A Real Extraterrestrial on Mars?

[rdunk]

Sorry didn't read the entire thread,,,my bad...

No No! Don't be bothered by that! Sometimes difficult to read every word of every post in a thread. No big deal! I appreciate your sharing with us, as always!

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

No No! Don't be bothered by that! Sometimes difficult to read every word of every post in a thread. No big deal! I appreciate your sharing with us, as always!

Now that I'm thinking about this, it wasn't a week ago but at least a year ago I looked at this photo for someone. Could have been 1WWatcher or maybe Deuem.   Now I'm curious. Have to wait till tomorrow though, night.

[astr0144]

Looking again at the image...I am not sure if any of the image experts on PRC can do anything more with it, but when you show the close up, there is so much distortion around it and in other parts of the photo that I just find it too hard to make any real further assessment on it...

But it would be great if you prove right...and if you can show us some further evidence..

I seems to also recall seeing something similar to this, but at that time I think that it was being suggested that the other part that I initially thought you were referring to may have been an Aliens head peeping above the terrain....I just seem to recognise that part of the photo for some reason...

In this case, I have searched much on St Mary's Cape, and I have found numerous anomalies, which I have not yet posted. I do not know how many times I might have passed over this ET, but one day last year, while doing my normal search, I JUST SAW THIS. And when I first saw it, I knew exactly what it was (for what I see) - a really strange-looking humanoid! The only reason I have held off posting it here is, I think this is fairly close proof-positive relative to extraterrestrials. which should be of some importance to the world.

Yes, I wish we could see the face in these pics!! And yes, I wish we had a better (closer) actual pic - and maybe if ET was smiling that would be even better.

[Sinny]

The more I think about it, the more I would entertain the idea that it may be the remnants of a statue or construction.. Some of the geometry in that section of the image is different and more 'clean cut' than it's surroundings, however, with the quality of images that we have, we cannot determine it's original nature.

In instances like this, I move on and seek to find something I can determine..

[rdunk]

Thanks Sinny for your comments! You likely know this, but much of the "image bad" is the pixelation of the black shadow that interferes with what we see when looking at ET's back/rear. Sadly, the image is what it is. The perfect images are too far away to see any detail, and the significantly magnified image has pixelation. But even with the pixelation. the target image remains fairly seeable, the way I see it!

So many of the best anomalies I have found in photos leave much to be desired in photo quality, for lots of different reasons. Probably the most common "bad" is that someone always forgets to tell the "anomaly" to "look at the camera", as is the case with this one! We always have to make the best we can with the "evidence we have", and I see the evidence with this one as being quite good though pixelated!

All of the ET's "seeable" body parts are in the right place, including neck, shoulders, upper right arm, bent elbow, back, upper right leg in the sitting position, etc.! To me the most striking part of this ET is the shaped piece that we would consider as being on top of its head, or a part of its head.

Yes Sinny, we can always consider the thought of this being a statue, and I have good examples of anomaly statues. But in this case..........since this ET seems to be sitting on a rock, with his legs dangling off, and with his right forearm folded over his leg/knee, I thought that to be a bit too unusual for a statue position, for this to be a statue. Of course, anything is possible with the totally unknown!! I do say ET is "sitting on a rock" because there is a big rock there. But, where he is actually sitting is totally black shadowed, so there could be som kind of cushion between his butt and the rock!

[ArMaP]

Yes Sinny, we can always consider the thought of this being a statue, and I have good examples of anomaly statues. But in this case..........since this ET seems to be sitting on a rock, with his legs dangling off, and with his right forearm folded over his leg/knee, I thought that to be a bit too unusual for a statue position, for this to be a statue.

Don't you think that sitting for 24 hours 25 hours, 51 minutes and 53 seconds in the exact some position a bit unusual too?

[rdunk]

Don't you think that sitting for 24 hours in the exact some position a bit unusual too?

Yes, I have thought about that too, but............I read somewhere two or three years ago, that Rover pics of different sol days may have been taken on the same day, with processing on different sol days because of equipment constraints.. So, I am not too bothered by this showing up on two different sol days. 

What I really wonder about is why this location on a few pics does show up as a jumble of rocks - significantly different from those with the ET??

[ArMaP]

Yes, I have thought about that too, but............I read somewhere two or three years ago, that Rover pics of different sol days may have been taken on the same day, with processing on different sol days because of equipment constraints.. So, I am not too bothered by this showing up on two different sol days.

From what I read, the file name is created on the rover, when the image is created. After being processed the images get new suffixes, but the original name remains the same.

What I really wonder about is why this location on a few pics does show up as a jumble of rocks - significantly different from those with the ET??

I will try to make an animated GIF with the 22 images of that area.

[rdunk]

I will try to make an animated GIF with the 22 images of that area.

That might be good! I have all of the 22 images on my computer, but I didn't see a need to post them all - which is why I posted the Sol day links.

Thanks ArMaP

P. S. - You do have a pretty good eye - I expect that you can probably see what I see in this anomaly, doncha??

[ArMaP]

P. S. - You do have a pretty good eye - I expect that you can probably see what I see in this anomaly, doncha??

I do, I just have a different interpretation.

[rdunk]

I do, I just have a different interpretation.

                                          !!

[ArMaP]

This took longer than expected, but here is an animation made with the 22 images that show that area. I used the radiometrically corrected images, but without applying the correction, resized them to 300% and applied auto levels (in GIMP) to each image, as they were too dark. I may make another animation with the radiometrically correct images with the correction applied (no need for auto levels).

[rdunk]

ArMaP, don't you think it interesting that all of the camera shots showing ET are basically the same, even with three of them supposedly on Sol 1212, and the others on 1213 - maybe a little shadow difference on a few??

[ArMaP]

ArMaP, don't you think it interesting that all of the camera shots showing ET are basically the same, even with three of them supposedly on Sol 1212, and the others on 1213 - maybe a little shadow difference on a few??

There are many differences in the shadows, I think only two photos appear to show the same shadows, all other photos show differences.

[rdunk]

ArMaP, coincidentally I just noticed on the current JPL Rover Opportunity "raw images" page a statement that confirms what I said about delayed photos.

Sol 3775 raw images have arrived!

Opportunity began performing activities requested by the science team during Sol 3776. Those images and other data are currently being sent back to Earth for posting on Sol 3777. Any data not transmitted on Sol 3777 will be stored onboard the rover and sent on subsequent days during the next possible communications opportunities. (Black spaces typically mean partial data has arrived, but Opportunity will fill in the rest of the data as soon as possible). Stay tuned! 

According to this statement, the photos May actually get posted on the Sol day the photos are transmitted, if I am reading it correctly. There are daily MB transmission limitations because the data has to go up to one of the orbiters to be transmitted.

I wonder if we have a way to find out whether these Sol day 1212 and 1213 photos were really all actually taken on the same day??