Michael Tsarion - Compilation

[Sinny]

Brian Heatley (born 1968), better known as Michael Tsarion, is a proponent of the New Age movement and the Truth movement. Originally from Belfast, Northern Ireland, he moved to the United States and became a protégé of the freemason Jordan Maxwell (real name, Russell Pine). Tsarion mixes some truth with lies and as with his mentor, is widely regarded to be a shill. He has stated that he is sympathetic to freemasons such as Aleister Crowley, Manly Palmer Hall and Helena Blavatsky. Tsarion has done some interesting work pertaining to Irish metahistory and antiquity in general, however because of his association with paramasonry and the New Age movement, is to be taken with a huge grain of salt.

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Michael_Tsarion

Woah, woah, woah - I was looking for a 'quick fix' quote, but not one like the above! lol.
I was surprised to see he didn't have a wiki-page, but he does in fact have a 'Metapedia page'.

First off Tsarion is quite anti 'New Age', to clarify the opposite of the opening statement in the above.
I say anti, because he is only dissecting and studying it, from an academic point of view, he does not support any 'movement'.
He is not a 'supporter' of any historical persona's, he studies them and their effects on human society.
He does not mix truth with lies - he presents his academic arguments, to astounding academic standard.
He always advises to study his referenced material and draw your own conclusions.

I have decided to add this author into this sub-forum as a large portion of Tsarions life's work is dedicated to the study of ancient civilizations and ancient ideologies. He also presents very valid research that indicates these ancient ideologies are still a driving force steering humanity today.

To clarify, I have studied about 50% of Tsarions work, I've found his work aiding me in my first University year, that of Social Science, and there are still some aspects of ideologies that we do not quite share the same conclusions on - however, as always, a good resource to draw upon - really get those brain clogs moving.

The Irish Origins of Civiliasation:



The Origins of Evil:



Origins & Oracles - Part 1 - Atlantis, Alien Visitation & Genetic Manipulation



Orgins & Oracles - Part 2 - 2012: Where History Ends



Orgins & Oracles - Part 3 - Divination & the Goddess Tradition



Orgins & Oracles - Part 4 - Weapons of Mass Deception: Behind the New World Order



Orgins & Oracles - Part 5 - Astro-Theology & Sidereal Mythology



Orgins & Oracles - Part 6 - The Subversive Use of Sacred Symbolism in the Media



Age of Manipulation - Part 1



Age of Manipulation - Part 2



Age of Manipulation - Part 3



The Queen of England's Tarot Card Coronation

[petrus4]

I haven't looked into Tsarion much.  Jordan Maxwell is also a name that you will encounter fairly quickly, if you start doing research into the sovereignty movement; but again, he's not someone I pay a lot of attention to.  Bad vibes, to be honest.  These guys are the so-called Truth Movement's Outer Limits.

As far as Crowley is concerned; truthfully Uncle Al has probably been a much greater influence on me than is healthy.  I spent a fairly large part of my teens reading Blavatsky, as well; they are all familiar names.

Tsarion, however, I'm honestly not sure about.  I can tell you that he is obsessed with the Eye; probably to an even greater degree than David Icke.  I also know that Tsarion's research has taken him deep into the usual dark, slimy, generally yucky territory that is inevitably entered by anyone seriously researching the Service to Self demographic.

I would stay away, personally.  One of the things about magick, is that you need to get clear about which side you are on, as early as you can.  Blavatsky did some interesting work, particularly in the area of astrology, but she also had some fairly disturbed ideas.  Everyone from that particular circle did.

[petrus4]

I have done some more thinking, and there are a few other points that need to be made, where the likes of Tsarion are concerned.

The first and most general, is the fact that hermeticism, in and of itself, is merely a discussion of certain mechanics, or principles.  As such, it is value neutral.  If you know about gravity, you can rely on it to let you stay in bed at night, as opposed to floating above it; or you can rely on it, to know that when you drop a bowling ball above someone, it will fall on their head.  That depends on your moral inclination.

When you really start looking into these things, however, what you very quickly start realising, is that the snakes are not even so much interested in knowing the rules, as they also are in breaking them.  I'll give you the Great Pyramid as the usual example.  Nature designs things by miniaturising at the per-node level as much as possible, and then massively replicating.  The Great Pyramid is an example of the exact opposite; maximum per-node size, and limited replication.

