Real Suppression of Free Energy?

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Mag motors are not easy, been working on them for years.
Progress, but not enough..
Howard Johnson was one of the more successful inventors, i happen to know his former lab assistant, i've got an MP3 of a radio interview he did.
I will try & find it for you guys, & i will make a second attempt to get him here on the forum. He is not very technical, but he can describe Johnson's motors & confirm that they actually worked.
This is getting it from the horses mouth, so to speak. We need this in order to beat the trolls & debunkers.

His name is Al Witherspoon:


ETA: this is hardly 'breaking news' maybe we should split/move this thread into the 'free energy' area?

[Back]

In the US you can get a 2000 W modifided sine wave inverter for about 200% But it might not power all devices. One friend uses one for tail gate parties. He said that it will power his TV but wont power a new crock pot with a digital display. Another friend has a solar aray and did have a wind mill that was blown down last tornado. He said he has no problem with the modified inverter. I dont know the answer.

PWM is correct in the full sine wafe inverters. Very expensive about 1$ per watt.
I was pricing them Friday.

Bless
Back

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Thanks, Back!
Glad to see i'm not too out of touch
(PS i will PM you with some details about those components)

I reckon we can build some pretty hefty inverters, but it will be even easier to get an off the shelf one & modify it.
Of course, if we did that, we could not sell them, but this is more for the DIY fans
I think at this point we could build a few prototypes, & pass them around, so to speak
I still have a couple of models in mind, advanced ones like the MEG hybrid may be worth the effort, especially if we can get them running above 100%


I finally found that interview, it was hosted by Alan Sterling (of PesWiki/New Energy Systems).
This was in response to the 'Mylow' mag motor on YT.
I spoke with Mylow as it happens, it would appear that after his initial success, he was 'persuaded' to fake a second video, let it be debunked as a fake, & quietly disappeared from the public area.
That's why i decided to post it here, since this appears to be right on topic, i.e. supression.
Here you can (safely) download the Alan Sterling interview with Al Witherspoon, a.k.a. Magnetgrunt on YooToob, it's an MP3 less than 12 megs:

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/files/FreeNRG/AlWitherspoon_HowardJohnson.mp

3
Enjoy!

[robomont]

a successful mag wheel would have two magnetic cancelers.these kill the field at opposite sides of the wheel.
use a 9VDC battery to kill the magnets using a commutator.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Check out the Mylow motor and Howard Johnson
No coils, no electricity, just permanent magnets

[zorgon]

At least, i would like to make them as cheap as possible, we could probably make them a lot cheaper than commercial ones.

Maybe go through Chine

Do we care if they copy them?

[Eighthman]

My theory:  How To Find Free Energy


If free energy was easily available as a natural process, we wouldn't exist.  The whole universe would just be a glowing mass of plasma because of all the free energy spilling out everywhere.  A coherent universe requires tight conservation of energy.

And this is what we observe..... the Laws of Thermodynamics have been extensively tested and found to be precisely reliable again and again. Or have they?


I am skeptical about transients and the degree to which they have been studied. Transients look to me like a safe way to add a little energy, here and there, without being noticed.  Remember, if you truly believe in the Conservation of Energy, then no extra energy has ever been added to the universe anywhere, across billions of years.  It can't be created or destroyed.

I have heard of something called "Connective Physics" in which you switch things very quickly and violate physics before the universe applies the Law of Conservation of Energy.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

8man, you have a point, so i would like to try & clarify what I mean as 'free energy'

Energy is always conserved, never created or destroyed, that's true.

That also means that the laws of thermodynamics (for the most part) also holds true.

But consider this: Our universe is so brimming with enrgy, it is literally flowing at terrawatts per second all around us, creating so-called Higgs particles at random, billions of times a second all around you.
This energy is also re-released into the 'quantum state' or 'vacuum' whenever such a particle 'disappears'.
So you see, all in all it equals out, energy is merely replaced with mass as per E=MC^2, so far so good.

Now, if we need something like CERN with it's own power station, and a Gigajoule capacitor bank, to produce 2 such particles (should have been just the 1 LOL) then think how much energy is flowing around us, creating & destroying these particles all around us 24/7 ?

Can we tap into that flow of energy, maybe sacrifice a few particles to power our house?

imo; Yes We Can 
And the 'laws' of thermodynamics will still hold true

Zorgon: They copied our motorbikes, we copy their inverters, just stick an extra resistor in there & call it our own design and yes, they are welcome to copy ours, but they will first have to become members of PRC before they can see the plans

[Eighthman]

My problem with 'zero-point energy' is that I never see any explanation of a necessary sink.  If this energy is all around us, then we need to find a place 'where it isn't' to create a flow.  If it's the same everywhere, then it's like tremendous pressure at the bottom of the ocean. How do you harness it?

If you read the stuff by Rene-Louis Vallee on the Naudin site (in French), he seems to pretty much claim what you're talking about - ionized elements yanking bits of energy out of the vacuum in the Tokamaks he worked with.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

If this energy is all around us, then we need to find a place 'where it isn't' to create a flow.  If it's the same everywhere, then it's like tremendous pressure at the bottom of the ocean. How do you harness it?

It seems there are several ways, you can 'shake' it, and use the extra 'momentum' from that, or you can 'inject' a low pressure into that high pressure area & use that.

What i mean is with the water analogy, you could release air into a balloon, say 1 cubic metre.
The deeper it gets, the more 'lift' the baloon gets, on the ocean floor it can easily lift a ton.

Nature hates imbalance, & if you create (for eample an electrically) unbalanced condition, Nature will do her best to restore the balance, supplying whatever amount of energy may be needed...

My french is awful, but i would like to know what the french PRC members can come up with..?
Tokamaks: All the rage these days it seems Lucky i still got my files from the 80's

[robomont]

the force of the bubbles lift stays the same but the volume of the bubble gets smaller.
i had a idea of an electrolisis unit at the bottom of the ocean and a conveyor that trapped the bubbles and rode their lift to the surface then were trapped and burned but i think it takes more energy to break the ho at those depths .if it took less then it may be feasible.
the bubble would be the size of a pinhead at the bottom but the size of a bus at the surface probably.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Forget the bubbles, i was just using an analogy for electricity LOL

There are many 'overunity' circuits, some based on capacitance, some on inductance, some a mixture of the two.

There would also appear to be gravity effects associated with each system, i.e.electro-gravitic, and magneto-gravitic. Hmm.......

[robomont]

i thought teslas idea used ground as a sink

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

He used it as a sink, and as a source
Only one person i know of also managed that, someone called Stubblefield...

[1Worldwatcher]

Playswithmachines wrote:

The deeper it gets, the more 'lift' the baloon gets, on the ocean floor it can easily lift a ton.

Buoyancy displacement is very readily available, but you must take all respects of sending unit, container unit material and size.
The Buoyancy creates a natural form of inertia, due to water pressure surrounding it, as stated before, the deeper it is, the faster it wants too escape the pressures. This is mainly due to the pressures with in the containment of the air itself.
Though area/mas and Volume are the constituents of different results. The more Area/Mass or volume, the more it wants to over ride opposing pressures.
we could call it "Anti-Sinking Effect"? lol
1WW