News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Scientists think there may be a wormhole in the center of our galaxy

Started by COSMO, May 29, 2014, 12:55:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

COSMO

I don't subscribe to the big bang and believe that black holes are actually an extension of space/time into another volume, another Universe.  It's fluid dynamics, the ETHER is a superfluid and it's just like water going down the drain.  It's the VORTEX and it's natures model, an ETHER VORTEX!  It's torsion field physics and is also the model to achieve gravity modification and faster than light travel.  Nature is showing us the way...always...

If Zilong Li and Cosimo Bambi of the Fudan University in Shanghai are correct, what we thought was a massive blackhole in the center of our galaxy could be a wormhole that would allow instantaneous travel between two points in space and time. In fact, it may be the gateway to a different universe.

They even go beyond that—their paper says that every supermassive black hole candidate in other galaxies can actually be wormholes created in the early Universe.

The supermassive black hole candidates at the center of every normal galaxy might be wormholes created in the early Universe and connecting either two different regions of our Universe or two different universes in a Multiverse model.
Their theory may sound fantastic, but it's not a completely crazy idea. Wormholes are allowed under the Theory of General Relativity. In fact, while they have never been observed, this hypothetical topological phenomenon of space-time was first postulated by Albert Einstein himself and his friend Nathan Rosen.

But while the equations indicate that they may exist—and, so far, General Relativity has been accurate in its predictions—we need to actually detect one to prove they exist.

Li and Bambi think this will be possible in a couple of years, when a new instrument called Gravity becomes operative at the Very Large Telescope Interferometer, the European Space Observatory located on the top of Cerro Paranal, 74.5 miles (120 kilometers) south of Antofagasta, Chile.   


What we know is what is possible under Einstein's general relativity. The theoretical work says that

1) Wormholes can exist.

2) Wormholes would allow matter to travel faster than light (FTL) because, while objects passing through a wormhole would still move at sub-light speeds locally (therefore obeying Einstein's first commandment: Thou shall not travel faster than light!) they will go from one point of the universe to the other much faster than a beam of light traveling outside the wormhole, through regular space.

3) Wormholes would allow to travel in time. This is way too complex to explain here, but you can make your head explode at any time by reading this.

4) Wormholes may connect different universes, which ties with the idea of many parallel universes derived from quantum mechanics. This avoids any time paradox because,according to some recent theories, "a particle returning form the future [through a wormhole] does not return to its universe of origin but to a parallel universe." I know, Marty, my mind is collapsing into a tiny black hole right now.

This all means that we really don't have a clue about what may be happening yet when going through a wormhole. We just have a lot of equations that seem to work and, according to Zilong Li and Cosimo Bambi, the possibility of testing the existence of wormholes in the very near future using a new scientific instrument.

And that, my friends, is very exciting on its own, no matter what the final result is.


http://sploid.gizmodo.com/scientists-think-there-may-be-wormhole-in-the-center-of-1582831794/+jesusdiaz



Cosmo

And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

WarToad

Now we just need to figure out how to travel 50,000 light years to the center of the galaxy.  Or even 4 light years to the closest star, Alpha Centari.  Or Mars.  Or find flight 370.
Time is the fire in which we burn.

COSMO

Quote from: WarToad on May 29, 2014, 01:00:19 PM
Now we just need to figure out how to travel 50,000 light years to the center of the galaxy.  Or even 4 light years to the closest star, Alpha Centari.  Or Mars.  Or find flight 370.

Quote from Ben Rich, former director of Lockheed Skunkworks:

1 : "Inside the Skunk Works (Lockheed's secret research and development entity), we were a small, intensely cohesive group consisting of about fifty veteran engineers and designers and a hundred or so expert machinists and shop workers. Our forte was building technologically advanced airplanes of small number and of high class for highly secret missions."

2 : "We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do."

3 : "We now have the technology to take ET home. No, it won't take someone's lifetime to do it. There is an error in the equations. We know what it is. We now have the capability to travel to the stars. First, you have to understand that we will not get to the stars using chemical propulsion. Second, we have to devise a new propulsion technology. What we have to do is find out where Einstein went wrong."

