Exuberant1's Lunar Anomaly Finds

[zorgon]

Exuberant1's Lunar Anomaly Finds

Exuberant1 doesn't always have time to keep up with the posts so I will be adding the ones he sends me and collecting older ones from various places they have been posted. This thread will be locked as a collection. To discuss any of these photos simply quote them into a new thread...

[zorgon]

  Exuberant1

Speaking of moon stuff,

I've got something that I don't think is a scratch.  Notice how it disappears and re-emerges from the shadows:



And this one form the same region is emerging from a crater:



*Given the properties of these two features, I think it is safe to safe that whatever they may be, they are on the lunar surface and not a result of flaws in the film.

Did I show you this one yet?
It's one of those nikon shots from Apollo 17:

[zorgon]

  Exuberant1

13 on the moon.




High Albedo feature in rough delta shape: 

[zorgon]

I think the biggest problem with no one looking at Lunar anomalies on LRO is that the the main hunters have been scattered to the 4 winds. When we were all at ATS there was energy, which drove the search.  Perhaps I need to hunt them all down. John is here, we need Mike Singh, LunaCognita and some others.

As to the 13... here on Earth there are many letters and numbers painted or marked out with stones on hillsides... All over the West old mining towns would put a number or a letter on the hill as a landmark where the mine or town was located. If you have ever been out here in the desert away from a city, you will see that all the terrain looks pretty much alike from a distance. With these big white letters you can see them for miles

Hurricane Utah



Carlin Nevada



Brigham City , Utah



So yeah... it could be a landmark

I actually have some more stuff from LRO related to this that I will add later

[zorgon]

  Exuberant1



I think I showed you this one before, I practiced highlighting the anomaly in sepia.



And this sexy bitch of an anomaly - it looks like it is sending a package home:



Hey zorgon,

The frame that those images are from has some weird stuff in.

I'm going back for a third scan of it later, but for now check this out - I am calling it the Omega Anomaly:



*The image these are from is called "It's the moon's fault"

[exuberant1]

[exuberant1]

[exuberant1]

The Schroteri Anomaly:

[exuberant1]

UFO over Tsiolkovsky - similiar image flaws have been ruled out:

[exuberant1]

Pipeline-type feature:

[exuberant1]

Related:

[exuberant1]

Big tube:

[exuberant1]

Check out this massive thingamajig.

It either Moved, or was Removed from the image and subsequent ones. Check it out:

[exuberant1]

Excerpts from Ingo Swann's Penetration


(Images Source: Moon (2009) Text source: Ingo Swann Penetration)

And before everyone starts thinking 'that's crazy', 'what a crazy old nut'; let's remember that the Apollo astronauts who were looking at a part of the moon actually thought that it looked like it might be being mined. Why the hell would they be considering that possibility...


*Keep in mind that this is from the DSE blackbox recording and was not made available to the public at the time. These boxes kept recording throughout the entirety of the mission, and so they contain many interesting things that were not released to the public in audio or text form. The blackbox transcripts contain transcribed audio not related to transmissions.

[exuberant1]

Here is something that you Apollo fans will probably find at least a bit interesting. It concerns the 3D models made of the Apollo landing sites during the Apollo Program. The Moon Hoax guys are gonna love this one.


The 3D models were done in wireframe and allowed the operator to see what things would look like from a particular vantage point on the landing site.

The Operator would enter in the coordinates on the model and would be able to see what the astronauts would see when they were standing there. These models were quite accurate in that regard.

Apollo 17 provides the best example of these 3D models. Here is a print-out of 3 vantage points:



*And as you can probably guess; these accurate computer models would allow one create accurate Moon sets where all the set pieces and simulated terrain/topographical features are positioned in such a way that the view for cameraman on set would be remarkably similar to what one would see on the part of the moon upon which the simulation is based.