Just talking about this stuff, however, is making me feel heavy, so I am not going to continue to do it; but that is one point I wanted to make.  The Kybalion should be required reading for pretty much everyone, as far as I am concerned; but it is good because it only gives you mechanics.  It doesn't tell you that you should be Service to Self polarised.

I will mention one other thing; although most of you here probably already know even more about this than I do.  This, however, is very important.

One of the snakes' very favourite games to play with us, revolves around two of the sephirah from the Qabbalah; Chesed and Geburah.  The other really fun part is that in terms of the exoteric (mundane, supposedly) game they play, they've also swapped the colours on you, as compared with ritualistic use.  Geburah is supposed to be red, and Chesed is supposed to be blue; but with what they have given you, it's the opposite.  That really frags you up.



These two sephirah correspond with the terms Mercy (Chesed) and Severity.  (Geburah)

The snakes understand how vital it is for these two sephirah, even more than the others, to be balanced within an individual's makeup, so what they have done, is to create a society in which these two are perpetually split.  You always have two opposing camps, factions, or teams; blue associated with conservatism, or Geburah, and red falsely associated with Chesed, or Mercy.

So Communism/Socialism/the Democrats/the Horde correspond with red, (Chesed/Mercy, in their swapped correspondence) and Conservatism/Capitalism/Fascism/the Republicans/the Alliance correspond with blue.  (Geburah/Severity)

To quote from the good old Hegelian dialectic, though; you have Chesed corresponding with antithesis, (entropy) Geburah corresponding with thesis, (energy) and Kether corresponding with synthesis.  (Synergy)  If you don't get those two balanced up, you don't activate Kether; and if you don't activate Kether, you stay in a relatively animalistic, disempowered, broken state, which is of course what the snakes want.

The way to get yourself straightened out on this score, is to start doing first the Qabbalistic Cross, and then eventually the Middle Pillar.  I haven't performed either of these for too long, and I should; but the few times in my life when I have been sane, have generally corresponded with me both doing puja, but also performing both of those rituals as well. 

"For thine [Kether] is the Kingdom, [Malkuth] the Power, [Geburah] and the Glory, [Chesed] forever and ever.  Amen."

When the Catholics perform the sign of the cross, they probably don't fully understand the real significance of what they are doing, but it does have genuine power.  Like most of these things, however, it is hidden in plain sight.  You have to do your homework to figure it out.

That balances both of those energy hemispheres, however, and you start feeling like a whole person again.  That is the entire reason why the snakes make those two factions, however.  The point isn't even so much to keep people divided and seperated externally, (although that certainly serves their interests as well) as much as it is to do it internally, because that is where it is primarily important.  As above, so below.

[Sinny]

I also know that Tsarion's research has taken him deep into the usual dark, slimy, generally yucky territory that is inevitably entered by anyone seriously researching the Service to Self demographic.

Funny you should bring this up. The general consensus in the New Age movement is that Service to Self is negative, whilst Service to Others in positive.

However within the Law of One it is stated, that to serves one's self is to serve others, if one has/is adequately serving them selves, they are no longer a  burden on others, hence if everybody chose the Service to Self, there would be no need for others to serve others.

Even The Law of One has been misunderstood in almost all instances, as people still refer to the positive/negative variation of service in different aspects.

[undo11]

i'm on the first video.  he's brought up some stuff that rings particularly true.  however, and i dunno if he realizes this, but he's engaging occassionally in orwellian double speak.   we should embrace our emotions, he says, our anger, our human-ness, then seems totally perplexed later in the video, as to why human civilizations currently have a penchant to be angry and territorial.  well duh hehe

i have this same issue with the information in the book of revelation. here we have jesus, this loving, long-suffering, merciful creator figure, who says to forgive, repeatedly, who suddenly goes rambo and wipes out huge swaths of people in a massive case of eye for an eye, that is so uncharacteristic of his prior teachings. 

now either that's double speak by the author of the book, double speak by the translators, or it's metaphorical for a celestial event.

