News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Holographic Planes & Blue Beam

Started by Sinny, February 19, 2014, 12:58:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

zorgon

Quote from: space otter on January 29, 2015, 03:53:34 PM
[PDF](or "Ghost Gun") Project "Blue Beam" - StealthSkater

Jul 4, 2004 - Project "Ghost" (or "Ghost Gun"). Project "Blue Beam". StealthSkater note: I had heard about projecting holographic images into the air for.

Way back near the beginning of my time at ATS I posted a link to a document at Maxwell AFB on Holograms.  That live link is now gone :P but at the time just posting it on the forum page set off bells and whistles. Seemed everyone that opened the thread page got an automatic alert from AF Security :D

Ever since that day I will never post a direct .mil link again unless I know it is a public access page :P

The image that went with that page is this one...  projecting a Holographic black triangle in front of the real ship as a decoy




I have the paper somewhere LOL

But Holograms are far ahead of what they show us  even when the Main Stream News can do THIS 

CNN Hologram TV First




zorgon


zorgon

Quote from: onetruekeeper on September 14, 2014, 12:46:35 AM
If we are living in a hologram, there should be evidence of holographic projectors. In the movie Zardoz, Zed, the Brutal exterminator was able to see the bluish laser light that was always present in the Vortex

Well a few years back there were some NASA photos...  on the Moon... and the NASA archive page said the 'anomaly' was unexplained. They later changed that to read 'camera defect'  Maybe ArMaP could find my original reference on ATS where I quoted tha NASA description  (unless the Matrix itself was rewritten it should be there)

The images in question showed a bluish aura around the Astronaut and equipment that changes in intensity













The effect lasted a short time and does not appear again  Camera Artifact? Sorry not buying that one but I would like to find the original post at NASA archives that said they had no idea what caused it

zorgon

#243
Have you seen THIS one?





There were two other videos of this approach sightly different angle but the have been removed from YouTube  I have a series of stills I captures





















Notice on the top video the pod is only a blob, while in the stills from the other angle you can see the pod  (The pod is an item yet to be explained)

thorfourwinds

Greetings:

Mr. Zorgon, are you really trolling the precious audience, hanging on Your every Word handed down from On-High  ;), them sheeple perhaps even believing that a 'hologram' could result in a blast radius as evidenced by a veritable plethora of unclassified photographs?

Dear Reader, do not let this obvious government shill/disinfo agent sell you a bill of Chinese-made microchips, unless One is as gullible/stupid/paid-off as our U.S. government.

Errrr, wait just a moment . . . what blast radius?




WTF?

How come the building explodes outward when Your hologram/plane/drone dissolves/penetrates/aluminum-slices-through-steel-beams-anomaly/apparition in these photographs?







,

UnSure in Georgia    :-*






EARTH AID is dedicated to the creation of an interactive multimedia worldwide event to raise awareness about the challenges and solutions of nuclear energy.

Pimander

Does anyone else see the pod on the second 9/11 plane?  I have to admit it looks like a pod.  Explain that!

ArMaP

Quote from: zorgon on April 29, 2015, 02:45:16 AM
Way back near the beginning of my time at ATS I posted a link to a document at Maxwell AFB on Holograms.  That live link is now gone :P but at the time just posting it on the forum page set off bells and whistles. Seemed everyone that opened the thread page got an automatic alert from AF Security :D

Ever since that day I will never post a direct .mil link again unless I know it is a public access page :P

The image that went with that page is this one...  projecting a Holographic black triangle in front of the real ship as a decoy

The Internet Archive may help. :)

Is this what you're talking about?

ArMaP

Quote from: zorgon on April 29, 2015, 03:02:29 AM
Well a few years back there were some NASA photos...  on the Moon... and the NASA archive page said the 'anomaly' was unexplained. They later changed that to read 'camera defect'  Maybe ArMaP could find my original reference on ATS where I quoted tha NASA description  (unless the Matrix itself was rewritten it should be there)
This?

It's still there on the Apollo 12 page.