4 : When Rich was asked how UFO propulsion worked, he said, "Let me ask you. How does ESP work?" The questioner responded with, "All points in time and space are connected?" Rich then said, "That's how it works!"

Dr. Ben R. Rich former Lockheed Skunk Works director confirmed:

1. There are 2 types of UFOs -- the ones we build and ones 'they' build. We learned from both crash retrievals and actual "hand-me-downs." The Government knew and until 1969 took an active hand in the administration of that information. After a 1969 Nixon "purge", administration was handled by an international board of directors in the private sector...

2. Nearly all "biomorphic" aerospace designs were inspired by the Roswell spacecraft -- from Kelly's SR-71 Blackbird onward to today's drones, UCAVs, and aerospace craft...

3. It was Ben Rich's opinion that the public should not be told [about UFOs and extraterrestrials] . He believed they could not handle the truth -- ever. Only in the last months of his decline did he begin to feel that the "international corporate board of directors" dealing with the "Subject" could represent a bigger problem to citizens' personal freedoms under the United States Constitution than the presence of off-world visitors themselves."



Is it a coincidence that Townsend Brown worked for Vega Aircraft which became the Skunkworks?  Or that Nick Cook speculated that Brown's electrogravitic technology had found it's way into the B2 bomber? 

Is Col. Corso's story of Roswell and the reverse engineering of alien technology related?

What could it be that the government has been working on all these years?

Maybe this???



http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=6359.msg88579#msg88579

Yes, everything is connected...in the ETHER!

Good luck on flight 370...

Cosmo


And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

WarToad

Quote from: COSMO on May 29, 2014, 01:52:54 PM
Quote from Ben Rich, former director of Lockheed Skunkworks:


2 : "We already have the means to travel among the stars,....

There is an error in the equations. .... we have to devise a new propulsion technology. What we have to do is find out where Einstein went wrong."


Thinking you know how to do something, and being able to do it are two different things.  Dr. Rich's statements tell me it hasn't been done because they still haven't figured it out.  They have the general concept, but lacking the critical details.
Time is the fire in which we burn.

Littleenki

You are correct, Cosmo, as when a density of matter, or point of gravitational expression retreats into the night, everything follows however distant, into the whirlpool(vortex) created by it's relocation....so then...which side of the whirlpool are we on today?

Coming or going....or both at once?

My money is on both, hence the planar appearance of our galaxy, which seems not to be shaped as a whirlpool itself so much as a wet saw blade spinning at high angular velocity flinging off densities of itself into the fray, while absorbing other densities to relocate them on the other side of our two sided whirlpool.

And, each density slung off acts as its own vortex-like black hole, keeping the effect as well as the cause in constant motion, fractally speaking.

If it were one or the other..in or out, there would be a discernable cone shape to our galaxy as everything was either sucked in or spewed outward from the center..which there is not...balance defined as in certainin hermetic terminology.
Hermetically sealed, for your protection

COSMO

Quote from: WarToad on May 29, 2014, 02:19:35 PM
Thinking you know how to do something, and being able to do it are two different things.  Dr. Rich's statements tell me it hasn't been done because they still haven't figured it out.  They have the general concept, but lacking the critical details.

Or maybe they DO have the details.  Please check out the information in the ZP Final Cut link.  I think it is accurate.  Mark McClandlish is the person that put Nick Cook onto the story that became THE HUNT FOR ZERO POINT.   

Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

COSMO

And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

COSMO

Quote from: Littleenki on May 29, 2014, 02:29:53 PM
You are correct, Cosmo, as when a density of matter, or point of gravitational expression retreats into the night, everything follows however distant, into the whirlpool(vortex) created by it's relocation....so then...which side of the whirlpool are we on today?

Coming or going....or both at once?

My money is on both, hence the planar appearance of our galaxy, which seems not to be shaped as a whirlpool itself so much as a wet saw blade spinning at high angular velocity flinging off densities of itself into the fray, while absorbing other densities to relocate them on the other side of our two sided whirlpool.

