Proof Edgar Fouche Faked A Document

[David Hilton]

 I posted this to YouTube today. Enjoy! 

[ShotInTheDark]

WoW !!!! I posted that document all over the place for him. Unreal man.

[spacemaverick]

My Army documents were on Microfiche and my original copies given me are in bad shape but still readable.  My Air Force Documents are few but original.  It's a shame we can't get a set of his records from USAF to see if anything was added or taken away in this particular document.  I don't know how to use photoshop so basically I have to take your word as an expert with Photoshop.  Is there another way to verify what you are saying is true?

[David Hilton]

My Army documents were on Microfiche and my original copies given me are in bad shape but still readable.  My Air Force Documents are few but original.  It's a shame we can't get a set of his records from USAF to see if anything was added or taken away in this particular document.  I don't know how to use photoshop so basically I have to take your word as an expert with Photoshop.  Is there another way to verify what you are saying is true?

You can maybe get a copy of it from filing a FOIA for it specifically. Maybe. That would be the absolute final word. I still have an outstanding FOIA request for Ed's records with the Air Force and the National Archives. Maybe they will include this page. I hope they do.

[spacemaverick]

You can maybe get a copy of it from filing a FOIA for it specifically. Maybe. That would be the absolute final word. I still have an outstanding FOIA request for Ed's records with the Air Force and the National Archives. Maybe they will include this page. I hope they do.

It would put a lot of things to rest and verify one way or the other.

[rdunk]

To my knowledge, Ed has never been a member of this forum, and based upon Zorgon's specific comments these past several years about Ed, I believe Z probably doesn't need to have other accusations posted (true or otherwise) about Ed, as he already knows what he knows. (Of course, Z can speak for himself!   )

Because of seeing this stuff long-time ongoing elsewhere too, to me it is a continuing meaningless attempt to prove your side of the argument, to at least some of the which here who have absolutely no interest. For myself on this, I could "not" care less....................!! (which is what I pretty much said in a prior of your posts)

[1967sander]

Sorry but to me this is all disinformation.

Fact: Faking any (official) documents of or impersonating to be someone who is serving the government (in a uniform), pretending to be miltary or police is a fellony. So basically if a person would claim to be working for a government agency and he or she is not, he or she will land in prison. Sicne this has not happened there must be something true in the story. Right?

Case closed!

[spacemaverick]

To my knowledge, Ed has never been a member of this forum, and based upon Zorgon's specific comments these past several years about Ed, I believe Z probably doesn't need to have other accusations posted (true or otherwise) about Ed, as he already knows what he knows. (Of course, Z can speak for himself!   )

Because of seeing this stuff long-time ongoing elsewhere too, to me it is a continuing meaningless attempt to prove your side of the argument, to at least some of the which here who have absolutely no interest. For myself on this, I could "not" care less....................!! (which is what I pretty much said in a prior of your posts)

I had mentioned to staff that I had a problem with the original post but then withdrew my complaint.  I'll leave it at that.  If any of us are going to debunk someone I would have a debunker thread.  The only problem I would see with that type of thread is that it becomes a war between people and nothing is accomplished.  From this point forward I will stay out of this thread.  No matter what he is, Ed is my friend.

[ArMaP]

Is that document in the video available to anyone?

If yes, where can I get it?

[astr0144]

You make a fair Comment Sanders, and your probably right that he would be taking a huge risk if he had faked it..

But I recall seeing a similar  Alex Jones Video where he claimed and showed a video by similar  experts who did a similar thing to looking at Obama's birth certificate...where they claim its faked and  showed something  similar to what Dave has shown in his video...where they can see how various things had been altered and added in...

If its correct, I do not know How Obama has got away with it so far other than he will probably be looked after by those at the top !

Fact: Faking any (official) documents of or impersonating to be someone who is serving the government (in a uniform), pretending to be miltary or police is a fellony. So basically if a person would claim to be working for a government agency and he or she is not, he or she will land in prison. Sicne this has not happened there must be something true in the story. Right?

[Amaterasu]

Not that I want to get in the thick of it here, but as a Photoshop expert, I have to say that somewhere along the line, at MINIMUM, the word "cryptological" was altered or messed with.  Period.

What I can't say is when and where and by whom.

[rdunk]

Not that I want to get in the thick of it here, but as a Photoshop expert, I have to say that somewhere along the line, at MINIMUM, the word "cryptological" was altered or messed with.  Period.

What I can't say is when and where and by whom.

And yes amy, that is "perzactly" the point is all of this - the where and by whom! Only the shadow knows! If Ed actually did this, what for - just to make money selling books and speaking engagements? He sure went to a lot of trouble, if he actually did everything he is accused of!! One man doing all of this on his own??

On the other hand, if he did know "some things", and openly talked about them, there are not enough fingers and toes amongst all of us, for counting the number of people that would be being brought to bear to destroy Ed's credibility, and or destroy him. Most of us have seen over the years that is the way things work. People step out "too far", and they are in effect destroyed.

Is that the case here? I am not a part of the case, so I won't even address that!!

FWIW, I do not believe this is anywhere close to the Obama birth certificate photo shop controversy. That investigation was handled very differently, by folks who knew what they were doing, and were doing it openly and under control. No pigs in that barrel!!

[Gigas]

The obama photoshop thing had layers that were found to still be active instead of the forger merge all layers so no one would be able to see what had been going on.

This document with ed shows tampering and manipulation. I wonder if the document had been scanned or imaged from a camera. Also the paper used when creating the document.

One other thing, in many ufo photos the perp creates the image in a graphics program and screen prints the image to fool the eye of a ufo in a real back ground.

Ed could have created the document and screen printed that as well to hide artifacts but that part with the erasure tool leaving details in the image are troubling for ed as is the out of place cryptological word.

Hilton has some serious observation of the document

[Amaterasu]

And yes amy, that is "perzactly" the point is all of this - the where and by whom! Only the shadow knows! If Ed actually did this, what for - just to make money selling books and speaking engagements? He sure went to a lot of trouble, if he actually did everything he is accused of!! One man doing all of this on his own??

On the other hand, if he did know "some things", and openly talked about them, there are not enough fingers and toes amongst all of us, for counting the number of people that would be being brought to bear to destroy Ed's credibility, and or destroy him. Most of us have seen over the years that is the way things work. People step out "too far", and they are in effect destroyed.

Is that the case here? I am not a part of the case, so I won't even address that!!

FWIW, I do not believe this is anywhere close to the Obama birth certificate photo shop controversy. That investigation was handled very differently, by folks who knew what they were doing, and were doing it openly and under control. No pigs in that barrel!!

What if this Ed guy is part of a directed disinfo effort that extends well behind His singular appearance in the "limelight?"  Just sayin' that if it seems like an awful lot of effort for one Human...it has a good possibility of having more (Humans, ET, whatever - Beings, at any rate) involved.

But yeah.  The BC debacle is much bigger in scale.

[ArMaP]

Not that I want to get in the thick of it here, but as a Photoshop expert, I have to say that somewhere along the line, at MINIMUM, the word "cryptological" was altered or messed with.  Period.

After a quick look it looked to me like the spacing between the letters is not even the same as used by the other letters.

So, yes, it does look altered, but without the original image we cannot know who did it, as anyone can do that with any image he/she gets.