UFO Found In Baltic Sea?

[Littleenki]

Perhaps the multiple of the smaller one design ,would help to explain the cigar shaped sightings?

Or perhaps it's akin to pinocchio...the more lies are told about it, the longer it grows.
hobbit

Hehehe!
youre a trip, kevin!!
LOL!
Ya know, I did think about how it might be a number of the same ships docked together, like pods, and the separate ones are broken free from the main one...a possibility, but yes pinocchio's nose may be growing to long for his face!

Le

[Amaterasu]

Is it me or does that long one look like a multiple of the small ones?

It looks like a bad photoshop job, where they used the original picture to make a new one with a repeat of the same pattern over and over into a cigar shaped anomaly.

And the one anomaly, C, is similar to an inverted version of A.

Anyone here who looks for moon and mars anomalies will see what im saying right away...anyone?

Le

I'm fully with You on that, Dave.  That looked completely shopped.  Spidy sense says that image is the hoax.

[rdunk]

Is it me or does that long one look like a multiple of the small ones?

It looks like a bad photoshop job, where they used the original picture to make a new one with a repeat of the same pattern over and over into a cigar shaped anomaly.

And the one anomaly, C, is similar to an inverted version of A.

Anyone here who looks for moon and mars anomalies will see what I'm saying right away...anyone?
Le

Littleenki, there is yet no way of knowing what this "thing' is, but, you are right about "multiples", much in the same way "train engines and train cars are multiples". That 920 ft long anomaly is made up of multiple sections, of different sizes. There are eleven sections in the anomaly. The two sections on each end of the anomaly are identical. The eight sections in the middle are identical (the two middle sections may be slightly more narrow), and smaller than the end smaller sections. The "two extra sections" appear to be the same size as the end sections on the anomaly.

it is fairly obvious that these sections are designed to Interlock, as in slide into one another. That is what is clearly represented by the fore and aft areas of the two extra sections, and also by the exposed ends of the two very end sections of the anomaly. Actually, if you will notice, the end section on the right end of the anomaly is seen to not be "fully engaged into its mating section.  If one compares this end to the left end, it is clear that the right end is not fully engaged.

Just a very strange anomaly. The article does say the anomaly is 920 feet long, 205 feet wide, and it is hollow. That would be over 3 football fields long, and over 1 football field wide (45 ft more). And that is without the other two sections, which "may" have somehow become "unattached" with whatever has happened with this anomaly.

I believe this does deserve more discussion!! I will post anther pic, which has magnification, to give us a little better view of the detail.

[Ellirium113]

I'm fully with You on that, Dave.  That looked completely shopped.  Spidy sense says that image is the hoax.

Definitely not adding any credibility with them for sure... +1 for me... look at these images...   

http://gaanderson.hubpages.com/hub/Baltic-Sea-UFO-UnIdentified-Submerged-Object#slide6109513



http://www.theorionconspiracy.com/html/third_wreck.html

[zorgon]

This whole thing is beginning to show signs of the classic coverup...do they think we are that stupid?

Well in a word... yes And most people are. Its only a few in forums like this that question things

Now Ellirium just posted a link to the thermal density image. Haven't checked the link yet but if this is real its VERY interesting



Balt?k Denizi'nde UFO Av? - Turkish

English Translation - UFO Baltic Sea Hunt

[Ellirium113]

Somehow I doubt it is a thermal image...more likely an image manipulated in photoshop from the Orion Conspiricy site.

[zorgon]

Yeah most likely   But I didn't have that Third Ship from Orion yet   Will have to add that to the Orion thread if I can find it again

[Amaterasu]

Definitely not adding any credibility with them for sure... +1 for me... look at these images...   

http://gaanderson.hubpages.com/hub/Baltic-Sea-UFO-UnIdentified-Submerged-Object#slide6109513



http://www.theorionconspiracy.com/html/third_wreck.html

My biggest clue that the "cigar" was shopped was the way the "land" at the top keeps repeating.  And the pixels seem to match within the dispersion expected from a clone tool.  My guess is that this was produced to add confusion and dismissal in non-discerning types.  We here are a bit more discerning.

