A Real Extraterrestrial on Mars?

[Amaterasu]

Chiming in...  I too say:  rocks.

[rdunk]

None of the aliens I talked to are typically made up of sedimentary deposits so based on that I am going with rock formation. 

Hi Ellirium, thanks for your comment!! I don't have much other reply for you, except I don't know what "sedimentary deposits" you are referring to. I just see the little ET just sitting there, on a large rock, with his back to us. (I use the word "his", just for simplicity of comment)

[ArMaP]

No, ArMaP, I don't. I simply assume that if JPL was bragging about it, it must be something better than standard resolution, which is good enough for me.

Superresolution is what they call using several photos from the same subject to make a higher definition photo, using the small differences between the original photos to try to "guess" extra detail. The problem is when that technique is used in photos with noise, as the fact that the noise is in different places in different photos messes the creation of the final image. That's why in that panorama we can see several places with some dots in strange places.

[rdunk]

Thus far I do appreciate all of your comments. I am going to post the very high mag pic again for you, as I have added some identification to it, relative to the different body parts. There is maybe a slight possibility that this might help some of you see the ET image a little better. I do hope that it does!!

Click on the pic to see the full mag!!

[rdunk]

Superresolution is what they call using several photos from the same subject to make a higher definition photo, using the small differences between the original photos to try to "guess" extra detail. The problem is when that technique is used in photos with noise, as the fact that the noise is in different places in different photos messes the creation of the final image. That's why in that panorama we can see several places with some dots in strange places.

That is good! Thanks ArMaP! For me, the panorama has pretty much the same detail as does the individual Sol day Rover pics, for the ET object - at least the way I see it!

[ArMaP]

Pimander, just for fun, I was using this ET as my avatar several weeks ago. I did make a post of just my avatar pic, with no other info, because I wasn't ready to post the full detail. It was discussed just a little back then.

I was wrong, it was the same after all (as seen here), I didn't remember that image appearing before.

[Pimander]

I was wrong, it was the same after all (as seen here), I didn't remember that image appearing before.

I knew you would realise.  Pimander being wrong? 

[rdunk]

Chiming in...  I too say:  rocks.

Hi Amy! You are right, there are some rocks there in the pics! But the image I am referring to is separate from the "rocks", except ET is sitting on one - as I see it.  Thanks for your comment!!

[The Seeker]

Thus far I do appreciate all of your comments. I am going to post the very high mag pic again for you, as I have added some identification to it, relative to the different body parts. There is maybe a slight possibility that this might help some of you see the ET image a little better. I do hope that it does!!

Click on the pic to see the full mag!!

Rdunk, it this last pic with your pointers added, looks even more like a face; almost looks like darth vader;s helmet lol


seeker

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

I just now looked at the first photos that were posted on this thread....and it looked real familiar...

Didn't we do a thread on that item and discussed this already?...

I'll have to look some more..but I could swear this was already talked about...

Just saying...

Rock...

[rdunk]

Thanks again seeker. I am glad the additional pointer info in the pic is helping! As for the face, because of ET's position, that is hard to see. Seeing how the body is positioned, ET is looking away from the camera, but, because of way-out Darth feature on top of his head, we can't know whether that top piece is a part of his head, or his head is in it or attached to it??

It is interesting that the body of this thing seems so natural otherwise. However, either any outer wear is fitting very tightly, or there is no outer wear. 

There is another piece nearby that I believe to be relative to this ET - maybe a "relative"!. It has the strange top piece, but no seeable body - it does seem to have possible outer wear. I will post that as a reply a little latter today for everyone to consider with this.

[rdunk]

Sgt., that has been mentioned in prior comments, to which I also replied. Yes, I posted my avatar, with no info/no data several weeks ago, just for a little advance for whenever I was completely ready for the full post. So, your memory is still working. ArMaP posted in one of his reply's here a link to the prior limited discussion.

[astr0144]

Just based upon my initial browse of your thread Rdunk and the pictures....

The initial ones you posted... I don't think that I would have been able to spot what you have pointed out to suggest it may be an ET....I would have just seen various rocks unless I had some real reason to believe something was in the picture...So did that stand out to you, or did you decide to attempt to do a detailed study of the Martian photos to see if you could detect something.

When you later show the image and label it... it was not the thing  that I had initially thought that you had been referring to... I was looking at  a rock or something to the lower left of the object that you indicate thinking it MAY have been a ET head looking towards us in the photo with its body hidden behind some terrain.... Unless there are two close together...

But with rock formations, it is so easy for us to compare them to certain things, shapes etc...and if the mind starts to believe... then the thing can become more and more realistic to us...

The image you point out...I can see and maybe comprehend some things you suggest, but I may also see it in another way as well...like which is the front or back of its head and what direction is it looking..

But at the moment, equally I could also just see it as a rock....

Unless there is some other strong reason to think it is not a rock....I would not easily be convinced that I am not just seeing background terrain...

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Sgt., that has been mentioned in prior comments, to which I also replied. Yes, I posted my avatar, with no info/no data several weeks ago, just for a little advance for whenever I was completely ready for the full post. So, your memory is still working. ArMaP posted in one of his reply's here a link to the prior limited discussion.

Sorry didn't read the entire thread,,,my bad...

[rdunk]

Just based upon my initial browse of your thread Rdunk and the pictures....

The initial ones you posted... I don't think that I would have been able to spot what you have pointed out to suggest it may be an ET....I would have just seen various rocks unless I had some real reason to believe something was in the picture...So did that stand out to you, or did you decide to attempt to do a detailed study of the Martian photos to see if you could detect something.

When you later show the image and label it... it was not the thing  that I had initially thought that you had been referring to... I was looking at  a rock or something to the lower left of the object that you indicate thinking it MAY have been a ET head looking towards us in the photo with its body hidden behind some terrain.... Unless there are two close together...

But with rock formations, it is so easy for us to compare them to certain things, shapes etc...and if the mind starts to believe... then the thing can become more and more realistic to us...

The image you point out...I can see and maybe comprehend some things you suggest, but I may also see it in another way as well...like which is the front or back of its head and what direction is it looking..

But at the moment, equally I could also just see it as a rock....

Unless there is some other strong reason to think it is not a rock....I would not easily be convinced that I am not just seeing background terrain...

Astro, you have made a great response!! Going over in detail your differing thoughts is a highlight of the replies in this thread so far. ET is looking away from us, because of the positioning of his body and arms and legs.

What you are going through is often what we anomaly hunters experience during our research. I would say that very often as we are closely searching an area, there is often much we do not see the first time - or second time. And then bang, something materializes into view. Often, that is the way it is.

In this case, I have searched much on St Mary's Cape, and I have found numerous anomalies, which I have not yet posted. I do not know how many times I might have passed over this ET, but one day last year, while doing my normal search, I JUST SAW THIS. And when I first saw it, I knew exactly what it was (for what I see) - a really strange-looking humanoid! The only reason I have held off posting it here is, I think this is fairly close proof-positive relative to extraterrestrials. which should be of some importance to the world.

Yes, I wish we could see the face in these pics!! And yes, I wish we had a better (closer) actual pic - and maybe if ET was smiling that would be even better.

As I said in an earlier reply, I do have a correlating piece to post, that may add a bit more of reality to what I am seeing and posting for everyone. It is just what I see.

Thanks again for your comments!