Yes, Mars Anomalies

[Amaterasu]

Couldn't find this. Apologies if already posted.

[Amaterasu]

[zorgon]

Couldn't find this. Apologies if already posted.

INCA CITY - E09-00186

Mars Global Surveyor
"INCA CITY"
MOC wide-angle image E09-00186

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Mars_Images_24.html







SETI
On Lunar Archeology

Apology not accepted

[zorgon]

So lemme get this straight... NASA is covering up but he is using NASA pictures to show the cover up?

Ummm okay

The gear looking thing is interesting... I will see if I can find the original. Getting them off youtube... well SUCKS

[Amaterasu]

Thanks for the awesome input, z!  GFY!

Yeah.  I have gotten into looking for anomalies and will post a few I found here in a wee bit.

EDIT to add:  Yes, We use NASA's data.  Cool thing is a trained eye can catch things They missed, or evidence of tampering.  [grin]

[ArMaP]

Cool thing is a trained eye can catch things They missed, or evidence of tampering.  [grin]

The problem is that most people do not have a trained eye and are not able to distinguish evidences of tampering from JPEG compression.
Also, professionally done image editing is not detectable. Even amateur image editing is not detectable, as a test I did some years ago showed me.

[Amaterasu]

From this image:

http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/117546/snapshots/315914

I extracted the following images.  I passed many things that I could make some case for tampering/anomaly, asking the question, "Could this be attributed to rocks?"  I am not saying any of these could not be, but that I gave very low probability.

I will present the screen shot I worked off of and the result for images I worked.  In working images, I used unsharp mask, contrast, and levels.  This is only part of what I found.

The Temple:





The stripe





The Pavilion





Here I contemplated how I might build with both the ability to move massive stones with ease, and also to "melt" stone into pliable substance, and could see...

The Compound





This may just be paradelia...or however it's spelt.  Spell-check gave Me nothing.  I thought it was striking so it's included.

The Catface





The Chest




The Evidence


Blurring




This one clearly shows a trapezoidal selection that has been blurred




This is a part of the distance which seems to have no major data, but processed, it's clear some major messing has taken place.





And...

How more in-Your-face can We get?

[ArMaP]

The gear looking thing is interesting... I will see if I can find the original. Getting them off youtube... well SUCKS

My "trained eye" tells me that it's this photo.
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00052/mcam/0052MR0239007000E1_DXXX.jpg

[Amaterasu]

The problem is that most people do not have a trained eye and are not able to distinguish evidences of tampering from JPEG compression.
Also, professionally done image editing is not detectable. Even amateur image editing is not detectable, as a test I did some years ago showed me.

[shrug]  If You say so, ArMaP.

[ArMaP]

And...

How more in-Your-face can We get?

What's the problem with the UHF antenna, besides being out of focus?

[ArMaP]

[shrug]  If You say so, ArMaP.

I do say it, specially the part of not being able to detect image tampering.
The test I made had two photos, one altered the one untouched, and most people pointed to the untouched image as being the one I had altered. The ones that pointed the right image could not point to what I really had changed.

Good image editing is undetectable.

[Amaterasu]

I do say it, specially the part of not being able to detect image tampering.
The test I made had two photos, one altered the one untouched, and most people pointed to the untouched image as being the one I had altered. The ones that pointed the right image could not point to what I really had changed.

Good image editing is undetectable.

Unless You're Deuem.

I don't think these guys are taking that much time with any given image.  They have butt-loads to go through.  They could hire Me...  Hehe.

[Amaterasu]

What's the problem with the UHF antenna, besides being out of focus?

LOL!  I guess You don't appreciate My humor, ArMaP.

Hahahahaha!

[zorgon]

My "trained eye" tells me that it's this photo.
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00052/mcam/0052MR0239007000E1_DXXX.jpg

Ah! A field of basalt Some amygdaloidal (scoria)

...basalt is a cool stone... it forms hexagonal columns

[zorgon]

They have butt-loads to go through.  They could hire Me...  Hehe.

We tried to... when ASU called out to the public to look for anomalies. We wrote them, showed them ArMaP's favorite anomalies, but they wrote back and said they changed their mind and would let SETI do it

We wrote SETI to offer our help... they never replied, even though they have the Lunar Archaeology department (looking for anomalies in pictures )

It was NASA that labeled that picture "INCA CITY"