WHOA! A Head From A Broken Statue On Mars?

[ArMaP]

To me, there is nothing natural here at all.

To me, everything is natural on that photo.

There's only one thing that makes it look like a statue, if we remove that area it looks like some rocks (at least to me, but that doesn't mean much, as those that know me already know )

[rdunk]

To me, everything is natural on that photo.

There's only one thing that makes it look like a statue, if we remove that area it looks like some rocks (at least to me, but that doesn't mean much, as those that know me already know )

Hello, ArMaP! Well one thing you are right about is, yes, there is a whole cliffside full of "rocks". Big rocks, little rocks, and every size in between. One thing for sure, there are a lot of rocks.

One thing for sure though, we can't "remove any of them", anomalies or not. Every anomaly and rock gets to stay where it is, no matter our feelings toward what we actually see in the photos. 

Sometimes i wonder if "location" might be a a strong directional force for what we see, or admit to seeing, like on Mars. If the "statue anomaly" posted here, was presented as a photo taken on Earth, in Egypt, I wonder if there would be anyone who would question its authenticity, or its statuesqueness.

But, with it being presented, and clearly seen in a photo from the Mars Rover, well now, that makes it become a "whole nuther discussion"! And on Mars, some see it for what it is, and some just cannot see it (or admit to seeing it) as a "statue", prepared by some form of intelligent design.

And, for whatever reason, I guess that is pretty much the way things like this will remain, until we people from Earth can get on the ground of Mars, to see for ourselves. (or our government tells everyone the truth of the matter)

ArMaP, yes, there are numerous anomalies shown in this photo, that portray intelligent design and intervention. Did you see the fancy number "2" anomaly I posted in reply on Feb. 5? This number 2 is just sitting there in the pic, plain as day. I didn't even put a ring around it in the pic, it is so easy to see.

And there are other anomalies on this cliffside, that could also be posted and discussed.

[ArMaP]

One thing for sure though, we can't "remove any of them", anomalies or not. Every anomaly and rock gets to stay where it is, no matter our feelings toward what we actually see in the photos. 

I was not talking about "removing any of them", what I said was "remove that area", meaning removing it from the photo.

I said that because the top of the "head" of the "statue", if we remove or hide the area below it, we can see that it looks like the rock to the right (from out point of view), only more eroded.

Also, if we look just at the "face" area we can also see that the rock to the right is not that different, that particular piece is more eroded, just that.

The area that is most different from the rest is that flat area (the "body"), but looking at the way those rocks break, I don't see anything unusual with it.

Sometimes i wonder if "location" might be a a strong directional force for what we see, or admit to seeing, like on Mars. If the "statue anomaly" posted here, was presented as a photo taken on Earth, in Egypt, I wonder if there would be anyone who would question its authenticity, or its statuesqueness.

I have seen many people say that, and some even tried to post photos from different places, my opinion is never affected by the surroundings or by the supposed place where the photo was taken.

ArMaP, yes, there are numerous anomalies shown in this photo, that portray intelligent design and intervention. Did you see the fancy number "2" anomaly I posted in reply on Feb. 5? This number 2 is just sitting there in the pic, plain as day. I didn't even put a ring around it in the pic, it is so easy to see.

A number 2 is hardly something that can only be explained as an artificial shape.

[rdunk]

Quote ArMaP: "A number 2 is hardly something that can only be explained as an artificial shape".
...

That is possible, but can you tell us how you might try to "explain" the "natural existence" of this very fancy #2 in a high quality photo of this Martian cliffside. I will post another screenshot for you, and I will even put a ring around it, so you, and everyone, can easily find it in the rocks.

Thanks!

[ArMaP]

That is possible, but can you tell us how you might try to "explain" the "natural existence" of this very fancy #2 in a high quality photo of this Martian cliffside.

I don't think the "2" exists as such, to me it looks made from two different objects that appear like a "2" only when seen from this position.

I think that all the photos that show this area were taken from the same position, if we can find a photo from a different position it will show if it's a matter of perspective or not.

[rdunk]

I don't think the "2" exists as such, to me it looks made from two different objects that appear like a "2" only when seen from this position.

