Ebola Outbreak World News

[rdunk]

The Ebola death total has reached 4,447

While numbers are not the most important thing, they are important to us relative to helping us understand the reality of this very real EBOLA threat. The present and potential seriousness of it is beyond the experience of most of us, for our ability to comprehend. I do think playing "conspiracy games" with Ebola is paramount to dangerous ignorance to the simple facts, IMHO!


Ebola death rate rises to 70 percent, says world health body

By Elise Viebeck - 10/14/14 09:22 
Global health officials said Tuesday that the death rate in the Ebola epidemic has risen to 70 percent, up from 50 percent.

The World Health Organization (WHO) made the announcement at a news conference in Geneva, where officials said there could be up to 10,000 new cases of the virus every week within two months.


A total of 4,447 people have died from Ebola this year, the WHO said, while 8,914 have been sickened. Experts believe the real number of Ebola victims is much bigger than the official figures due to difficulties in reporting the cases.



Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/220644-ebola-death-rate-rises-to-70-percent

[Glaucon]

I'm in Love with Elise Viebeck 

[petrus4]

Well, well, well.  What do Ya know.

From:  http://www.naturalnews.com/047251_Ebola_vaccine_NIH_pharmaceutical_companies.html

Much more at site.

At the risk of sounding pseudoskeptical, I have learned not to consider Mike Adams an entirely reputable source, to be honest.

[Amaterasu]

Well, considering that site is a gatekeeping site, I agree that some of the info may be tainted.  But like all gatekeepers, They offer truth amidst the lies.  I am sure that We can find where Dr. Anthony Fauci said what He said.  And verify the listed credentials.  So it matters not whether Mike is overall credible.  The fact remains that People who stand to profit are pumping up the idea that everyOne must be jabbed.

[petrus4]

Well, considering that site is a gatekeeping site, I agree that some of the info may be tainted.

What do you mean by this, Amy? Can you explain?

[Amaterasu]

What do you mean by this, Amy? Can you explain?

Well...  I wrote a long and cogent reply, explaining the promotion of psychopaths in any money system...  It was deleted.  They have done that to Me before.  This is gatekeeping behavior.

[Amaterasu]

More info:  http://12160.info/forum/topics/ebola-outbreak-in-guinea-now-linked-to-vaccines-produced-by
http://www.liberianobserver.com/commentaries/ebola-breakout-coincided-un-vaccine-campaigns

Ebola Outbreak in Guinea Now Linked to Vaccines Produced by Sanofi Pasteur Pharmaceutical Owned by Bill Gates & Rothschild

The ebola pandemic began in late February in the former French colony of Guinea while UN agencies were conducting nationwide vaccine campaigns for three other diseases in rural districts.

The simultaneous eruptions of this filovirus virus in widely separated zones strongly suggests that the virulent Zaire ebola strain (ZEBOV) was deliberately introduced to test an antidote in secret trials on unsuspecting humans.     

The cross-border escape of Ebola into neighboring Sierra Leone and Liberia indicates something went terribly wrong during the illegal clinical trials by a major pharmaceutical company.

Through the lens darkly, the release of Ebola may well have been an act of BIOWARFARE in the post-colonial struggle TO CONTROL MINERAL RICH WEST AFRICA.     

Earlier this year, rural residents eagerly stood in line to receive vaccinations from foreign-funded medical programs. Since the cover-up of the initial outbreak, however, panicked West Africans rural folk are terrified of any treatment from international aid programs for fear of a rumored genocide campaign.

The mass hysteria is also fueled in a region traditionally targeted by Western pedophiles by the fact that filovirus survives longer in semen than in other body fluids, a point that resulted in murderous attacks on young men believed  to be homosexuals.

Ebola detonated fear and loathing, and perhaps that is exactly the intended objective of a destabilization strategy.

This ongoing series of investigative journalism reports on the Ebola crisis exposes how West Africans are largely justified in their distrust of the Western aid agencies that unleashed, whether by mistake or deliberate intent, the most virulent virus known to man.        Guilt Without Doubt

[Pimander]

Pim, as Jon Rappaport points out, that PCR test says NOTHING about how much of the virus is present.  One virus does not a sick Person make.  Millions upon millions do.

If you have Ebola in your cells that is proof of Ebola as per the discussion above.  Ebola RNA in any liquid has the potential to cause disease.  You can have different levels of infection but if you have it you can pass it on.

Jon Rappaport is obviously not aware of quantitative PCR which is a variation on the method I gave.  However, to confirm the presence of Ebola there is no need for quantitative PCR.  You only need to come into contact with a single RNA virus to potentially be infected so the presence of the virus is a danger.

P.S.  There is a typo in my post.  It should say Ebola is an RNA virus not RNS.

[Amaterasu]

And more:  http://www.activistpost.com/2014/10/nbcs-ebola-victims-strange-connection.html

NBC's Ebola Victim's Strange Connection to Obamacare and CFR

What's up with Mukpo's media team led by NBC chief medical correspondent Dr. Nancy Snyderman — who apparently is a real doctor, she has a degree and everything — breaking her Ebola quarantine to go to a restaurant for takeout? She's obviously really worried about Ebola. After all, she was over in Liberia, witnessed the situation for herself firsthand, her cameraman becomes infected with the deadly, awful disease and she's SO concerned for herself and everyone else in this country that she...breaks quarantine for some soup?

