Farside buildings

[johnlear]

Lots of buildings or as they say 'constructs' here. Just east of farside 180 longitude to the south.




Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[RUSSO]

Thank you John.

This picture leaves no doubt that there are several buildings there. There are so many "anomalies" that is difficult to point all.

I'll put here three areas in the picture that caught my attention among all those "anomalies".

Could this be a control tower?



Same pic sharpened:



A base?



Same pic sharpened (look at the patterns):



A mining machine?



Same pic sharpened



Below you can see another "strange" formation on moon:

Enhanced photo of crater Moon base taken by Japanese space probe:



Amazing find John...

[hobbit]

I must suppose that You can develop an EYE for the anomilies in photos of the moon?
Could I offer a difficult to explain theory about the moon?
You are viewing the moon from earth, whether from the surface or via any device manufactured here.

The earth is alive and contained within it's own unique field geometries.
The moon is alive and contained within it's own field geometries, but closely aligned to those of the earth.
This basically creates a time differential between the earth and the moon.
What We view in photos of the moon are relative to the time and geometries of the earth.
Whilst any view from the moon using earth deviced apparatus will view the earth as it is relative to the time and geometry of earth.

Basically unless We have the technology to alter the field about ourselves , we will view all of universe relative to earth.

This is really difficult to verbalise, as it requires a comprehension of the methods of creation relative to the overall field that dominates.

There is possibly a civilization on the moon that is fractionally out of synch relative to to earth, thus We can barely see it, and could walk straight through their buildings as We are nothing but a compound of signals, as are they but at different settings.

If You built a device made of moons materials, the pictures may be more revealing?
But the two different time fields may be quite dangerous to each other.

sorry for the ramble.
a hobbit trait

[johnlear]

This is a Lunar Orbiter photo taken from orbit around the moon in 1966. Not taken from earth.

[starwarp2000]

Most interesting observations Hobbit!

Reminds me of the Apollo 17 Command Module Pilot who stated, "I can see the landing site, and the Astronauts walking around".
Houston must of thought, "gee, this guy is suffering from space madness"

Or, the Astronauts were 70ft tall in the Moon Environment!, allowing the Command Module Pilot to see them clearly.
To the Astronauts on the moon, nothing would be out of the ordinary, as it is 'Relative' to observation. If you are 'in the field', then all your observational transducers are affected in the same way and you don't notice anything out of place.

We all know that an Antenna works by picking up Electromagnetic Radiations and converting them to a dynamic Electric field that can be demodulated to receive the original transmission. And we all should know that it requires an Antenna length of at least 1/4 Wavelength for 'Optimum' reception!

But what most people don't know (And i will probably get in trouble for this  ) that even in the Earth's orbit there is an expansion of mass due to the distance from the Earth's centre, and thereby a change in the local time and space vectors.

Therefore, when a satellite is put into orbit, the receiving and transmitting antennas are manufactured slightly longer to recieve a particular frequency than they would if they were on the Earth!

And don't ever let anyone tell you they stuffed up the Hubble Telescope by grinding the mirror wrong! Then why didn't it work in space, when it worked perfectly on the Earth?? Funny that it passed every optical test here on Earth, but exhibited blurry images in orbit??
Might it have been that the local space/time vector are different in orbit?

I can tell you that because of compartmentalization, that Contractor A ground the mirror to Earth Specs, not knowing that it should be ground to different specs! But because Contractor A wasn't privy to that 'Science' they didn't know that it would be wrong

Anyway, keep up the good questions Hobbit!

And remember that the truth is mostly hidden in plain sight  

[Somamech]

On all counts this has to be one of the best moon threads I've seen for age's. 

-Brilliant Pics (John is Thee Moon Man)   

-Interesting discussion about magnetic shielding   

John I know this is not the Q and A section!  But have you watched TV with Zorgon of late ?

[johnlear]

Most interesting observations Hobbit!

And don't ever let anyone tell you they stuffed up the Hubble Telescope by grinding the mirror wrong! Then why didn't it work in space, when it worked perfectly on the Earth?? Funny that it passed every optical test here on Earth, but exhibited blurry images in orbit??
Might it have been that the local space/time vector are different in orbit?