[Littleenki]

Can you say...Pho-to-shop?

What if there is something there, and the images are just covering the real story?

Balkan Balking?

What gets my goat, Amy is how someone can actually pass that off and expect us to fall for it.

Its akin to the WTC being replaced with a cardboard cutout to fool us into thinking they never fell!

Too much photoshop and not enough honesty. And now there's a movie...oh boy...fire up the gullible express honey! Were going to the cinema!

Ill be interested in how this pans out, but I know in my heart it isnt real, although I cant make that call for anyone else, so Ill just sit back and watch the Balkan circus erupt into a big pile of elephant dung!

Sweet dreams, Amy! The millenium Falcon is fueling up for tomorrows flight!:D
Littleenki

[Amaterasu]

I do think the original mysterious object is real, in that something unusual sits on the floor of the Baltic sea.  But I am equally certain that efforts (via Photoshop/equivalent and outlandish creppola stated) to make everyOne just roll Their eyes at the whole mess and move on.

This is how They hide the truth in plain sight.  Too much non-truth out there such that the truth gets lumped with the bogus.

[zorgon]

This is how They hide the truth in plain sight.  Too much non-truth out there such that the truth gets lumped with the bogus.

OR....

There is nothing there but some odd shaped rocks

[Amaterasu]

Doubtful, z.  Lessee...  First it's a mushroom.  Then it's got hallways...  Then it's got photoshopped adjunct structures...  Not, "Well, We went down there and just found a bunch of odd-shaped rocks.  What a bust."

[rdunk]

Amaterasu, you may be right about this thing, but, since we actually don't know, I will wait for later search and determination. Although, if they want to distort the truth, whatever that may be, then how can we ever be sure.

A couple of things I will mention.

First, have you noticed that the lower edge of the longer anomaly has some type of dark/black vertical features all along that edge. These features are not visible on either of the two separate pieces. And shouldn't they be, if this single piece was just photo shopped into the longer section?? It is hollow, so there should be vertical height.

Secondly, you mentioned that "the land" at the top keeps repeating", and it does look that way. Well, while it does look that way, there are a few differences in those "land features". One difference is, they don't all go the same way, from the anomaly. A couple of them veer to the left, while the others veer to the right. Also, have you noticed the "white features" along the upper edge of the anomaly. Each section has one, and whatever those features are, they could have something to do with the "movement of the land", operationally or otherwise.

Thirdly, don't you think it a little odd, if this is a shopped piece, that right end section on the long anomaly is shown as being less than completely engaged?? That is pretty easy to see in the photo. It is kinda obvious, that hoax or not, the lower single section shows us the features of how these sections could joined together.

I am just say'in! We will find out something about this in due time.

One thing I do like about this, as a possible UFO, is that in my opinion, the architecture of it breaks completely away, from our general vision, or sense, of an interstellar vehicle. And that is a good thing for us to get away from, to broaden our vision of the possibilities.

[Amaterasu]

rdunk,

1.  If You look at the anomaly bottom right, You will see that indeed there is a stripe of black at the bottom (which matches with the "segments").  Clearly this was not precisely a clone tool job, but more a copy & paste job, where the segments were taken and erased in areas They didn't want to have showing - and then shrunk slightly - thus accounting for some of the "differences."

2.  Pixel differences will occur when One places a piece - Photoshop/equivalents will approximate the pixels if not placed precisely on the pixel grid, and when shrunk.  Also, if You look closely, the line of the "cigar" is not exactly square with the edge of the picture.  It drops slightly right to left.  This too will give the differences You describe.

3.  No.  Who knows what was going through the mind of the person who did this when they create it, but the top right hand piece matches virtually perfectly (with allowances for pixel approximation and shrinkage) to the lower right "original."  Including the "white" wide-ish band about 1/4 in from the right (and the other bands).  In real things, this NEVER happens.

So.  As a Photoshop expert, I give probabilities this was shopped at 99.9999999999999999999%

Seriously.

[zorgon]

Not, "Well, We went down there and just found a bunch of odd-shaped rocks.  What a bust."

First report  on video interview  "It could be just some unusual rocks..." 

Then the news media called it the Millennium Falcon