Another Mars Anomaly

[Sinny]

ArMaPs picture seems to be a 95% match, but I have a problem with the 'ring' imprint around the 'screw bit'.

In the Mars pik, the 'circle rim' has to defined edges, but judging from the photo of the Earth 'screw' thing, it should have only left the one 'rim imprint'

Am I making sense?

[ArMaP]

Am I making sense?

Maybe.

Could you rephrase that?

[Pimander]

Technically it was a screw and the backplate.  Guess You need a backpat.  Good Pim, good Pim.  Feel better now?

Thank you. 

[Lunica]

From the other place (ssshht)



?

[Amaterasu]

From:  http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/124981/snapshots/420909



There's a new variety of rock on Mars...  It's "blurry schist..."  You can find this blurry rock naturally in any area that appears to have the remains of shattered ruins.

[ArMaP]

As I said on the other forum where I saw this, that panorama was made with photos from several sols. In sol 72 we can see that out focus thing (part of the rover) but not the part of the ground between that area and the rover, so the person that made the panorama used photos from a different sol for that area, but, apparently, there aren't any photos of the area with the out of focus object without the object, which makes sense, seeing that it's part of the rover and always appears in 360º panoramas.

As someone that makes panoramas like that I have seen that happening several times.

Edit: you can see the photos with the out of focus object here.

[spacemaverick]

From:  http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/124981/snapshots/420909



There's a new variety of rock on Mars...  It's "blurry schist..."  You can find this blurry rock naturally in any area that appears to have the remains of shattered ruins.

And once again an object is obscured...what is it they don't want us to see???

[ArMaP]

And once again an object is obscured...what is it they don't want us to see???

What object was obscured, a piece of the rover?

[spacemaverick]

What object was obscured, a piece of the rover?

Looking at the picture I do not see where it is attached to the rover.  Something is obscured.

[ArMaP]

Looking at the picture I do not see where it is attached to the rover.  Something is obscured.

Did you follow the link Amaterasu posted above the image? That image is part of a panorama made with several photos from several different days (or sols).

So, although something is missing, it's the part of the rover that the person that made the panorama chose to replace with photos of the ground taken on a different sol.

You can see the individual photos from sol 72 on this page.

PS: I have several panoramas made by me on that Gigapan site.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Panoramas are notorious for blurring objects. Nature of the beast!

[ArMaP]

Panoramas are notorious for blurring objects. Nature of the beast!

That never happened to me.

[thorfourwinds]

At last, disclosure!

ArMaP and Sarge agree that "we" have cameras
that have resolution that can detect a screw head on Mars.   

However, "we" cannot "see" 'things' on the Moon,
let alone losing the debris field from Fukushima.   

Thanks for the enlightenment, I think.   

[ArMaP]

ArMaP and Sarge agree that "we" have cameras
that have resolution that can detect a screw head on Mars.   

Anyone that knows the Curiosity's (in this case) cameras knows that it has the "Mars Hand Lens Imager" (MAHLI), a camera made to make close-up photos, with a resolution of, at most, 13.9 micrometers per pixel, so yes, it can show a screw head on Mars.

However, "we" cannot "see" 'things' on the Moon, let alone losing the debris field from Fukushima.   

Because we don't have, as far as I know, any camera like that on the Moon. As for your Fukushima fetish, I don't know what debris field you are talking about.

Thanks for the enlightenment, I think.   

I think that, in this subject, you need much more.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

That never happened to me.

What I meant that some portions of the panaoramas have blurred objects in them.

ArMaP and Sarge agree that "we" have cameras
that have resolution that can detect a screw head on Mars.

I don't remember agreeing to anything 

(MAHLI), a camera made to make close-up photos, with a resolution of, at most, 13.9 micrometers per pixel

Aristarchus, Endymion, Tsiolkovsky would look a little different if there was one of these on the Moon.