I can tell you that because of compartmentalization, that Contractor A ground the mirror to Earth Specs, not knowing that it should be ground to different specs! But because Contractor A wasn't privy to that 'Science' they didn't know that it would be wrong

Anyway, keep up the good questions Hobbit!

And remember that the truth is mostly hidden in plain sight

Remember now, there were 2 Hubbles, count them 2. When the second, the public one was launched, the stereo photos (when combined with the first) were so fantastic that the Military wanted both for themselves.

So they cooked up a hoax that the second one had a flaw and couldnt be used. There was no regrinding, no fixing, no nothing done to the public Hubble. The contractor made out like a theif because he got paid for nothing. Its possible that a third Hubble was launched to replace the public one for the stereo views but the public eventually got theirs back.

And please remember when anybody brings up the word 'mass'. There is no basis for Newtons assumption that gravitational force is due to and is proportional to the quantity and density of matter. F=m1m2/r^2 is just rot. And Newton didn't even come up with that equation. It was insertied into his theory after he died.

And that is the 'rest of the story'. John Lear

[hobbit]

Most interesting observations Hobbit!

Reminds me of the Apollo 17 Command Module Pilot who stated, "I can see the landing site, and the Astronauts walking around".
Houston must of thought, "gee, this guy is suffering from space madness"

Or, the Astronauts were 70ft tall in the Moon Environment!, allowing the Command Module Pilot to see them clearly.
To the Astronauts on the moon, nothing would be out of the ordinary, as it is 'Relative' to observation. If you are 'in the field', then all your observational transducers are affected in the same way and you don't notice anything out of place.

We all know that an Antenna works by picking up Electromagnetic Radiations and converting them to a dynamic Electric field that can be demodulated to receive the original transmission. And we all should know that it requires an Antenna length of at least 1/4 Wavelength for 'Optimum' reception!

But what most people don't know (And i will probably get in trouble for this  ) that even in the Earth's orbit there is an expansion of mass due to the distance from the Earth's centre, and thereby a change in the local time and space vectors.

Therefore, when a satellite is put into orbit, the receiving and transmitting antennas are manufactured slightly longer to recieve a particular frequency than they would if they were on the Earth!

And don't ever let anyone tell you they stuffed up the Hubble Telescope by grinding the mirror wrong! Then why didn't it work in space, when it worked perfectly on the Earth?? Funny that it passed every optical test here on Earth, but exhibited blurry images in orbit??
Might it have been that the local space/time vector are different in orbit?

I can tell you that because of compartmentalization, that Contractor A ground the mirror to Earth Specs, not knowing that it should be ground to different specs! But because Contractor A wasn't privy to that 'Science' they didn't know that it would be wrong

Anyway, keep up the good questions Hobbit!

And remember that the truth is mostly hidden in plain sight

As a dowser.....
I find a dual circulating field about all, and it has a heart centred point( alpha and omega) where the spin passes through and loops out to its maximum diameter where it returns spinning in the opposite direction.
The torroidal field thus has geometry relative to the heart centre and it's overall diameter.
The moon has a smaller diameter, but it will be overall larger in comparison to it's mass than earths, and that is what will cause so called lower gravity, and a time differential with here, the smaller the mass the mor powerfull is the field.
Gravity is TIME....john Worrall keely.
Are you familier with david Barclays book called UNITY?
http://www.gravitycontrol.org/unity-book.html

There bright up in canada, and David has been given a trip.

It grates against current ASSUMED so called laws of science, but basically gravity is a consequence of opposing field interactions, thus TIME is also.
Watch the moon tonight and tomorrow morning....lunar eclipse.
hobbit

[johnlear]

The moons gravity is 70% that of earth so its mass is not what you think it is. Its atmosphere at the surface is equal to about 18,000 above sea level here on earth.

The population of the moon is between one and one point five billion.

Hobbits line of BS, measured in miles is equal to or greater than the distance of the Earth-Moon neutral point as measured from the moon which is 43,495 miles.

Tell us about tidal lock Hobbit. Surely you don't believe in that also?

[hobbit]

The moons gravity is 70% that of earth so its mass is not what you think it is. Its atmosphere at the surface is equal to about 18,000 above sea level here on earth.

The population of the moon is between one and one point five billion.

Hobbits line of BS, measured in miles is equal to or greater than the distance of the Earth-Moon neutral point as measured from the moon which is 43,495 miles.

