Mysterious Moon Object

[LSWONE]

Almada Portugal

[ArMaP]

Almada Portugal

[go2toa]

Portugal is cool.  Good girls there, warning boys about bad (Brazilian) girls...seems to generate more tourism than Brazilian tourist ads.  Both countries are interesting.

There is a 300' x 300' building on Bougainville Road, Coronada Island, CA.  It's shaped like a swastika*  ironically used to train the US Navy.  It's not a little 30', questionable "structure".  There is or was a building on the moon that practically duplicates it.

If that's too small, there is a 400' building on the moon within walking distance.  Straight lines 300' + are an impressive trick for my imagination.  If you want coordinates I'd gladly hand them over.  I respect your job to suppress conspiracy theories -- you can supply blank photos of these.  I don't mind.  If they did appear in ASU, we would have heard about them on the front page of the times.

If helium 3 was mined and worth more than it's weight in gold, how early would I have to fear people looking at me in good telescopes AND coming up to check out my ops?  About 1950.  And if I suppressed my front side ops by 1950, could I hide the backside by 2005?  Heck yeah.

* In my blog, I wrote about discrepancies of the building in Iron Sky and the real building.  I realize there is too much coincidence but the movie is definitely fiction

[ArMaP]

If you want coordinates I'd gladly hand them over.

That would make things easier.

I respect your job to suppress conspiracy theories -- you can supply blank photos of these.

It's not my job or even one of my hobbies, I hope stating my opinions about this and other subjects only gives people more information to base their opinions on, but, even if I wanted, how could my opinion suppress any thing?

If they did appear in ASU, we would have heard about them on the front page of the times.

Maybe they appeared. In many cases (like this one) we can see that there's something there that, on a lower resolution, looks slightly different. In this case we can still see the triangular shape that was exaggerated by the light/shadows and bad resolution.

[deuem]

In true supression ArMaP could just delete any post he wanted or give out warnings. Eliminate a member even. All within his powers. I have never seen him do that and he does let you move on with a thought. The only supression I have ever seen on PRC has to do with 4 letter words, Bad taste in a photo on the wrong thread and fights that get way too personel and have been asked to stop many times. Other than that, it is a debating web site to further research on all subjects.

And by the way English is not his spoken language which makes it harder for him and us. And then there is all of the technical stuff that has not even come up yet, cameras, lenes, distances, masters. That end seems to get endless. I suggest to all to try and learn from each other as much as you can and have a fun time doing it.

Deuem

[08rubicon]

  I have pictures of the moon, taken by me, from my back yard, that show
very similar 'lights' or sun reflections...Consider that the sun must strike
the moon at a very precise angle for any anomaly to be visable in any image.
A few minuets before or after the precise angle, the anomaly will not be
visable..I think that John Lear has stated that there are 'people' on the
moon..I think that is true. They may be us, they may not. Please correct
me if I am wrong, or just relagate this to the dust bin, if it is not relevent..
or does not agree with your opinion. If my spelling is incorrect, correct
that also..
   rubicon

[COSMO]

Pixelation may explain it, but the light that extends to the bottom of the crater almost looks like the light shining out from within.  Maybe they just close the door when they are done.  Camouflage would be expected if the stories of moon bases and such have any validity. 

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

In true supression ArMaP could just delete any post he wanted or give out warnings. Eliminate a member even. All within his powers. I have never seen him do that and he does let you move on with a thought. The only supression I have ever seen on PRC has to do with 4 letter words, Bad taste in a photo on the wrong thread and fights that get way too personel and have been asked to stop many times. Other than that, it is a debating web site to further research on all subjects.

Thank you Deuem

Think of PRC as a car, and Armap is our brake

Every car needs one, no?


ETA: Sure that bridge could have gone by now, they've been very busy up there the last 40 years

[Somamech]

The question is though mate, Why is Google Moon not a reputable source?  Are you suggesting that there are some people working on the google moon project who don't know their profession too well?

I would be very keen to hear your thought's on that as in all seriousness it means the picture's could be filtered as someone like I believe and yet at the same time you believe Google are messing with picture's. 

Between the pair of source's and beliefs we have discovered a perfect IO system of human dung

and yes I know you are from a very pretty land thats not Chile 

[ArMaP]

The question is though mate, Why is Google Moon not a reputable source?

