new sandyhook info

[Amaterasu]

Don't know, micjer.  Just bringing things here that I have found.  Here's another piece:

[Amaterasu]

What's the point of that video? 

It's saying that "Victoria Soto" is not who We are told She is.  Instead, that She is "Malia Schmidt."

[ArMaP]

It's saying that "Victoria Soto" is not who We are told She is.  Instead, that She is "Malia Schmidt."

Thanks.

The YouTube user that posted the video says in one of the comments:

At first I thought they? kind of looked alike in the pic, but I think that may just be a different person

[Amaterasu]

Again... Just offering what I have found.  To Me They do look like the same person - but there are People who look very much like other People.

EDIT to add:  Your thoughts about the People magazine piece?

[ArMaP]

EDIT to add:  Your thoughts about the People magazine piece?

What piece?

[Littleenki]

Ragrdless of all the evidence presented by numerous outlets and investigators, they will sweep this under the rug...they always do.

Still firmly believing that it was a false flag...100%

[Amaterasu]

What piece?

Up there in reply #135

And for all...  Here is something related - long, but very intriguing:

[Amaterasu]

Ragrdless of all the evidence presented by numerous outlets and investigators, they will sweep this under the rug...they always do.

Still firmly believing that it was a false flag...100%

I suspect someOne was sacrificed - who is unclear...  It surely did NOT go down as the media claim.  Do watch the piece above.

[ArMaP]

Up there in reply #135

Oh, the video. I was looking for a link to People magazine.

That video is useless, I can't see a thing.

As for the other video, it's too long, I don't have the time to see it.

[thorfourwinds]

Oh, the video. I was looking for a link to People magazine.

That video is useless, I can't see a thing.

As for the other video, it's too long, I don't have the time to see it.

Greetings:

We'll simplify it for you, one point at a time, so you can respond so eloquently.

The YouTuber is pointing out the fact that the distribution on the bulldog edition was 12 December - 2 days before the event.

Your response?

[ArMaP]

The YouTuber is pointing out the fact that the distribution on the bulldog edition was 12 December - 2 days before the event.

Your response?

What's the "bulldog edition"?
That cover is from the December 31 issue.

[micjer]

I think the People Magazine date on label can be explained.  If you have a subsription to a magazine, as this person does, they put the date in which your subscription runs out.  In this case Dec 12 2012 and the neighbours he spoke of was in February.

Keep the info coming.  All I want is the truth.

How about this?


http://www.cmionline.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Talking-With-Your-Children-About-the-Sandy-Hook-Elementary-Shooting.pdf

Guide on how to talk to children about Sandy Hook 4 days BEFORE massacre

http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/17/80/30/86/arling10.png







Here is a more in depth discussion on this.

http://letsrollforums.com/guide-talk-children-sandy-t28975.html?s=7be8a56a653ab0177b88d4e426ff9311&

[ArMaP]

I think the People Magazine date on label can be explained.  If you have a subsription to a magazine, as this person does, they put the date in which your subscription runs out.  In this case Dec 12 2012 and the neighbours he spoke of was in February.

That makes sense, thank you for that.

How about this?

An URL (or URI) doesn't have a connection with a specific date, unless some content management system that manages the site works like that, but even if it does it's only a name, it's independent from the date the document was posted.

And the PDF has a creation date of December 14, at 21:56:07.

[Amaterasu]

Why would They send out a copy of the 12/31 issue if the subscrip ends 12/12?  I'm not saying it's impossible - just that it does raise a flag...

And the fact that in less than a month People gathered ALL legal permissions, laid out the mag, printed it...  Seems VERY unlikely.

[thorfourwinds]

What's the "bulldog edition"?
That cover is from the December 31 issue.

Greetings:



My journalism background just reared its pointy head.   

A bulldog edition is the earliest version of a morning or Sunday paper usually appearing the evening before. The 'real' edition contains breaking news and arrives Sunday morning.


Yes, the cover date is 31 December: that was a given - you wouldn't be playing with us now, would you?

We never mentioned 'cover' in our fairly simple question to you to attempt to get a handle on all the carp that seems to abound. We figured you would explain the fishy smell.   

Nice try, but no cigar.


One more time:

The YouTuber is pointing out the fact that the distribution on the bulldog edition was 12 December - 2 days before the event. 

Aha! Thank you for answering that in the above posts.

So, you are saying we can now cross off the idea that the magazine was printed and distributed before the event on the 14th?

Thank you and you know we love you and are just funning with you.