And, each density slung off acts as its own vortex-like black hole, keeping the effect as well as the cause in constant motion, fractally speaking.

If it were one or the other..in or out, there would be a discernable cone shape to our galaxy as everything was either sucked in or spewed outward from the center..which there is not...balance defined as in certainin hermetic terminology.

Here's what we are seeing...



I think the irregularity seen can be explained by the black hole universe theory.  It could be caused by an influx of raw space time, the pre-matter form of creation.  That would explain the inflation issue also.  It would have been a faster than light expansion in the beginning because MOVEMENT OF ETHER IS ALWAYS SUPERLUMINAL...Sub Quantum Kinetics...

Here is another discovery that can be explained by an area of ETHER influx:

Cosmic Rebirth Encoded in Background Radiation:



http://news.discovery.com/space/a-fingerprint-embedded-in-cosmic-background-radiation.htm

So...everything that modern science is seeing in the universe can be attributed to the black hole universe theory.  The reason I like the black hole universe theory is because the ETHER(ZPE, dark energy,space/time) is a super fluid, and this is the way of nature.



It is just so obvious and natural. 

Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

COSMO

Black Hole, White Hole

The big news last week came from the Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization 2 (BICEP2) experiment at the South Pole, which saw imprints in the cosmic microwave background—the oldest light in the universe, dating from shortly after the big bang—that appear to have been caused by gravitational waves rippling through the fabric of spacetime in the early universe. The finding was heralded as a huge breakthrough, although physicists say confirmation from other experiments will be needed to corroborate the results.

If verified, these gravitational waves would be direct evidence for the theory of inflation, which suggests the universe expanded exponentially in the first fraction of a nanosecond after it was born. If inflation occurred, it would explain many features of our universe, such as the fact that it appears to be fairly smooth, with matter spread evenly in all directions (early inflation would have stretched out any irregularities in the universe).

http://coyoteprime-runningcauseicantfly.blogspot.com/2014/04/cosmology-multiverse-debate-heats-up-in.html

Inflation might also mean that what we consider the universe—the expanse of everything we could see with the most perfect telescopes—is just one small corner of space, a pocket where inflation stopped and allowed matter to condense, galaxies and stars to form, and life to evolve. Elsewhere, beyond the observable universe, spacetime may still be inflating, with other "bubble" universes forming whenever inflation stops in one location.




Stephen Hawking proposed the White Hole theory.  I think that every black hole, exits as a white hole, another bubble of raw space time...another Universe.

And there may be matter in our universe that made it through the black hole intact.  We may have matter in our universe that is OLDER than our universe!

Scientists Have Discovered A Planet They Thought Was Impossible:

A mysterious system
Researchers had previously thought that this kind of planet impossible.

Not only did they think something that big would be a gas giant, but they didn't even think the elements that make up a rocky planet existed in our universe when this solar system was born: The early universe had only the lighter elements of hydrogen and helium. Heavier elements were forged from these lighter ones in stars over billions of years.


http://news.yahoo.com/scientists-discovered-planet-thought-impossible-170448463.html

The black hole/white hole universe theory could explain that planet. 

Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

COSMO

More black/white hole information:

Black holes EXPLODE when they die: Galactic phenomenon burst apart and become white holes at the end of their life

Nature.com explains the new theory as suggesting 'that the transition from black hole to white hole would take place right after the initial formation of the black hole, but because gravity dilates time, outside observers would see the black hole lasting billions or trillions of years or more, depending on its size. If the authors are correct, tiny black holes that formed during the very early history of the Universe would now be ready to pop off like firecrackers and might be detected as high-energy cosmic rays or other radiation.'




I believe that one day we will find that black holes are an entry way into another universe and that is how a white hole works. This meshes well with space time that is a superfluid and the bubble universe theory.

