new sandyhook info

[Ellirium113]

Is there real evidence that what was posted is true?
For example, what does it really mean being an "energy slaves via the institution of a paper"? Does that paper really makes a difference? What about the people that were not born in the US and don't have an US birth certificate?

Another excerpt from that .PDF file...

Registration vs. Recording
"Registration" comes from Latin "rex, regis" etc. meaning regal. So think about what occurs to
whatever you 'register' – you hand legal title over to the Crown. When you register anything with the public,
it releases legal title to the government corporation and leaves you with only equitable title – the right to use,
not own, and for that use you will pay a 'use' tax which is every tax, be it income, sin, sales, property, etc. as
opposed to lawful taxes – excise and impost. So that it doesn't appear that the government now owns the
property which you have registered they put it in a name which so much resembles your own that you won't
suspect it, however, the NAME is owned by the government. If you choose rather to record your legal title to
your property with the public, you maintain your status as Title Owner. This is one of the most important
things you can ever learn for the sake of your commercial affairs.

This is not just relevent to the US and Canada this is international. Always remember the language of these acts is written in legal ease and simple words may take on an entirely different meaning than what you think according to the wordplay they use and the definitions of those words according to THEM is what counts. If you do not understand the legal definitions then you can not possibly know what implications are of documents you sign.

[ArMaP]

Another excerpt from that .PDF file...

I am doubting the information from that PDF file, quoting more of it doesn't help in trying to know if there is real evidence of what is said. Anyone can make a PDF saying anything they want.

Registration vs. Recording
"Registration" comes from Latin "rex, regis" etc. meaning regal. So think about what occurs to
whatever you 'register' – you hand legal title over to the Crown.

Not really, as anyone that speaks a Latin based language can tell you. In Portuguese, for example, "registar" (meaning registration) is not related to "reger" (to rule), and it's from this root that regis and rex come.

When you register anything with the public, it releases legal title to the government corporation and leaves you with only equitable title – the right to use, not own, and for that use you will pay a 'use' tax which is every tax, be it income, sin, sales, property, etc. as opposed to lawful taxes – excise and impost.

Not true, when a newborn is registered neither he/she or the parents pay any tax for it (although they usually pay the registration service).

So that it doesn't appear that the government now owns the property which you have registered they put it in a name which so much resembles your own that you won't suspect it, however, the NAME is owned by the government.

This part I don't understand, what does it mean the "they put it in a name which so much resembles your own" part? And "the NAME is owned by the government"?

This is not just relevent to the US and Canada this is international. Always remember the language of these acts is written in legal ease and simple words may take on an entirely different meaning than what you think according to the wordplay they use and the definitions of those words according to THEM is what counts.

Well, if that's true then I guess there must be hundreds or even thousands of court cases in which we can see that the definitions of the words are different from the normal legal definitions.

If you do not understand the legal definitions then you can not possibly know what implications are of documents you sign.

True, but that doesn't mean that all that talk about registration and whatever is true either. That's why I asked if there was any real evidence, a PDF by someone I do not know doesn't mean much to me.

[thorfourwinds]

What about the people (me) that were born and raised on a commune and have no birth certificate.

Even though - somehow - I have enjoyed a 'License to Drive' from Washington State (acquired on my 16th birthday - signed for by adopted mother-long passed), which was 'proof of something' to get my California DL, which in turn was 'proof of something' to get my Florida DL, which WAS NOT enough to get a Georgia DL.

Georgia requires a Birth Certificate, period.

So have been driving on a Florida DL, until it expired on my birthday, 18 May 2012.

Florida now requires a Birth Certificate, period.

No, my old one doesn't count for anything      ...


signed:

frustrated in Georgia   

[Amaterasu]

Thor, may I point out that when You are operating a vehicle, unless specifically for commercial purposes, You are NOT "driving."  You are traveling.  And We are free to travel without license.

As for ArMaP's questions...  I am using simple logic.  I cannot be held accountable for what OTHERS have signed - on My "behalf" or otherwise.  Elirium seems to have a better handle on answers for You than do I.

