Farside buildings

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

OK, thanks.
I could say the same thing about your analysis, as you ignored the higher resolution photos I once provided of one of those "anomalies", but that was not the reason I didn't watch the video, it was because 6 minutes is above my self-imposed limit to watch any video (it's between 3 or 4 minutes, depending on the first seconds being interesting or not), although I make some exceptions, if I know what I will be watching.
Sure it's your interpretation, too bad you don't use other sources to compare with those old photos.
What I like is irrelevant for what you post but not for what I do with my own time.

I have no idea what better resolution photos you're talking about! Please re-fresh my memory. The main reason I used this one was because John Lear took a great effort to get me this photo and that's the reason I used it. I've always tried to find the higer resolution photos available. I'm sorry I'm not as well versed as you and I'm fairly new to this game. It's just fun for me.

As far as you're time goes, that's up to you, but you did find the time to comment as you usually do.
So please don't waste your time on my account.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Many thanks 1WorldWatch and you too A51Watcher

[ArMaP]

ArMap is a bit hard nosed , yes, but , if one has an itch, one must scratch, no matter how controversial it may be to do so....LOL 

I just think the same as you that "it is hard too understand why people don't see the obvious here", I just have a different "obvious", obviously.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

I just think the same as you that "it is hard too understand why people don't see the obvious here", I just have a different "obvious", obviously.

Obviously obvious not your obvious. 

[ArMaP]

I have no idea what better resolution photos you're talking about! Please re-fresh my memory.

I have to refresh my own memory first, I only remember that I posted a photo from Kaguya/Selene that showed that an area where you pointed some "satellite dish antennas" (or something like that) were just some smaller craters and a play of light, shadows and colours.

I'm sorry I'm not as well versed as you and I'm fairly new to this game. It's just fun for me.

When I started reading posts about the Moon and Mars some 10 years ago I didn't had any idea of where I could find the photos, now I can look at a photo and (in most cases) see if it's Mars or the Moon or any other place or even which satellite took the photo. It has been a lot of fun for me, so I understand what you mean and I don't want to spoil your fun.

As far as you're time goes, that's up to you, but you did find the time to comment as you usually do.
So please don't waste your time on my account.

But I didn't waste those six minutes.

[ArMaP]

Obviously obvious not your obvious. 

Obviously.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

I have to refresh my own memory first, I only remember that I posted a photo from Kaguya/Selene that showed that an area where you pointed some "satellite dish antennas" (or something like that) were just some smaller craters and a play of light, shadows and colours.



When I started reading posts about the Moon and Mars some 10 years ago I didn't had any idea of where I could find the photos, now I can look at a photo and (in most cases) see if it's Mars or the Moon or any other place or even which satellite took the photo. It has been a lot of fun for me, so I understand what you mean and I don't want to spoil your fun.
But I didn't waste those six minutes.

Now I know what you're talking about. That was a completely different area.    OBVIOUSLY

[ArMaP]

Now I know what you're talking about. That was a completely different area.    OBVIOUSLY

And, apparently, obliviously.

[1Worldwatcher]

I just think the same as you that "it is hard too understand why people don't see the obvious here", I just have a different "obvious", obviously.

So ArMap "What is your take on these 'Anomalies' we seemingly find with fine construct of one another?" I am by no means a geologist, astrophysicist or one that can write these off as just 'Normal/Natural' occurrences of either fractal or impact scenario's. And by this statement, I am only going by what I have read and learned over the past several years of looking at things from the Lunar surface. I could not for the life of me depict Mars photos from Lunar ones with out reference, err go my novice interpretation of what I see in a given format.

Sgt.'s allocation of these anomalies and then his renderings brings the subject matter at hand more feasible for further understanding, and I, for one, have seen a lot of thing's that I can't stereo type as 'Normal out croppings, shadows or play of light' scenarios. Though I do have healthy skepticism with in the discussion of such topics, it becomes obvious too me that there truly is something to the whole "Base's on the Moon" theory. (Had too throw that Obvious in there, keep it going you know...LOL... )

Is there method too the madness of where they are located and do you think, with similar mining facilities on Earth, that these are conspicuously and alarmingly similar? Sometimes right down to the possible equipment we would use for such facilitation?

If there was one thing I would ask of Sgt.  it would be too use a different color other than red for outlining, maybe yellow or a higher contrast color when displaying. But for the most part, everything that Sgt. is pulling out for discussion seems too be quite relevant and rather 'Out of Place' too say the least.

ArMap "What percent of these locations do you think are actually 'Unexplainable' and can be feasibly what they seem too be?" (Lunar Facilities of some sort.)