tsarion accuses the ancient texts of concocting metaphors  from what was otherwise mundane astronomy in his estimation (here he quotes velikovsky's work on the subject), when in fact, the metaphors are the actual information about the mundane events and it is just the teachers of the past who didn't understand it.  in other words, he's got it backwards.  an example this might be the following:

let's say you're aware of the science of astronomy and look for signs when the sun is behaving oddly.  you see the sun with red spots on it and because of your knowledge, you realize you need to inform your fellow scientists of future problems with the sun.  you describe it in a text as an orange with red spots that is clearly about to decay so they should protect themselves by not eating it, and thus, you create a sort of metaphorical story to go with the event that your fellow scientists will recognize but will not inform the common folk of some future date in which the sun goes rambo.

fast forward. some people read it and say, it's about an orange and that we should not eat oranges with red spots, in the future.  then some guy named tsarion reads the orange story and says, doh, it's not about an orange, it's a metaphor for the sun, therefore the authors of the text have turned a real event into a metaphor - thus, you shouldn't believe them. 

hello? that's the point!  it's a metaphor because it wasn't meant for the wider reading audience to understand.   sadly, this is the case with most of the ancient texts -- metaphors are rampant to keep certain data at the level of the priest / scientist.

[undo11]

Funny you should bring this up. The general consensus in the New Age movement is that Service to Self is negative, whilst Service to Others in positive.

However within the Law of One it is stated, that to serves one's self is to serve others, if one has/is adequately serving them selves, they are no longer a  burden on others, hence if everybody chose the Service to Self, there would be no need for others to serve others.

Even The Law of One has been misunderstood in almost all instances, as people still refer to the positive/negative variation of service in different aspects.

yeah, jesus talked about that.  he basically said,  love starts with you.  if you don't love you, how ya gonna love someone else?  self empowerment is obviously important, because without it, everyone sinks into despair.  however, gotta remember not to hoard it.

[stealthyaroura]

Sinny, M Tsarion  my favourite.
I'm sure you have seen " Architects of control" ?
nice one for the info. Any Tsarion is always welcome

[Sinny]

Sinny, M Tsarion  my favourite.
I'm sure you have seen " Architects of control" ?
nice one for the info. Any Tsarion is always welcome

Architects of control - currently running on my laptop as I take notes on the 'seduction of the material world' to help me expand on the work of the Social Scientist Zygmunt Bauman in his theory that Western Consumer Society can be split into two groups, the 'seduced' and the 'repressed'.

I should have opened with this video   

Architect's of Control:

[undo11]

still on first video.  he goes into lengthy discussion on the subject of irish druidism, and suggests that judaism was originally druidic - thus the tree motifs and so forth.   he also mentions that the druids had to be pure, and their information had to be closely held to keep vital information about their astronomical and sacred information from getting into the hands of the common folk, and they did this with metaphor.     i don't think he's remembering what he already said because he has so much data in his head.  but he had prior said that the ancient texts that applied metphorical stories to scientific events, were bad.   blink blink. 

i see this alot in conspiracy videos, and to be honest, it's darn confusing. 

[undo11]

to be fair, i stopped watching video #1 and started watching architects of control, as you suggested you should've posted it first.  one issue i have with his information is, he seems to want to convince the listener that it's okay if the ideas he supports do the same thing as those he is criticizing, because his intentions are pure. 

an example is the idea that words are dangeorus and that you should consider them akin to spell casting as they can change your mind and manipulate you -- he then shows a clip of george bush jr, during one of infamous speeches.  now let's consider his idea for a moment -- if it's spell casting to try to change people's minds or manipulate them to believe differently than they already do, or to enlighten them in some fashion, what the heck is he doing ?  it's clearly not sign language and it's definitely designed to make some other world view look bad, while trying to make his own, look good. i seriously do not know what to make of it. 

i'm beginning to wonder if he hasn't had some significant mental trauma, and by that i don't mean that he's mentally handicapped or insane but rather, his brain is disjointed to just enough of a degree that he doesn't even realize how often he's contradicting himself.  i wonder if he has been seriously hurt in the past. an emotional trauma or shock or something

