Another Mars Anomaly

[Amaterasu]

Panoramas are notorious for blurring objects. Nature of the beast!

And that's why just that object is blurry, part of it sticks out of the blur, and the right edge is NOT blurred, but clear manipulation...  Go zoom in on it in the panorama.  This is NOT "nature of the beast."  It was deliberately manipulated to obscure something.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

and you know that how?....

what part of the rover is blurred?...

maybe and emblem? a serial number? a picture of ET?...



you know, after taking a closer look,,,they are trying to hide something. What I have know idea.

[ArMaP]

Aristarchus, Endymion, Tsiolkovsky would look a little different if there was one of these on the Moon.

Seeing that the camera acts as a microscope I suppose all the craters would look the same.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Seeing that the camera acts as a microscope I suppose all the craters would look the same.

My point exactly 

[Amaterasu]

Yeah, I can't see any rational explanation for this other than that something is being hidden.

It's almost like They figure that since We bought such things as Sandy Hook and the "ebola" psyop, We would not question that.

[ArMaP]

And that's why just that object is blurry, part of it sticks out of the blur, and the right edge is NOT blurred, but clear manipulation...

Sure it's manipulation, it's a panorama made from many photos, not a real photo. And the object is blurry because it's out of focus, as it's much closer than the background and the camera is focused on the background.

It was deliberately manipulated to obscure something.

Yes, to obscure part of the rover's robotic arm. 

Did anyone looked at the original photos on this page? The panorama is made with those photos (besides photos from other sol(s).

[ArMaP]

Yeah, I can't see any rational explanation for this other than that something is being hidden.

That's because you are looking for some hidden meaning that isn't there.

If you put a finger 10 cm in front of your face and look at something on the other side of the room the finger appears blurred, in the same way a camera on the rover, while focused on the ground some metres away, will show something some centimetres in front of the camera as blurred, as it will be out of focus.

It's almost like They figure that since We bought such things as Sandy Hook and the "ebola" psyop, We would not question that.

You should mostly question your own opinions. 

[Amaterasu]

Sure it's manipulation, it's a panorama made from many photos, not a real photo. And the object is blurry because it's out of focus, as it's much closer than the background and the camera is focused on the background.

It's been manually manipulated, ArMaP.  Zoom in on it in the panorama.  Look at the right side.

Yes, to obscure part of the rover's robotic arm. 

Uh...  No.

Did anyone looked at the original photos on this page? The panorama is made with those photos (besides photos from other sol(s).

I did.  And yes I see the blurry thing...  Question is...WHY the blocky manipulation to the right? 

That's because you are looking for some hidden meaning that isn't there.

Yup.  You're right.   

If you put a finger 10 cm in front of your face and look at something on the other side of the room the finger appears blurred, in the same way a camera on the rover, while focused on the ground some metres away, will show something some centimetres in front of the camera as blurred, as it will be out of focus.
You should mostly question your own opinions. 

ArMaP, I grasp that principle.  But this has CLEAR evidence of sloppy coverup on the right side especially.  WHY?

[ArMaP]

It's been manually manipulated, ArMaP.  Zoom in on it in the panorama.  Look at the right side.

Probably because the idea of the panorama was to show the ground, not the rover.

Uh...  No.

The out of focus object is part of the rover's robotic arm.

I did.  And yes I see the blurry thing...  Question is...WHY the blocky manipulation to the right? 

On the original photo?

Yup.  You're right.   

I think I am.

ArMaP, I grasp that principle.  But this has CLEAR evidence of sloppy coverup on the right side especially.  WHY?

On the original photos?

[ArMaP]

Maybe this panorama will help.

http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/163589

[Amaterasu]

On the original photos?

I could not find the image on the right.  Perhaps You can?

[ArMaP]

I could not find the image on the right.  Perhaps You can?

The out of focus object is made from two photos, this one on the left and this one on the right.

As you can see parts of the right side photo were replaced with parts from the ground, from photos taken in a different sol.

I may try to make my own version of that panorama.

[zorgon]

ArMaP and Sarge agree that "we" have cameras
that have resolution that can detect a screw head on Mars.   

Well Zorgon had the first Spring on Mars years ago   

While most people see pictures like THIS



We get to see pictures like THIS





So my Spring trumps your screw inpression 

However, "we" cannot "see" 'things' on the Moon,

Well there is THIS one   


http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Moon_Images_A15.html

let alone losing the debris field from Fukushima.   

Don't worry about that... that is how we evolve into the Grays   

[Sinny]

Well Zorgon had the first Spring on Mars years ago   

We get to see pictures like THIS

What is this?

[ArMaP]

What is this?

The heat-shield that protected the craft during descent.