a martian oddbox

[funbox]

Sure don't hope it has something of interest to you guys though.

I see the darker dunes they've illustrated , but not the ones that have been 'preserved' also , what method did they use to date them ? carbon dating ?

funbox

[funbox]

from page eight http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=8636.105

fossilised Sandune 300 million years old ?

funbox

[ArMaP]

fossilised Sandune 300 million years old ?

I don't think so, it doesn't look like sandstone.

Did you notice what looks like a face on the far right of the dune on the top image?

[funbox]

I don't think so, it doesn't look like sandstone.
Did you notice what looks like a face on the far right of the dune on the top image?

indeed I did , but im sure we had this conversation before

where though, I don't know

funbox

[funbox]

and again it will reverce back onitself with another face .. getting more realistic though..



from sol 1834 mast

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/01384/mcam/1384ML0067960480601502C00_DXXX.jpg

subframe too , might get a bit more definition

funbox

[ArMaP]

jeep3r just posted about this one on ATS.



Very interesting.

[Eighthman]

Nice squiggles.  May I ask what the scale or size of them is?

[ArMaP]

Nice squiggles.  May I ask what the scale or size of them is?

As they explain on this page and according to the counter for that photo, the camera was something like 6 cm from the target, giving it a resolution of something like 0.032 mm per pixel.

[Eighthman]

http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/2016/07/ancient-construction-site-discovered-in.html

This is bouncing around the net. I tried to find an original source or photo.  A dam and a city?

[ArMaP]

http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/2016/07/ancient-construction-site-discovered-in.html

This is bouncing around the net. I tried to find an original source or photo.  A dam and a city?

Here's the original source.
http://www.uahirise.org/ESP_046198_1750

[funbox]

jeep3r just posted about this one on ATS.



Very interesting.

Jeep's on the ball again eh ArMaP .. enough for you to almost exclaim ! what do you think to the image ? fossil remnants ?

funbox

[funbox]

and before you even dare mention the wire brush tool , ide like to point out there are no instances of overlapping which, one would expect from a  rotating, disorganized/battered, brush head

but I have a feeling your not even going there

notabrushbox

[Pimander]

jeep3r just posted about this one on ATS.



Very interesting.

They look a lot like parts of crinoid fossils to me (there are some near me).  If the rock was not a shade of red I'd say it looked like limestone  (which is formed at the bottom of oceans.)

VERY INTERESTING.

ArMaP, do you have the ATS thread link?

[funbox]

As they explain on this page and according to the counter for that photo, the camera was something like 6 cm from the target, giving it a resolution of something like 0.032 mm per pixel.

a typical complimentary text from them too, more description of camera settinsg and time of day.. but its not always like that , sometimes they give their theorys on what we're looking at, ide say it was an unusual aversion , but you know

funbox

[ArMaP]

what do you think to the image ? fossil remnants ?

It's hard to say, but it's a possibility.

As I have said in other occasions, when there's life there's always more than one species, so if those are fossils we should see more than one species. As we are looking at a very small area that doesn't mean that we should see those other species in that area, only that if we see other fossil-looking things but different from these then that makes it more likely that they are fossils, at least from my point of view.