Because, like with their search engine, they prefer to fool people than have good data. In this case, probably to make things faster, they use low resolution images instead of the higher resolution ones available, even from the source they site (in this case, Jaxa).

I will not use the image from the opening post because that one suffers from two more problems, zooming too much into the image and looking at it in perspective, as if they were looking at a 3D object instead of a 2D image, but compare what Google Moon shows and the photo I downloaded (and cropped) from Jaxa.

Google Moon


Jaxa


Even without zooming too much into the image we can already see some JPEG artefacts (and I think we can see other artefacts, I think they may have changed something in their system, things didn't look that bad before).

Are you suggesting that there are some people working on the google moon project who don't know their profession too well?

Maybe there are, but that's not what I'm saying, as it looks more like a company policy problem than a professionalism problem.

I would be very keen to hear your thought's on that as in all seriousness it means the picture's could be filtered as someone like I believe and yet at the same time you believe Google are messing with picture's. 

I don't think Google is messing with the pictures, I think they are just reducing the quality because of speed and maybe because those worse images make the headlines and give them free publicity.

and yes I know you are from a very pretty land thats not Chile 

Why did you choose Chile?

[Sinny]

Venus?

aha. Just wanted to join in the 'random location game'. I skipped reading a bit lol.

Anyway - Looks like a flying Triagle - I'm probably wrong but that the obvious diagnosis.

[deuem]

Google Moon

On the photo above it appears that the crater at 11 O'clock from the one in question has the same pattern of triangular lights or pixels. Take you pick.

Since the photo came in for me as indexed color and at such a low res it is almost imposible to process. I have to do so much manipulation to get anything it becomes useless.

Deuem

[COSMO]

Interesting thoughts.  I am not a photo analyst so am surely not the best judge on this.  There is a huge lighting difference in the 2 pics and I wonder how much that is affecting it?  The light level in the crater is totally different.  Is that pixelation? 
On another note, has anybody here said anything about the mysterious Martian jelly donut rock?

[go2toa]

That would make things easier.

US Navy Seal Duplicate (Swastika)
23 deg 17' 0" N
143 deg 15' 36" E

..and 1.25 km away..

Large Building (Warehouse?)
23 deg 18' 30" N
143 deg 13' 27" E

Here's the video analysis I did a while back
http://thewaystuffreallyworks.blogspot.com/2012/09/moon-base.html

I don't think anything will show up in your archive but I wish you the best. 

If you do use Google Moon someday and visit the crater, really study it; it's a crazy town with a lot going on.  Those converging spheres reflecting light I mentioned a couple weeks ago...(making people think they are lights)?  That actually started this thread.  Where are they?  This crater.

Outside of Belyaev, there are no buildings, just spheres.  But as you move away from the crater, you'll see the number of spheres diminish.  That's why I felt they were important.  The reason for being there.  I joined this forum hoping someone knew what they were.

[go2toa]

Because, like with their search engine, they prefer to fool people than have good data.

They do both: have good data and fool people.

They have the processing power and data to show a 100% meritocracy with under 14 day lag in what's happening on the internet even without a "new site" submission.  Yahoo needed 4-6 months with a forced submission and no bribe.

On popular subjects, they accept explicit ads.  And fool people with bribes in the six figures for search result ranks, normally they are gone after the first four sites returned.  After that, they're honest because that's how they squashed their competitors.  They could go either way if they wanted to.

I haven't dismissed the possibility of them putting easter eggs on moon or mars pictures.  However, based on google earth, it seems they don't want to jeopardize their reputation putting easter eggs on anything.  For non-technical people, an easter egg is a deeply hidden developer joke.  Holiday games around the Google logo are not hidden.

Somebody suggested there was a 10,000' long spacehship on the moon.  The hi res jaxa images showed the landscape features still there, suggesting a spaceship at very high altitudes (eg. 20 miles high).  Up close it was just a hill.  Clearly, that theory should be shot down.

If hi res images don't match google's unnatural structures, 1-those images should show boring landscape that imply the structures, or 2-google should confess they put up easter eggs. 

In the absence of conditions 1 or 2, it's not worth the time to debate imo.  A bridge that crosses a crater is taken down at the time of the later photo, etc.