Tell us about tidal lock Hobbit. Surely you don't believe in that also?

Perhaps I am not explaining myself too well?
And You will have to better explain what You are reffering to as "BS"
hobbit

[johnlear]

Perhaps I am not explaining myself too well?
And You will have to better explain what You are reffering to as "BS"
hobbit

For starters:

The earth is alive and contained within it's own unique field geometries.

The moon is alive and contained within it's own field geometries, but closely aligned to those of the earth.

This basically creates a time differential between the earth and the moon.

What We view in photos of the moon are relative to the time and geometries of the earth.
Whilst any view from the moon using earth deviced apparatus will view the earth as it is relative to the time and geometry of earth.

Basically unless We have the technology to alter the field about ourselves , we will view all of universe relative to earth.

This is really difficult to verbalise, as it requires a comprehension of the methods of creation relative to the overall field that dominates.

There is possibly a civilization on the moon that is fractionally out of synch relative to to earth, thus We can barely see it, and could walk straight through their buildings as We are nothing but a compound of signals, as are they but at different settings.

If You built a device made of moons materials, the pictures may be more revealing?
But the two different time fields may be quite dangerous to each other.


Pure, unaldurated crap. Its like NAZA coming up with a reason why we see houses, build

ings and factories on the moon. Using earth deviced apparatus? What like my eyes?

You are not explaining yourself too well? You are explaining yourself just fine.

Take a hike Hobbit.

[The Seeker]

Hi John  good to see you again after such a long  time apart... is there any newer raw footage in high res of this same area that you are aware of?

Definitely an interesting photo to ponder and my thanks for sharing with us...


hopefully more are forthcoming...


seeker

[hobbit]

For starters:

The earth is alive and contained within it's own unique field geometries.

The moon is alive and contained within it's own field geometries, but closely aligned to those of the earth.

This basically creates a time differential between the earth and the moon.

What We view in photos of the moon are relative to the time and geometries of the earth.
Whilst any view from the moon using earth deviced apparatus will view the earth as it is relative to the time and geometry of earth.

Basically unless We have the technology to alter the field about ourselves , we will view all of universe relative to earth.

This is really difficult to verbalise, as it requires a comprehension of the methods of creation relative to the overall field that dominates.

There is possibly a civilization on the moon that is fractionally out of synch relative to to earth, thus We can barely see it, and could walk straight through their buildings as We are nothing but a compound of signals, as are they but at different settings.

If You built a device made of moons materials, the pictures may be more revealing?
But the two different time fields may be quite dangerous to each other.


Pure, unaldurated crap. Its like NAZA coming up with a reason why we see houses, build

ings and factories on the moon. Using earth deviced apparatus? What like my eyes?

You are not explaining yourself too well? You are explaining yourself just fine.

Take a hike Hobbit.

I don't know You at all, but I am quickly forming My own little opinion/s.

If You can't listen to a different perspective without resorting to verbals, then nobody is ever gonna listen to You.

Are You OK??
hobbit

[hobbit]

I haven't much time just now, some of us have to work .

I have been told to,

"TAKE A HIKE HOBBIT"

In England that would mean ..clear off...leave etc.
As there may be differences between England and American English??, could that be clarified.
Is this a typical example of how this forum will operate?
Have I scratched a nerve?
Hobbit.

Hobbits never back down.

[Linda Brown]

Hobbit,

I am a little suprised at Johns remark to you.

" Shove off" in my neighborhood would never be considered friendly and this is odd from a man who is able to say of the moon

"The population of the moon is between one and one point five billion.......and somehow not be challenged here.....

Surely that remark has been met with unfriendly responses and yet it is valued here..... am I right?

I should think that your dowsers way of regarding the moon should be given the same courtesy.

Now what in Johns statement can be verified by anyone.
Anyone? Anywhere?

So it seems there is a different set of expectations operating here?

I was told once by John Lear that Townsend Brown was responsible for opening a portal in space/time that is going to eventually mean the demise of the human race.

John now says that he can't remember saying that.

Perhaps when he realizes that you are quite serious about what you are saying too he will rethink the " Shove off" comment..... Just as he wants others to rethink the comments about Townsend Brown?

Surely there is room for gracious conversations?

Linda Brown