I think that all the photos that show this area were taken from the same position, if we can find a photo from a different position it will show if it's a matter of perspective or not.

Actually Amp, if you look closely, what makes it possibly look like "two" pieces to you, may be the fact that a rock pretty much hides the bottom horizontal part of the figure "2". I don't know if you saw it that way or not, but that is the way i see it. You can just see the point of the rock covering that part of the view of the "2".

As I have already said, to me, it is just a fancy two, and a "white one" at that!. Yes, another photo can always give us more confidence in what we think we see, but thus far, this is the only photo I have found of the "2". Most of the photos of this Cape seem to have been taken from the crater rim, looking at the cape from a leftward angle, toward our right in the photo.

I still am going to continue looking for a better pic, even though I am satisfied that it is a numerical "2", as we know it, on Earth.

[Pimander]

I still am going to continue looking for a better pic, even though I am satisfied that it is a numerical "2", as we know it, on Earth.

I'm satisfied that it looks like a numerical 2 on that picture.  ArMaP's right though, the bottom horizontal line is likely the top of another object and not part of the rest of the 2.

if you find another picture of the object, from a different perspective, you will probably be able to see better to decide for sure.  In the meantime I'd say it might be a 2 but is most likely an optical illusion.

Sorry rdunk.

[rdunk]

I'm satisfied that it looks like a numerical 2 on that picture.  ArMaP's right though, the bottom horizontal line is likely the top of another object and not part of the rest of the 2.

if you find another picture of the object, from a different perspective, you will probably be able to see better to decide for sure.  In the meantime I'd say it might be a 2 but is most likely an optical illusion.

Sorry rdunk.

Hey Pimander - absolutely nothing to be sorry about!! You said, "I'm satisfied that it looks like a numerical 2 on that picture". We always appreciate the comments and interaction.  While we may not agree on some of the specifics, we each can add to and compliment the details of the discussion.

I do think that if you look closely at the screenshot, you too can see the rock that is in front of, and below, the "2". The side of that rock, facing us in the photo, is triangular shaped. The pic is clear enough to see the "triangle". And you can see that the upper point of the triangle rock does cover most of the horizontal leg of the "2". That is why the horizontal leg of the "2" is a different color, rather that white. 

While optical illusions are always possible with some features and pics, you have to admit a numerical "2" is pretty common, and is a recognizable feature for almost everyone.

And yes, it does seem out of place on the side of that cliff, but so do numerous other things there, besides the "two" large statues. It really is just another place on Mars, that displays in the photos, definite specific objects of intelligent civilized design activities.

I am going to attach another screenshot of the "2", with "added lines", that will help everyone locate and see the view blocking triangle shaped rock, in front of the "2",  I hope this helps!

[RUSSO]

Optical illusion or not, looks like a 2.

I like it.

JMO.

[rdunk]

Thanks for the comment Russo! With these anomalies, it always helps to know when others are at least seeing what the poster has proffered.

Do you have any thoughts about just how that "2", on the side of a cliff of Victoria Crater, on the planet Mars, might have gotten there??? It seems to look more out of place there, than does the "Egyptian-looking statue", just down below the "2". Very odd "cliff buddies", that "2" and the "statue"!

Well, my answer to that question is, "somebody done it"!! Yes, "somebody"!! "Who done it" would be left an open question.

Why in the world can't NASA just say/admit, "yes, there are signs and features of intelligent life on Mars, past, existing, or transient" A really big deal, but not a big deal to just say it!

[RUSSO]

Why in the world can't NASA just say/admit, "yes, there are signs and features of intelligent life on Mars, past, existing, or transient" A really big deal, but not a big deal to just say it!

I think its because this is THE card that they plan to play in a very specific time with a well planed game. A game they are architecting and playing for decades.

Furthermore, We should keep in mind that there are many interests at stake. Many institutions depends on the ignorance of people. I think religion is one good example.

About how that was "put" there, I cant say. As I said before that could be a manufactured simbol. But could be just a simple optical illusion. This does not mean you're wrong or right. This mean you could be right. There is no way to say this without having pictures with better resolution.

Remember this: The truth is the daughter of time.