News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Israeli / Saudi Arabia Tactical Nuclear Strike on Yemen (Neutron Bomb)

Started by zorgon, May 27, 2015, 11:11:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

zorgon

Israeli / Saudi Arabia Tactical Nuclear Strike on Yemen (Neutron Bomb)

Watch closely the pixelation on the film from the radiation





RUSSO



QuoteBy Gordon Duff and Jeff Smith, Editors


A video received from Yemen, believed to be taken May 20, 2015, of an explosion, when analyzed by nuclear weapons experts is, by very high probability, a neutron bomb that could only have been an Israeli attack.  The analysis:

A. Its not a conventional 2k lb bomb. It's much bigger.

B. Its either a very large MOAB bigger than 4,000 lbs. or; ???? Max weight for an F-15 / 16 is about 2,000 lb payload per bomb rack making the deployment of a MOAB impossible.

C. Its appears to be a small neutron bomb. The size, color, lightning effect and duration of the fire ball being suspended in mid air and the very large mushroom cloud is the main give away. The CCD cameras imaging device was "scintillating" (detecting Neutrons) That is the white pixel flashes in the video. When the photo has white pixel flashes in it, that is because it is being hit by neutrons from the nuclear fireball blast. It overloads the ccd's electronic circuit producing white flashes.

If the radiation is too high it will burn out the chip. They had big problems with this in Japan with the Fukushima robots cameras failing due to very high radiation counts.

D. Delivery is most likely by an IDF F-16 with a Saudi paint job on the plane. They are not even hiding their use anymore, they just don't publicly admit it and the IAEA does nothing or says nothing. That is the true war crime. The UN just ignores it unless the US, France or GB complains........ Russia and China say nothing.

E. This is now the second known use of nukes in Yemen by Saudi Arabia..............

Post Script:

A. The range of the camera is calculated to be about 4 to 5 miles from ground zero based on shock wave timing.

B.Saudi has no F-16's. The aircraft reported to be used to droop the bomb in Yemen were F-16's. Photos and acoustic signature confirms that the jet engines noise is from a single engine jet fighter of the F-16 type.
Source:http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/21/358343/

The source is Veterans Today, so... Take it with a grain of salt :P
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

WarToad

QuoteIts either a very large MOAB bigger than 4,000 lbs. or

::)  The fill weight alone of a MOAB is 18,000 lbs.  The entire she-Bang is around 22,000 lbs.  Someone needs to do their homework.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-43/B_Massive_Ordnance_Air_Blast

And if they got that wrong, I'm doubting any authority or expertise on knowing what a neutron bomb is.
Time is the fire in which we burn.

RUSSO

Quote from: WarToad on May 27, 2015, 12:55:23 PM

And if they got that wrong, I'm doubting any authority or expertise on knowing what a neutron bomb is.

Yep. Too fancy. :D

A tactical nuke maybe would be more credible, but even so... it would be relatively easy to check on that. No radiation measures?

*Edited because it seems there was eletronic interference*
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

Mada Thenyou

This happened on the 20th May 2015, the same day US NAVY X37B OTV 5 mission entered Low Earth Orbit.
For any one that knows what the X37B is capable of as a Space Weapon..well that answers everything.
It can definitely hold in its special payload a Neutron Bomb and deploy it any on the planet in a ten minute period.
Awesome toy!!!

If anyone wants to contact me directly i actually have proof and hard evidence of this event..yes i caught them in the act at the actual moment.

Regards,

Mada



RUSSO

This Explosion In Yemen Looks Like A Tactical Nuke Going Off



QuoteThere have been some massive explosions caught on film during the last month of Saudi-led air strikes on Houthi rebel positions, but the result of this particular attack is so enormous you could be mistaken that it's the kind of mushroom cloud and fallout seen during early tactical nuclear weapons tests.
The fireball and resulting mushroom cloud seen in this video is not just from a weapon dropped by a fighter aircraft, but the result of explosive munitions and/or oils and fuels stored at the site ignited by the initial blast. These "secondary effects" combine to create some absolutely stunningly scary exothermic reactions, as seen above.

