Possible Spacecraft?

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

I was toodling around LO-5-019 series, H1,H2,H3. Looking at all the structures and outlining them when I found what looks like a spacecraft hovering above the lunar surface. Tell me what you think.

[A51Watcher]

I think... nice work!!

Did you get a tripod for xmas? 


Very nice clear presentation.

Spacecraft?... I dunno. But I wouldn't have spotted any of that without your efforts.


Keep up the great work Sarge.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Thanks, I don't know either. Just jumped out at me & that was the first thing that came to mind! Maybe, maybe not.


Huh, no tripod just using 'Snagit' for the first time.

[1Worldwatcher]

Very Cool Sgt.!! As usual, you do realize that this anomaly looks very similar to the first one you had rendered on the Far Side thread, Correct?
And for the most part, Whatthehey and I were trying to bring a similar craft to everyones attention with in the Far Side thread too a sighting that had taken place back in 2012 of a UFO that was captured from 4 different vantage points at the same time. I believe Cosmos was the first to post the video from YT, but when we had initially seen the object, it was similar to the first object or UFO you had rendered with your software. But they all have ht the same basic body lines and apparent design similarities. You might want to go into the Far Side threads and take a peek at the first rendering you did and the video, this will help make the connection Whatthehey and I did when we seen it for the first time.
My PC is currently on the fritz, can't place info here for all to see, but if someone would want to that has clearance, that would be great.
AS usual Sgt. a man of great talents, truly miss the Far Side thread works you were producing, some amazing stuff my friend!!

With Great Respect,
1Worldwatcher

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Very Cool Sgt.!! As usual, you do realize that this anomaly looks very similar to the first one you had rendered on the Far Side thread, Correct?
And for the most part, Whatthehey and I were trying to bring a similar craft to everyones attention with in the Far Side thread too a sighting that had taken place back in 2012 of a UFO that was captured from 4 different vantage points at the same time. I believe Cosmos was the first to post the video from YT, but when we had initially seen the object, it was similar to the first object or UFO you had rendered with your software. But they all have ht the same basic body lines and apparent design similarities. You might want to go into the Far Side threads and take a peek at the first rendering you did and the video, this will help make the connection Whatthehey and I did when we seen it for the first time.
My PC is currently on the fritz, can't place info here for all to see, but if someone would want to that has clearance, that would be great.
AS usual Sgt. a man of great talents, truly miss the Far Side thread works you were producing, some amazing stuff my friend!!

With Great Respect,
1Worldwatcher

Thanks 1WW. Yes it does look similar because I used the same model I did on the original vid. I didn't have the time to model a new one, I just used the old one since the shapes looked kind of similar.  I just used it to bring attention to the area I was looking at. I was mainly looking at the shadow that was being cast on the surface and the shadow on the belly of the craft. I honestly don't remember the YT vid by Cosmos or the craft you and Whatthehey were talking about. I'll look it up. As far as the Far Side thread goes, it doesn't seem to attract as much attention as before. I've kind of run out of info from sources and I haven't heard from John in a long time. So I'm just hanging back chilling. LO-5-019 series is currently what I'm looking at because of all the anomalies (ancient I believe) that I believe I'm looking at. Everytime I look at this series, I see more and more stuff. I've also been experiencing with different screen capture software, because of the complaints about the 'shaky' video. Anyway thanks for the comments friend. Anyword on that sketch that you were going to send me?...

Take Care
Peace 
Rock

[undo11]

back when john lear was posting on ats regularly, z had introduced an arizona state university site, that had taken the clementine photographs, colored them based on natural light,  and made them into a zoomable map like the original black and white clementine map.  the images were immense, much bigger and more detailed than the black and white, and the colors made things really pop and suggest all kinds of additional detail.  problem was, when john saw it, he said it was a bunch of hooey, and was photomanipulated, etc.   but before he made that pronouncement, i was finding anomalies like every 2 minutes lol  imagine seeing it in color, not the blob of gray variations we normally get to see.

anyway, one thing i kept seeing were what looked like craters literally floating above the ground, and some appeared to be emitting little exhausts, like puffs of steam or smoke, reminiscent of the  jetson's cartoon flying vehicles. .. ya know they had that little trail following them.   only two possible explanations for that (well 3, if you count that it was just an illusion) are 1) they weren't in the air but rather the moon's surface is transparent sheets of glass like material in some areas, which is not very thick.  below the glass like material, is some kind of solid, opaque surface upon which the crater's shadow was cast. in other words, it's like looking at the shadow of a bowl sitting on the table and casting its shadow onto your tabletop but in this case, the tabletop has a 12 inch thick sheet of plexiglass or something similar, on top of it which the bowl is sitting on.   so it gives the illusion from a distance tht it is floating above the table.  OR 2) some craters are not craters. lol

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

It just seems to my observations that the most interesting look areas are always the ones that are blurry

So far what I've seen looks ancient and not used in a long time.

[ArMaP]

I was toodling around LO-5-019 series, H1,H2,H3. Looking at all the structures and outlining them when I found what looks like a spacecraft hovering above the lunar surface. Tell me what you think.

I think it's just a ground feature and you are not interpreting the shadows in the right way.

This is what that area looks like as photographed by Kaguya/Selene (reduced to 10% or something like that).

[ArMaP]

back when john lear was posting on ats regularly, z had introduced an arizona state university site, that had taken the clementine photographs, colored them based on natural light,  and made them into a zoomable map like the original black and white clementine map.

They didn't "coloured" the photos, they made those images with photos from different filters (I think Clementine used five different filters in the UV/Vis camera)

the images were immense, much bigger and more detailed than the black and white, and the colors made things really pop and suggest all kinds of additional detail.

The images have the same size as the greyscale ones.

only two possible explanations for that (well 3, if you count that it was just an illusion)

3 is the right one.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

I think it's just a ground feature and you are not interpreting the shadows in the right way.

This is what that area looks like as photographed by Kaguya/Selene (reduced to 10% or something like that).

That very well maybe the case, but if your's is Kaguya/Selene, and it IS a spacecraft, I doubt that it would still be there. You know 'spacecraft' do fly around....

Rock

[ArMaP]

That very well maybe the case, but if your's is Kaguya/Selene, and it IS a spacecraft, I doubt that it would still be there. You know 'spacecraft' do fly around....

That's why I see it the other way: if it was still there after all those years it's not a spacecraft.

And I don't think it looked like a spacecraft in the Lunar Orbiter image, just another play of light and shadow.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Your opinion , not mine

[ArMaP]

Your opinion , not mine

Obviously, that's why I posted.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Yes I know  you always do.

[ArMaP]

Have you looked at photos LO-5-0013, LO-5-0014, LO-5-0015, LO-5-0016, LO-5-0017, LO-5-0018 and LO-5-0020?
They all show the same area.