Question: If even SHE of all people isn't taking this situation all that seriously, and she's been to the so-called hot zone and witnessed her coworker becoming infected, then how is anyone else supposed to take it seriously?

[Amaterasu]

If you have Ebola in your cells that is proof of Ebola as per the discussion above.  Ebola RNA in any liquid has the potential to cause disease.  You can have different levels of infection but if you have it you can pass it on.

So the solution is to give it to everyOne via vaccines?  Dead virii do not cause an antibody reaction.  So all vaccines are either non-effective or contain live virii.

Seems a poor "solution" to Me.

[zorgon]

Seems a poor "solution" to Me.

No surprise there 

But it worked with polio and other deadly diseases in the past. Is it 100% effective for everyone? Not likely but but I never got polio 

[zorgon]

...NBC chief medical correspondent Dr. Nancy Snyderman — who apparently is a real doctor, she has a degree and everything —

LOVE the way that is worded  LOL "apparently is a real doctor has a degree and everything"

It's easy enough to verify someones degree LOL

NBC  aren't those the guys that pay Jim Oberg to be an 'expert" on space?



Just sayin...

[Amaterasu]

No surprise there 

But it worked with polio and other deadly diseases in the past. Is it 100% effective for everyone? Not likely but but I never got polio 

No.  It did NOT work with polio.  Polio rates were declining as nutrition and hygiene improved, and when the vaccine was introduced, there was a SPIKE in polio cases, mainly in Those vaccinated.  I presume You ate well and kept clean, had clean water, etc.

It is a myth that polio was "cured" with the polio vaccine.  (They merely renamed cases that emerged...  Watch that vid with the lady in braids.)  And meanwhile millions of Us were injected with SV40, and today have cancer because of it.

[Pimander]

So the solution is to give it to everyOne via vaccines?

No.  It might help in places where the outbreak is bad like West Africa though.  NO point with only a few cases inEurope or the USA.  They are already doing the right thing in my opinion which is to try to contain it.

Dead virii do not cause an antibody reaction.

They can cause one. Who told you that?

So all vaccines are either non-effective or contain live virii.

That is simply not true.

Seems a poor "solution" to Me.

It would be if you were right.

The truth is that mass inoculation would be overkill and a waste of money.  More people will die from flu this winter in Europe and N. America - I guarantee it.

Oh and one more thing

DOOM, DOOM, DOOM! EBOLA, EBOLA EBOLA.  EARTHQUAKES EARTHQUAKES, DISEASE, PESTILENCE, FAMINE, DEATH, APOCALYPSE!!!!

I fuc4ing hate all this doomy crap.  Depressing or what?  Anyone else bored of it or am I losing it? 

Before 2012 I asked for an opology from all the doom-mongers when we all woke up and everything was the same and the world DID NOT end.  YOu know how many I got?

[Wrabbit2000]

Sanitation had some impact in localized examples. Large cities, more than anything, and where sanitation really made a difference for the crowded conditions. The majority of America wasn't stacked and packed like rats in a box for hygiene to have made dramatic differences and it didn't change in enormous ways over the course of a decade or two, or in all areas equally. The numbers bear that out as well.

I was in the process of putting this all together separately when I came across this site that had charts for all three at the same time, and showing numbers consistent with public health records as well as the CDC. Go to the link for the charts, and I'll quote the explanation for what they indicate, so as not to over-do that fair use exception by taking too much.

The big thing to notice about these three graphs is that they all include the same years, 1928-2003. By looking at all three of them, you can see that each disease decreased at a different time. Smallpox cases were pretty much nonexistent by 1948. However, that's when polio cases started to rise! They didn't start decreasing until 1954, and they didn't become virtually nonexistent until the early 1960s. Measles cases, on the other hand, stayed fairly steady until the late 1960s and didn't become pretty much nonexistent until the 1990s. Unfortunately, because people are choosing not to vaccinate, measles is making a comeback in the United States.

The main point here is that if sanitation were responsible for getting rid of these diseases, you would expect them to all decline at roughly the same time. However, they clearly did not. This tells us that while good sanitation is responsible for the reduction of many diseases (such as cholera, dysentery, and typhoid), it is clearly not the reason for the reduction of diseases like smallpox, polio, and measles.

Source

That isn't to say I trust vaccines. I don't, and I will not take a flu shot, personally. My wife and son have theirs, but I won't. The difference is, they have compromised immune systems from unrelated conditions and a severe flu could put them among the annual mortality stats after just one bad experience. The minor risk of vaccine issues is worth it to them. I don't have those issues...so, while I had my full childhood series, I won't take these 'preventative' ones like the Flu or Shingles. They can keep ones where the illness isn't worse than a complication.

The BIG ones worked and they continue to work though. Simple science and numbers show that. Polio even proves its own point today by making a come back and directly from one of the only regions in the world to actively resist the vaccine. The Pakistani Tribal region. Go figure..and I think it's cause and effect at work in reverse of what it was in the 50's.