T7 Process Vector

[ArMaP]

Easier than that. Viewing the original tape shows the observed phenomenon as well.

Conversion case closed.

[funbox]

Conversion case closed.

eh ?  im surprised ArMaP ? are you saying it a possible Alien craft ? stolen or bartered for , but not made of this earth ?

and here's me thinking you was going  to question the absence of a fixed point , alongside the light in frame.. interesting .. did I miss a trick ?

did you use a tripod Areafiftyonewatcher?

funbox

[ArMaP]

eh ?  im surprised ArMaP ?

If you are surprised that's because, once more, you are thinking that I am thinking like you, but I'm not.

are you saying it a possible Alien craft ? stolen or bartered for , but not made of this earth ?

No, just saying that if the original shows that then it cannot be the result of a conversion.

and here's me thinking you was going  to question the absence of a fixed point , alongside the light in frame.. interesting .. did I miss a trick ?

That was your problem. 

[funbox]

f you are surprised that's because, once more, you are thinking that I am thinking like you, but I'm not.

I don't think, you think like me , you think like you , not me, no surprise in you thinking that, really, no surprise at all

No, just saying that if the original shows that then it cannot be the result of a conversion.

what is it that the video is showing , original or otherwise ?

That was your problem. 

hmmm , a fair comment though wouldn't you agree ?
a frame of black and a light, or are you using a reference im unaware of ?

funbox

[ArMaP]

what is it that the video is showing , original or otherwise ?

I don't know, I wasn't talking about what it shows, I was only saying what is seen could be a result of the camera and/or conversion technology used. As it appears on the original it cannot be a result of the conversion technology used.

hmmm , a fair comment though wouldn't you agree ?

Not if you read my first post, as it was clear I wasn't talking about that.

[funbox]

Not if you read my first post, as it was clear I wasn't talking about that.

so you don't think highly contrasted images might play a part , especially when fast motion is apparent ?

you are referring to the tearing/re-joining of the light aren't you ?

funbox

[ArMaP]

so you don't think highly contrasted images might play a part , especially when fast motion is apparent ?

I don't think that conversion can play a part when there's no conversion, only that.

you are referring to the tearing/re-joining of the light aren't you ?

Yes.

[funbox]

I don't think that conversion can play a part when there's no conversion, only that.
Yes.

interesting

funbox

[A51Watcher]

There is only one photographic anomaly I know of that compares to this, astronomers often see it in images of galaxies and it's called gravity lensing.

I suspect the powerful artificial gravity distortion field surrounding the craft is producing a gravity lensing effect, just like the ones seen in space.

[funbox]

There is only one photographic anomaly I know of that compares to this, astronomers often see it in images of galaxies and it's called gravity lensing.

I suspect the powerful artificial gravity distortion field surrounding the craft is producing a gravity lensing effect, just like the ones seen in space.

try imagining being inside the camera , watching the shutter chop 30 times a second, now , throw your minds eye simultaneously outside , watch as  the light being thrown out the craft reaches the camera, as the object moves rapidly one way or another. it reaches the cameras shutter and gets chopped quickly , but some of the light moves so quick even the rapid moving shutter manages to block some, the sensor/tape is not to happy and doesn't receive, what are important pieces of information for the budding u.f.o researcher

funbox

[A51Watcher]

try imagining being inside the camera , watching the shutter chop 30 times a second, now , throw your minds eye simultaneously outside it, watch as  the light being thrown out of it, as the object moves rapidly one way or another. it reaches the cameras shutter and gets chopped quickly , but some of the light moves so quick even the rapid moving shutter manages to block some, the sensor/tape is not to happy and doesn't receive, what are important pieces of information for the budding u.f.o researcher

funbox

sensor/tape not receiving would display less not more.

We have two images of the same thing in different places.

Gravity lensing does the exact same thing.

AND... we have a powerful gravity source nearby to effect the change, just like gravity lensing.

[funbox]

sensor/tape not receiving would display less not more.

as you see. black is the colour of a frame, where it moved so quick the frame rate couldn't keep up , hence the gap(no light hitting sensor)/blur(partial light)/re-join effect (unimpeded photons)

funbox

[funbox]

I guess its like trying to play a first person shooter at 30 frames a second.. with speed, there's going to be glitches

funbox

[A51Watcher]

as you see. black is the colour of a frame, where it moved so quick the frame rate couldn't keep up , hence the gap(no light hitting sensor)/blur(partial light)/re-join effect (unimpeded photons)

funbox

Yes I see your angle - blur with not all of it showing, only the points at each end.

But if we compare the length of those blurs which DO show the middle vs those that do not, there are many long blurs (and short ones as well) indicating a longer distance traveled in the same amount of time, i.e. a faster rate of speed, than the short alleged blurs that do not show an alleged middle.

The cam appears to have no problem catching all the light even in much longer (and thus faster) blurs.

So why would it have a problem in shorter/slower speeds?

There are also many instances of short blurs that have no problem catching all the light.

So we have intermittent seizures in not being able to catch it all? 

[A51Watcher]

I guess its like trying to play a first person shooter at 30 frames a second.. with speed, there's going to be glitches

funbox

Well even with a glitch you would expect to see an attempt to partially capture some of it.

But we are seeing two clearly distinct separate points of light with ZERO in between.

There should be SOME light traces between them, even if very faint.