new sandyhook info

[ArMaP]

Why would They send out a copy of the 12/31 issue if the subscrip ends 12/12?  I'm not saying it's impossible - just that it does raise a flag...

I once subscribed a magazine and I got it on the mail two weeks before it appeared on the stands, so to me that makes sense.

And the fact that in less than a month People gathered ALL legal permissions, laid out the mag, printed it...  Seems VERY unlikely.

What legal permissions? 

[ArMaP]

A bulldog edition is the earliest version of a morning or Sunday paper usually appearing the evening before. The 'real' edition contains breaking news and arrives Sunday morning.

Thanks for the explanation, I learned something new.

So, you are saying we can now cross off the idea that the magazine was printed and distributed before the event on the 14th?

How many people does it take to design and print a magazine like that? Do you think nobody would notice?

[micjer]

Here is a clearer picture of the label.

[zorgon]

[petrus4]

Extremely stupid thing to do.  The pseudoskeptics could have written off the map in TDKR much more easily without this.  All killing him does is lend support to the idea that he actually did know something, and was trying to warn people in advance.

They either don't care that people know what they are doing, or they are really dumb.

[Amaterasu]

Here's another...  No One can claim that ALL these "donation" sites just happen to show up erroneously dated before the incident:

[Amaterasu]

I once subscribed a magazine and I got it on the mail two weeks before it appeared on the stands, so to me that makes sense.

Um... So the mag would have been done and out at most a day or two after???

What legal permissions? 

As the film points out, permission to print pics like that need to be filled out by family members...

[ArMaP]

As the film points out, permission to print pics like that need to be filled out by family members...

And you believe it because...

[micjer]

Little bit of clarification on magazine label.

http://www.ehow.com/how_7830198_read-magazine-address-label.html

How to Read a Magazine Address Label

3

Read to the right of your address. You'll be able to see a month and year. For example: Oct 11. or Oct. 2011. This means that your magazine subscription ends during this month and year. Most magazine labels have this information.

So it looks like it is saying subsription runs out in Dec 2012.  Not dec 12th

[Amaterasu]

And you believe it because...

Because I know about copyright, and:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/01/technology/01link.html

EDIT to add: People would be opening Themselves up to lawsuits right and left - so getting permission is legal protection.

[thorfourwinds]

Not that clearly, it doesn't sound like that to me.

We agree with ArMaP.   

[ArMaP]

Because I know about copyright, and:

Even if that's the case, why weren't all the sites that published the photos sued?

Does anyone (without a capital 'o' ) know if, in cases like this, the photos are sent to the press so they can be published?

[zorgon]

They either don't care that people know what they are doing, or they are really dumb.

Remember Kennedy assassination?? What have "We the People..." done about that?



Remember 9/11? What have "We the People..." done about that?



"We the People..." are impotent and only whine about the state of things on the internet and facebook

...and the internet was created by DARPA

...and Facebook is operated bt the CIA


Hmmm time to turn this thing off and do some spring gardening

[Amaterasu]

Even if that's the case, why weren't all the sites that published the photos sued?

Does anyone (without a capital 'o' ) know if, in cases like this, the photos are sent to the press so they can be published?

I'm guessing that if the photos are on "memorial" sites, it's part of the same group. Once up on the web, it's pretty much impossible to go after Those who use the pic.

But in the case of print...and a national publication at that...They are fully vulnerable to any who object and are related.  So They would be fools to just grab photos from anywhere and publish with no permission. 

[ArMaP]

I'm guessing that if the photos are on "memorial" sites, it's part of the same group.

I'm talking about news sites. As far as I know the first site to show photos of the victims was a British paper.

But in the case of print...and a national publication at that...They are fully vulnerable to any who object and are related.  So They would be fools to just grab photos from anywhere and publish with no permission.

That doesn't answer my question.