I've received some mail asking how Houthi rebel forces are so heavily armed that explosions like these continue to happen. The answer is that Houthi forces now control the western half of Yemen, along with Yemen's antiquated – although still deadly – military stockpiles, which included gravity bombs and SCUD missiles.

Even if Houthi fighters aren't able to use these systems for their intended purposes, they can be used for improvised explosive devices or they can fall into the hands of terrorist elements that riddle the country.

With that in mind, the Sunni Arab dominated coalition has had these sites at the top of their target list.

Seeing as Houthi fighters know full well the location of established Yemeni military weapons dumps and installation before seizing large areas of the country, many of the weapons themselves were squirreled away to other sites. We'll continue to see these explosions happening as Saudi, pro-government Yemeni and allied intelligence sources locate them.
Sourcehttp://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/this-explosion-in-yemen-looks-like-a-tactical-nuke-goin-1704044741


This is what it looks like when the world's smallest nuke explodes


QuoteOne of the smallest nuclear weapons ever built, the Davy Crockett was developed in the late 1950s for use against Soviet troops had war broken out in Europe. Small teams of the Atomic Battle Group (charged with operating the device) would be stationed every few kilometers to guard against Soviet attack, using the power of their nuclear artillery to kill or incapacitate advancing troop formations and irradiate the area so that it was uninhabitable for up to 48 hours, long enough to mobilize NATO forces.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

RUSSO

QuoteThis happened on the 20th May 2015, the same day US NAVY X37B OTV 5 mission entered Low Earth Orbit.

Interisting.

QuoteIf anyone wants to contact me directly i actually have proof and hard evidence of this event..yes i caught them in the act at the actual moment.

You could make a thread on this... Im sure there is more people that would love this info. Me included :)
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

Pimander

I had an odd dream the other night about a tactical nuke going off.  I remember being in the distance on the battlefield and trying to shield my face from the heat!  Odd coincidence....

Sgt.Rocknroll

before everyone goes running off, their head covered yelling 'THE SKY IS FALLING'...lets see some real info. A handheld phone camera is not the best recording device and certainly not for detecting Nukes...

Mada, has some interesting info....

Let's wait and see... ;)

Rock.
Non nobis, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini Tuo da gloriam

zorgon

Well I doubt it is a neutron bomb because those camera people would be dead :P

What was interesting to me was the missing pixels at the time of the explosion.  This is something radiation does but I suppose it is possible the intense light on cheap cameras did it  Maybe ArMap could jump in on that

Neutron bomb
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb

zorgon

Look at the pixelation signatures at 0:30 and 1:55  of the OP video. Maybe someone can do some screen capture or I will later tonight

Sure looks like a radiation stream hit the camera. especially the one at 1:55  Even if it was a plant explosion (there was a small glow before the big bang. they might have had nuke material on site  Interesting anyway.

ArMaP

Quote from: zorgon on May 27, 2015, 08:25:00 PM
Look at the pixelation signatures at 0:30 and 1:55  of the OP video. Maybe someone can do some screen capture or I will later tonight

Sure looks like a radiation stream hit the camera. especially the one at 1:55  Even if it was a plant explosion (there was a small glow before the big bang. they might have had nuke material on site  Interesting anyway.
It doesn't look like an effect of radiation to me, it looks more like pieces of metal (or some other reflective material) being blown by the explosion, but I have to get some screen captures. :)

Edited to say that, instead of reflective, I now think it's more likely that those were pieces of incandescent material.

ArMaP

One thing I noticed in the video is that, in the first part, we can see that there are not bright spots in the area of the dust cloud from the first explosion, if those bright spots were the result of radiation I would expect them to go through the dust and for an even distribution of the radiation throughout the sensor, as the whole sensor would be hit by the radiation, not just the central area near the explosion.

A video from the explosion of an ammunitions depot in Russia shows similar results.




ArMaP

Seeing that the video has an YouTube address at the top I went looking for the original video, and it has much better quality and it says that the explosion happened on May 11.



ArMaP

Radiation overload of the sensor's pixels isn't affected by motion blur. :)