[thorfourwinds]

Thor, may I point out that when You are operating a vehicle, unless specifically for commercial purposes, You are NOT "driving."  You are traveling.  And We are free to travel without license.

As for ArMaP's questions...  I am using simple logic.  I cannot be held accountable for what OTHERS have signed - on My "behalf" or otherwise.  Elirium seems to have a better handle on answers for You than do I.

We love you Amy, but that logic falls in line with TAP - great idea - not applicable ATM - operating a motor vehicle while traveling is driving and requires a license.

When I had my last 'discussion' with one of Mountain City's finest regarding the subject, I did not pass go (had to be arrested because IT'S THE LAW) and went straight to Rabun County Detention Center - cuffed - only to be let go immediately on OR (I own my home) and it cost me $1200 in fines and NOBODY was interested all along the line as to the REAL problem...

Sorry, we digress.



HOW ABOUT GETTING BACK ON TOPIC ?

[micjer]

Retraction Time!

[micjer]

We all remember this picture.  It was said to be from a drill on  another day.




http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/17/80/30/86/sandy-10.jpg


Well after I enlarged this video from a helicoptor that day (around the 1:25 mark), I am confident that this pic is legit.  Take notice of the cars (white one on the end) and the orange cones.  They do match up.  If you look there are two silver vehicles parked in front of the white van on end.  They do match up.  Later on in the vid when there is a close up of the car with tape around it, you can see the orange cones placed on the road.

The likelihood of these cars being parked identically more than one day is very very low.

We want the truth so just adding what I found.



Just proves pic was from that day.  Nothing else.

[micjer]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/newtown-school-shootings-first-responders-deal-with-searing-memories/2012/12/30/2ac5ba5e-5135-11e2-950a-7863a013264b_singlePage.html?tid=obnetwork

Has anyone read this article in the Washington Post?

I read it and a couple of things jumped out at me.

First of all, why was the local firehall not notified with the 911 call. Here in Canada everyone (police,ambulance and fire) is notified on a call. Seems strange he heard all the sirens going by his hall and didn't know what was going on.

But here is the biggy for me.

Why were the ambulances not taking the dead out of the school? They are not considered dead until a doctor says so. A paramedic or ambulance drivers job is to get people to a hospital and work on them even if they think they are deceased. The statement that no one is coming out and to just leave the bodies in the school is totally bizarre. Think of the JFK assassination....they knew he was dead. Did they just pull over and put caution tape around his car? Of course not. They rushed him to hospital and tried to revive him.

Would not that be the reaction in a normal situation when children are found shot. Rush them to the hospital and try everything they could to help them.

Not here they just are standing around with nobody being pulled out. :wtf:

[petrus4]

Would not that be the reaction in a normal situation when children are found shot. Rush them to the hospital and try everything they could to help them.

Not here they just are standing around with nobody being pulled out. :wtf:

[thorfourwinds]

It gets weirder.





Published on Jan 9, 2013
Anyone who may have had questions about the placement of the words "Sandy Hook' on a map in the film 'The Dark Knight Rises', may first seek an explanation for it from the film's prop master, Scott Getzinger.

Alas, that is not possible since the man is deceased.

Scott Getzinger was from Newtown and he died in a car accident in April.

[petrus4]

It gets weirder.

I don't see that as weird.  Zorgon asked in the Alex Jones thread, why all the whistleblowers are still alive.  It would seem that he has his answer.

[ArMaP]

We all remember this picture.  It was said to be from a drill on  another day.

It was? I have seen other photos from that sequence and it was obviously from that day.

Who said it was from a drill?

PS: nice catch on the cars positions. 

[Amaterasu]

More...




Don't know why the YT links that start with httpS will not embed, so click the link.

[micjer]

It was? I have seen other photos from that sequence and it was obviously from that day.

Who said it was from a drill?

PS: nice catch on the cars positions. 

It wasn't on here.  There was some discussion on other boards about the timing,  One even said it was from July.  LOL  Connecticut has leaves on the trees in summer!

[micjer]

This video has almost 4 million views!