Farside buildings

[The Seeker]

I'm guessing the latter.  That is just SOOOOO not right.

Ama, if you look slightly above and to the left of your red circle you will see another similar blotch...

I find it difficult to be a result of pasting/stitching since it is in such a small area and does not carry full length as one would expect a stitch line to...

but that is just my ramblings on the matter...

seeker

[Amaterasu]

Yep.  Saw that, too, but it "hides" better.  I agree, just not the right size for a stitch.

[ArMaP]

Hopping around the moon on that link, Pim.  Saw this (and many others like it):

It would be easier if we had a location for that.

[Pimander]

It would be easier if we had a location for that.

I suspect we might need a guide for members when they are looking for anomalies. 

Never post a lunar picture without image ID or location coordinates is a good tip.  Even some experienced members do it from time to time, without naming names.

[Amaterasu]

Sorry.  I saw it and copied the image directly...  It's in the southern part, pretty much straight down from where They start You off at.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Sorry.  I saw it and copied the image directly...  It's in the southern part, pretty much straight down from where They start You off at.

If you can find it again, get the footprint info or copy the long/lat that's displayed.

[ArMaP]

I've found it.

It looks more like the mosaic they use has many errors than any attempt at hiding something. The other mosaics do not have that problem.

[Pimander]

Here are some sources of data.

Clementine: http://www.nrl.navy.mil/clm/

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunar_orbiter/

http://ode.rsl.wustl.edu/moon/

http://webgis.wr.usgs.gov/pigwad/down/moon_dl.htm

Sorry about the off-topic posts folks.

I would appreciate it enormously if someone took the time to do a thread detailing the best sources for lunar images.  Come on mate, I'm just so busy lately.

[Pimander]

Why don't we just steal all the data and do out own ArcGIS database?  We could just start with areas of interest.  If we password protected it the feds wouldn't know. 

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Something old, something new.. Took the original 1102-H1 & spliced in H2 & H3 for some more interesting objects.. Enjoy!

[1Worldwatcher]

Well, it took a while to get caught up, and what fascinating finds for a more tangible approach to the 'Living Moon' theory.
Absolutely mind blowing as usual Sgt. And John, great pic's, as well as some that others have provided thus far.
I am still out on the sphere thing's/anomalies. They serve purpose, as too what? I can only go by speculation from space time continuum distorter too condensation recovery units, very complex for sure by way of thought perception and true function.
I was wondering John, "Do you have any inclination of what these sphere's may be?" with all the evidence so far, I have not heard your point of view of what these things may be for or if you have any opinion at all on their function.
Glad too be back here at PRC the way it was, thanks Z for the continued hard work and unparalleled efforts for our wonderful website here.

1Worldwatcher

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Thanks 1WW...I have notice several on varying photos....at least to me they appear to be spheres, or incredibly smooth boulders..

Rock

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Just re-watched John's interview in April of this year on his home website...now I'm really fired up...

Excellent viewing....

http://therealjohnlear.com/TheRealJohnLear.com/NEWS/Entries/2012/4/16_INTERVIEW_2012.html

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

This thread is well....yawn...

[ArMaP]

This thread is well....yawn...

It could be because there are no real buildings on the Moon.