[undo11]

as regards the presidents and vps and all the wars,  yet saying "peace peace but there is no peace" (<--prophecy from the new testament, btw),
he makes an excellent point that they are talking out of both sides of their mouths.  perhaps everyone does that to one degree or another but the intentions behind doing so are the real issue here.  in the case of saying peace and then blowing people up,  i'm just as horrified as he seems to be about it, although i engage in fantasy video games in which the use of violence is almost constantly present, my intention is not a fantasy of blowing up real people or real anything for that matter.  can't say the same for our presidents, however.

i'd like to suggest that the reason the presidents are doing that peace bomb peace bomb thing is not what it seems on the surface.  they aren't boming muslim lands to rid themselves of muslims.  they are killing specific sects of muslims and christians, leaving mostly radicalized wahabbis.  perhaps a political and financial agreement with the saudis, i dunno.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Bump !

Interesting, will listen to these as i work

[undo11]

i'd like a response to some of my commentary, if possible.

[Sinny]

He seems to want to convince the listener that it's okay if the ideas he supports do the same thing as those he is criticizing, because his intentions are pure. 

Just as a 'New World Order' is much needed for this planet - just a pure one 

An example is the idea that words are dangerous and that you should consider them akin to spell casting as they can change your mind and manipulate you

Valid so far.

He then shows a clip of George bush Jr, during one of his infamous speeches. Now let's consider his idea for a moment -- if it's spell casting to try to change people's minds or manipulate them to believe differently than they already do, or to enlighten them in some fashion, what the heck is he doing ? 

Manipulate would be the operative word here. The difference between George Bush and Tsarion is that Bush is masking his true intention with fluffy, positive, or fear mongering, emotionally invoking descriptive words. (Coupled with neural linguistics).

Tsarion in, my opinion, is presenting his thoughts quite clearly and openly with no malice or manipulation.

It's clearly not sign language and it's definitely designed to make some other world view look bad, while trying to make his own, look good. i seriously do not know what to make of it.

Where is the line drawn through my opinions and use of language on this site, drawn between openly sharing my knowledge or being manipulative?

His brain is disjointed to just enough of a degree that he doesn't even realize how often he's contradicting himself.

Contradictory or progressively questioned? We should always be in a state of questioning, exploring and changing. There is no one divine truth when working with circumstantial evidence -  circumstances can only ever be pondered - therefore questions will always remain, and unless we have a time machine, or an all seeing eye (pun intended  ) definitive answers will always elude us.

[Sinny]

as regards the presidents and vps and all the wars,  yet saying "peace peace but there is no peace" (<--prophecy from the new testament, btw),
he makes an excellent point that they are talking out of both sides of their mouths.  perhaps everyone does that to one degree or another but the intentions behind doing so are the real issue here.  in the case of saying peace and then blowing people up,  i'm just as horrified as he seems to be about it, although i engage in fantasy video games in which the use of violence is almost constantly present, my intention is not a fantasy of blowing up real people or real anything for that matter.  can't say the same for our presidents, however.

I'd like to suggest that the reason the presidents are doing that peace bomb peace bomb thing is not what it seems on the surface.  they aren't boming muslim lands to rid themselves of muslims.  they are killing specific sects of muslims and christians, leaving mostly radicalized wahabbis.  perhaps a political and financial agreement with the saudis, i dunno.

Valid assessment - I can't add much more to that..

Except, when the world is waking up to these controlling methods (which we, collectively,are), they either have to enforce these methods in the physical, or change to more effective, subversive, methods to counter our non-compliance to their original game plan.

Well, once you 'know', you can't 'unknow' - and as we have seen, they've almost run out of subversive methods - hence the police state.

Though U.S. leadership has been essential to global stability and development, the cumulative effects of national self indulgence, financial irresponsibility, an unnecessary war and ethical transgressions have discredited that leadership. Making matters worse is the global economic crisis.

The resulting challenge is compounded by issues such as climate, health and social inequality - issues that are becoming more contentious because they have surfaced in the context of what I call "the global political awakening."

For the first time in history almost all of humanity is politically activated, politically conscious and politically interactive. Global activism is generating a surge in the quest for cultural respect and economic opportunity in a world scarred by memories of colonial or imperial domination.

Zbigniew Brzezinski - 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/16/opinion/16iht-YEbrzezinski.1.18730411.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0