Done but not.

[Elvis Hendrix]

So Apollo 8.
Done to death, but not Really.
It's a piece of lint. On the camera.
If you have, and we all have the jpg.
This cannot be seen. No matter how far you zoom.
It's only viewable on the tiff.
So, it's so small how could it have such a defined structure?
Unless it was exactly there.
It was there.
Elvis.

[ArMaP]

It was there.

It was.

On the photo, during the scanning.

[Elvis Hendrix]

Armap.
I have read everything you have said about this.
And it is too small to see unless you have the tiff.
Do you agree?

[ArMaP]

And it is too small to see unless you have the tiff.
Do you agree?

I don't remember, what's the photo ID?

[1967sander]

I have a huge database of over 500,000 photos. Most of these never watched. From what film roll is this particular image?

Sander

[ArMaP]

I found the photo ID, AS08-12-2209.

Answering the question, yes, it only shows in the TIFF image, along with several other fibres/hairs and other things that are common on scanned photos.

[zorgon]

Exuberant1
posted on Dec, 22 2009 @ 05:51 AM link   


Here is a strange tube-like thing that my brother and I found in as08-13-2228hr (towards the bottom right). It sort of reminds me of the tube on that machine Lear found near Lomonosov (see below):



This is the thing/machine from the John Lear moon thread:



Sherpa ordered the High res version of AS8-12-2209 - this is what was on it:



So THIS CLIP is a Pegasus Original   The purple version is from a book scan that John has

[zorgon]

I need to copy Exuberant1's posts from that thread.

He is another one of the originals that just vanished without a trace like Internos, BigFatFurryTexan, Luna Cognita, Sherpa, Zarniwhoop and others

[Elvis Hendrix]

Cool,
Yea I've seen johns book scan and if I'm not mistaken it looks like the object is in a slightly different position.
I think the purple book scan is a before or after shot consecutive to the grey one. That to me suggests the object has moved.
I think it was alive when it was photographed.

And someone explain to me if a piece of lint is SO TINY that it will only show up on a tiff! How on earth could it hold such defined structure and shape.?
Answer .. Because it's not lint or fluff . It's a huge organic entity that was filmed in two consecutive pictures.
Imho.

[ArMaP]

And someone explain to me if a piece of lint is SO TINY that it will only show up on a tiff!

Being a TIFF or a JPEG is irrelevant.

How on earth could it hold such defined structure and shape.?

Answer: because it was on the photo when it was scanned or when the copy of the photo was printed. Different copies have different features.

PS: why do people talk only about that "thing" on that photo when the photo is full of fibres and other "garbage"?

[Sinny]

Creepy spidery looking thing...

As a side note, has anybody done any studies into theose orbs that grow long tenticle legs, that can been seen on numerous NASA footage?

[ArMaP]

As a side note, has anybody done any studies into theose orbs that grow long tenticle legs, that can been seen on numerous NASA footage?

It's easier if you provide an example of what you're thinking about.

[LSWONE]

Cool,
Yea I've seen johns book scan and if I'm not mistaken it looks like the object is in a slightly different position.
I think the purple book scan is a before or after shot consecutive to the grey one. That to me suggests the object has moved.
I think it was alive when it was photographed.

And someone explain to me if a piece of lint is SO TINY that it will only show up on a tiff! How on earth could it hold such defined structure and shape.?
Answer .. Because it's not lint or fluff . It's a huge organic entity that was filmed in two consecutive pictures.
Imho.

To me it does not look like the object has moved but the camera has moved. Notice the "tail's" location to the crater or white spot and the location of the white spot in front of it on both pics.

If the purple pic was shot first, then the camera is moving in a CCW turn around the object. This is why I think it is something on the surface of the moon and not lint sitting on the pic when scanned.


LSWONE.

[ArMaP]

To me it does not look like the object has moved but the camera has moved.

Nothing moved.

[LSWONE]

Tanks ArMaP fort the overlay. sure makes a difference when the pics are oriented the same.


LSWONE.