new sandyhook info

[burntheships]

Has this video been posted?

I find this rather bizarre. How did this happen?





Woman's Daughter's Photo used for Sandy Hook
Shooting "Victim"  ...



http://www.dailypaul.com/268669/claims-daughter-s-photo-was-stolen-from-flicker-and-used-as-sandy-hook-shooting-victim

[rdunk]

He is right look at the date.


Sandy Hook Elementary School Tribute - Newtown, CT on Vimeo



? 4:38? 4:38


vimeo.com/53220123

Nov 10, 2012
Sandy Hook Elementary School Tribute - Newtown, CT. from Joseph Ametrano 1 month ago. Sandy Hook ...

More videos for vimeo sandy hook elementary school tribute »

I don't post videos - - - but, I would like to ask, can video postings be edited for content corrections after posting? IE, could anyone have come back and edited the content from something else, to the Sandy Hook stuff, and left the date as original??

Just wondering!

One thing I have wondered about from the beginning - The Feds (I believe) were the first to search the shooter's house and computer stuff. I personally was very suspect when it was "announced" that the "shooter had trashed/destroyed" his hard drive. My thought was that possibly others would have had a greater reason than the shooter for at least saying "the hard drive had been trashed"! With all that was going on for the shooter, why would he have trashed the hard drive??

[Amaterasu]

To my knowledge, rdunk, no. Not on vids.

I'm yelling You all...if You still think there was no conspiracy here - You are bound and determined NOT to see one no matter the evidence.  This whole thing is fish city!

[petrus4]

The Government has no legal standing to deny parents
the opportunity to view/identify their very own children.

If those children have birth certificates, then unfortunately, yes it does.  A birth certificate is a form of registration within the system, which says that the individual named has been handed over to the system (in whichever country) in order for the individual's literal flesh and blood to be used as collateral to pay off debt (which in reality cannot be repaid) owed by the government to the bankers, under the fractional reserve banking system.

Bottom line:-  If you have a currently active birth certificate, you're screwed.  They literally own you.  The only way out of that, is to figure out how to revoke the birth cert; which I haven't read about yet.

[ArMaP]

Bottom line:-  If you have a currently active birth certificate, you're screwed.  They literally own you.  The only way out of that, is to figure out how to revoke the birth cert; which I haven't read about yet.

A death certificate?

[petrus4]

A death certificate?

Well, yes, Armap.  That is one way, obviously; but I've seen a few in the sovereignty movement imply that they were able to do something about their birth certificate while they were still alive.  It was also very strongly implied that revoking the birth certificate was the first and most important step in the process of gaining legal individual sovereignty.

[Amaterasu]

Can We not ask to see where WE signed the birth certificate?  And from there declare We are not obligated by any document that We did not sign?

[Amaterasu]

And more:

[Ellirium113]

Can We not ask to see where WE signed the birth certificate?  And from there declare We are not obligated by any document that We did not sign?

Irrelevent...see below:

When mums apply for a birth
certificate, the application is registered. The legal title of her baby is then transferred from mum to the State.
Mum is left with equitable title of her baby whom she can use for a fee – a 'use tax' – and since the property
does not belong to her, she has to treat it in the manner which the owner wants.

http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/solutions/How_I_08.pdf

Bottom line:-  If you have a currently active birth certificate, you're screwed.  They literally own you.  The only way out of that, is to figure out how to revoke the birth cert; which I haven't read about yet.

On the contrary...one might as well use the system against them...if you go through that .PDF in the link above Elizabeth Mary Croft shows you how. Here is an example:

What is going on in the 'courts' today is that the Strawman – the
government-created corporation – is being charged with a crime based upon violation of a statute. This would
be OK if we weren't being held as surety for that entity which couldn't possibly have done anything wrong
because it exists only in the minds of those who would confiscate our freedom. We cannot be charged by
the state with any crime because all crimes are commercial .... and Commerce is an unreal situation in which
we cannot involve ourselves because we are real. Fictions cannot connect with living souls; fictions cannot do
anything which requires a meeting of the minds, e.g.: contract, or any of the senses of a living soul – hearing,
seeing, thinking. Our use of the Strawman is to enable us to operate in Commerce. It is exigent that we learn
how to do this so that we can begin to win by publicly 'discharging debt' and privately, by 'serving'. We
were never meant to operate in commerce.
The legal use of words is vastly different from normal English usage, the best example being when thenpresident
Bill Clinton said, "That depends on what the definition of 'is' is." We all laughed, yet Black's
Law Dictionary has eighteen (18) different meanings of the word 'is'. Check every document which you
think identifies you: birth certificate, driver licence, passport, voter registration, utility bills, etc. The name
which represents you is nowhere on any of them.
As fictitious entities cannot contract with natural beings, a transmitting utility is required for the
connexion. The Strawman is the transmitting utility. So all contracts are between the Strawman and the
Public entity, not between the Private living soul and a Public entity.

[ArMaP]

Renunciation of citizenship?

[Amaterasu]

Irrelevant, You say?  Really?  How can We be held to a document We did not sign?  Or is that document, by its very method of creation null?

[Ellirium113]

Irrelevant, You say?  Really?  How can We be held to a document We did not sign?  Or is that document, by its very method of creation null?

It is a scam contract agreed to by your own blood relatives agreeing to award you those benefits in return they sign over your servitude (for lack of a better word). The parent acts in your "best interest" as they believe this is the right thing to do. After all how else can you get a job or a drivers licence, etc.

I agree that if you did not sign up for it you should have the right to renounce your corporate entity anytime you so wish. Although there are many instances of people having played the strwaman card and won court cases, got out of debt among other things. But that is all for another thread.

[ArMaP]

It is a scam contract agreed to by your own blood relatives agreeing to award you those benefits in return they sign over your servitude (for lack of a better word). The parent acts in your "best interest" as they believe this is the right thing to do. After all how else can you get a job or a drivers licence, etc.

Is there real evidence that all that is true, or is this one of those things that everyone believes in just because it goes against the government?

[Amaterasu]

Is there real evidence that all that is true, or is this one of those things that everyone believes in just because it goes against the government?

It's a scam, ArMaP.  They have made the Human race Their energy slaves via the institution of a paper about which the parents seldom are told the truth of.  Had *I* known the truth when My daughter was born, I would NOT have signed it!

A scam is ANY such transaction that takes without giving full disclosure of all ramifications.

[ArMaP]

It's a scam, ArMaP.  They have made the Human race Their energy slaves via the institution of a paper about which the parents seldom are told the truth of.

Is there real evidence that what was posted is true?
For example, what does it really mean being an "energy slaves via the institution of a paper"? Does that paper really makes a difference? What about the people that were not born in the US and don't have an US birth certificate?