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=6666.15;last_msg=97273

Cosmo

And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

robomont

im not a big fan of wormhole theory.per my own theories.
but im willing to believe in a magnetic component to them.
i dont believe they explode either but turn into neutron stars.now if the star explodes then yea.
if there was time dilation then no light should reach us.and no xrays would be expelled unless xrays are not effected by time,but they seem to be.if not then we have the tools necessary for ftl travel.
ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

COSMO

Why is the Milky Way blowing bubbles? Portrait of strange structures revealed - but scientists still can't explain their source
Scientists have created a data-based 'portrait' of two massive bubbles
These Fermi bubbles, they claim, glow in nearly uniform gamma rays
They appear like two 30,000-light-year bulbs screwed into galaxy's centre
But according to astrophysical theories, these gamma ray bubbles shouldn't be there, and scientists are still baffled by their presence

The Milky Way is blowing huge, mysterious bubbles that stretch for tens of thousands of light years.

These 'Fermi' bubbles, which are mostly made up of gamma rays, were discovered four years ago by Harvard physicist Douglas Finkbeiner - and scientists have been trying to explain them ever since.

Now a group of US researchers has used data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Telescope to create a 'portrait' two bubbles stretching out above and below our galaxy.




Dmitry Malyshev, at the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology in Stanford, found that the bubbles have very clear outlines and are fixed at each pole of the Milky Way.

The bubbles themselves, he claims, glow in nearly uniform gamma rays and appear like two 30,000-light-year-tall incandescent bulbs screwed into the centre of the galaxy.

But according to current astrophysical theories, these gamma rays shouldn't be there, and scientists have been unable to find a source.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2718749/Why-Milky-Way-blowing-bubbles-Portrait-strange-structures-revealed-scientists-explain-source.html

It's an Astrophysical unipolar inductor at work!  It is moving space/time/ether, producing gamma radiation...



http://www.plasma-universe.com/Unipolar_inductor

It's natures way...

Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

robomont

its because particles colliding at certain energy levels and higher put off the xrays and gamma at right angles to collision ,it would make sense that cosmic rays are created  that way too.that is the normal method of creation of these waves in the lab.
the center of the galaxy is like or is a black type hole.
this accelerated pressure and velocity does this.
all accelerated inward,into a level plain
the bubble shows a right angle mirror image of  this plain.since the bubble is not a straight collumn but a outward plane,then the collapsing plain downward and inward should be relative to that plain or disk type surface.or it could be just random plasma  fluxuation.but it wouldnt surprise me if its being trapped by a magnetic field somehow.
my question would be is can they show even energy density across the bubble or more like a column energy density.
what i find strange is when scientist say a blackhole they say that the collumn is hollow and comes off the edge of the event horizon but then heres an article saying a bubble.

if i was captain of a space ship,i would stay the heck away from either.
ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

robomont

well cosmo,after more thought,if this guys pic is correct,then it blows my theory of it being a flat plane and suggest a clump or radius of neutrons.and its very small relative to the other masses.this causes the  tight angle at the bottom of bubble.
this actually a really good article ,for whats going on,if the pic is true.
it may also meaan neutrons are not effected by magnetic fields on this scale since the neutrons clump instead of being a flat disk due to polarity from magnetic force.
ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

Littleenki

This work you shared above Cosmo, does correlate with the newer viewpoint of how certain celestial formations might not be collapsing into themselves, but actually densifying and expelling matter from that center simultaneously with a weaker intake of information from what we know as universal mind.

Of course, during this process, some of that matter is returned back into the singular point of centricity, as would suggest a wormhole, but the "wormhole" is just a pinch point where unaccreted matter is relocated for future expulsion in my honest opinion.



Theres that spiral meandering of Quanta again... ;D

Exactly like the 2d graphic you posted of a inductive device...but in 3d form..the ancients who were vastly in tune with this whole process, even without Hubble telescopes and such, called it Anu....and the nature of everything conforms to this strict mean in many different ways, hence various stages of stellar metamorphosis, and nebulous creation.

Its our Kundalini, Samadhi, what have you..galaxies are as each singular density of matter..fractal and exacting,combining to create an apparent view of the whole.

And I do agree with Robomont..the spaceship captain would do his crew and ship well to avoid that pinch point, lest he be relocated into something new, such as a bird, fish, or Honey Boo Boo's underpants. :o

Cheers!
Le

Hermetically sealed, for your protection