Moontruth

[larishira]

its been soo long when i study.let's see if i remember...thanks God...i found some videos with all evidences..

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Check out Moonwalkers, 'How we really went to the Moon"!

[Ellirium113]

Take a look at 2:27....how an astronaut can fall to the ground...on the moon?

it's funny

Quite remarkable at 2:43 in that video look at the positioning of his feet and how his feet are dragged, one arm on the ground was holding something which meant he would not have had enough leverage to toss himself up. If that was the case they should be jumping around 10' at a time up there not those little bunny hops. Also unlikely his partner could straighten him up and drag him at the same time with one hand unless he was a body builder and the other guy was very thin. 

[ArMaP]

its been soo long when i study.let's see if i remember...thanks God...i found some videos with all evidences..

Did you notice that the last video shows evidence that gravity was what it was supposed to be on the Moon and that there wasn't any acceleration of the videos?

[larishira]

 Photo with shadows that should not exist on the moon.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/ap11ann/kippsphotos/5903.jpg

no large holes in the ground under the Lunar Module.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/ap11ann/kippsphotos/5864.jpg

Evidence of the Lunar Module had not landed on the moon.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/ap11ann/kippsphotos/5920.jpg

And the most important proof...


Picture taken against the sun without burning the negative.
Floor without propellant use of evidence at the time of landing.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5863-69.jpg

[zorgon]

I can't find it right now, but the fact that the NASA Apollo astronauts were clearly suspended on wires in some of the footage is obvious at about 2m30 in the first video you posted here.
Zorgon started a thread with some of the footage with amusing soundtracks but the search button is not my friend today.  I'll try to find the footage.

PUPPET ON A STRING

Part One





Part Two

[Pimander]

At what time, in which video?

Around 2m40 in the first one I embedded in this thread.  I'll make it easier for you. 40s in this one:



Not only do his legs lift off the ground when he is helped to his feet but the way his feet skim across the surface and lift just after that show that something is pulling him into the air.  That is not the effect of low gravity.  That is the effect of a force lifting his feet off the ground.

You can see that!

[zorgon]

Check out Moonwalkers, 'How we really went to the Moon"!

I put that eaxact phrase into Google search and the 1st one on the list was...

Comedy Moonwalkers Wonders: What If We Faked The Moon Landing?
http://io9.com/comedy-moonwalkers-wonders-what-if-we-faked-the-moon-l-1691797409

I kid you not

[Pimander]

Quite remarkable at 2:43 in that video look at the positioning of his feet and how his feet are dragged, one arm on the ground was holding something which meant he would not have had enough leverage to toss himself up. If that was the case they should be jumping around 10' at a time up there not those little bunny hops. Also unlikely his partner could straighten him up and drag him at the same time with one hand unless he was a body builder and the other guy was very thin. 

Exactly the part I was referring to.  When Phage said he saw nothing unusual about that his credibility dropped to much lower for me.  So sceptical except when it comes to what NASA has to tell us.  Absolutely fascinating.   

Scepticism (as opposed to disbelief) is an important tool. I find you can learn a lot about people when they are selective in their application of scepticism.

[Pimander]

Sceptically speaking:  If there is an atmosphere and the bag is on earth then there is also air resistance acting on the open bag which functions like a parachute and slows the velocity of the bag as it falls.

The analysis is based on the idea that the films are in a vacuum and are flawed.

[zorgon]

The analysis is based on the idea that the films are in a vacuum and are flawed.

There is a video showing a hammer feather drop on earth. It is done is a room with no wind and the feather is dropped stem first (same as he did on the moon)  The feather dropped on Earth hit the ground at the same time as the hammer.  There was no flutter. An Eagle wing feather is stiff and relatively heavy... There is not enough distance dropped from 4-5 ft to show a difference in air resistance on such a heavy feather dropped end first

I will see if I can find that video tomorrow  I saved it somewhere  Wish I had a place to post older videos

[larishira]

THIS one?

[ArMaP]

Photo with shadows that should not exist on the moon.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/ap11ann/kippsphotos/5903.jpg

I don't understand that, why shouldn't any shadows exist? And exactly which shadows?

no large holes in the ground under the Lunar Module.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/ap11ann/kippsphotos/5864.jpg

Why should there be large holes in the ground? Because of the engine exhaust?

Evidence of the Lunar Module had not landed on the moon.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/ap11ann/kippsphotos/5920.jpg

Explain what you mean, please.

Picture taken against the sun without burning the negative.
Floor without propellant use of evidence at the time of landing.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5863-69.jpg

You should get your facts straight before posting them, otherwise it looks like you are so worried about proving your point of view that you use any thing you can get your hands on, without even knowing what it is.

That's not a photo, that's a panorama made with several photos from more than one mission and with an artificial light added on the place where the Sun was supposed (by the person that made the panorama, Ed Hengeveld) to be. You can read more about it here.

As for the lack of marks on the ground made by the engine when landing, those marks exist in the photos that show the ground up close. I will look for some.

[ArMaP]

Around 2m40 in the first one I embedded in this thread.  I'll make it easier for you. 40s in this one:

Thanks.

Not only do his legs lift off the ground when he is helped to his feet but the way his feet skim across the surface and lift just after that show that something is pulling him into the air.

I don't understand it, are you saying that he wasn't touching the ground? The only occasion when I see both feet off the ground is when he gives an impulse with his legs, but when he gets up he has the right foot on the ground and (I think) the left hand is being held by the other astronaut to help him get up.

[ArMaP]

Sceptically speaking:  If there is an atmosphere and the bag is on earth then there is also air resistance acting on the open bag which functions like a parachute and slows the velocity of the bag as it falls.

And as it goes up, right? I see no signs of any braking effect.