Sinny

Thor,

I'm unsure where the satire ends and the genuine questions start in your post...
"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society"- JFK

zorgon

Quote from: ArMaP on April 29, 2015, 01:49:55 PM
This?
It's still there

Yes that is it. Thanks :D

Yeah the original NASA post was by Pete Teague (Sp?)  We found a lot of directories by him of 'photos in progress' :D


"Pete took this partial pan from the southeast rim of Middle Crescent just before he and Al headed back for the LM. The frames are AS12-46- 6836 to 6844. Note the strong colors at the center of the righthand frames. Examination of successive frames indicate that this related to the camera lens, very likely a dust smudge. Kipp Teague notes "The lens aberration begins at as12-46-6813. It's a blue glow around the astronaut in 6818, again in 6826, a discoloration in other frames, affecting clarity in most, and it's not gone again until 6853 (back in the LM). Whatever the phenomenon is, it has a varying impact on color based on the brightness of the central object in the image. On bright subjects, the aberration adds a blue cast, and on darker subjects, the aberration adds a reddish cast."



Now we all know that NASA's pet answer is 'ice and dust'  and 'lens artifacts' :P

So it is nice to dee the occasional (and rare) "Whatever the phenomenon is...."

zorgon

Quote from: thorfourwinds on April 29, 2015, 05:07:29 AM
How come the building explodes outward when Your hologram/plane/drone dissolves/penetrates/aluminum-slices-through-steel-beams-anomaly/apparition in these photographs?

Well one of the official claims is the intense heat caused by the burning jet fuel that cause the steel core beams to melt.

What I DON'T understand is how those people who so easily accept the "official story" do so without thinking. It boggles my mind really.

I have done welding and it takes a long time to heat steel to close to melting point, As soon as you remove the heat source it cools rapidly. Any welder can tell you this.  Try melting a steel rod in a fire pit see how long it takes to get red...let alone reach melting point

So #1  "plane" hits building  Jet fuel explodes in a big fireball...  but HOW LONG did it burn?

Well  about 7 Seconds













So the fireball of the burning jet fuel lasted about 7 seconds and set some office furniture on fire.  Don't forget that a) the steel core beams were THICK heavy steel designed to withstand several hits of airplanes and b) the reason Silverburg had to demolish the towers was because they were covered in fireproof asbestos and c) the temperature of burning jet fuel or office furniture is NOT hot enough to melt steel, certainly not in just a few minutes


So back to that HOLE the 'plane' left    Look at the hole CLOSELY. This is minutes after the plane hit... What do you see? Take a minute...  there are 4 points of importance


zorgon

Quote from: ArMaP on April 29, 2015, 12:55:04 PM
Is this what you're talking about?/quote]

Yeah that is it but I did have it on the Livingmoon



Here is the original link to Maxwell AFB  Let me know what you get :D  Don't be afraid to accept certificates :D  They really don't bite. That is the link to the Air Force College

https://www.maxwell.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/b5_6.htm

ArMaP

Quote from: zorgon on April 29, 2015, 06:33:04 PM
Here is the original link to Maxwell AFB  Let me know what you get :D
404 - File or directory not found.

QuoteDon't be afraid to accept certificates :D
Never was. :)

In this particular case the warning meant only that the organisations that signed the certificate are not known as trustworthy.

ArMaP

One question about this whole hologram thing: how many people here have seen a hologram with their own eyes, not just in photos or videos?

Sinny

#254
Quote from: ArMaP on April 29, 2015, 10:00:17 PM
One question about this whole hologram thing: how many people here have seen a hologram with their own eyes, not just in photos or videos?

Never that I know of for sure.

But considering all the stange sightings I've had, holograms have entered the list of possibilities.

Some of my UFO's have behaved so strange. I was hoping so called UFO investigators out there would be interested in the sheer diversity and behaviour of them, but apparently UFOlogy is lacking in the scientific method. In fact, no one has really asked me any questions about my sightings... Leaving me to wonder if anyone really is interested in solving the mystery.  I have noticed people sometimess don't want to push the boundries of possibilities very often, subconcious fear I'm sure.
"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society"- JFK