1WW

[ArMaP]

So ArMap "What is your take on these 'Anomalies' we seemingly find with fine construct of one another?"

I don't think they are anomalous.

I am by no means a geologist, astrophysicist or one that can write these off as just 'Normal/Natural' occurrences of either fractal or impact scenario's.

One of the main reasons people see strange things on Moon (Mars, etc.) is the fact that people forget that, on a 2D screen, we cannot really see a 3D scene, but that doesn't stop our brains from creating a possible 3D version of what we are seeing.

The Moon, even in greyscale photos, has many different shades (and in reality, many different colours), so when people see a brighter area close to a darker area they, usually, create a 3D version of what they see, by imagining that the brighter area represents some kind of reflection. The same thing happens with darker areas, confused many times with shadows.

That's why I always look for other photos of the same area, as even a slightly different angle is usually enough to give us a 3D version that is much closer to reality.

Sgt.'s allocation of these anomalies and then his renderings brings the subject matter at hand more feasible for further understanding, and I, for one, have seen a lot of thing's that I can't stereo type as 'Normal out croppings, shadows or play of light' scenarios.

The problem with the outlining and rendering in any photo is that the person doing it may be considering that, for example, a rock behind a crater is just one object, so the result, although a help for other people to see what the person doing the outlining or rendering sees, doesn't really get us closer to the truth, it only shows us that person's vision.

Though I do have healthy skepticism with in the discussion of such topics, it becomes obvious too me that there truly is something to the whole "Base's on the Moon" theory. (Had too throw that Obvious in there, keep it going you know...LOL... )

I have yet to see something that really looks like a base.

Is there method too the madness of where they are located and do you think, with similar mining facilities on Earth, that these are conspicuously and alarmingly similar? Sometimes right down to the possible equipment we would use for such facilitation?

Zorgon once posted what he said was some crane-like object on the edge of, if I'm not mistaken, Copernicus crater. On a different photo the "crane" was clearly a ground feature.

I haven't seen any mines either.

If there was one thing I would ask of Sgt.  it would be too use a different color other than red for outlining, maybe yellow or a higher contrast color when displaying.

I agree, yellow (or bright green) makes a much better contrast.

ArMap "What percent of these locations do you think are actually 'Unexplainable' and can be feasibly what they seem too be?" (Lunar Facilities of some sort.)

Of all I have seen, only one was, to me, unexplainable, or, more correctly, I didn't find an explanation that I thought was clearly better than all other possibilities.

That means that, as a percentage, it's very low.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

I whole heartedly agree with ArMaP. There is nothing on the Moon other than rocks and dust. This has just been an exercise in the macab. Tricks of light and shadow and 63 year old eyes wearing trifocales make the ordinary rock look like the Mona Lisa. I forget that ArMaP only sees what 'he sees' and what you and I 'see' are just tricks of light and bad grayscale images. Just us of the great unwashed, imagining moon people and mining operations and heaven forbid, 'spacecraft' and 'spaceports', don't know what we're talking about.

In conclusion, I'm sorry for having tricked everyone into thinking there might be something, somewhere, on the moon where it's not and I promise I'll never ,ever use RED again if at all. Shame on me. I have enjoyed my time here and hope you all have a great day.



Peace out Rock.

[ArMaP]

I forget that ArMaP only sees what 'he sees' and what you and I 'see' are just tricks of light and bad grayscale images. Just us of the great unwashed, imagining moon people and mining operations and heaven forbid, 'spacecraft' and 'spaceports', don't know what we're talking about.

Anyone can post what they think they see but I cannot post what I think I see?

Should I keep my mouth shut and not post my opinions to avoid offending your 63 years old eyes?

If that's what you want just ask.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

No no no. I'm agreeing with you. 100% there's nothing up there.

[zorgon]

There are also no UFO's and Aliens... it is a CIA plot (I have documents)

There is no 'Free Energy'... its all misdirection and Tom Bearden works for the CIA

Its all a hoax - nothing to see here move along back to your Ipods and video games, but read this first   

WARNING DOT MIL AHEAD

THE ONE HUMAN PROBLEM, ITS SOLUTION, AND ITS RELATION TO UFO PHENOMENA
Jauuary 3, 1977
Thomas E. Bearden

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a034236.pdf

A Conditional Criterion for Identity, Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic
Thomas E .Bearden 1979

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a071032.pdf

[zorgon]

 Policing the New World Order: An Alternative Strategy
National Defense University National War College Fort McNair,
Washington, DC 20319
1991 

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a436613.pdf