ask..imo..enough said